Search Results

The BroadMaster HealthCare System is a software accessory compatible with legally marketed BroadMaster Biotech glucose meters, such as the Glucose Shepherd Blood Glucose Monitoring System and ADVOCATE® Redi-Code* BMB-EA001S Blood Glucose Monitoring System and is intended for use in the home setting by people with diabetes. It is intended to aid in the review, analysis, and evaluation of patient data to support diabetes management. The BroadMaster HealthCare System receives via USB, stores, and uses patient data for display and reporting, sets meter date, time and alarm. The software is designed for multiple users use and only compatible with personal computer. It's not compatible with other devices such as PDAs or smartphones.

The BroadMaster HealthCare System is a software designed to collect user glucose raw data, analyze results with easy-to-read trend graphs and save glucose raw data to .csv file for report. This system is very easy and friendly to use, even if user has a little computer experience. The BroadMaster HealthCare System Software works with its own behind-the-scene database to store glucose raw data from the glucose device. Glucose raw data downloaded to the software system are stored under the user profile that was selected before the download. In short, the BroadMaster HealthCare System will help user to store the blood glucose device readings, analyze results with easy-to-read trend graphs, and save glucose raw data to .csv file for report.

The provided text describes a software device, the BroadMaster HealthCare System, an accessory to glucose meters. The document asserts that the device meets performance requirements but does not provide specific acceptance criteria or detailed results from a study proving these criteria are met.

Here is an analysis based on the available information:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:

The document states: "The performance of the BroadMaster HealthCare System Software was studied in the laboratory settings. The studies have demonstrated that this system meets the performance requirements of its intended use."

However, no specific acceptance criteria (e.g., accuracy metrics, specific thresholds for data integrity, speed of processing, or reliability measures) are listed, nor are any quantitative performance results reported. Therefore, such a table cannot be constructed from the provided text.

2. Sample Size for the Test Set and Data Provenance:

The document mentions "laboratory settings" for performance studies. However, it does not specify the sample size used for any test set or the provenance of the data (e.g., country of origin, retrospective or prospective).

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth and Their Qualifications:

The document describes a software system that processes glucose meter data. In this context, "ground truth" would likely refer to the accuracy of the glucose meter readings themselves or the correct interpretation of data for display and reporting. The text does not mention the use of any human experts to establish ground truth for the test set, nor does it detail their qualifications.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set:

Given that there's no mention of experts establishing ground truth, there is no information provided on any adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1, none) for a test set.

5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study:

The BroadMaster HealthCare System is a data management and analysis software for glucose readings. It is not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool that would typically involve human readers interpreting images or complex data with and without AI assistance. Therefore, it is highly unlikely that an MRMC comparative effectiveness study was done, and the document does not report any such study or effect size related to human reader improvement with AI assistance.

6. Standalone Performance Study:

The document states, "The performance of the BroadMaster HealthCare System Software was studied in the laboratory settings." This implies a standalone study of the algorithm's performance in processing and presenting data. However, no specific performance metrics or outcomes of such a study are provided beyond the general statement that it "meets the performance requirements."

7. Type of Ground Truth Used:

For a system that handles glucose data, the "ground truth" would be the actual glucose readings from the connected meters, and the software's ability to accurately store, display, and report these values. The document does not explicitly state how this "ground truth" was established, but it implicitly relies on the accuracy of the legally marketed glucose meters it interfaces with. It is not expert consensus, pathology, or outcomes data in the usual sense.

8. Sample Size for the Training Set:

The document does not mention a training set sample size. This type of software, performing data storage, display, and basic trend analysis, is typically rule-based or uses standard data processing algorithms rather than machine learning that requires large training datasets.

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established:

As there's no mention of a training set, there's no information provided on how ground truth for a training set was established.

Summary of Missing Information:

The provided document offers a high-level overview of the BroadMaster HealthCare System and its intended use but lacks specific technical details regarding its performance studies, including:

• Quantitative acceptance criteria.
• Actual performance results against these criteria.
• Sample sizes of test and training data.
• Methods for establishing ground truth or expert involvement.
• Details on study design (e.g., retrospective/prospective).
• Any mention of AI, MRMC studies, or specific standalone performance metrics beyond a general statement of compliance.

Ask a specific question about this device