Search Results

Bard Modified Extra Large Composix Kugel Hernia Patch is indicated for use in the reconstruction of soft tissue deficiencies, such as for the repair of hernias and chest wall defects.

The modified XL Composix Kugel Mesh is a self-expanding, two-layered mesh with two extruded monofilament PET polymer "rings". The mesh is constructed of knitted polypropylene monofilament approximately 0.006" in diameter. The mesh is knitted to form a strong, porous, support material. The knit structure of the polypropylene mesh is identical to that of the predicate Composix Kugel Mesh product and allows for repair of the defect. The monofilament PET polymer "rings" add stability to the device enabling greater simplicity and assurance in the proper placement of the patch.

The provided text describes a 510(k) premarket notification for a medical device, the "Modified XL Composix Kugel Mesh." It is a submission to the FDA seeking to demonstrate substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This type of submission focuses on comparing a new device to an existing one, rather than presenting a detailed study proving the new device's performance against specific acceptance criteria in a clinical setting.

Therefore, many of the requested details about acceptance criteria, clinical study specifics, and ground truth establishment are not present in this document because they are generally not required for a 510(k) submission that relies on equivalence to a predicate device.

Here's an attempt to answer the questions based only on the provided text, noting where information is absent:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance:

   Acceptance Criteria	Reported Device Performance
   N/A	N/A

   Explanation: The document does not explicitly state acceptance criteria or provide a table of device performance against such criteria. The submission is based on demonstrating "substantial equivalence" to a predicate device, not on meeting predefined performance metrics through a clinical study.

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective):

   • Sample Size for Test Set: Not applicable. No test set for a clinical study is described.
   • Data Provenance: Not applicable. The "Performance Data" section mentions "Bench testing," which is typically laboratory-based and doesn't involve patient data from specific countries or study designs (retrospective/prospective).

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience):

   • Number of Experts: Not applicable. No clinical test set requiring expert ground truth establishment is described.
   • Qualifications of Experts: Not applicable.

4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set:

   • Adjudication Method: Not applicable. No clinical test set requiring adjudication is described.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:

   • MRMC Study: No. This document describes a medical mesh device, not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool. Therefore, an MRMC study with human readers and AI assistance is not relevant or mentioned.
   • Effect Size: Not applicable.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:

   • Standalone Performance Study: Not applicable. This is a medical device (mesh), not a software algorithm.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert concensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc):

   • Type of Ground Truth: Not applicable for a clinical study. For bench testing, the "ground truth" would be engineering specifications and validated measurement methods to assess the device's physical properties.

8. The sample size for the training set:

   • Sample Size for Training Set: Not applicable. This is not a machine learning or AI device that would require training data.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established:

   • Ground Truth Establishment for Training Set: Not applicable.

Ask a specific question about this device