Search Results
Found 2 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(57 days)
The diagnostic ultrasound system and probes are designed to obtain ultrasound images and analyze body fluids. The clinical applications include: Fetal/Obstetrics, Abdominal, Gynecology, Pediatric, Small Organ, Neonatal Cephalic, Adult Cephalic, Trans-rectal, Trans-vaginal, Muscular-Skeletal (Conventional, Superficial), Urology, Cardiac Adult, Cardiac Pediatric and Peripheral vessel.
It is intended for use by, or by the order of, and under the supervision of, an appropriately trained healthcare professional who is qualified for direct use of medical devices. It can be used in hospitals, clinics and similar care environment for clinical diagnosis of patients.
Modes of Operation: 2D mode, Color Doppler mode, Power Doppler (PD) mode, M mode, Pulsed Wave (PW) Doppler mode, Continuous Wave (CW) Doppler mode, Tissue Doppler Imaging (TDI) mode, Tissue Doppler Wave (TDW) mode, ElastoScan Mode, Combined modes, Multi-Image mode(Dual, Quad), 3D/4D mode.
The HS30 is a general purpose, mobile, software controlled, diagnostic ultrasound system, Its function is to acquire ultrasound data and to display the data as 2D mode, M mode, Color Doppler imaging, Power Doppler imaging (including Directional Power Doppler mode; S-Flow), PW Spectral Doppler mode, CW Spectral Doppler mode, Harmonic imaging(S-Harmonic), Tissue Doppler imaging, Tissue Doppler Wave, Panoramic Imaging, Freehand 3D, Elastoscan Mode or as a combination of these modes. The HS30 also gives the operator the ability to measure anatomical structures and offers analysis packages that provide information that is used to make a diagnosis by competent health care professionals. The HS30 has real time acoustic output display with two basic indices, a mechanical index and a thermal index, which are both automatically displayed.
This document describes the Samsung Medison Co., LTD's HS30 Diagnostic Ultrasound System, which is a general purpose ultrasound system for various clinical applications. The document focuses on showing substantial equivalence to previously cleared predicate devices (HS30 Diagnostic Ultrasound System K182632 and HS40 Diagnostic Ultrasound System K200339).
Here's an analysis based on your request:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
For this device, the "acceptance criteria" are demonstrating substantial equivalence to the predicate devices in terms of intended use, imaging capabilities, technological characteristics, safety, and effectiveness. The reported device performance is presented as being conformant to various applicable medical device safety standards.
| Acceptance Criteria | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|
| Intended Use consistency with predicate devices | Consistent with predicate devices (Fetal/Obstetrics, Abdominal, Gynecology, Pediatric, Small Organ, Neonatal Cephalic, Adult Cephalic, Trans-rectal, Trans-vaginal, Muscular-Skeletal (Conventional, Superficial), Urology, Cardiac Adult, Cardiac Pediatric and Peripheral vessel applications). |
| Imaging Capabilities consistency (Modes of Operation, Scanhead Types, Scanhead Frequency, Features) | Largely consistent or expanded upon predicate devices. The HS30 (under review) explicitly lists "3D/4D mode" as a mode of operation, which was listed for the HS40 but not the primary HS30 predicate. Some transducer types and biopsy guides vary slightly but are generally comparable. |
| Technological Characteristics (Acoustic Output Display, System Characteristics) consistency | Consistent with predicate devices (e.g., MI/TI output display, mobile cart, LED monitor, 256 gray shades, power requirements). |
| Safety & Effectiveness Demonstrated by Compliance to Standards | Conforms with applicable medical device safety standards including IEC 60601-1 (general safety), IEC 60601-1-2 (EMC), IEC 60601-2-37 (ultrasonic diagnostic equipment safety), ISO 10993-1 (biocompatibility), ISO 14971 (risk management), and NEMA UD 2-2004 (acoustic output measurement). |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
The document explicitly states: "The subject of this premarket submission, HS30 is not required clinical studies to support substantial equivalence."
Therefore, no test set, sample size, or data provenance information from clinical studies is provided for the device for the purpose of this 510(k) submission. The evaluation was non-clinical, focusing on compliance with standards and comparison to predicate devices.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of those Experts
As no clinical studies were required, there is no mention of experts establishing a ground truth for a test set. The assessment relied on non-clinical evaluations and technical comparisons.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
Not applicable, as no clinical test set was used for this submission.
5. If a Multi Reader Multi Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
Not applicable. This submission does not involve an AI-assisted diagnostic device or MRMC studies. The device is a diagnostic ultrasound system.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done
Not applicable. This is a hardware and software diagnostic ultrasound system, not a standalone algorithm.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
For this 510(k) submission, the "ground truth" for proving substantial equivalence was primarily:
- Compliance with recognized industry standards: IEC and ISO standards for safety, electromagnetic compatibility, acoustic output, and biocompatibility.
- Comparison to legally marketed predicate devices: The functional specifications and intended uses of the HS30 (under review) were compared directly to already cleared HS30 (K182632) and HS40 (K200339) systems.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
Not applicable. Since no clinical studies were required for this submission, there is no mention of a training set for an algorithm development.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set was Established
Not applicable, as no training set was identified in this submission.
