Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K161467
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2016-12-22

    (209 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    876.5665
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    HydraGuard 10 UltraFilter

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The HydraGuard 10" UltraFilter is intended to be used to filter EPA quality drinking water. The filter retains bacteria, viruses and endotoxin. By providing ultrapure water for patient washing and drinking, the filter aids in infection control. The filter produces water that is suitable for patient wound cleaning of equipment used in medical procedures and washing of surgeon's hands. Medical: The filter is not intended to provide water that can be used as a substitute for USP sterile water.

    Device Description

    Not Found

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided document is a 510(k) clearance letter for the HydraGuard 10" UltraFilter. It does not contain information about acceptance criteria for device performance or a study demonstrating the device meets such criteria in terms of clinical or diagnostic accuracy. Instead, it describes the indications for use and the regulatory classification of the device as a water purification system.

    The "Indications for Use" section (page 2) describes what the device is intended for:

    • To filter EPA quality drinking water.
    • To retain bacteria, viruses, and endotoxin.
    • To provide ultrapure water for patient washing and drinking, aiding in infection control.
    • To produce water suitable for patient wound cleaning, cleaning of equipment used in medical procedures, and washing of surgeon's hands.

    It explicitly states, "The filter is not intended to provide water that can be used as a substitute for USP sterile water."

    Based on the provided text, the specific details regarding acceptance criteria, device performance metrics (other than the qualitative statements above), and information about a "study that proves the device meets the acceptance criteria" in the context of clinical effectiveness or diagnostic accuracy are not available. The document focuses on regulatory clearance based on substantial equivalence to a predicate device, not on a detailed performance study with specific quantitative acceptance criteria as would be found for a diagnostic or AI-driven device.

    Therefore, I cannot populate the table or answer the specific questions about sample sizes, expert involvement, adjudication, MRMC studies, or ground truth establishment based solely on the text provided. This document is a regulatory approval letter, not a clinical study report.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1