Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K210452
    Device Name
    Creatinine2
    Date Cleared
    2022-03-22

    (399 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    862.1225
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    Creatinine2

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Creatinine2 assay is used for the quantitation of creatinine in human serum, plasma, or urine on the ARCHITECT c System.

    The Creatinine2 assay is to be used as an aid in the diagnosis and treatment of renal diseases, in monitoring renal dialysis, and as a calculation basis for measuring other urine analytes.

    Device Description

    The Creatinine2 assay is an automated clinical chemistry assay. At an alkaline pH, creatinine in the sample reacts with picric acid to form a creatinine-picrate complex that absorbs at 500 nm. The rate of increase in absorbance is directly proportional to the concentration of creatinine in the sample.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided document describes the Abbott Creatinine2 assay, an in vitro diagnostic device, and its performance relative to a predicate device. The information needed to answer the request is primarily found in Section 5: 510(k) Summary (Summary of Safety and Effectiveness), specifically subsections VIII (Summary of Nonclinical Performance) and VII (Comparison of Technological Characteristics).

    Here's the breakdown of the requested information:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    The document does not explicitly state "acceptance criteria" as a separate, pre-defined column. Instead, it presents the results of various performance studies. The "Reported Device Performance" below is extracted directly from the study results presented in the document. The comparable predicate device values are included for context where available.

    Creatinine2 Assay - Performance Summary

    MetricAcceptance Criteria (Implied/Predicate Performance)Reported Device Performance (Creatinine2)
    Analytical Measuring Interval (AMI)Serum/Plasma: 0.09 – 37.34 mg/dL
    Urine: 2.54 – 740 mg/dL
    Reportable IntervalSerum/Plasma: 0.04 – 37.34 mg/dL
    Urine: 1.24 – 740 mg/dL
    Precision (Within-Laboratory %CV)Predicate (Serum/Plasma): 3.18 - 4.95% (at 1.20-4.66 mg/dL)
    Predicate (Urine): 1.27 - 1.34% (at 61.95-145.48 mg/dL)Serum/Plasma: ≤ 4.5% (Panel A: 0.25 mg/dL), ≤ 2.3% (Panel B: 26.00 mg/dL), ≤ 2.1% (Panel C: 36.36 mg/dL)
    Urine: ≤ 5.5% (Panel A: 5.37 mg/dL), ≤ 1.8% (Panel B: 278.12 mg/dL), ≤ 1.8% (Panel C: 701.12 mg/dL)
    Accuracy (Bias)Serum/Plasma (vs. NIST SRM 967a): -4.1% to 0.4% bias
    Urine (vs. NIST SRM 914a): -4.8% to 3.3% bias
    Lower Limits of Measurement (LoB, LoD, LoQ)Predicate (Serum/Plasma LoD): 0.05 mg/dL
    Predicate (Serum/Plasma LoQ): 0.10 mg/dL
    Predicate (Urine LoD): 4.00 mg/dL
    Predicate (Urine LoQ): 5.00 mg/dLSerum/Plasma: LoB: 0.02 mg/dL, LoD: 0.04 mg/dL, LoQ: 0.09 mg/dL
    Urine: LoB: 0.93 mg/dL, LoD: 1.24 mg/dL, LoQ: 2.54 mg/dL
    LinearityPredicate (Serum/Plasma): 0.20 – 37.00 mg/dL
    Predicate (Urine): 5.00 – 740.00 mg/dLSerum: 0.09 to 37.34 mg/dL
    Urine: 2.54 to 740 mg/dL
    Method Comparison (Correlation Coefficient)Predicate: Not explicitly stated as a target, but K083809 (Abbott Creatinine) is the predicate and a correlation of 1.00 for both serum and urine suggests excellent agreement.Serum: 1.00 (between Creatinine2 and predicate Creatinine)
    Urine: 1.00 (between Creatinine2 and predicate Creatinine)
    Method Comparison (Intercept)Serum: -0.01
    Urine: -1.23
    Method Comparison (Slope)Serum: 0.96
    Urine: 1.01
    Interference (within ±10%)No significant interferenceSerum/Plasma Endogenous: No interference from listed substances at specified levels (e.g., Acetoacetate 20 mg/dL, Hemoglobin 1000 mg/dL)
    Serum/Plasma Exogenous: No interference from listed substances at specified levels (e.g., Acetaminophen 160 mg/L)
    Urine Endogenous: No interference from listed substances at specified levels (e.g., Acetoacetate 480 mg/dL)
    Urine Exogenous: No interference from listed substances at specified levels (e.g., Acetaminophen 16 mg/dL)

    2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

    The document describes several nonclinical laboratory studies.

