Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K062339
    Device Name
    DERMOTHERAP GUN
    Date Cleared
    2007-02-05

    (179 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    880.6920
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Predicate For
    N/A
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The DermoTherap Gun is an electrical powered syringe needle injector intended to be used for intradermal administration of liquid medications in low preset doses to a precise needle penetration depth.

    Device Description

    The DermoTherap Gun is an electrical powered syringe needle injector.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text is a 510(k) clearance letter from the FDA for a device called "DermoTherap Gun." This document does not contain the kind of detailed information about acceptance criteria, study design, sample sizes, and ground truth establishment that you are requesting.

    The letter explicitly states: "We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices..."

    This means the device was cleared based on its equivalence to existing devices, not necessarily on a novel study demonstrating specific performance metrics against pre-defined acceptance criteria in the way a new drug or a more complex AI medical device might require.

    Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information from the given text. A 510(k) summary (which might be a separate document submitted to the FDA) or the full 510(k) submission would typically contain such study details if they were required for clearance.

    Here's a breakdown of why this document doesn't contain the requested information:

    • Acceptance Criteria and Reported Performance: Not present. The letter focuses on "substantial equivalence."
    • Sample Size and Data Provenance: Not present. No mention of a test set or data source.
    • Number and Qualifications of Experts: Not present. No ground truth establishment is described.
    • Adjudication Method: Not present.
    • MRMC Comparative Effectiveness Study: Not mentioned.
    • Standalone Performance Study: Not mentioned.
    • Type of Ground Truth: Not applicable, as no study results are detailed.
    • Training Set Sample Size: Not applicable, as no machine learning or AI component is mentioned.
    • Ground Truth for Training Set: Not applicable.
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1