Search Results

The Ammonia/Iron Standard Kit is a device intended for medical purposes for use in a test system to establish points of reference that are used in the determination of values in the measurement of substances in human specimens.

Not Found

The provided document is a 510(k) clearance letter from the FDA for an "Iron Standard Kit" (later referred to as "Ammonia/Iron Standard Kit"). This type of document does not contain the detailed study information required to answer your questions about device performance, acceptance criteria, ground truth establishment, sample sizes, or expert qualifications.

The letter explicitly states: "We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent...". This means the device was cleared based on its equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, not necessarily on a full clinical trial demonstrating novel performance against defined acceptance criteria.

Therefore, I cannot extract the following information from the provided text:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance: This information is typically found in the 510(k) submission itself, not in the clearance letter.
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance: Not present.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: Not present.
4. Adjudication method for the test set: Not present.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance: This device is an "Iron Standard Kit," which is a calibration or reference material, not an AI-powered diagnostic or imaging device. Therefore, an MRMC study is not relevant.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done: Not relevant for this type of device.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.): Not present for performance assessment in the context you're asking. For a standard, its "ground truth" would relate to its certified concentration or purity, which would be established by analytical methods, not expert consensus or pathology on human specimens.
8. The sample size for the training set: Not relevant for a standard kit.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not relevant for a standard kit.

The letter's key information is that the device (Iron Standard Kit) is "intended for medical purposes for use in a test system to establish points of reference that are used in the determination of values in the measurement of substances in human specimens." Its clearance is based on substantial equivalence, implying it functions similarly to existing, cleared iron standard kits.

Ask a specific question about this device