Search Results
Found 10 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(29 days)
MODIFICATION TO HERMES OPERATING ROOM CONTROL CENTER
The HERMES® O.R. Control Center and Port Expander is indicated for use with Stryker Endoscopy 882 Camera, Stryker Quantum 5000 Light Source, Stryker SE5 Shaver, WOM 20L Insufflator, WOM 2.0L Arthroscopy Pump, Stryker Total Performance System, Berchtold Surgical Lights, Steris Amsco Table Model SP3085, Steris Amsco Table Model SP3085, AESOP®HR (HERMES-Ready™), Valleylab Force FXTM Electrosurgical Unit, Smith & Nephew Dyonics® Access 15 Arthroscopic Fluid Irrigation System, Smith & Nephew Dyonics® Vision 635 Digital Image Management System, Skytron Stellar Series O.R. Lights, and Smith & Nephew Dyonics® Power Shaver. It can be used in general laparoscopy, nasopharyngoscopy, ear endoscopy, and sinuscopy where a laparoscope/endoscope is indicated for use. A few examples of the more common endoscopic surgeries are laparoscopic cholecystectomy, laparoscopic hernia repair, laparoscopic appendectomy, laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection, laparoscopically assisted hysterectomy, laparoscopic & thoracoscopic anterior spinal fusion, decompression fixation, wedge resection, lung biopsy, pleural biopsy, dorsal sympathectomy, pleurodesis, internal mammary artery dissection for coronary artery bypass, coronary artery bypass grafting where endoscopic visualization in indicated and examination of the evacuated cardiac chamber during performance of valve replacement. The users of the HERMES O.R. Control Center are general surgeons, gynecologists, cardiac surgeons, thoracic surgeons, plastic surgeons, orthopedic surgeons, ENT surgeons and urologists.
The HERMES O.R. Control Center is a computer-driven system whose basic function is to offer the surgeon the additional option of voice control for ancillary devices.
The intent of the HERMES O.R. Control Center is to allow for simplified and more direct control of medical device settings by the physician, thereby eliminating the necessity of using the various interfaces existing on ancillary devices, or relying on verbal communications between the surgeon and other personnel in the operating room in order to adjust the surgical equipment.
The HERMES® O.R. Control Center is a computer-driven system designed to offer surgeons voice control for ancillary devices in the operating room. This system aims to simplify the control of medical device settings, eliminating the need for manual interfaces on various ancillary devices or verbal communication between the surgeon and other personnel.
Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets them, based on the provided text:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:
Acceptance Criteria / Test | Reported Device Performance |
---|---|
Safety Standards (Electrical and Medical Equipment) | |
IEC 601-1 (International Standard for Medical Electrical Equipment) | Device tested to this standard, indicating compliance with general safety requirements for medical electrical equipment. |
IEC 601-1 Amendment 1 (International Standard for Medical Electrical Equipment) | Device tested to this standard, indicating compliance with an amendment to the general safety requirements. |
IEC 601-2-18 (International Standard for Medical Electrical Equipment) | Device tested to this specific standard, likely related to the particular type of medical electrical equipment. |
UL 2601-1 (Underwriters Laboratory) | Device tested to this standard, indicating compliance with UL safety requirements. |
CAN/CSA-C22.2 No. 601.1 (Medical Electrical Equipment Part 1, General Requirements for Safety, General Instructions Part 1) | Device tested to this Canadian/CSA standard, indicating compliance with general safety requirements for medical electrical equipment. |
EN60601-1 (International Standard for Medical Electrical Equipment) | Device tested to this European standard, indicating compliance with general safety requirements for medical electrical equipment. |
EN60601-1-1 (General Requirements for Safety – Collateral Standard) | Device tested to this collateral standard, indicating compliance with specific safety aspects. |
Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) | |
EN55022/A1 (Conducted Emission) | Device tested for conducted emissions, indicating compliance with limits on electromagnetic interference generated and conducted through power lines. |
EN55022/A1 (Radiated Emission) | Device tested for radiated emissions, indicating compliance with limits on electromagnetic interference generated and radiated into the environment. |
EN61000-4-2 (Electrostatic Discharge) | Device tested for electrostatic discharge immunity, indicating its ability to withstand static electricity without malfunction. |
EN61000-4-3 and EN50140 (RF Immunity) | Device tested for radiofrequency (RF) immunity, indicating its ability to operate correctly in the presence of RF electromagnetic fields. |
EN61000-4-4 (EFT/Bursts Immunity) | Device tested for electrical fast transient/burst immunity, indicating its ability to withstand short-duration, high-frequency electrical bursts. |
EN61000-4-5 (Surge Immunity) | Device tested for surge immunity, indicating its ability to withstand transient overvoltages. |
EN61000-4-6 (Conducted Immunity) | Device tested for conducted immunity, indicating its ability to operate correctly in the presence of electromagnetic disturbances conducted through signal lines. |
EN 60601-1-2 (Emissions and Immunity Test Measurements) | Device tested to this standard, indicating compliance with general requirements for EMC in medical electrical equipment. |
Functional and Software Performance | |
VA-24734 (CMI System Functional Testing) | Device underwent CMI System Functional Testing, demonstrating that the system performs its intended functions as specified. (Details of specific functions or metrics are not provided in the summary.) |
CP-15345 (CMI Software Verification and Validation) | Device underwent CMI Software Verification and Validation, confirming that the software meets its specified requirements and is fit for its intended use. (Specific verification/validation metrics are not provided.) |
Environmental Performance | |
VA-19795 (CMI Environmental Testing) | Device underwent CMI Environmental Testing, demonstrating its ability to safely and effectively operate within specified environmental conditions (e.g., temperature, humidity). (Specific test parameters or results are not provided.) |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance:
The provided 510(k) summary does not contain information regarding:
- The sample size used for any specific test set.
- The data provenance (e.g., country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective).
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts:
The 510(k) summary does not contain information about:
- The number of experts used to establish ground truth.
- The qualifications of those experts.
The tests conducted are primarily engineering and compliance-based (electrical safety, EMC, software verification, environmental testing), rather than clinical performance evaluations that would typically involve expert-established ground truth. The focus is on the device's adherence to recognized standards for safety and fundamental operation.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set:
Given the nature of the tests (compliance with IEC, UL, CSA, EN standards, functional testing), an adjudication method in the context of expert review for a "test set" (as might be seen in diagnostic AI) is not applicable or detailed in this summary. The tests involve quantifiable measurements against established standards, and functional checks against specification.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was Done:
Based on the provided text, a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was not performed or described. The device is an O.R. control system, not a diagnostic imaging AI that would typically undergo such a study. The "AI" component is its voice control for ancillary devices, which is assessed for functionality and safety rather than diagnostic accuracy or comparative effectiveness with human readers.
