Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K103399
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2011-02-28

    (101 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    872.4200
    Panel
    Dental
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    GENERAL DENISTRY MOTOR

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Can be used for a wide range of dental procedures including endodontic surgeries, such as drilling into the root canal, and general dentistry, such as removing carious material from the dentin.

    Device Description

    Not Found

    AI/ML Overview

    This is a 510(k) clearance letter for a dental handpiece (AEU-5000), which is a Class I device. Class I devices are generally exempt from premarket notification requirements if they meet certain criteria, and this letter confirms substantial equivalence without requiring a detailed performance study like those for higher-risk devices or software.

    Therefore, the provided document does not contain the information requested for acceptance criteria and a study proving device performance as it would for a device requiring more rigorous testing. The information requested (acceptance criteria table, sample sizes, expert qualifications, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone performance, ground truth types, and training set details) is typically found in premarket submission documents for software or higher-risk devices, not in a 510(k) clearance letter for a Class I dental handpiece.

    The letter simply states that the device is "substantially equivalent" to legally marketed predicate devices, meaning it has the same intended use and technological characteristics as a predicate device, or has different technological characteristics but does not raise new questions of safety and effectiveness, and is as safe and effective as a legally marketed device. This equivalence is typically established based on existing standards and performance data for similar devices, rather than a new, comprehensive clinical study specifically detailed in this type of letter.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1