Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K063210
    Date Cleared
    2007-03-15

    (143 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    870.1330
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    ATTAIN HYBRID GUIDE WIRES, MODEL GWR419378, GWR419388, GWR419478, GWR419488

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Attain Hybrid guide wire is intended to aid in the placement of Medtronic transvenous left ventricular leads in the coronary vasculature.

    Device Description

    The Attain Hybrid Guide Wire is a single use guide wire designed to aid in the placement of Medtronic transvenous left ventricular leads in the coronary vasculature. The guide wires consist of a core wire with springs, and coatings. Near the distal end of the device, the core wire consists of tapers to allow differing support or stiffness levels.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text is a 510(k) summary for the Medtronic Attain Hybrid Guide Wires. It lacks the specific details about acceptance criteria and study data that would allow a comprehensive response to your request. The document focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices rather than providing detailed performance metrics from a specific study against acceptance criteria.

    However, I can extract and infer some information based on the typical content of such submissions:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:

    This information is not present in the provided text. The document states: "Device verification testing was performed to demonstrate the Attain Hybrid Guide Wires meet established performance criteria and to support equivalency to the referenced predicate devices. Visual, performance and compatibility testing was completed. All design and compatibility requirements were met." This indicates that performance criteria were established and met, but the specific criteria (e.g., tensile strength, kink resistance, pushability, torqueability, coating durability) and the quantitative results are not detailed.

    Acceptance CriteriaReported Device Performance
    Not specified in documentNot specified in document, but generally stated as "All design and compatibility requirements were met."

    2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance:

    This information is not present in the provided text. The document refers to "Device verification testing," but does not mention the sample size for this testing or the provenance of the data.

    3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications:

    This information is not applicable and not present in the provided text. The device is a physical medical device (guide wire), not an AI or diagnostic imaging system that requires expert interpretation to establish ground truth for a test set. Design verification and validation for such devices typically involve engineering tests, not expert consensus on medical images or diagnoses.

    4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set:

    This information is not applicable and not present in the provided text for the same reasons as point 3.

    5. If a Multi Reader Multi Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done, and Effect Size:

    This information is not applicable and not present in the provided text. This type of study is relevant for AI-powered diagnostic tools or systems where human readers interpret results. The Attain Hybrid Guide Wire is a physical medical device.

    6. If a Standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done:

    This information is not applicable and not present in the provided text. This concept applies to AI algorithms.

    7. The Type of Ground Truth Used:

    For a physical device like a guide wire, "ground truth" typically refers to engineering specifications and performance standards rather than medical diagnoses or outcomes data in the way it's used for AI or diagnostic devices. The text mentions "established performance criteria" and "design and compatibility requirements," which would serve as the "ground truth" for the device's functional performance. There is also a mention of "Biocompatibility testing consistent with ISO 10993-1: 2003," which indicates a specific set of accepted standards for biological safety.

    8. The Sample Size for the Training Set:

    This information is not applicable and not present in the provided text. The concept of a "training set" is relevant for machine learning/AI models.

    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established:

    This information is not applicable and not present in the provided text for the same reasons as point 8.

    In summary:

    The provided document is a 510(k) summary for a physical medical device, not an AI or diagnostic imaging system. Therefore, many of the questions related to AI-specific testing methodologies (like "training set," "ground truth experts," "MRMC studies") are not applicable. The document confirms that "Device verification testing was performed to demonstrate the Attain Hybrid Guide Wires meet established performance criteria" and that "All design and compatibility requirements were met," indicating successful completion of the necessary testing, but it does not delve into the quantitative specifics of those tests or the exact acceptance criteria.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1