Search Results
Found 1 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(183 days)
BC-5D Hematology Control
BC-5D is an assayed whole blood control designed for Mindray BC-5390 (Mindray 5000 series) Auto Hematology Analyzer for the following parameters: WBC, Neu#, Lym#, Mon#, Eos#, Bas#, Neu%, Lym%, Mon%, Eos%, Bas%, RBC, HGB, HCT, MCV, MCH, MCHC, RDW-CV, RDW-SD. PLT. and MPV.
The BC-5D Hematology Control consists of three levels of controls (Low, Normal, and High). It is recommended to perform quality control check using these controls established by the laboratory procedures and/or local/national regulations.
BC-5D Hematology Control is an in vitro diagnostic reagent composed of human erythrocytes, simulated leukocytes, and mammalian platelets in a plasma-like fluid with preservatives. This control is contains stabilized materials that provide a means of monitoring the performance of hematology blood cell counters. It is sampled in the same manner as a patient specimen.
Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and study information for the BC-5D Hematology Controls, based on the provided text, while noting limitations due to the document's nature as an FDA 510(k) summary, which often doesn't contain detailed study protocols:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The provided 510(k) summary states, "The BC-5D Hematology Control met the acceptance criteria, as determined during verification, over the life of the product." However, it does not explicitly list the quantitative acceptance criteria for each parameter (WBC, Neu#, Lym#, etc.) nor does it provide a table of the reported device performance values against those criteria. It only indicates that the device met the criteria.
Without the specific numerical ranges for acceptance criteria and the actual performance data, a table like the one requested cannot be constructed from the given text. The relevant section notes that an "assay range" was determined for each parameter, and subsequent validation lots "met the acceptance criteria." This implies that the acceptance criteria revolved around the ability of the control to consistently fall within these established assay ranges.
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
- Sample Size (Test Set): The study involved testing "3 validation lots" of BC-5D Hematology Controls. The document does not specify the number of individual control samples tested within each lot or the number of measurements taken for each parameter.
- Data Provenance: Not explicitly stated, but as a commercial product seeking FDA clearance in the U.S., it's implied that the testing was conducted in a laboratory setting. The data is prospective in the sense that these validation lots were manufactured and tested specifically for the 510(k) submission. No information is given about the country of origin of the data beyond the applicant being R&D Systems, Inc. in Minneapolis, MN, USA.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Experts
This information is not applicable and therefore not provided in the document because:
- The device is a hematology quality control (QC) mixture, not a diagnostic device that relies on expert human interpretation of results (like an imaging device or a histological slide).
- The "ground truth" for a QC material is its assayed value, typically established by the manufacturer through rigorous testing using a reference method or consensus methods, not by "experts" in the sense of clinicians or radiologists interpreting results.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
This is not applicable and therefore not provided for the same reasons as point 3. Adjudication methods (like 2+1, 3+1) are used to resolve discrepancies in human expert interpretations, which is not relevant for a quality control material where performance is assessed against pre-defined numerical ranges.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done
No, an MRMC comparative effectiveness study was not done.
- This type of study is relevant for diagnostic devices where human readers (e.g., radiologists, pathologists) interpret data, and the effect of AI assistance on their performance is evaluated.
- The BC-5D Hematology Control is a quality control material for an automated hematology analyzer. It does not involve human interpretation or AI assistance in the diagnostic process itself. Its purpose is to monitor the performance of the analyzer.
6. If a Standalone (Algorithm Only Without Human-in-the-Loop Performance) Was Done
This question is not directly applicable in the context of this device.
- The BC-5D is a control material, not an algorithm. Its "performance" is its ability to produce consistent and accurate results within its specified assay range when run on the Mindray BC-5390 Hematology Analyzer.
- The analyzer itself (Mindray BC-5390) performs in a "standalone" fashion (algorithm-only processing of samples). The control is used to verify that this standalone analyzer is functioning correctly.
- The study did evaluate the performance of the control material (i.e., its own characteristics like stability and assayed values) without human intervention in the result generation, but this isn't the typical "standalone algorithm performance" evaluation for a diagnostic AI device.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
The "ground truth" (or reference standard) for a hematology quality control material is its assayed value for each parameter. These values are established by the manufacturer through a combination of:
- Reference methods: Using highly accurate and precise analytical methods.
- Consensus values: Often by analyzing the control material on multiple instruments or by comparing with primary reference standards.
- The document implies that an "assay range" for each parameter was determined during the "manufacture and analysis of three verification lots." This "assay range" essentially defines the expected "ground truth" for the control material when it is functioning correctly.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
This information is not applicable and therefore not provided.
- "Training set" refers to data used to train a machine learning algorithm.
- The BC-5D Hematology Control is a physical control material, not a machine learning algorithm. Therefore, there is no "training set" in this context.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
This information is not applicable and therefore not provided for the same reasons as point 8.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1