6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was Done:
The "HERMES® O.R. Control Center" is itself a standalone system (it functions independently as a computer-driven control center). The provided tests are evaluating the performance of this system as a whole, including its software, electronics, and voice recognition capabilities. There isn't a clear distinction made between "algorithm only" performance versus "human-in-the-loop," as the device's primary function is to serve the human surgeon. Its performance is its standalone capability to interpret voice commands and control ancillary devices.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used:
For the compliance tests (IEC, UL, CSA, EN standards), the "ground truth" is the published requirements and limits defined by those international and national standards. For CMI System Functional Testing, Software Verification and Validation, and Environmental Testing, the "ground truth" would be the detailed specifications and design requirements internally defined by Computer Motion, Inc. for the HERMES system.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set:
The 510(k) summary does not contain information regarding a "training set" or its sample size. This type of information is typically relevant for machine learning or AI models that learn from data, which is not explicitly discussed here in that context. While the voice recognition component undoubtedly involves some form of training, details are not provided.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established:
As no specific training set is discussed, the summary does not provide information on how its ground truth might have been established. For any voice recognition components, ground truth during development would likely involve carefully curated voice commands and their corresponding intended actions, possibly recorded by various speakers in different conditions, and transcribed/labeled for training purposes. However, these specifics are beyond the scope of the provided 510(k) summary.
Ask a specific question about this device
(15 days)
MODIFICATION TO HERMES OPERATING ROOM CONTROL CENTER
The HERMES® O.R. Control Center and Port Expander is indicated for use with Stryker Endoscopy 882 Camera, Stryker Quantum 5000 Light Source, Stryker SE5 Shaver, WOM 20L Insufflator, WOM 2.0L Arthroscopy Pump, Stryker Total Performance System, Berchtold Surgical Lights, Steris Amsco Table Model SP3085, Steris Amsco Table Model SP3085, AESOP®HR (HERMES-Ready™), Valleylab Force FX™ Electrosurgical Unit, Smith & Nephew Dyonics® Access 15 Arthroscopic Fluid Irrigation System, Smith & Nephew Dyonics® Vision 635 Digital Image Management System, and Skytron Stellar Series O.R. Lights. It can be used in general laparoscopy, nasopharyngoscopy, ear endoscopy, and sinuscopy where a laparoscope/endoscope is indicated for use. A few examples of the more common endoscopic surgeries are laparoscopic cholecystectomy, laparoscopic hernia repair, laparoscopic appendectomy, laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection, laparoscopically assisted hysterectorny, laparoscopic & thoracoscopic anterior spinal fusion, decompression fixation, wedge resection, lung biopsy, pleural biopsy, dorsal sympathectomy, pleurodesis, internal mammary artery dissection for coronary artery bypass, coronary artery bypass grafting where endoscopic visualization in indicated and examination of the evacuated cardiac chamber during performance of valve replacement.
The HERMES O.R. Control Center is a computer-driven system whose basic function is to offer the surgeon the additional option of voice control for ancillary devices. The intent of the HERMES O.R. Control Center is to allow for simplified and more direct control of medical device settings by the physician, thereby eliminating the necessity of using the various interfaces existing on ancillary devices, or relying on verbal communications between the surgeon and other personnel in the operating room in order to adjust the surgical equipment.
The HERMES® O.R. Control Center is a computer-driven system designed to provide surgeons with voice control over ancillary medical devices, thereby simplifying device adjustments and reducing reliance on manual interfaces or verbal communication with other operating room personnel.
Here's an overview of its acceptance criteria and the studies performed:
1. Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:
The provided document lists several international and internal standards the device was tested against. It doesn't explicitly state quantitative performance metrics or acceptance thresholds for these in a comparative table format. Instead, it indicates compliance with these standards.
Acceptance Criteria Category | Standard/Test | Reported Device Performance |
---|---|---|
Electrical Safety | IEC 601-1, IEC 601-1 Amendment 1, IEC 601-2-18, UL 2601-1, CAN/CSA-C22.2 No. 601.1 | Passed/Compliant with all specified electrical safety standards. |
Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) | EN55022/A1 (Conducted Emission), EN55022/A1 (Radiated Emission), EN61000-4-2 (Electrostatic Discharge), EN61000-4-3 and EN50140 (RF Immunity), EN61000-4-4 (EFT/Bursts Immunity), EN61000-4-5 (Surge Immunity), EN61000-4-6 (Conducted Immunity), EN 60601-1-2 (Emissions and Immunity Test Measurements) | Passed/Compliant with all specified EMC standards, indicating no undue electromagnetic interference and robust operation in typical surgical environments. |
System Functionality | VA-23763 (CMI System Functional Testing) | Performed as intended, demonstrating proper control of integrated devices and voice command recognition. (Details not provided in the summary) |
Software Verification & Validation | CP-15345 (CMI Software Verification and Validation) | Software operated without critical errors and met design specifications. (Details not provided in the summary) |
Environmental Testing | VA 19795 (CMI Environmental Testing) | Withstood specified environmental conditions (e.g., temperature, humidity) without operational failure. (Details not provided in the summary) |
2. Sample Size for Test Set and Data Provenance:
The document does not specify a sample size for a "test set" in the context of clinical performance or diagnostic accuracy. The tests listed are primarily engineering and compliance standards (e.g., electrical safety, EMC, software verification), which typically involve testing the device itself against predefined specifications rather than a set of patient data.
3. Number of Experts for Ground Truth and Qualifications:
This information is not applicable and not provided in the document as the device is a control system, not a diagnostic or AI-driven system requiring expert-established ground truth for image or data interpretation.
4. Adjudication Method for Test Set:
This information is not applicable and not provided as the device is a control system, not a diagnostic or AI-driven system requiring adjudication of results.
5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study:
An MRMC study was not conducted and is not applicable for this device. The HERMES® O.R. Control Center is a device control system, not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool that would improve human reader performance. Its purpose is to simplify control of other surgical devices, not to aid in diagnosis or interpretation.
6. Standalone Performance (Algorithm Only without Human-in-the-loop):
The concept of "standalone performance" as it pertains to an algorithm interpreting data does not directly apply here. The HERMES system's core function is voice control, which is inherently a human-in-the-loop interaction. However, the "CMI System Functional Testing" (VA-23763) and "CMI Software Verification and Validation" (CP-15345) would assess the device's internal algorithms and functionalities independently of a surgeon's specific use case, ensuring it accurately recognizes commands and sends correct signals. The document does not provide specific metrics from these tests.
