Search Results
Found 1 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(261 days)
The Halyard Purple Nitrile* Powder‐Free Exam Gloves, Sterile Pairs or Sterile Singles, Tested for Use with Chemotherapy Drugs, Fentanyl Citrate, Simulated Gastric Acid and Fentanyl in Simulated Gastric Acid are disposable devices intended for medical purposes that is worn on the examiner's hand to prevent contamination between patient and examiner.
The following chemotherapy drugs and concentration had NO breakthrough detected up to 240 minutes:
- Azacitidine (25 mg/ml)
- Bendamustine HCl (5 mg/ml)
- Bleomycin Sulfate (15 mg/ml)
- Bortezomib (1 mg/ml)
- Busulfan (6 mg/ml)
- Capecitabine (26 mg/ml)
- Carboplatin (10 mg/ml)
- Carfilzomib (2 mg/ml)
- Cetuximab (2 mg/ml)
- Cisplatin (1 mg/ml)
- Cladribine (1 mg/ml)
- Cyclophosphamide (20 mg/ml)
- Cytarabine HCl (100 mg/ml)
- Dacarbazine (10 mg/ml)
- Dactinomycin (0.5 mg/ml)
- Daunorubicin HCl (5 mg/ml)
- Decitabine (5 mg/ml)
- Docetaxel (10 mg/ml)
- Doxorubicin HCl (2 mg/ml)
- Epirubicin HCl (2 mg/ml)
- Etoposide (20 mg/ml)
- Fludarabine Phosphate (25 mg/ml)
- Fluorouracil (50 mg/ml)
- Fulvestrant (50 mg/ml)
- Gemcitabine HCl (38 mg/ml)
- Idarubicin HCl (1 mg/ml)
- Ifosfamide (50 mg/ml)
- Irinotecan HCl (20 mg/ml)
- Leuprolide Acetate (5 mg/ml)
- Mechlorethamine HCl (1 mg/ml)
- Melphalan HCl (5 mg/ml)
- Methotrexate (25 mg/ml)
- Mitomycin C (0.5 mg/ml)
- Mitoxantrone HCl (2 mg/ml)
- Oxaliplatin (5 mg/ml)
- Paclitaxel (6 mg/ml)
- Pemetrexed (25 mg/ml)
- Raltitrexed (0.5 mg/ml)
- Rituximab (10 mg/ml)
- Temsirolimus (25 mg/ml)
- Topotecan HCl (1 mg/ml)
- Trisenox (Arsenic Trioxide) (1 mg/ml)
- Vinblastine Sulfate (1 mg/ml)
- Vincristine (1 mg/ml)
- Vinorelbine Tartrate (10 mg/ml)
The following chemotherapy drugs and concentration showed breakthrough detected in less than 100 minutes:
- Carmustine (3.3 mg/ml) No breakthrough up to 44.5 minutes.
- Thiotepa (10 mg/ml) No breakthrough up to 99.1 minutes.
- Warning- Not for use with Carmustine and ThioTEPA
The following hazardous drugs (opioids) and concentration had NO breakthrough detected up to 240 minutes:
- Fentanyl Citrate Injection (100 mcg/2 ml)
- Simulated Gastric Acid Fluid/Fentanyl Citrate Injection Mix 50/50 Solution
The following hazardous drugs and concentration had NO breakthrough detected up to 240 minutes:
- Chloroquine (50 mg/ml)
- Cyclosporin A (100 mg/ml)
- Cytovene (10 mg/ml)
- Retrovir (10 mg/ml)
- Triclosan (2 mg/ml)
- Zoledronic Acid (0.8 mg/ml)
The Halyard Purple Nitrile* Powder‐Free Exam Gloves, Sterile Pairs or Sterile Singles, Tested for Use with Chemotherapy Drugs, Fentanyl Citrate, Simulated Gastric Acid and Fentanyl in Simulated Gastric Acid are disposable, 9.5" purple‐colored, chlorinated, nitrile, powder‐free, textured fingertip, ambidextrous, sterile patient examination gloves.
The provided text is a 510(k) clearance letter and summary for medical examination gloves, not an AI/ML device. Therefore, it does not contain information related to AI/ML specific acceptance criteria or study details such as:
- Sample size used for the test set and data provenance (e.g., country of origin, retrospective/prospective).
- Number of experts used to establish ground truth and their qualifications.
- Adjudication method for the test set.
- Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study.
- Standalone (algorithm-only) performance.
- Type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data).
- Sample size for the training set.
- How ground truth for the training set was established.
Instead, the document focuses on the physical and chemical properties of the gloves and their resistance to various chemicals, using established ASTM and ISO standards for medical gloves.
However, I can extract the acceptance criteria and reported device performance for these medical gloves based on the provided document.
Analysis of Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance for Medical Gloves
The document details the non-clinical testing performed on the Halyard Purple Nitrile* Powder-Free Exam Gloves to demonstrate their safety and effectiveness. The acceptance criteria and the results of these tests are clearly outlined.
