Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K232319
    Date Cleared
    2024-04-22

    (263 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    880.6250
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Predicate For
    N/A
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Black Pearl Nitrile Examination Glove is a disposable device, intended for medical purposes that is worn on the examiner's hand to prevent contamination between patient and examiner.

    Device Description

    Black Pearl Nitrile Examination Glove is a single use examination glove, intended for medical purposes that is worn on the examiner's hand to prevent contamination between patient and examiner. The nitrile glove is an ambidextrous, beaded cuff and black in colour. It meets the performance requirements in accordance with ASTM D6319-19 Standard Specification for Nitrile Examination Gloves for Medical Application.

    AI/ML Overview

    This looks like a 510(k) Premarket Notification for a medical device (Black Pearl Nitrile Examination Glove). For this type of device, the acceptance criteria and supporting studies are focused on performance, safety, and biocompatibility, rather than clinical efficacy studies often seen with AI/ML devices.

    Here's an analysis of the provided information, framed by your request:

    Acceptance Criteria and Study for Black Pearl Nitrile Examination Glove

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    The device is evaluated against the standards ASTM D6319-19 (Standard Specification for Nitrile Examination Gloves for Medical Applications) and ASTM D6124-06 (Reapproved 2017) (Standard Test Method for Residual Powder on Medical Gloves).

    Test PerformedApplicable StandardAcceptance CriteriaReported Device PerformanceStatus
    DimensionsASTM D6319-19Length: XS, S: Min. 220mm; M, L, XL: Min. 230mmLength: XS: Min. 242mm; S: Min. 244mm; M: Min. 241mm; L: Min. 240mm; XL: Min. 241mmPass
    Width: XS: 70mm ±10mm; S: 80mm ±10mm; M: 95mm ±10mm; L: 110mm ±10mm; XL: 120mm ±10mmWidth: XS: 77-80mm; S: 83-86mm; M: 96-98mm; L: 107-110mm; XL: 119-124mmPass
    Thickness: Palm - Min. 0.05mm; Finger - Min. 0.05mmThickness: Palm - Min. 0.06mm; Finger - Min. 0.08mm (for all sizes tested)Pass
    Freedom from HolesASTM D6319-19Sample size: 200 pcs, Inspection level: G-I, AQL: 2.5, Accept: ≤ 10 pieces, Reject: ≥ 11 pieces2 pieces were found with holes (within acceptance).Pass
    Physical PropertiesASTM D6319-19Before Aging: Tensile Strength: Min. 14 MPa; Ultimate Elongation: Min. 500%
    After Accelerated Aging: Tensile Strength: Min. 14 MPa; Ultimate Elongation: Min. 400%Before Aging: Tensile Strength: Min. 18.2 MPa; Ultimate Elongation: Min. 500%
    After Accelerated Aging: Tensile Strength: Min. 17.4 MPa; Ultimate Elongation: Min. 400%Pass
    Powder-free ResidueASTM D6124-06 (Reapproved 2017)≤ 2.0 mg/glove0.70 mg/glovePass
    Skin Irritation TestISO 10993-23:2021(E) (Implied by conclusion)Non-irritantPrimary irritation index obtained was '0'. No local skin irritation observed.Pass
    Skin Sensitization TestISO 10993-10:2010(E) (Implied by conclusion)Non-sensitizerNo skin sensitization reactions observed.Pass
    In vitro CytotoxicityISO 10993-5:2009 (Implied by conclusion)Non-cytotoxic to L-929 cells in 1:16 dilution (6.25%) and 1:32 dilution (3.125%). Acceptably cytotoxic at higher concentrations/lower dilutions (undiluted, 1:2, 1:4, 1:8) for its classification as a surface device with limited contact. (This is a non-standard acceptance criteria interpretation for the table, as the report explicitly states cytotoxicity at higher concentrations).Cytotoxic in undiluted (100%), 1:2 (50%), 1:4 (25%) and 1:8 dilution (12.5%). Non-cytotoxic to L-929 cells in 1:16 (6.25%) and 1:32 dilution (3.125%).Pass
    Acute Systemic ToxicityISO 10993-11:2017(E) (Implied by conclusion)Did not induce any acute systemic toxicityDid not induce any acute systemic toxicity in swiss albino mice. No clinical toxicity or overt toxicity observed.Pass

    2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

    • Dimensions: 13 pieces of gloves from each size (XS, S, M, L, XL) for each parameter (length, width, thickness). Lot size for sampling was 35,001 to 150,000, with an inspection level of S-2 and AQL of 4.0.
    • Freedom from Holes: 200 pieces of M-size gloves. Lot size for sampling was 35,001 to 150,000, with an inspection level of G-1 and AQL of 2.5.
    • Physical Properties: 13 pieces of M-size gloves. Lot size for sampling was 35,001 to 150,000, with an inspection level of S-2 and AQL of 4.0.
    • Powder-free Residue: 5 pieces of gloves.
    • Skin Irritation Test: 6 New Zealand White rabbits (3 for polar extracts, 3 for non-polar extracts).
    • Skin Sensitization Test: 30 guinea pigs (5 for polar solvent control, 10 for polar test item extract, 5 for non-polar solvent control, 10 for non-polar test item extract).
    • In vitro Cytotoxicity: L-929 mouse fibroblasts cells.
    • Acute Systemic Toxicity Test: 20 Swiss Albino mice (4 groups of 5 males each).

    Data Provenance: The document does not explicitly state the country of origin for the testing facilities or the specific animal vendors/data source, but the submitter is from Malaysia. These are prospective tests performed specifically for this 510(k) submission.

    3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of those Experts

    These tests are standardized laboratory and in-vivo animal tests, not typically requiring "experts" in the sense of clinical reviewers establishing ground truth for diagnostic or AI systems. The "ground truth" is established by the well-defined and validated methodologies of the ASTM and ISO standards themselves. The results are quantitative measurements or qualitative observations by laboratory personnel trained in those specific methods.

    4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

    Not applicable in the context of these types of performance and biocompatibility tests. Results are generally objective measurements or direct observations against a standard, not requiring multi-expert adjudication.

    5. If a Multi Reader Multi Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

    Not applicable. This device is an examination glove, not an AI/ML-based diagnostic system.

    6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done

    Not applicable. This device is an examination glove, not an AI/ML-based diagnostic system.

    7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.)

    The "ground truth" for these tests is based on:

    • Standardized measurement protocols: For physical dimensions, tensile strength, elongation, and powder residue.
    • Defined biological reactions: For freedom from holes (water leak detection) and biocompatibility tests (observed biological responses in animals or cell cultures according to ISO guidelines).

    8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

    Not applicable. This is not an AI/ML device, so there is no training set in the typical sense. The performance characteristics of the glove are inherent to its manufacturing process and material properties, validated by testing against established standards.

    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

    Not applicable. There is no training set for this type of device.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1