7. Type of Ground Truth Used:
The "ground truth" for this device would be tied to its functional performance and compliance with engineering standards:
- Compliance with International Standards: The device's operation was measured against the established parameters and requirements of standards like IEC 601-1 for electrical safety, and EN series for EMC.
- Design Specifications: For internal functional testing and software validation, the "ground truth" would be the predefined design specifications and expected behavior of the system, such as accurately interpreting voice commands and correctly controlling integrated medical devices.
The document does not refer to clinical outcomes, pathology, or expert consensus in the same way a diagnostic AI might.
8. Sample Size for Training Set:
This information is not provided and is not directly applicable in the context of traditional machine learning training sets. While the voice recognition component would have been developed using a dataset, this document focuses on regulatory compliance and does not detail the development process of the voice recognition module.
9. How Ground Truth for Training Set was Established:
This information is not provided. If voice recognition software was indeed a core component that required training, the ground truth for that training data would typically involve annotated audio samples where specific voice commands are correctly labeled with their intended actions. However, the document provided does not delve into the specifics of the voice recognition training.
Ask a specific question about this device
(58 days)
HERMES OPERATING ROOM CONTROL CENTER
The HERMES ™ O.R. Control Center and Port Expander is indicated for use with Stryker Endoscopy 882 Camera, Stryker Quantum 5000 Light Source, Stryker SE5 Shaver, WOM 20L Insufflator, WOM 2.0L Arthroscopy Pump, Stryker Total Performance System, Berchtold Surgical Lights, Steris Amsco Table Model SP3085, AESOP®HERMES-Ready™, Valleylab Force FX™ Electro-surgical Unit, and Smith & Nephew Dyonics® Vision 635 Digital Image Management System. It can be used in general laparoscopy, nasopharyngoscopy, ear endoscopy, and sinuscopy where a laparoscope/endoscope is indicated for use. A few examples of the more common endoscopic surgeries are laparoscopic cholecystectomy, laparoscopic hernia repair, laparoscopic appendectomy, laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection, laparoscopically assisted hysterectomy, laparoscopic & thoracoscopic anterior spinal fusion, decompression fixation, wedge resection, lung biopsy, pleural biopsy, dorsal sympathectomy, pleurodesis, internal mammary artery dissection for coronary artery bypass, coronary artery bypass grafting where endoscopic visualization in indicated and examination of the evacuated cardiac chamber during performance of valve replacement. The users of the HERMES O.R. Control Center are general surgeons, gynecologists, cardiac surgeons, thoracic surgeons, plastic surgeons, orthopedic surgeons, ENT surgeons and urologists.
The HERMES O.R. Control Center is a computer-driven system whose basic function is offer voice control of ancillary devices.
Here's an analysis of the provided text regarding the HERMES™ O.R. Control Center, focusing on acceptance criteria and supporting studies.
Important Note: The provided document is a 510(k) Summary of Safety and Effectiveness for the HERMES™ O.R. Control Center. This type of document primarily focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device and adherence to recognized standards, rather than presenting a detailed clinical study with specific performance metrics and acceptance criteria in the way a novel AI-driven diagnostic device might. Therefore, many of the requested fields, particularly those related to AI-specific study designs (e.g., sample sizes for test/training sets, experts for ground truth, MRMC studies, standalone performance), are not applicable or detailed in this document.
Description of Acceptance Criteria and Study to Prove Device Meets Acceptance Criteria
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
Acceptance Criteria Category | Acceptance Criteria | Reported Device Performance / Evaluation Method |
---|---|---|
Safety and Electrical Standards | Compliance with recognized international and national standards for medical electrical equipment, electromagnetic compatibility (EMC), and safety. This implies the device must operate safely without causing electrical hazards, interference, or being susceptible to interference. | The HERMES O.R. Control Center has been tested to and found compliant with numerous standards, including: |
- IEC 601-1, IEC 601-1 Amendment 1, IEC 601-2-18, EN 60601-1, EN 60601-1-1, EN 60601-1-2 (Medical Electrical Equipment Safety)
- UL 2601-1, CAN/CSA-C22.2 No. 601.1 (Underwriters Laboratory / Canadian Electrical Safety)
- EN55022/A1 (Conducted/Radiated Emission), EN61000-4-2 (ESD), EN61000-4-3 & EN50140 (RF Immunity), EN61000-4-4 (EFT/Bursts), EN61000-4-5 (Surge), EN61000-4-6 (Conducted Immunity) (EMC Compliance) |
| Functional Performance | The system's basic function is to offer voice control of ancillary devices and to interface correctly with a specified list of medical equipment. It must perform its intended voice control operations accurately and reliably. | System Functional Testing (VA-23829-002) was conducted. While specific performance metrics (e.g., voice recognition accuracy, response time) are not provided in this summary, the completion of this test implies the device met its functional requirements. The device is also explicitly indicated for use with a list of specific devices. |
| Software Verification and Validation | The software controlling the device must be verified and validated to ensure it functions as intended, is free from critical defects, and performs reliably within the specified operational parameters. | Software Verification and Validation (CP-15345-002) was performed, indicating that the software was rigorously tested to confirm its correctness and reliability. |
| Environmental Performance | The device must withstand specified environmental conditions (e.g., temperature, humidity) encountered during storage, transport, and operation without degradation of performance or safety. | Environmental Testing (VA-19795-002) was performed, confirming the device's resilience to various environmental factors. |
| Substantial Equivalence to Predicate | The device must be demonstrated to be as safe and effective as a legally marketed predicate device, meaning it does not raise new questions of safety or effectiveness. This is a primary acceptance criterion for 510(k) clearance. | The device was determined by the FDA to be "substantially equivalent" to the HERMES O.R. Control Center (K973700) and an updated version for Valleylab Force FX™ (K003222). This implies that through testing and comparison, the device's characteristics and performance are comparable to the predicate. |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
This document describes a medical device clearance based on engineering and conformity testing to standards, along with a demonstration of substantial equivalence to predicate devices, rather than a clinical study evaluating diagnostic or treatment performance against a large test set of patient data.
- Test Set Sample Size: Not applicable in the context of patient data. The "test set" here refers to the actual HERMES device and its components undergoing engineering and functional tests.
- Data Provenance: Not applicable in the context of patient data. The "data" comes from the results of the various technical standards tests (e.g., electrical safety measurements, EMC measurements, software tests, functional tests on the device itself).
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts
Not applicable. Ground truth, in the sense of expert consensus on patient diagnoses or outcomes, is not relevant for this type of device clearance. The "ground truth" for this device is adherence to engineering specifications and regulatory standards. The experts involved would be engineers, quality assurance personnel, and regulatory specialists conducting the tests and assessments.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
Not applicable. There's no "adjudication method" in the sense of resolving discrepancies among expert interpretations of patient data. Test results against standards are objective measurements or pass/fail criteria.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done
No. An MRMC study is typically performed for diagnostic imaging devices or AI tools that assist human readers in interpreting clinical data. The HERMES O.R. Control Center is a voice-controlled surgical control system, not a diagnostic AI.
