Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K103418
    Device Name
    DESARA MINI
    Date Cleared
    2011-11-30

    (373 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    878.3300
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    DESARA MINI

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Desara Mini is intended to be used in females to position a suburethral mesh sling for treatment of Genuine Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI) and mixed incontinence resulting from urethral hypermobility. The mesh is placed transvaginally using a reusable introducer (sold separately)

    Device Description

    The Desara Mini is a sterile, single-use pubourethral sling. The device is comprised of monofilament polypropylene yarn, which is knitted into a mesh, two self-fixating tips and two guiding suture loops at each end of the device. The device contains a visible midline marker to assist the surgeon in placement of the device.

    The Desara Mini is available in one configuration and a reusable introducer is available separately.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided 510(k) summary for the Caldera Medical Desara Mini surgical mesh primarily focuses on establishing substantial equivalence to predicate devices through technical and performance characteristic comparisons, rather than presenting a study to prove acceptance criteria for a new, unique performance claim. As such, the information needed to fully respond to your request regarding acceptance criteria and a study proving device performance in the context of an AI/human reader study is not present in this document.

    However, I can extract the available information regarding performance data and testing methods used to demonstrate substantial equivalence, which serves a similar purpose in the medical device approval process:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:

    The document doesn't explicitly state "acceptance criteria" in a quantitative, measurable way for novel performance endpoints. Instead, it demonstrates that the Desara Mini meets the established characteristics and performance benchmarks of its predicate devices. The "reported device performance" is essentially that the Desara Mini's characteristics are "substantially equivalent" to the predicate devices.

    Here's an interpretation of the performance data in relation to the predicate devices:

    Performance Characteristic/TestAcceptance Criteria (Implied by Predicate Device Equivalence)Reported Device Performance
    Mesh Characteristics
    Mesh ThicknessEquivalent to Desara Mesh (K110169)Substantially equivalent
    Mesh Weave CharacteristicsEquivalent to Desara Mesh (K110169)Substantially equivalent
    Pore SizeEquivalent to Desara Mesh (K110169)Substantially equivalent
    Mesh DensityEquivalent to Desara Mesh (K110169)Substantially equivalent
    Tensile StrengthEquivalent to Desara Mesh (K110169)Substantially equivalent
    Mesh StiffnessEquivalent to Desara Mesh (K110169)Substantially equivalent
    Flexural RigidityEquivalent to Desara Mesh (K110169)Substantially equivalent
    Tear ResistanceEquivalent to Desara Mesh (K110169)Substantially equivalent
    Burst StrengthEquivalent to Desara Mesh (K110169)Substantially equivalent
    Suture PulloutEquivalent to Desara Mesh (K110169)Substantially equivalent
    Pyrogen LevelsEquivalent to Desara Mesh (K110169)Substantially equivalent
    BiocompatibilityMeets FDA guidance for biocompatibility (as per Desara Mesh)Passed all testing requirements; substantially equivalent
    Sterility/PackagingMeets FDA guidance for sterility, aging, shelf life, transportation, sterilization (as per Desara Mesh)Passed all testing requirements; substantially equivalent
    Mechanical/Functional
    Junction StrengthEquivalent to MiniArc (K073703)Demonstrates equivalent
    Device Function (Fixation Tips, Polypropylene Mesh, Suture Loops, Introducer)Equivalent to MiniArc (K073703)Demonstrates equivalent
    Device PerformanceEquivalent to MiniArc (K073703)Demonstrates equivalent

    2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance:

    The document does not specify a "test set" in the context of human data or clinical studies for performance evaluation. The testing described involves bench testing for material properties and mechanical performance, and cadaver lab testing for functional performance. No sample sizes for these tests are provided. Data provenance is not specified beyond being "bench" and "cadaver lab" testing. This is common for a 510(k) submission where substantial equivalence is primarily based on material and design similarities, rather than new clinical effectiveness.

    3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth and Qualifications:

    Not applicable. This document describes a medical device submission based on substantial equivalence through material and functional testing, not a study requiring expert readers to establish ground truth for image interpretation or diagnosis.

    4. Adjudication Method:

    Not applicable, as no expert consensus or ground truth establishment process is described.

    5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study:

    No, an MRMC comparative effectiveness study was not done. The submission is for a surgical mesh and its performance relies on physical and mechanical properties, not on diagnostic accuracy enhanced by AI.

    6. Standalone (Algorithm Only Without Human-in-the-Loop Performance) Study:

    Not applicable. The Desara Mini is a physical surgical device, not a software algorithm.

    7. Type of Ground Truth Used:

    The "ground truth" for the performance claims in this submission is the established performance characteristics and safety profile of the predicate devices (Desara Mesh and MiniArc), as well as established industry standards and FDA guidance for surgical mesh testing. For instance, the mesh characteristics were assessed against standards, and biocompatibility was assessed against ISO-10993.

    8. Sample Size for the Training Set:

    Not applicable. This document describes a medical device submission where the relevant "training" would be the historical data and performance of the predicate devices and general knowledge of surgical mesh properties, not a machine learning training set.

    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established:

    Not applicable. (See #8).

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1