Search Results

The ACE Calibrator is a device intended to be used with the Sentinel ACE Liquid Reagent for the preparation of the calibration curve for the kinetic determination of angiotensing enzyme (ACE) assay in human serum or plasma. The product is for in vitro diagnostic use only.

The ACE Calibrator is a single level, single analyte serum based calibrator. It consists of a lyophilized preparation of human serum containing angiotensin converting enzyme (porcine source), in a buffered human serum base with added preservatives and stabilizers. The kit consists of six vials, containing 1 mL per vial. Once reconstituted, the calibrator is stable for 7 days when stored capped at 2-8°C.

Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets them, based on the provided text:

Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

2. Sample Size and Data Provenance for Test Set

• Sample Size for Value Assignment: For the primary value assignment, five replicates of pooled ACE calibrator were analyzed on each run across two Abbott Architect analyzers over two days, resulting in a total of 20 replicates.
• Sample Size for Shelf-life Stability: Two distinct batches of ACE Calibrator were used.
  • Batch #1: Data collected over 46 months.
  • Batch #2: Data collected over 38 months.
• Sample Size for Reconstituted Stability: Three vials of ACE Calibrator were reconstituted and pooled. Testing occurred at Day 0 (fresh), Day 2, Day 7, and Day 8. The calibrator and controls were run in triplicate for each test point.
• Data Provenance: The document does not explicitly state the country of origin for the data; however, the submitter is from Milano, Italy. The value assignment utilized proficiency survey material from the College of American Pathologists (CAP) ACE program and WEQAS (Wales External Quality Assurance Scheme), suggesting international reference materials were incorporated. All studies mentioned are prospective in nature, as they involve testing the device under controlled conditions to determine its performance and stability.

3. Number of Experts and Qualifications for Ground Truth

• The document does not mention a specific number of experts or their qualifications for establishing ground truth for the test set.
• For the value assignment (a form of ground truth establishment for the calibrator's value), it mentions using proficiency survey material from CAP ACE program and WEQAS. While these programs rely on expert consensus or established methodologies, the document doesn't detail the number or qualifications of experts involved in those programs.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

• The document does not describe an adjudication method (like 2+1 or 3+1) for the test set. The performance testing relies on quantitative measurements and comparisons against predefined criteria rather than subjective expert review.

5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study

• No, an MRMC comparative effectiveness study was not done. This device is a calibrator, not an imaging or diagnostic device that typically involves human reader interpretation. Therefore, a study comparing human readers with and without AI assistance is not applicable.

6. Standalone (Algorithm Only) Performance Study

• Yes, the studies reported are essentially standalone performance studies for the calibrator. The device is a calibrator, and its performance is assessed intrinsically (e.g., its ability to maintain its assigned value over time, its stability when reconstituted) on analytical instruments (e.g., Abbott Architect analyzers, Cobas Mira) against established reference materials or its initial performance. There is no "human-in-the-loop" aspect to its performance as a calibrator.

7. Type of Ground Truth Used

• For Value Assignment: The ground truth for the calibrator's assigned value was established by targeting traceability to the Trinity Biotech ACE reagent system a market leader, and using proficiency survey material from CAP ACE program and WEQAS. This leans towards a form of expert consensus/reference method through established external quality assurance programs and a highly regarded commercial product.
• For Stability Studies: The ground truth for stability was the initial performance/recovery value of the calibrator at the time of manufacture. Subsequent measurements were compared against this baseline.

8. Sample Size for the Training Set

• The document does not mention a training set in the context of machine learning or AI. This device is a calibrator, and its development and validation do not involve AI model training.

9. How Ground Truth for Training Set Was Established

• Not applicable, as there is no mention of a training set for an AI model.

Ask a specific question about this device