6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
No, and not applicable. While the device has software components (as evidenced by "Software Verification and Validation"), it's an interactive control system designed to be used by a human surgeon. Its performance is intrinsically linked to human interaction (voice commands) and its ability to control other devices as instructed. It's not an "algorithm only" device in a diagnostic sense.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
The "ground truth" for this device clearance is primarily:
- Engineering Specifications and Performance Standards: The device's operational parameters, safety features, and functional capabilities must meet predefined engineering and regulatory requirements.
- Compliance with Recognized Standards: Successful completion of tests against established international and national standards (IEC, UL, CSA, EN).
- Functional Adequacy: The device correctly performs its intended function of voice control and interoperability with listed medical devices.
- Substantial Equivalence: The comparison to legally marketed predicate devices demonstrates that the new device is as safe and effective.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
Not applicable. The HERMES O.R. Control Center is not an AI/machine learning device that learns from a "training set" of data in the way a diagnostic algorithm might. Its functionality relies on programmed logic and potentially speech recognition models, but the concept of a "training set" in the context of clinical data for performance validation is not relevant here.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set was Established
Not applicable, as there is no "training set" or "ground truth" for it in the context of an AI-driven diagnostic device. If the device uses speech recognition, the "ground truth" for that component would involve annotated voice commands used to train the speech recognition model, but this specific detail is not part of the 510(k) summary.
Ask a specific question about this device
(38 days)
MODIFICATION TO HERMES OPERATING ROOM CONTROL CENTER
The HERMES™ O.R. Control Center and Port Expander is indicated for use with Stryker Endoscopy 882 Camera, Stryker Quantum 5000 Light Source, Stryker SE5 Shaver, W.O.M. 20L Insufflator, W.O.M. 2.0L Arthroscopy Pump, Stryker Total Performance System, Berchtold Surgical Lights, Steris Amsco Table Model SP3085, AESOP®HERMES-Ready™, Valleylab Force FX™ Electro-surgical Unit, and Dyonics® Access 15 Arthroscopic Fluid Irrigation System. It can be used in general laparoscopy, nasopharyngoscopy, ear endoscopy, and sinuscopy where a laparoscope/endoscope is indicated for use. A few examples of the more common endoscopic surgeries are laparoscopic cholecystectomy, laparoscopic hernia repair, laparoscopic appendectomy, laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection, laparoscopically assisted hysterectomy, laparoscopic & thoracoscopic anterior spinal fusion, decompression fixation, wedge resection, lung biopsy, pleural biopsy, dorsal sympathectomy, pleurodesis, internal mammary artery dissection for coronary artery bypass, coronary artery bypass grafting where endoscopic visualization in indicated and examination of the evacuated cardiac chamber during performance of valve replacement.
The HERMES O.R. Control Center is a computer-driven system whose basic function is offer voice control of ancillary devices.
The HERMES™ O.R. Control Center is a computer-driven system for voice control of ancillary devices during endoscopic surgeries.
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:
Test | Acceptance Criteria (Standard Met) | Reported Device Performance |
---|---|---|
IEC 601-1 / EN60601-1 | International Standard for Medical Electrical Equipment | Device tested to and meets this standard. |
IEC 601-1 Amendment 1 | International Standard for Medical Electrical Equipment | Device tested to and meets this standard. |
IEC 601-2-18 | International Standard for Medical Electrical Equipment | Device tested to and meets this standard. |
UL 2601-1 | Underwriters Laboratory Standard | Device tested to and meets this standard. |
CAN/CSA-C22.2 No. 601.1 | Medical Electrical Equipment Part 1, General Requirements for Safety, General Instructions Part 1 | Device tested to and meets this standard. |
EN55022/A1 Conducted Emission | Conducted Emission Standard | Device tested to and meets this standard. |
EN55022/A1 Radiated Emission | Radiated Emission Standard | Device tested to and meets this standard. |
EN61000-4-2 Electrostatic Discharge | Electrostatic Discharge Standard | Device tested to and meets this standard. |
EN61000-4-3 and EN50140 RF Immunity | RF Immunity Standard | Device tested to and meets this standard. |
EN61000-4-4 EFT/Bursts Immunity | EFT/Bursts Immunity Standard | Device tested to and meets this standard. |
EN61000-4-5 Surge Immunity | Surge Immunity Standard | Device tested to and meets this standard. |
EN61000-4-6 Conducted Immunity | Conducted Immunity Standard | Device tested to and meets this standard. |
EN60601-1-1 | General Requirements for Safety - Collateral Standard | Device tested to and meets this standard. |
EN 60601-1-2 Emissions and Immunity Test | Emissions and Immunity Test Measurements Standard | Device tested to and meets this standard. |
System Functional Testing | N/A (Implied successful operation for intended use) | Successful completion of system functional testing reported. |
Software Verification and Validation | N/A (Implied successful verification and validation) | Successful completion of software verification and validation reported. |
Environmental Testing | N/A (Implied successful performance under specified environmental conditions) | Successful completion of environmental testing reported. |
Summary of the Study Proving Device Meets Acceptance Criteria:
The provided document describes a 510(k) submission for the HERMES™ O.R. Control Center, indicating that the device has undergone various tests to demonstrate its safety and effectiveness. The main study described is the testing of the device against a comprehensive set of international and national medical device standards, as listed in the table above. These standards cover aspects such as electrical safety, electromagnetic compatibility, and general safety requirements for medical electrical equipment.
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance:
The document does not specify a "test set" in the context of clinical data or images. The testing described is primarily engineering and performance-based to ensure compliance with relevant safety and performance standards. Therefore, concepts like sample size for a test set and data provenance (country of origin, retrospective/prospective) are not directly applicable to the type of testing reported for this device.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts:
This information is not applicable. The "ground truth" for this device's acceptance is its adherence to established engineering and safety standards, rather than a clinical diagnosis or interpretation requiring expert consensus.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set:
This information is not applicable as the testing involves compliance with technical standards, not interpretation of clinical data.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:
A Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was not done. The HERMES™ O.R. Control Center is a voice-controlled system for ancillary devices, not an AI-powered diagnostic tool that assists human readers in interpreting medical images or data.
6. If a Standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done:
A "standalone" performance study in the context of an algorithm's diagnostic accuracy was not done. The device's function is to provide voice control, and its performance is evaluated based on its ability to control the integrated devices and its compliance with safety and performance standards, not as a standalone diagnostic algorithm.
