Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K030234
    Date Cleared
    2003-04-28

    (95 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    862.3250
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    COZART EIA COCAINE ORAL FLIUD KIT

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Cozart EIA Cocaine Oral Fluid Kit is intended for use in clinical and analytical laboratories when used in conjunction with the Cozart RapiScan Oral Fluid collection system. Using this collection system it provides qualitative screening results for cocaine and metabolites in human oral fluid at a cutoff concentration of 10ng/ml. This is equal to 30ng/ml. in undiluted oral fluid as the collection system involves a 1:3 dilution of the sample.

    This assay is for professional use only and provides only a preliminary analytical test result. Clinical consideration and professional judgement must be applied to any drug of abuse test result, particularly in evaluating a preliminary positive result. In order to obtain a more confirmed analytical result a more specific alternative chemical method is needed. Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS) is the preferred confirmatory method.

    Device Description

    The Cozart EIA Cocaine Oral Fluid Kit is a laboratory based test for the detection of cocaine and metabolites in human oral fluid using a cutoff equivalent to 30ng/mL. The Cozart EIA Cocaine Oral Fluid Kit is a competitive ELISA for the detection of cocaine and its metabolites in human oral fluid. The kit supplies the following reagents - a microtitre plate coated with antibody, enzyme conjugate reagent, wash buffer, substrate solution, stop solution and four calibrators (0, 5, 10 and 50ng/ml benzoylecgonine in oral fluid matrix).

    AI/ML Overview

    Here's a summary of the acceptance criteria and study details for the Cozart EIA Cocaine Oral Fluid Kit, based on the provided text:

    Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance

    Acceptance Criteria CategoryReported Device PerformanceComments / Context
    Method Comparison96% overall agreementCompared to GC/MS (Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry), the gold standard.
    PrecisionCVs less than 9% (kit)Acceptable for qualitative manual ELISA assay (CVs less than 10% acceptable).
    Total precision (kit) CVs less than 11%
    Sensitivity1.8 ng/mLDetection limit for cocaine in oral fluid.
    SpecificityNo cross-reactivity with 29 potential interferentsThree out of four related compounds showed some cross-reactivity.
    Cutoff Concentration ValidationAbsorbances for 5 ng/mL higher than 10 ng/mL cutoff calibrator; Absorbances for 15 ng/mL lower than 10 ng/mL cutoff calibratorConfirmed appropriate response around the 10 ng/mL cutoff.
    Interference StudiesNo interference observedTested against alcohol, sample adequacy indicator dye, hemoglobin, smoking, coffee, tea, water, food, orange juice, hard candy, chewing gum, and mouthwash.
    Stopped Assay StabilityMust be read within 15 minutes at 450 nmAbsorbance readings at various time points (0, 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, 60 minutes) showed stability up to 15 minutes.
    Assay DriftLittle change across the plateSample addition must occur within 25 minutes.

    Study Details

    1. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance:

      • Sample Size: 177 samples.
      • Data Provenance: Not explicitly stated, but the context of clinical and forensic samples suggests human samples. The country of origin is not specified, but the manufacturer is based in the UK. The study appears to be retrospective, as existing samples were tested.
    2. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Their Qualifications:

      • Not applicable for this type of in-vitro diagnostic (IVD) device. The ground truth was established by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), which is an analytical method, not human expert consensus, for drug detection.
    3. Adjudication Method for the Test Set:

      • Not applicable. The reference method (GC/MS) served as the definitive ground truth, and the device's results were compared directly to it. There was no mention of human adjudication between different readers or methods beyond the GC/MS.
    4. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done:

      • No, an MRMC study was not done. This device is an in-vitro diagnostic kit, not an imaging or diagnostic algorithm requiring human interpretation of output.
    5. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done:

      • Yes, this was a standalone performance study. The Cozart EIA Cocaine Oral Fluid Kit is a laboratory-based test that provides a qualitative result based on its biochemical reactions and spectrophotometric reading. Its performance was evaluated directly against GC/MS without human intervention in the interpretation of the kit's results.
    6. The Type of Ground Truth Used:

      • analytical reference method, specifically Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS). The text explicitly states: "The device detailed above was compared to Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS)." and "96% overall agreement as compared with GC/MS". GC/MS is widely considered the "gold standard" for confirmatory drug testing.
    7. Sample Size for the Training Set:

      • Not explicitly stated. The document describes a "method comparison" study as the primary performance evaluation. For a competitive ELISA kit, internal calibration and validation (which might involve a "training" equivalent) would have been performed by the manufacturer during its development, but details regarding a distinct "training set" sample size are not provided in this 510(k) summary.
    8. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established:

      • Not explicitly stated. Given that performance for the test set was established against GC/MS, it is highly probable that any internal development, calibration, or "training" (if applicable for this type of device) would also have referenced GC/MS or highly purified standards of cocaine and its metabolites at known concentrations.
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1