Search Results

The USFilter MedRO - SPD is a single/acute care patient reverse osmosis unit intended to supply water that is used for hemodialysis treatments. The water produced will meet the minimum water quality requirements as specified by ANSI/AAMI American National Standard for Water Treatment Equipment for Hemodialysis Applications (RD5:1992 and RD62:2001) and the CSA Water Treatment Equipment and Water Quality Requirements for Hemodialysis (CSA-Z364.2.2-03) when used as directed. Dependent on feed water quality this unit may be used in conjunction with other approved water treatment components.

MedRO™-SPD is a reverse osmosis unit used to purify water in hemodialysis applications.

The provided document describes the MedRO™-SPD, a water purification unit for hemodialysis, and its performance testing. However, it does not include information about a study proving the device meets acceptance criteria in the context of a medical AI device, as implied by the structure of the requested output.

Specifically, the document pertains to hardware validation and water quality testing of a physical device, not an AI algorithm. Therefore, many of the requested fields are not applicable.

Here's an analysis based on the provided text, highlighting the differences:

The document describes performance testing for a physical medical device (a reverse osmosis unit), not an AI algorithm. Thus, questions related to AI-specific terms like "test set," "training set," "ground truth experts," "MRMC study," and "standalone AI performance" are not applicable.

Here's an attempt to answer the questions based on the provided content, acknowledging the difference in device type:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance

• Sample Size: For water quality testing (chemical, bacteria, endotoxin), "Two samples were drawn for the water testing to assure reproducibility of these results." Other tests (IQ, OQ, FAT) involved functional testing of the single unit.
• Data Provenance: The testing was conducted on the MedRO™-SPD unit itself, installed to a potable water source. This is a prospective, in-house validation of the manufactured device.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts

• This question is not applicable as the "ground truth" here refers to objective measurements against established engineering specifications and AAMI water quality standards, not expert interpretations of medical images or data. The "experts" would be the engineers performing the validation and laboratory technicians analyzing water samples according to standard protocols.

4. Adjudication method for the test set

• Not applicable in the context of a physical device validation. Results were determined by direct measurement against pass/fail criteria (e.g., AAMI standards, functional test outcomes).

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

• Not applicable. This is for a physical water purification device, not an AI system.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

• Not applicable. This is for a physical water purification device, not an AI algorithm.

7. The type of ground truth used

• The "ground truth" was based on:
  • Engineering Design Specifications: For Installation Qualification (IQ), Operational Qualification (OQ), and Failure Analysis Test (FAT).
  • ANSI/AAMI American National Standard for Water Treatment Equipment for Hemodialysis Applications (RD5:1992 and RD62:2001): For chemical contaminants, bacteria, and endotoxin levels in the product water.

8. The sample size for the training set

• Not applicable. This is for a physical water purification device, not an AI system. There is no "training set" in the AI sense. The device's design and manufacturing are based on established engineering principles and prior experience (e.g., the predicate device MedRO™ Reverse Osmosis System).

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

• Not applicable. As noted above, there is no AI training set. The "ground truth" for the device's design and operation comes from engineering best practices, regulatory requirements, and industry standards like AAMI.

Ask a specific question about this device

The USFilter/lonpure Med-RO™ Reverse Osmosis System is intended to supply water for use in the preparation of dialysate for hemodialysis patients and for other hemodialysis-related procedures such as cleaning, rinsing of equipment, and reprocessing of dialyzers. The water produced will meet the minimum water quality requirements as specified by ANSI/AAMI American National Standard for Water Treatment Equipment for Hemodialysis Applications RD 62:2001[RD-5: 1992 if Treatment Equipment for Temodiarysle Applications RD & LES T.(RE ST 1000 in conjunction with other components of a water treatment system as necessary with compatible input and output water requirements.

The Med-RO™ Reverse Osmosis System is a machine used to purify water.

The provided text describes a 510(k) submission for a medical device called the "Med-RO™ Reverse Osmosis System." This submission focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device rather than presenting a detailed clinical study with acceptance criteria and performance metrics in the way one might find for a diagnostic or therapeutic device.

Here's an analysis of the provided text in relation to your request:

Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

The concept of "acceptance criteria" and "reported device performance" as typically seen in clinical trials for diagnostic algorithms is not explicitly present in this document. The submission is for a water purification system used in hemodialysis. For such devices, acceptance criteria would likely relate to specific water quality parameters (e.g., conductivity, levels of specific contaminants) and performance would be measured against those parameters.

