Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K042646
    Device Name
    DYNACT
    Date Cleared
    2004-10-19

    (21 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    892.1600
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    DYNACT

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    DynaCT is an x-ray imaging software option, which allows the reconstruction of twodimensional images acquired with a standard angiographic C-arm device into a threedimensional image format.

    DynaCT is intended for imaging both hard and soft tissues as well as other internal body structures for diagnosis, surgical planning, interventional procedures and treatment follow-up.

    Device Description

    The DynaCT is an x-ray imaging software option, which allows the reconstruction of two-dimensional images acquired with a standard angiographic C-arm device into a three-dimensional image format. DynaCT provides extended visualization capability. An increased number of acquired and post processed images results in an improved visualization of soft tissues. This improved visualization is comparable to CT images.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text, a 510(k) Summary for the Siemens DynaCT, does not contain specific information regarding a study with acceptance criteria and reported device performance. The document focuses on establishing substantial equivalence to predicate devices based on technological characteristics and intended use.

    Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information in the format given, as the study details, acceptance criteria, ground truth, and other specific performance metrics are not included in the provided text.

    The document states: "In summary, Siemens is of the opinion that DynaCT does not introduce any new potential safety risks and is substantially equivalent to and performs as well as the predicate devices." This suggests that the primary method of demonstrating safety and effectiveness was through comparison to existing cleared devices rather than a detailed performance study with explicit acceptance criteria.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1