Search Results
Found 2 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(88 days)
THOMAS MEDICAL, INC.
To be used for soft tissue cutting of the uterine cervix and coagulation, intraepithelial neoplasia, condylomata acuminata, and miscellaneous lesions; polyps, molluscum contagiosum, nevi, seborrheic keratosis, achricordon, etc.
Not Found
This document is a 510(k) premarket notification letter from the FDA regarding the Thomas Medical Electrodes. It is a regulatory document and does not contain the kind of information requested in the prompt (acceptance criteria, study details, sample sizes, ground truth information, etc.) because these types of studies are not typically required for a 510(k) clearance, which primarily focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device.
Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information based on the given text. The prompt asks for details about a study that proves the device meets acceptance criteria, but this document only states that the device is substantially equivalent to a predicate device and can proceed to market.
Ask a specific question about this device
(88 days)
THOMAS MEDICAL, INC.
To be used during hysterosonography, hysterosalpingogram, salpingoplasties, and hydrotubation.
Not Found
The provided text is an FDA 510(k) clearance letter for a device named "Uterine Injector." It announces that the device has been found substantially equivalent to a legally marketed predicate device.
However, this document does not contain any information regarding acceptance criteria, study details, device performance metrics, sample sizes, ground truth establishment, or expert qualifications.
The letter is primarily focused on regulatory clearance and does not include the technical details of the device's validation or clinical performance studies. Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request for:
- A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
- Sample sizes used for the test set and data provenance
- Number of experts and their qualifications
- Adjudication method
- MRMC comparative effectiveness study details
- Standalone performance details
- Type of ground truth used
- Sample size for the training set
- How ground truth for the training set was established
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1