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
| Test | Standard | Acceptance Criteria | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ASTM D 6319 | Length ≥230 mm Palm Width Size Small: 70 - 90 mm Med: 85–105 mm Large: 100 - 120 mm Finger thickness ≥0.05 mm Palm thickness ≥0.05 mm Cuff thickness ≥0.05 mm | Meets requirements |
| Physical Properties (Tensile Strength & Elongation) | ASTM D 6319 | AQL 4.0 Before Aging: Tensile Strength: ≥14 MPa Ultimate elongation: ≥500% After Aging: Tensile Strength: ≥14 MPa Ultimate elongation: ≥400% | Meets requirements. The physical dimensions and properties (tensile strength before and after aging, and elongation before and after aging) met the requirements of the standard. |
| Freedom from Pinholes | ASTM D 6319, ASTM D 5151 | AQL 2.5% No leakage | Meets requirements. Testing of the subject device shows it meets the 2.5% AQL requirement in the standards for leakage. |
| Sterility | ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11137 | 10⁻⁶ | 10⁻⁶ |
| Powder Free | ASTM D 6124, ASTM D 6319 | ≤ 2 mg / glove | Meets requirements. Residual powder on the subject device is an average of 0.4 mg/glove, which is within the powder-free limit of < 2 mg maximum powder per glove. |
| Test for Irritation | ISO 10993, Part 23 | Grade 1 (Implies non-irritant) | Under the conditions of the study, the device is not an irritant. |
| Test for Acute Systemic Toxicity | ISO 10993, Part 11 | No animals treated with test extracts exhibit greater reaction than control animals. | Under the conditions of the study, no evidence of acute systemic toxicity. |
| Test for Skin Sensitization | ISO 10993, Part 10 | Grade < 1.0 (Implies non-sensitizer) | Under the conditions of the study, the device is not a sensitizer. |
| Resistance to Permeation by Chemotherapy Drugs | ASTM D6978‐05 | No breakthrough for up to 240 minutes for listed drugs. | 51 Drugs tested showed minimum breakthrough detection time up to 240 minutes, including various concentrations of: Azacitidine, Bendamustine HCl, Bleomycin Sulfate, Bortezomib, Busulfan, Capecitabine, Carboplatin, Carfilzomib, Cetuximab, Cisplatin, Cladribine, Cyclophosphamide, Cytarabine HCl, Dacarbazine, Dactinomycin, Daunorubicin HCl, Decitabine, Docetaxel, Doxorubicin HCl, Epirubicin HCl, Etoposide, Fludarabine Phosphate, Fluorouracil, Fulvestrant, Gemcitabine HCl, Idarubicin HCl, Ifosfamide, Irinotecan HCl, Leuprolide Acetate, Mechlorethamine HCl, Melphalan HCl, Methotrexate, Mitomycin C, Mitoxantrone HCl, Oxaliplatin, Paclitaxel, Pemetrexed, Raltitrexed, Rituximab, Temsirolimus, Topotecan HCl, Trisenox (Arsenic Trioxide), Vinblastine Sulfate, Vincristine, Vinorelbine Tartrate.Exceptions (breakthrough detected in less than 100 minutes):- Carmustine (3.3 mg/ml): No breakthrough up to 44.5 minutes (Warning: Not for use).- Thiotepa (10 mg/ml): No breakthrough up to 99.1 minutes (Warning: Not for use). |
| Resistance to Permeation by Hazardous Drugs (Opioids) | ASTM D6978‐05 | No breakthrough for up to 240 minutes for listed drugs. | No breakthrough detected up to 240 minutes for:- Fentanyl Citrate Injection (100 mcg/2 ml)- Simulated Gastric Acid Fluid/Fentanyl Citrate Injection Mix 50/50 Solution |
| Resistance to Permeation by Other Hazardous Drugs | ASTM D6978‐05 | No breakthrough for up to 240 minutes for listed drugs. | No breakthrough detected up to 240 minutes for:- Chloroquine (50 mg/ml)- Cyclosporin A (100 mg/ml)- Cytovene (10 mg/ml)- Retrovir (10 mg/ml)- Triclosan (2 mg/ml)- Zoledronic Acid (0.8 mg/ml) |
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance
The document indicates that testing was performed according to specific ASTM and ISO standards (e.g., ASTM D6978-05, ASTM D5151, ASTM D6124, ASTM D6319, ISO 10993 Parts 10, 11, 23, ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11137). These standards inherently define the sample sizes and methodologies for testing. For instance, AQL (Acceptable Quality Level) values like 2.5% and 4.0% are mentioned for pinholes and physical properties, which dictates sampling plans for quality control.
The data provenance is not explicitly stated as "country of origin" or "retrospective/prospective" in the context of an AI/ML study. It is implied to be laboratory testing data generated prospectively for the purpose of this 510(k) submission, confirming product specifications.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts
This is not applicable to the evaluation of medical gloves. The "ground truth" for glove performance is established by adherence to recognized international standards (ASTM, ISO, ANSI/AAMI) for physical, chemical permeation, and biocompatibility testing, rather than expert human interpretation of medical images or data. The testing is objective and quantitative.
4. Adjudication method for the test set
Not applicable. Testing involves standardized objective measurements, not subjective human evaluations requiring adjudication.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done
Not applicable. MRMC studies are relevant for imaging diagnostics or other AI/ML applications where human interpretation is a key component. This document describes the testing of a physical medical device.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
Not applicable. This is not an algorithm, but a physical product.
7. The type of ground truth used
The "ground truth" used is defined by the objective measurement criteria and methodologies specified in the cited international standards (ASTM D6978-05, ASTM D5151, ASTM D6319, ASTM D6124, ISO 10993, ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11137). For example, for chemical permeation, the ground truth is the chemical breakthrough time measured according to ASTM D6978-05. For biocompatibility, it's the observed biological reactions in animal models or in vitro tests compared to established toxicity/irritation/sensitization thresholds.
8. The sample size for the training set
Not applicable. This is a physical device, not an AI/ML model that requires a training set.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
Not applicable. As above, this document describes a physical medical device, not an AI/ML system.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1