7. The type of ground truth used:
The "ground truth" used for this device's acceptance is its compliance with internationally recognized and national medical electrical equipment and safety standards. This is a functional and safety ground truth, rather than a clinical ground truth like pathology, expert consensus on images, or outcomes data.
8. The sample size for the training set:
The document does not mention a "training set." The HERMES™ O.R. Control Center is a control system, not a machine learning model that requires a training set of data.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established:
This information is not applicable as there is no mention of a training set or machine learning components in the described device.
Ask a specific question about this device
(18 days)
MODIFICATION TO HERMES OPERATING ROOM CONTROL CENTER
Ask a specific question about this device
(19 days)
MODIFICATION OF: HERMES OPERATING ROOM CONTROL CENTER
The HERMES OR Control Center is indicated for use with Stryker Endoscopy 882 Camera, Quantum 5000 Light Source, Stryker SES Shaver, W.O.M. 20L Insufflator, W.O.M. 2.0L Arthroscopy Pump. and the Stryker Total Performance System (endoscopy port only). It can be used in general laparoscopy, nasopharyngoscopy, ear endoscopy, and sinuscopy where a laparoscope/endoscope is indicated for use. A few examples of the more common endoscopic surgeries are laparoscopic cholecystectomy, laparoscopic hernia repair, laparoscopic appendectomy, laparoscopic pelvic symph node dissection, laparoscopically assisted hysterectomy, laparoscopic anterior spinal fusion, decompression fixation, wedge resection, lung biopsy, pleural biopsy, dorsal sympathectomy, pleurodesis, internal mammary artery dissection for coronary artery bypass, coronary artery bypass grafting where endoscopic visualization in indicated and examination of the evacuated chamber during performance of valve replacement. The users of the HERMES ORCC are general surgeons, gynecologists, cardiac surgeons, thoracic surgeons, plastic surgeons, orthopedic surgeons, ENT surgeons and urologists.
The HERMES Operating Room Control Center is a computer-driven system whose basic function is offer the additional option for surgeon selection of attachment device parameter settings utilizing voice control.
The intent of the HERMES OR Control Center is to allow for simplified and more direct control of medical device settings by the physician, thereby eliminating the necessity of using the various interfaces existing on the Stryker Endoscopy 882 Camera, Quantum 5000 Light Source, Stryker SE5 Shaver, WOM 20L Insufflator, WOM 2.0L Arthroscopy Pump and the Stryker Total Performance System (endoscopy port only) in the Operating setting, or relying upon verbal communications between the surgeon and other personnel in the operation room in order to adjust surgical equipment.
The HERMES™ Operating Room Control Center is a computer-driven system that allows surgeons to control medical device settings using voice commands.
Here's an analysis based on the provided document:
Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance
This 510(k) summary does not include a table of specific acceptance criteria with corresponding device performance metrics (e.g., accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity). Instead, it primarily focuses on demonstrating that the HERMES™ Operating Room Control Center conforms to established safety and electrical standards.
The document lists the following standards to which the device was designed and tested:
Acceptance Criterion (Standard Compliance) | Reported Device Performance (Compliance Statement) |
---|---|
IEC 601-1 Second Edition 1990 Medical Electrical Equipment | Device was designed and tested to this standard. |
IEC 601-1 Second Amendment 1 1991 Medical Electrical Equipment | Device was designed and tested to this standard. |
IEC 601-2-18 First Edition 1990 Medical Electrical Equipment | Device was designed and tested to this standard. |
UL 2601-1 | Device was designed and tested to this standard. |
Conducted & Radiated Emission EN55022/A1: 1995 | Device was designed and tested to this standard. |
Immunity Tests EN61000-4-2: 1995 | Device was designed and tested to this standard. |
Immunity Tests EN61000-4-3: 1995 | Device was designed and tested to this standard. |
Immunity Tests EN50140:1994 | Device was designed and tested to this standard. |
Immunity Tests EN61000-4-4:1995 | Device was designed and tested to this standard. |
Immunity Tests EN61000-4-5:1995 | Device was designed and tested to this standard. |
Immunity Tests EN61000-4-6:1995 | Device was designed and tested to this standard. |
CAN/CSA-C22.2 NO. 601 | Device was designed and tested to this standard. |
Study Details:
The provided document is a 510(k) summary, which focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device rather than presenting a detailed clinical study with performance metrics in the way one might expect for diagnostic AI or imaging devices.
-
Sample size for the test set and data provenance:
The document does not specify a "test set" in the context of clinical performance data (e.g., patient data, image dataset). The testing refers to compliance with electrical and safety standards. Therefore, information on sample size and data provenance for a test set in the traditional sense is not applicable or provided. -
Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and qualifications:
Not applicable, as the provided document focuses on compliance with engineering and safety standards, not on clinical performance or diagnostic accuracy that would require expert-established ground truth. -
Adjudication method for the test set:
Not applicable, for the reasons stated above. -
Multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study:
No, an MRMC comparative effectiveness study was not done or reported in this 510(k) summary. This device is an operating room control system for device settings, not a diagnostic or AI-assisted interpretation tool that would typically involve MRMC studies. -
Standalone (algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) study:
While the system operates on voice control, the "standalone" performance isn't described in terms of a clinical outcome or diagnostic accuracy. Its performance is measured by its ability to reliably and correctly interpret voice commands to adjust device parameters according to the surgeon's intent, and its compliance with safety standards. The document doesn't provide specific data on voice recognition accuracy or response time for device control. -
Type of ground truth used:
The "ground truth" for this device's performance testing revolved around engineering standards and functional requirements. For example, whether it correctly changed a setting when a specified voice command was given, or if it met electromagnetic compatibility limits. It is not expert consensus, pathology, or outcomes data in the clinical sense. -
Sample size for the training set:
This information is not provided. If a voice recognition component involves machine learning, there would typically be a training set, but this detail is absent from the summary. -
How the ground truth for the training set was established:
Not provided. This detail would only be relevant if the device incorporated advanced AI/ML for voice recognition requiring specific training data and ground truth labeling, which is not elaborated upon in this 1999 document.
