Search Results

The Chlorine Sentinel II is intended for use by hemodialysis professionals as a secondary chlorine device to provide continuous monitoring of Combined Chlorine. It is not intended to replace the primary method of monitoring chlorine as part of the hemodialysis water treatment system. It functions completely independent of the water treatment system does not come into direct contact with feed water used to prepare dialysate.

Chlorine Sentinel II is a complete system that attaches to the drain of a hemodialysis water treatment system sample port. It detects dissolved combined chlorine in concentrations at or above 10 PPB by primary detection technology. It self-monitors for maintenance-required conditions and loss of electrical power.

The Chlorine Sentinel II is self-testing. It uses chlorinated city water to automatically test the chlorine detecting functionality of the device once a day and records if the test passed, failed to detect chlorine, or didn't rinse out after detecting chlorine.

The device is designed to use as little water as possible. The sampling water is only used for the length of time that it takes for the chlorine test to be completed. The customer determines how frequently the test needs to be taken from every 5 minutes to every 20 minutes. The user also sets the start time and end time for each day of the week.

The Chlorine Sentinel II has two combined chlorine concentration set points. The user can set a warning set-point at a value of 0.01 PPM to 0.09 PPM. Once the chlorine concentration exceeds this value, the device will alarm at 2-HZ to warn the user of chlorine present at that set-point. The second set-point is factory set at 0.10 PPM.

A chlorine concentration equal to or above the 0.10 PPM set-point will activate the buzzers and the red chlorine alarm indicators at 5 HZ for as long as the condition exists. The buzzers can only be muted for 3 minutes (then automatically reset) for as long as the condition exists. The alarms can be by-passed. When by-passed the pulsing lights will turn solid and the buzzer will double click over 15 minutes.

The front cover of the device has two screens. The screen of the chlorine monitor indicates the presence of combined chlorine when the value is not 0.000. The touch screen is used to enter user data and show the statuses of the device.

This FDA 510(k) clearance letter for the Chlorine Sentinel II provides limited specific details on acceptance criteria and study methodologies, particularly concerning clinical performance. The focus is on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device through technological comparison and bench testing.

Here's an analysis based on the provided document:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

The document does not explicitly state numerical acceptance criteria for clinical performance that can be directly compared to reported device performance metrics like sensitivity, specificity, or accuracy. Instead, the substantial equivalence is drawn based on similar intended use, technological characteristics, and performance verified through bench testing.

Based on the "Detailed Comparison of the Subject and Predicate Devices" (Page 8-10) and "Testing" (Page 14), here's a synthesis of what can be inferred about performance:

Note: The document primarily focuses on technological equivalence and adherence to safety/testing standards rather than presenting quantitative performance metrics against specific clinical acceptance criteria for sensitivity, specificity, or accuracy in a diagnostic context. This device is a water purification system component, not a diagnostic tool.

2. Sample Size for Test Set and Data Provenance

The document describes "Performance – Bench" testing but does not specify a "test set" in the context of clinical data, nor does it provide a sample size in terms of number of cases or data provenance (country, retrospective/prospective). The studies are bench-level evaluations of the device's technical specifications and linearity.

3. Number of Experts and Qualifications for Ground Truth

The document does not mention the use of experts to establish ground truth for a test set. The validation appears to be against established analytical standards (CLSI EP06-A, EP17-A2) for linearity and detection limits, and engineering standards for safety and electromagnetic compatibility.

4. Adjudication Method

As there is no mention of human expert review or a "test set" in a clinical sense, there is no adjudication method described.

5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study

No MRMC study was done, as this device is a water purification system component and not a diagnostic device involving human interpretation of medical images or data. Therefore, there is no effect size reported for human readers improving with AI assistance.

6. Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Study

The device operates standalone in its function of monitoring chlorine. The "Performance – Bench" testing described would fall under a standalone performance evaluation, but not in the sense of a medical AI algorithm. It's a measurement device whose performance is assessed against technical specifications and analytical standards.

7. Type of Ground Truth Used

The ground truth used for performance validation appears to be:

• Analytical Standards: CLSI standard EP06-A for linearity and CLSI standard EP17-A2 for limit of blank, limit of quantitation, and limit of detection.
• Functional Specifications: The device's ability to detect chlorine at specified concentrations (e.g., 0.10 PPM alarm, 0.01 PPM warning) and perform self-tests.
• Engineering Standards: IEC 61010-1 for electrical safety and IEC 60601-1-2:2020 for electromagnetic compatibility.

This is not "expert consensus, pathology, or outcomes data" as typically seen in diagnostic device clearances.

8. Sample Size for the Training Set

The document does not mention a "training set" as it would be understood for machine learning or AI algorithms. The device's operation is based on a polarographic sensor and PLC control, not a learned model from a dataset.

9. How Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

Not applicable, as there is no training set in the context of machine learning or AI for this device.

Ask a specific question about this device

The Nelson Sentinel Series Basic Chlorine Sentinel is an instrument that is intended for use by hemodialysis professionals as an auxiliary device to provide continuous monitoring of Total chloramines plus ammoniated free chlorine) concentration. It is not intended to replace the primary method for monitoring total chlorine as part of the hemodialysis water treatment system. It functions completely independent of the water treatment system and does not come into direct contact with feed water used to prepare dialysate.

The Nelson Sentinel Series Basic Chlorine Sentinel is a complete system that attaches to the drain of a hemodialysis water treatment system sample port. The Basic Chlorine Sentinel detects dissolved chlorine by an auxiliary meter detection technology, self-monitors for maintenance-required conditions, loss of electrical power, as well as two other system conditions such as flooding and the status of RO shutdown alarm. The device chlorine monitoring probe is preferably placed after the second carbon filter, before the RO machine or at the beginning of the patient water treatment loop.

