Search Results

The Dade Behring Heparin Calibrator is an in vitro diagnostic product used to calibrate the Berichrom® Heparin assay for the measurement of unfractionated heparin. Dade Behring Heparin Controls are in vitro diagnostic products intended to be used as assayed, unfractionated heparin quality control materials for the Berichrom® Heparin assay.

Dade Behring Heparin Calibrator and Controls are lyophilized products prepared from citrated human plasma and contain unfractionated heparin from a porcine source. The kit consists of a calibrator and two levels of assayed controls intended to monitor the performance of Berichrom® Heparin reagent when testing for unfractionated heparin using coagulation analyzers.

Here's a breakdown of the acceptance criteria and study information for the Dade Behring Heparin Calibrator and Controls, based on the provided text:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

The provided text focuses on the performance characteristics demonstrating equivalence and doesn't explicitly list "acceptance criteria" in a typical table format for all parameters. However, it does describe the performance that met the criteria.

2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

• Sample Size: The document states that the stability data used "at least duplicate determinations." For the method comparison studies, it mentions "different dilutions of USP Heparin Sodium Reference Standard were spiked into citrated plasma samples." The exact number of samples or dilutions is not specified.
• Data Provenance: The data appears to be from a prospective study conducted by the manufacturer, Dade Behring Inc. The country of origin of the data is not explicitly stated, but the manufacturer is based in Newark, Delaware, USA.

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts

• This device is a calibrator and control material for an in vitro diagnostic assay. The ground truth for this type of device is typically established through a reference standard rather than expert interpretation of images or clinical data.
• The study used the USP Heparin Sodium Reference Standard to establish the true heparin concentrations. Therefore, there were no "experts" in the traditional sense required to establish the ground truth for the test set.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

• Given that the ground truth was established by a reference standard, an adjudication method is not applicable in this context. The measurements were quantitative and compared against known values derived from the reference standard.

5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was Done, and the Effect Size of How Much Human Readers Improve with AI vs Without AI Assistance

• No. This is an in vitro diagnostic device (calibrator and control) and not an AI-powered diagnostic tool for image interpretation or similar tasks requiring human readers. Therefore, an MRMC study is not relevant aquí.

6. If a Standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was Done

• Yes, effectively. The performance evaluation described is for the device (calibrator and controls) used with coagulation analyzers (Dade Behring BCS® Analyzer and Sysmex® CA-1500 Analyzer). The "performance" of the calibrator and controls is assessed in their ability to correctly calibrate and monitor the assay. There isn't a human-in-the-loop scenario described; the evaluation is of the analytical performance of the products themselves in combination with the specified instrumentation.

7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

• The ground truth used was reference standard data, specifically the USP Heparin Sodium Reference Standard. This standard was used to:
  • Spike known concentrations of heparin into plasma samples.
  • Establish the calibration curve against which the new calibrator's performance was evaluated.

8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

• The document does not provide information about a "training set" for the calibrator and controls. These are standardized materials, and their development typically involves extensive characterization and formulation work rather than machine learning training sets. The studies described are validation (test set) studies to demonstrate performance.

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

• Not applicable, as a "training set" in the machine learning sense is not mentioned or implied for this type of in vitro diagnostic product. The fundamental "ground truth" for the calibrator's development would ultimately trace back to primary reference materials and methods for unfractionated heparin, though specifics are not detailed here.

Ask a specific question about this device