Ask a specific question about this device
(15 days)
MODIFICATION TO HERMES OPERATING ROOM CONTROL CENTER
The HERMES OR Control Center is indicated for use with Stryker Endoscopy 882 Camera, Quantum 5000 Light Source, Stryker SE5 Shaver, W.O.M. 20L Insufflator, W.O.M. 2.0L Arthroscopy Pump and Berchtold Surgical Lights. It can be used in general laparoscopy, nasopharyngoscopy, ear endoscopy, and sinuscopy where a laparoscope/endoscope is indicated for use. A few examples of the more common endoscopic surgeries are laparoscopic cholecystectomy, laparoscopic hernia repair, laparoscopic appendectomy, laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection, laparoscopically assisted hysterectomy, laparoscopic & thorascopic anterior spinal fusion, decompression fixation, wedge resection, lung biopsy, pleural biopsy, dorsal sympathectomy, pleurodesis, internal mammary artery dissection for coronary artery bypass, coronary artery bypass grafting where endoscopic visualization is indicated and examination of the evacuated cardiac chamber during performance of valve replacement.
The HERMES OR Control Center is a computer-driven system whose basic function is offer the additional option for surgeon selection of attachment device parameter settings utilizing voice control. The intent of the HERMES OR Control Center is to allow for simplified and more direct control of medical device settings by the physician, thereby eliminating the necessity of using the various interfaces existing on the Stryker Endoscopy 882 Camera, Quantum 5000 Light Source, Stryker SE5 Shaver, W.O.M. 20L Insufflator, W.O.M. 2.0L Arthroscopy Pump and Berchtold Surgical Lights in the Operating setting, or relying upon verbal communications between the surgeon and other personnel in the operation room in order to adjust surgical equipment.
The provided text describes a 510(k) premarket notification for the HERMES™ OR Control Center, a computer-driven system designed to allow surgeons to control medical device settings using voice commands.
However, the document does not contain information related to acceptance criteria, device performance metrics, or study details (like sample size, ground truth, expert qualifications, etc.) as requested in the prompt. The text focuses on regulatory classification, indications for use, and substantial equivalence to a predicate device, along with adherence to various electrical and safety standards.
Therefore, I cannot fulfill the request to discuss the acceptance criteria and the study proving the device meets them based on the provided input.
The document lists various standards the device is designed and tested to, such as IEC 601-1, UL 2601-1, and EN standards for emissions and immunity. These are safety and electrical performance standards, not typically acceptance criteria for clinical efficacy or diagnostic accuracy.
Ask a specific question about this device
(20 days)
HERMES OPERATING ROOM CONTROL CENTER
The HERMES OR Control Center is indicated for use with Stryker Endoscopy 882 Camera, Quantum 5000 Light Source, Stryker SES Shaver, W.O.M. 20L Insufflator and W.O.M. 2.0L Arthroscopy Pump. It can be used in general laparoscopy, nasopharyngoscopy, ear endoscopy, and sinuscopy where a laparoscope/endoscope is indicated for use. A few examples of the more common endoscopic surgeries are laparoscopic cholecystectomy, laparoscopic hemia repair, laparoscopic appendectomy, laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection, laparoscopically assisted hysterectomy, laparoscopic & thorascopic anterior spinal fusion, decompression fixation, wedge resection, lung biopsy, pleural biopsy, dorsal sympathectomy, pleurodesis, internal mammary artery dissection for coronary artery bypass, coronary artery bypass grafting where endoscopic visualization is indicated and examination of the evacuated cardiac chamber during performance of valve replacement. The users of the HERMES ORCC are general surgeons, gynecologists, cardiac surgeons, thoracic surgeons, plastic surgeons, orthopedic surgeons, ENT surgeons and urologists.
The HERMES Operating Room Control Center is a computer-driven system whose basic function is offer the additional option for surgeon selection of attachment device parameter settings utilizing voice control.
The intent of the HERMES OR Control Center is to allow for simplified and more direct control of medical device settings by the physician, thereby eliminating the necessity of using the various interfaces existing on the Stryker Endoscopy 882 Camera, Quantum 5000 Light Source, Stryker SE5 Shaver, W.O.M. 20L Insufflator and W.O.M. 2.0L Arthroscopy Pump in the Operating setting, or relying upon verbal communications between the surgeon and other personnel in the operation room in order to adjust surgical equipment.
Here's an analysis of the provided text regarding the HERMES OR Control Center, focusing on acceptance criteria and study details.
Based on the provided information, the HERMES OR Control Center is a medical device, and its "acceptance criteria" primarily relate to compliance with established medical device safety and electrical standards, rather than a clinical performance study with specific metrics like sensitivity or specificity for a diagnostic AI device.
This device, described as a "computer-driven system whose basic function is to offer the additional option for surgeon selection of attachment device parameter settings utilizing voice control," appears to be an interface or control system for existing medical equipment. Therefore, its safety and effectiveness are evaluated based on its safe and reliable operation in controlling those devices, not on its ability to interpret medical data or make diagnoses.
Here's a breakdown of the requested information, where applicable:
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
Acceptance Criteria (based on the provided text) | Reported Device Performance (implied from the 510(k) submission) |
---|---|
Safety and Electrical Standards Compliance: | |
IEC 601-1 Second Edition 1990 | Compliance stated in 510(k) submission ("HERMES OR Control Center is designed and tested to the following Computer Motion and voluntary standards.") - Pass |
IEC 601-1 Amendment 1 1991 | Compliance stated in 510(k) submission - Pass |
IEC 601-2-18 First Edition 1990 | Compliance stated in 510(k) submission - Pass |
UL 2601-1 Conducted & Radiated Emission | Compliance stated in 510(k) submission - Pass |
EN55022/A1: 1995 Immunity Tests | Compliance stated in 510(k) submission - Pass |
EN61000-4-2: 1995 | Compliance stated in 510(k) submission - Pass |
EN61000-4-3: 1995 | Compliance stated in 510(k) submission - Pass |
EN50140:1994 | Compliance stated in 510(k) submission - Pass |
EN61000-4-4:1995 | Compliance stated in 510(k) submission - Pass |
EN61000-4-5:1995 | Compliance stated in 510(k) submission - Pass |
EN61000-4-6:1995 | Compliance stated in 510(k) submission - Pass |
CAN/CSA-C22.2 NO. 601.1-M90 & NO. 601.2.18-92 | Compliance stated in 510(k) submission - Pass |
Functional Equivalence: | |
Substantially equivalent to K990787 | FDA determination of "substantially equivalent" to predicate device K990787 - Accepted (This implies that its functionality and safety profile are comparable to a previously cleared device). |
Intended Use: | |
Indicated for use with specific medical devices | The device is indicated for use with the listed Stryker and W.O.M. devices in the specified endoscopic procedures. The 510(k) clearance confirms this intended use. - Accepted |
Allow simplified and more direct control of device settings by physician (via voice) | This is the core functional benefit described. The 510(k) clearance implies that the voice control mechanism was deemed safe and effective for this purpose, likely through internal validation and adherence to usability standards (though specific usability data is not detailed in this summary). - Accepted |
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance
The provided 510(k) summary does not contain details about a "test set" in the context of an AI/ML algorithm evaluation with patient data. The testing discussed is related to compliance with electrical and safety standards. There is no mention of a dataset of patient cases, images, or clinical scenarios used to evaluate the device's performance.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts
Not applicable. As noted above, there is no "test set" of patient data for which a ground truth would need to be established by experts.