Ask a specific question about this device
(106 days)
The HS30 Diagnostic Ultrasound System and transducers are intended for diagnostic ultrasound imaging and fluid analysis of the human body.
The clinical applications include: Fetal/Obstetrics, Abdominal, Gynecology, Pediatric, Small Organ, Neonatal Cephalic, Adult Cephalic, Trans-rectal, Trans-vaginal, Muscular-Skeletal (Conventional, Superficial), Urology, Cardiac Adult, Cardiac Pediatric and Peripheral vessel.
The HS30 is a general purpose, mobile, software controlled, diagnostic ultrasound system, Its function is to acquire ultrasound data and to display the data as 2D mode. M mode. Color Doppler imaging, Power Doppler imaging (including Directional Power Doppler mode; S-Flow), PW Spectral Doppler mode, CW Spectral Doppler mode, Harmonic imaging(S-Harmonic), Tissue Doppler imaging, Tissue Doppler Wave, Panoramic Imaging, Freehand 3D, Elastoscan Mode or as a combination of these modes. The HS30 also gives the operator the ability to measure anatomical structures and offers analysis packages that provide information that is used to make a diagnosis by competent health care professionals. The HS30 has real time acoustic output display with two basic indices, a mechanical index and a thermal index, which are both automatically displayed.
The HS30 uses digital multi-beam forming technology and supports a variety of Linear, Convex, Phased, Static and Volume probes for a wide variety of applications. It is an ultrasound scanner, which provides high resolution, high penetration performance, and various measurement functions. Probes are supported in frequencies from 1.0 MHz to 20.0 MHz.
The acceptance criteria and study proving the device meets them are described below:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The document does not explicitly state quantitative acceptance criteria for device performance (e.g., sensitivity, specificity, accuracy). Instead, the clearance is based on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device (HS40 Diagnostic Ultrasound System, K180409) by showing that the new device (HS30 Diagnostic Ultrasound System) has similar intended use and key technological features, and that any differences do not raise new questions of safety or effectiveness.
The "performance" is implicitly demonstrated through adherence to various international and FDA guidance standards related to safety and functionality.
| Acceptance Criteria Category | Reported Device Performance (Summary) |
|---|---|
| Intended Use | Identical to predicate, except exclusion of "Intra-Operative" application (which is deemed not to raise new safety/effectiveness concerns). |
| Technological Features | Similar to predicate (all features migrated from predicate). |
| Acoustic Output Safety | Conforms to FDA guidance and IEC60601-2-37, NEMA UD 2, NEMA UD 3. |
| Electrical Safety | Conforms to ANSI AAMI ES60601-1. |
| Electromagnetic Compatibility | Conforms to IEC60601-1-2. |
| Biocompatibility | Conforms to ISO 10993-1. |
| Reprocessing | Conforms to FDA Guidance for Reprocessing Medical Devices. |
| Software/Firmware Functionality | Evaluated using the same test criteria as the predicate for all applicable imaging modes to ensure image quality was not compromised. |
| Risk Management | Assessed per ISO 14971. |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
The document explicitly states: "The proposed device HS30 Diagnostic Ultrasound System did not require clinical studies to demonstrate substantial equivalence." This means there was no specific clinical test set of patient data used for evaluating the device's diagnostic performance from a clinical perspective. The evaluation primarily relied on non-clinical testing and comparison to the predicate device.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts
Not applicable, as no clinical studies with a test set requiring expert ground truth were conducted for this submission. The determination of substantial equivalence was based on non-clinical engineering and safety testing.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
Not applicable, as no clinical studies with a test set requiring expert adjudication were conducted for this submission.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was Done
No, an MRMC comparative effectiveness study was not done. The submission explicitly states no clinical studies were required to demonstrate substantial equivalence.
6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was Done
The device is a diagnostic ultrasound system, not an AI algorithm intended for standalone diagnostic performance. Its functionality is to acquire and display ultrasound data for human interpretation. The "software/firmware-driven functionality" was evaluated to ensure image quality and functionality were not compromised compared to the predicate, but this is an assessment of the system's ability to produce expected outputs, not an assessment of an AI algorithm's standalone diagnostic accuracy.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
For the non-clinical tests conducted, the "ground truth" would be defined by the specifications and expected outputs of the various tests:
- Acoustic Output, Electrical Safety, EMC: Measured values against predefined technical limits and standards.
- Biocompatibility: Laboratory test results against established safety thresholds.
- Software Functionality: Expected system behavior and image quality output compared to the predicate device's established performance, verified through engineering tests.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
Not applicable. The HS30 Diagnostic Ultrasound System is a hardware and software system for generating ultrasound images, not an AI model that requires a training set in the conventional sense. Its development would involve engineering design, manufacturing, and testing processes. The "software functionality" was evaluated against the predicate device, implying a comparison against established benchmarks rather than training.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set was Established
Not applicable, as no AI model requiring a training set was part of this submission for the HS30 Diagnostic Ultrasound System.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1