Search Results

A glove is worn on the hand of healthcare and similar personnel to prevent contamination between healthcare personnel and the patient's body, fluids, waste or environment.

Glove, Patient Examination, Vinyl (Powdered)

The provided text describes the specifications and quality characteristics of Vinyl Patient Examination Gloves. It focuses on physical dimensions, material properties, and quality assurance for the gloves, referencing ASTM and JIS standards.

Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets them, based on the provided text, structured according to your request:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

Note: The table shows the "Reported Device Performance" as matching the "Acceptance Criterion" based on the conclusion statement: "Shinjiazhuang Hongray Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Vinyl Patient Examination Gloves meet ASTM Standards - meets pinhole requirements and labeling claims." This implies that the device did meet all specified criteria. The document provides the specifications for each size and characteristic, and the conclusion then confirms compliance.

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

The document does not specify the sample size used for the test set for any of the listed quality characteristics or the pinhole rate test. It also does not explicitly state the data provenance (e.g., country of origin, retrospective/prospective). However, the company is based in China and Taiwan, and the testing laboratories (Consumer Products Testing Co., USA for biocompatibility) are mentioned, which gives an indication of where some testing might have occurred. The JIS standards are Japanese Industrial Standards, implying international applicability or adoption.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)

This question is not applicable in the context of this device and study. The "ground truth" here is defined by objective, measurable physical and material properties (e.g., dimension measurements, tensile strength values, water leak test results for pinholes) according to established international standards (ASTM, JIS). Expert consensus is not typically used to establish these types of physical standards.

4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

This question is not applicable. Adjudication methods like 2+1 or 3+1 are used in studies where human interpretation or subjective assessment is involved, often for clinical endpoints or image analysis. For objective physical measurements and material testing, the results are derived directly from the test procedures outlined in the standards, not through adjudication.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

This question is not applicable. The device is a patient examination glove, not an AI-powered diagnostic tool. Therefore, MRMC comparative effectiveness studies, human readers, or AI assistance are irrelevant to its evaluation.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

This question is not applicable. The device is not an algorithm. Its performance is measured directly through physical and material tests.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.)

The "ground truth" in this context refers to the objective measurements and pass/fail criteria defined by recognized international standards such as ASTM Standard D5250 and various JIS-S-2045 sub-standards. For example, for tensile strength, the ground truth is "Min. 10.0 Mpa," and for pinholes, it's "Under 4% pinhole rate" as determined by the FDA glove water leak test.

8. The sample size for the training set

This question is not applicable. There is no concept of a "training set" for physical products like gloves undergoing these types of standardized tests. Machine learning models use training sets; physical products are tested against a defined set of specifications.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

This question is not applicable, as there is no training set for this type of product evaluation. The "ground truth" (specifications) for the testing was established by the relevant national and international standards bodies (ASTM, JIS, FDA) that created and maintain these standards.

Ask a specific question about this device