Search Results

To be used to administer medication or draw sample. To be used in applications that require clarity that only glass can offer or applications that require smooth plunger movement / control that is not possible with plastic syringe. Also to be used in applications where use of plastic syringe may cause contamination due to reaction of plastic with dispensed substance. May also be used in applications that require stability at extreme temperature.

"GlassVan" Glass Syringe

There's a critical misunderstanding here. The provided text is a 510(k) clearance letter from the FDA for a medical device: "Glass Van" Glass Syringes.

This document does not contain any information about a study proving the device meets acceptance criteria in the way you've described for an AI/algorithm-based device.

Instead, a 510(k) clearance is based on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate, legally marketed device. This typically involves showing that the new device has the same intended use and technological characteristics as the predicate, or if it has different technological characteristics, that those differences do not raise new questions of safety and effectiveness.

Therefore, I cannot provide the information requested in your bullet points because the input document does not contain that type of data.

To be clear:

• There's no mention of acceptance criteria in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, etc., as typically applied to performance studies of diagnostic algorithms.
• There's no study described with a test set, training set, experts, ground truth, or MRMC study.

The FDA letter confirms that the "Glass Van" Glass Syringes are substantially equivalent to a previously marketed device, allowing them to be marketed. This is a regulatory pathway, not a performance study report for an AI or algorithm.

Ask a specific question about this device