Search Results

BIOFREE INHIBITS AND CONTROLS THE GROWTH OF BACTERIA, BIOFILM, ENDOTOXINS, FUNGUS, AND ALGAE PROVIDING ANTIMICROBIAL SURFACE IS REGENERATED WITH THE CONTINUOUS USE OF A STERISIL WATER PRE-TREATMENT PRODUCT. BIOFREE IS INTENDED TO BE USED WITH DISTILLED, DEIONIZED, OR REVERSE OSMOSIS WATER. EFFICACY FOR TAP WATER HAS NOT BEEN DETERMINED. THIS PRODUCT IS NOT INTENDED TO PROVIDE STERILE WATER.

BIO-FREE TUBING AND BOTTLE FOR DENTAL OPERATIVE UNIT

This document, an FDA 510(k) clearance letter for the "Bio-Free Tubing and Bottle for Dental Operative Unit," primarily focuses on regulatory approval based on "substantial equivalence" to a predicate device. It does not contain information about acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets specific performance metrics in the way clinical or AI/software validation studies would.

Therefore, I cannot extract the requested information (acceptance criteria table, study sample sizes, expert qualifications, adjudication methods, MRMC study details, standalone performance, ground truth types, or training set details) from the provided text for the following reasons:

• Type of Device: The device is hardware (tubing and bottle). The document pertains to its substantial equivalence for use in dental operative units, indicating it's a physical product, not a software algorithm or AI.
• Nature of the Document: This is an FDA clearance letter based on a 510(k) submission. A 510(k) submission primarily demonstrates that a new device is "substantially equivalent" to a legally marketed predicate device. This process typically involves comparing design, materials, indications for use, and performance characteristics (if any are relevant and different from the predicate) rather than conducting extensive new clinical performance studies with acceptance criteria in the manner you're asking about for AI/software.
• Missing Information: The document explicitly states the device "inhibits and controls the growth of bacteria, biofilm, endotoxins, fungus, and algae," and that "efficacy for tap water has not been determined," but it does not provide any data or study details (like sample sizes, expert involvement, or statistical results) to back these claims or to define acceptance criteria for these claims.

The closest thing to "performance" mentioned is the antimicrobial function. However, the document does not describe a study to prove this performance, nor does it list specific acceptance criteria for "controlling growth." It mostly mentions the intended function and limitations (e.g., efficacy not determined for tap water).

In summary, the provided FDA 510(k) clearance letter does not contain the detailed study and acceptance criteria information you are seeking, as its purpose is regulatory clearance based on substantial equivalence, not a detailed technical performance report.

Ask a specific question about this device