The closest the document comes to this is in the "Indications For Use" section, which states: "The water produced will meet the minimum water quality requirements as specified by ANSI/AAMI American National Standard for Water Treatment Equipment for Hemodialysis Applications RD 62:2001 [RD-5: 1992 if Treatment Equipment for Temodiarysle Applications RD & LES T.(RE ST 1000 in conjunction with other components of a water treatment system as necessary with compatible input and output water requirements."

Therefore, the acceptance criteria for this device are implicitly tied to the ANSI/AAMI standards for water quality in hemodialysis. The document does not report specific measurements of water quality from the Med-RO™ system in a table format. It states that non-clinical tests were performed and that "Based on the testing performed as well as the information provided, there are no changes in the performance, safety or effectiveness of the modified device." This implies that the device meets the functional requirements for water purification, and thus, by extension, the ANSI/AAMI standards, but no concrete data is presented here.

Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:

Study Information as per Request:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
   (See table above. Specific numerical data is not provided in the document.)

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

   • N/A. The document explicitly states "Discussion of Clinical Test Performed: N/A." This indicates that no clinical test set was used for evaluating the device's performance in humans. The testing mentioned is "non-clinical." The submission is based on engineering design and performance verification, demonstrating that the modified device performs equivalently to the predicate device.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)

   • N/A. There was no clinical test set, and therefore no ground truth established by medical experts in this context. The "ground truth" for a water purification system would be the objective measurement of water quality against established engineering and medical standards (like ANSI/AAMI), not expert consensus on medical images or diagnoses.

4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

   • N/A. No clinical test set.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

   • N/A. This device is a water purification system, not an AI-assisted diagnostic or therapeutic tool for human readers.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

   • N/A. This is not an algorithm. The "standalone" performance here would refer to the Med-RO™ system's ability to purify water independently. The submission indicates non-clinical testing was done to verify this, but details of those tests are not provided in this summary.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)

   • The "ground truth" for this device's performance would be the direct measurement of water quality parameters (e.g., conductivity, total dissolved solids, specific ion concentrations, microbiological counts) against the specifications set by the ANSI/AAMI American National Standard for Water Treatment Equipment for Hemodialysis Applications RD 62:2001 (or RD-5:1992).

8. The sample size for the training set

   • N/A. This is not an AI/ML device that requires a training set.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

   • N/A. Not an AI/ML device.

Summary of the Study (as described in the document):

The submission describes a non-clinical study (or more accurately, a comparison based on non-clinical testing and engineering assessment) to demonstrate substantial equivalence of the Med-RO™ Reverse Osmosis System to a previously cleared predicate device (USFitter/lonpure, Inc. M-Series Reverse Osmosis Water Purification System).

The primary "study" performed was an engineering assessment and non-clinical testing to ensure that modifications to the device "will not negatively affect performance, safety, or effectiveness." The core argument for substantial equivalence is that the new device "contains the same fundamental scientific technology as the predicated device."

The study did not involve human subjects or clinical data in the manner often seen for diagnostic or therapeutic devices. Its "acceptance criteria" are implied to be adherence to the performance and safety characteristics of the predicate device and the relevant ANSI/AAMI water quality standards for hemodialysis. The document explicitly states "Discussion of Clinical Test Performed: N/A."

Ask a specific question about this device

The USFitter water punfication systems discussed in this premarket notification are intended for use in hemodialysis applications. The water purification systems are used to remove organic and inorganic substances and microbial contaminants from the subcent can be dilute dialysis concentrate to form water used to cince broyous began for other Gialysate, and rinse and disinfection.

Water Purification System

The provided documents are a 510(k) clearance letter and an "Indications For Use" statement for a medical device. This type of document from the FDA relates to the regulatory approval process for medical devices and does not contain information about acceptance criteria or a study proving that a device meets those criteria.

The 510(k) clearance process determines "substantial equivalence" to a predicate device, which is a regulatory standard, not a performance standard based on a clinical or performance study with acceptance criteria in the way you've described.

Therefore, I cannot extract the requested information (acceptance criteria, device performance, study details, sample sizes, expert qualifications, ground truth, MRMC study, standalone performance) from the provided text because it is not present in these documents.

Ask a specific question about this device