4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set
Not applicable. No such test set is described.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
Not applicable. The HERMES OR Control Center is not an AI-assisted diagnostic or interpretative device that would involve human "readers" or an MRMC study. It is a control interface.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
Not applicable. This device is inherently "human-in-the-loop" as its function is to control other medical devices based on surgeon voice commands. It does not perform a standalone diagnostic or therapeutic algorithm in a way that typically refers to "standalone performance" in AI/ML contexts.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)
Not applicable. No ground truth regarding patient data or diagnoses is relevant to the acceptance criteria described. The "ground truth" for this device would be its correct and safe execution of voice commands to control integrated medical equipment, and its compliance with safety standards.
8. The sample size for the training set
Not applicable. The device is not an AI/ML model that would typically have a "training set" of data for learning patterns or making predictions. It's a control system.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
Not applicable. No training set is described.
Summary of Device Evaluation Approach:
The 510(k) clearance for the HERMES OR Control Center primarily relied on:
- Conformance to Recognized Standards: The device was designed and tested to numerous international and national electrical, safety, and electromagnetic compatibility standards (IEC, UL, EN, CAN/CSA). This is the primary "acceptance criteria" explicitly listed.
- Substantial Equivalence: The FDA determined the device was substantially equivalent to a previously cleared predicate device (K990787). This means the FDA found no new questions of safety or effectiveness were raised by the HERMES device that were not already addressed by the predicate. This comparison typically involves evaluating similarities in design, materials, indications for use, energy used, technology, and performance.
- Functionality: The device's ability to provide voice control for specific surgical equipment, as described in its intended use, was accepted. (Details on how this specific voice control functionality was validated are not present in this summary but would have been part of the full 510(k) submission, likely including internal testing and verification).
In essence, this is a traditional medical device clearance where safety and performance are demonstrated through adherence to known engineering and electrical standards, and by showing equivalence to an already approved device, rather than through a clinical study involving patient data and AI performance metrics.
Ask a specific question about this device
(133 days)
HERMES OPERATING ROOM CONTROL CENTER WITH THE WOM 20L INSUFFLATOR
The HERMES OR Control Center is indicated for use with Stryker Endoscopy 882 Camera, Quantum 5000 Light Source, Stryker SE5 Shaver and WOM 20L Insufflator. It can be used in where nasopharyngoscopy, ear endoscopy, and sinuscopy a laparoscopy, general laparoscope/endoscope is indicated for use. A few examples of the more common endoscopic repair, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, laparoscopic hernia laparoscopic surgeries are ymph node dissection, laparoscopically assisted laparoscopic pelvic appendectomy, hysterectomy, laparoscopic & thorascopic anterior spinal fusion, decompression fixation, wedge resection, lung biopsy, pleural biopsy, dorsal sympathectomy, pleurodesis, internal mammary artery dissection for coronary artery bypass, coronary artery bypass grafting where endoscopic visualization is indicated and examination of the evacuated cardiac chamber during performance of valve replacement. The users of the HERMES ORCC are general surgeons, gynecologists, cardiac surgeons, thoracic surgeons, plastic surgeons, orthopedic surgeons, ENT surgeons and urologists.
The HERMES Operating Room Control Center is a robotic computer-driven system whose basic function is offer the additional option for surgeon selection of attachment device parameter settings utilizing voice control.
The intent of the HERMES OR Control Center is to allow for simplified and more direct control of medical device settings by the physician, thereby eliminating the necessity of using the various interfaces existing on the Stryker Endoscopy 882 Camera, Quantum 5000 Light Source, Stryker SE5 Shaver and WOM 20L Insufflator in the Operating setting, or relying upon verbal communications between the surgeon and other personnel in the operation room in order to adjust surgical equipment.
The provided document is a 510(k) summary for the HERMES OR Control Center System. This document focuses on the regulatory aspects and the intended use of the device, rather than detailed performance study results with specific acceptance criteria.
Based on the information available, a table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance cannot be fully constructed in the manner requested, as the document does not contain clear, measurable acceptance criteria or detailed study results beyond a statement of functional test requirements.
However, I can extract and infer some information related to the device's testing and regulatory approval based on the text:
Missing Information:
Many of the requested data points (sample size for test and training sets, data provenance, number and qualifications of experts, adjudication methods, MRMC study details, standalone performance, type of ground truth used) are not available in this 510(k) summary document. This document is a regulatory submission summary and typically does not include the detailed raw data or study methodologies to that extent.
Available/Inferred Information from the Document:
-
Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:
The document mentions "HERMES System Functional Test Requirements" as a standard the device was designed and tested to. However, the specific criteria within those requirements and the numerical performance results are not detailed in this summary. The only "performance" discussed is the intended function of the device: to offer voice control for medical device settings, simplifying control and eliminating the need for verbal communication with other personnel or direct interaction with individual device interfaces.
Acceptance Criteria (Inferred from functionality description) | Reported Device Performance (Inferred/Stated Intent) |
---|---|
Functional Control: Ability to offer additional option for surgeon selection of attachment device parameter settings utilizing voice control. | The device's basic function is to offer the additional option for surgeon selection of attachment device parameter settings utilizing voice control. (Implies successful implementation of this core functionality, though no quantitative metrics are given). |
Simplification of Control: Elimination of the necessity of using various interfaces on connected devices (Stryker Endoscopy 882 Camera, Quantum 5000 Light Source, Stryker SE5 Shaver, WOM 20L Insufflator). | The intent is to allow for simplified and more direct control, thereby eliminating the necessity of using the various interfaces existing on the [listed] devices. (This is a statement of intent and assumed outcome, not a quantified performance metric from a study). |
Reduction of Verbal Communication: Elimination of reliance upon verbal communications between surgeon and other personnel for adjusting surgical equipment. | The intent is to eliminate relying upon verbal communications between the surgeon and other personnel in the operating room in order to adjust surgical equipment. (Again, an intended outcome, not a measured performance metric from a study detailed here). |
Compliance with Standards: Adherence to relevant electrical, medical electrical equipment, and EMC standards (IEC 601-1, IEC 601-1 Amendment 1, IEC 601-2-18, UL 2601-1, EMC Directive 89/336/EEC, CAN/CSA-C22.2 NO. 601.1-M90 & NO. 601.2.18-92). This implies passing tests related to safety, electrical compatibility, and performance per those standards. | The device is designed and tested to the following Computer Motion and voluntary standards. (This implies successful compliance, but no specific test results or failure rates are provided. This is a regulatory requirement for safety and basic functionality, not directly a performance metric related to the primary clinical benefit of voice control accuracy or efficiency). "HERMES System Functional Test Requirements" were also cited, but specifics are not given. |
The Study that Proves the Device Meets Acceptance Criteria:
The document broadly states that the device "is designed and tested to the following Computer Motion and voluntary standards," and lists several standards (IEC 601-1, UL 2601-1, EMC Directive, etc.) in addition to "HERMES System Functional Test Requirements."