    • Precision (Within-Laboratory): For both Serum/Plasma and Urine, the studies tested 80 replicates per sample type for each of the two controls and three human panels (5 samples total). This was done in duplicate, twice per day, on 20 days. The provenance of the human panels (e.g., country of origin, retrospective/prospective) is not specified, but they are referred to as "human serum panels" and "human urine panels." This data is ex vivo laboratory testing.
    • Accuracy: No specific sample size of "patient samples" is given. The study was performed using "material standardized to the Certified Reference Material NIST SRM 967a" for serum/plasma and "material standardized to the Certified Reference Material NIST SRM 914a" for urine.
    • Lower Limits of Measurement (LoB, LoD, LoQ): n ≥ 60 replicates for zero-analyte and low-analyte level samples for LoB/LoD, and for low-analyte level samples for LoQ.
    • Linearity: The sample size for linearity is not explicitly stated in terms of number of unique samples, but it covers the analytical measuring interval by spiking and dilution.
    • Method Comparison:
      • Serum: 128 samples
      • Urine: 129 samples
        The provenance of these clinical samples (e.g., country of origin, retrospective or prospective) is not explicitly stated.
    • Interference: "Each substance was tested at 2 levels of the analyte." No specific sample size (n) for the number of replicates per interference test is given beyond this, nor is the provenance of the base samples used.
    • Tube Type: "Samples were collected from a minimum of 40 donors." The provenance is not explicitly stated.

    The studies described are nonclinical laboratory studies, primarily involving analytical performance evaluation rather than clinical patient studies.

    3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Their Qualifications

    This information is not applicable (N/A) to this specific device (Creatinine2 assay). The device is an in vitro diagnostic for quantitative measurement of creatinine, not an imaging device or a device requiring expert interpretation of complex clinical data to establish ground truth for its performance evaluation (e.g., a diagnosis of a disease from imaging). The "ground truth" for its analytical accuracy is typically established against certified reference materials (NIST SRM 967a for serum/plasma and NIST SRM 914a for urine) or reference methods, not by human experts adjudicating cases for a test set.

    4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

    This information is not applicable (N/A) for the same reasons as #3. Clinical adjudication by multiple experts (like 2+1, 3+1) is typically used for devices that rely on human interpretation of outputs (e.g., medical images, pathology slides) where consensus or expert opinion defines the ground truth for diagnostic accuracy. This device measures a biochemical analyte.

    5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done

    No, an MRMC comparative effectiveness study was not done. This type of study is relevant for medical devices where human readers or interpreters are part of the diagnostic workflow, such as imaging-based AI tools. The Creatinine2 assay is an automated clinical chemistry assay that directly measures creatinine levels in biological samples and does not involve human image interpretation or a "human-in-the-loop" effectiveness study as typically understood in the context of MRMC studies.

    6. If a Standalone (Algorithm Only Without Human-in-the-Loop Performance) Was Done

    The Creatinine2 assay is a standalone (algorithm only) device in the sense that it performs a quantitative measurement without a human-in-the-loop for interpreting the output of the device to arrive at the creatinine value. The performance metrics described (precision, accuracy, linearity, lower limits of measurement, interference, method comparison) are all tests of the device's performance directly, independent of human interpretation or assistance in generating the result.

    7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

    The ground truth for the performance evaluation of the Creatinine2 assay was primarily established using:

    • Certified Reference Materials: NIST SRM 967a for serum/plasma and NIST SRM 914a for urine were used for accuracy studies.
    • Predicate Device/Reference Method: The Creatinine assay (K083809; List No. 3L81) was used as a comparator for the method comparison study to assess substantial equivalence.
    • Defined Standards/Controls: For precision and lower limits of measurement, studies used control materials and low-analyte level samples with known or established concentrations to determine repeatability, detection, and quantitation limits.

    8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

    This information is not applicable (N/A). The Creatinine2 assay is a chemical assay, not a machine learning or AI-based device that requires a "training set" in the computational sense. Its performance is based on the chemical reaction and analytical methods described.

    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

    This information is not applicable (N/A) for the same reasons as #8.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1