- The term "study" in the context of clinical performance demonstrating quantitative improvements (e.g., accuracy, efficiency) is not explicitly detailed with methodologies or results in this summary.
- The primary evidence of "safety and effectiveness" for this 510(k) submission appears to be based on substantial equivalence to an existing predicate device (HERMES Operating Room Control Center and Accessories K973700). This means the FDA determined the new device is as safe and effective as a legally marketed device and does not raise different questions of safety and effectiveness. This often relies on meeting recognized consensus standards for safety and performance, and demonstrating that the new device functions similarly to the predicate.
Given this context, the document doesn't describe a specific, detailed study with quantitative performance results against explicit acceptance criteria in the way one might expect for a novel diagnostic algorithm. Instead, it attests to design and testing according to established engineering and regulatory standards, and relies on the concept of substantial equivalence.
Specific Requested Information (and why it's mostly unavailable from this document):
- Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance: Not mentioned. This would typically be found in detailed verification and validation reports, not a 510(k) summary.
- Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: Not mentioned. Such details are usually part of a clinical validation study.
- Adjudication method: Not mentioned.
- If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done: Not mentioned. This type of study is more common for diagnostic imaging AI. For a control system, "effectiveness" might be measured in terms of time savings, error reduction, or surgeon satisfaction, but such a study is not described.
- If a standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done: Not directly applicable or mentioned. This device is a human-in-the-loop system (voice control by a surgeon). Any standalone performance would be about the voice recognition accuracy and system response, which isn't detailed.
- The type of ground truth used: Not explicitly stated for performance testing. For a control system, ground truth might relate to whether commands were accurately interpreted and executed, or whether the system successfully integrated with and controlled the indicated medical devices. This would be part of functional testing.
- The sample size for the training set: Not mentioned. AI/ML models usually require training sets; while this device uses voice control, it's not described as a deep learning AI in the modern sense. It's more of a robotic control system with voice interface.
- How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not mentioned.
In summary, this 510(k) notification focuses on the regulatory requirements for showing substantial equivalence and compliance with engineering standards for a medical device. It does not provide the kind of detailed clinical or algorithm performance study description (with specific acceptance criteria, sample sizes, expert qualifications, etc.) that would typically be associated with modern AI/ML device submissions, especially those involving image analysis or diagnostic applications. The "study" here is primarily composed of general design and testing to established standards to ensure safety and functional requirements, leading to a determination of substantial equivalence.
Ask a specific question about this device
(151 days)
HERMES OPERATING ROOM CONTROL CENTER
The HERMES OR Control Center is indicated for use with Stryker Endoscopy 882 Camera and Quantum 5000 Light Source that is used in general laparoscopy, nasopharyngoscopy, ear endoscopy, and sinuscopy where a laparoscope/endoscope is indicated for use. A few examples of the more common endoscopic surgeries are laparoscopic cheleeystectomy, laparoscopic hernia repair, laparoscopic appendectorny, laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection, laparoscopically assisted hysterectorny, laparoscopic & thorascopic anterior spinal fusion, decompression fixation, wedge resection, lung biopsy, pleural biopsy, dorsal sympathectomy, pleurodesis, internal mammary artery dissection for coronary artery bypass, coronary artery bypass grafting where endoscopic visualization is indicated and examination of the evacuated cardiac chamber during performance of valve replacement. The users of the HERMES ORCC are general surgeons, gynecologists, cardiac surgeons, thoracic surgeons, plastic surgeons, orthopedic surgeons, ENT surgeons and urologists.
The HERMES Operating Room Control Center is a computer-driven system whose basic function is offer the additional option for surgeon selection of attachment device parameter settings utilizing voice control. The intended use of the HERMES OR Control Center is a Voice Control system whose function is to allow for simplified and direct control of Stryker Endoscopy 882 Camera and Quantum 5000 Light Source settings by the surgeon, thereby eliminating the necessity of using multiple input interfaces now common in the operating room, or relying upon verbal communications between the surgeon and other personnel in the OR in order to adjust Stryker Endoscopy 882 Camera and Quantum 5000 Light Source.
The provided text is a 510(k) Premarket Notification for the HERMES OR Control Center System. This type of document is for regulatory clearance of medical devices and focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device, rather than reporting on a clinical study with detailed performance metrics and acceptance criteria in the way a research paper would.
Therefore, the document does not contain information about:
- A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance
- Sample size used for the test set and data provenance
- Number of experts used to establish ground truth and their qualifications
- Adjudication method for the test set
- Multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study
- Standalone (algorithm only) performance
- Type of ground truth used (e.g., pathology, outcomes data)
- Sample size for the training set
- How ground truth for the training set was established
Instead, the document focuses on:
- Device identification and intended use: The HERMES OR Control Center is a computer-driven system offering voice control for Stryker Endoscopy 882 Camera and Quantum 5000 Light Source settings. It's intended to simplify control and eliminate the need for multiple input interfaces or verbal communication to adjust settings during various endoscopic procedures like laparoscopy, thoracoscopy, and sinuscopy.
- Substantial equivalence: The device is claimed to be substantially equivalent to AESOP 510(k)'s K931783 and K960655, Model 882 Camera: K820624, and Quantum 5000 Light Source: K961971. This is the primary method of demonstrating safety and effectiveness for a 510(k) submission.
- Compliance with standards: The HERMES OR Control Center was designed and tested to several international and national standards for medical electrical equipment, including IEC 601-1, UL 2601-1, EMC Directive European Union 89/336/EEC, and CAN/CSA-C22.2. It also mentions "HERMES System Functional Test Requirements," but does not detail these requirements or results.
- Regulatory clearance: The FDA reviewed the 510(k) notification and determined the device to be substantially equivalent for the stated indications for use, thereby permitting it to be marketed.
In summary, this regulatory document for the HERMES OR Control Center does not provide the kind of detailed performance study information with explicit acceptance criteria, ground truth, and reader studies that would be found in a clinical trial report or a scientific publication. Its purpose is to demonstrate substantial equivalence to legally marketed predicate devices and compliance with relevant safety standards.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1