The device has three components - a lockable master control enclosure, a lockable probe/tester enclosure, and the remote module installed in the patient area.

A chlorine concentration equal to or above the set-point (default: 0.10mg/L) will activate the buzzers and the red CHLORINE alarm indicators for as long as the condition exists. The buzzers can only be muted for 3 minutes (then automatically reset) for as long as the condition exists. The yellow AUTO-TEST OK/CL DETECTED indication will latch. The AUTO-TEST/CL DETECTED indication can be deactivated after the event by pressing the blue RESET PUSHBUTTON on the front cover of the controller.

A probe failure or the activation of one of the auxiliary input relays will activate the yellow MAINTENANCE needed indicators as well as the Buzzers which will remain activated as long as the condition exists. However, the buzzers can be muted by the key mute switch while the maintenance issue is being resolved.

The provided document is a 510(k) summary for the Nelson Sentinel Series Basic Chlorine Sentinel, a device intended for continuous monitoring of total chlorine in water purification systems for hemodialysis.

However, the document does not contain the level of detail requested for acceptance criteria and the study proving the device meets these criteria in the context of an AI/ML-based medical device performance study. This document describes a hardware device for chemical measurement and its equivalence to predicate devices, not an AI/ML algorithm.

Therefore, many of the specific questions about AI/ML study design, such as sample size for test/training sets, data provenance, expert ground truth, adjudication, MRMC studies, and standalone algorithm performance, cannot be answered from the provided text.

Here's an attempt to extract what is available regarding acceptance criteria and performance, reinterpreting some points for a hardware device context where applicable, and explicitly stating where information is missing for an AI/ML context:

Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance (Based on the provided document for a hardware device)

The document primarily focuses on establishing "substantial equivalence" of the Nelson Sentinel Series Basic Chlorine Sentinel to predicate and reference devices, rather than defining explicit acceptance criteria in terms of metrics like sensitivity, specificity, or AUC as one would for an AI/ML diagnostic. The equivalence is shown through comparison of intended use, technological characteristics, and performance testing.

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

Since this is a hardware device for chemical detection and not an AI/ML algorithm, the "acceptance criteria" are implied by performance tests to demonstrate safety and effectiveness for its intended use and similarity to established devices. The "reported device performance" refers to the results of these bench tests demonstrating the device's operational range and accuracy within its specified function.

2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

• Sample Size for Test Set: Not explicitly stated in the document. The document mentions various "studies" (Linearity, Precision, LoB/LoQ/LoD, Method Comparison, Free Chlorine, 15 Weeks Calibration), but does not provide details on the number of samples or measurements used in these bench tests.
• Data Provenance: The studies were performed as "Bench Testing." The origin of the water samples or the specific laboratory where tests were conducted is not specified, but it would be laboratory-based testing relevant to water purification for hemodialysis. The document does not specify if the data was retrospective or prospective in the context of an AI/ML study, as it's not an AI/ML device.

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Their Qualifications

• This question is not applicable as the device is a chemical sensor, not an AI/ML device requiring expert interpretation for ground truth. Ground truth for chlorine concentration would be established by analytical chemistry methods (e.g., lab-grade spectrophotometry, titration).

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

• Not applicable for a chemical sensor device.

5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was Done

• Not applicable. This is a hardware device for chemical detection; MRMC studies are relevant for evaluating diagnostic image interpretation by humans, often with and without AI assistance.

6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was Done

• Not applicable as this is not an AI/ML algorithm. The "performance" refers to the device's ability to accurately measure chlorine and provide alerts.

7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

• For the performance testing mentioned (Linearity, Precision, etc.), the ground truth for chlorine concentration would have been established by accurate chemical analysis methods in a laboratory setting (e.g., using reference standards and validated analytical techniques). It is not expert consensus, pathology, or outcomes data.

8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

• Not applicable. This device is not an AI/ML algorithm that requires a training set.

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set was Established

• Not applicable. This device is not an AI/ML algorithm that requires a training set.

Summary of Document Relevance to AI/ML Device Analysis:

This document is a regulatory submission for a physical medical device (a chlorine monitor) demonstrating its substantial equivalence to pre-existing devices. It details the device's functional characteristics, intended use, and bench testing performed to ensure safety and effectiveness. It does not provide information related to the development, validation, or performance of an AI/ML algorithm, which would require a significantly different set of acceptance criteria and study designs focusing on model performance metrics, data sets, and human-AI interaction.

Ask a specific question about this device

Nelson Water Systems' Water Purification for Hemodialysis is intended to be used for purifying the water used in hemodialysis treatment. It removes organic, inorganic, and microbial contaminants from the water.

The water purification system is a complete system accepting the influent facility water and providing purified water meeting AAMI standards for hemodialysis use. It removes organic, inorganic, and microbial contaminants from the water. The heart of the system includes carbon filters along with a reverse osmosis (RO) unit and/or portable exchange (PE) mixed-bed (MB) deionization (DI) tanks along with appropriate alarms. This equipment removes the oxidants such as chlorine and chloramines and mineral salts (dissolved solids) from the water. The specific configuration of the equipment will depend upon the customer's water quality desires (specifications) beyond the minimum AAMI standards. Pretreatment is used before the RO unit to match the specific influent water quality to those needs of the RO unit and/or final water specifications. Pretreatment can include pressure boosting, sediment and colloidal material filtration, water softening, pH balancing and specific element or compound reduction such as iron. The system usually includes a storage tank that is conical-bottomed and sealed. It has an air-filtered vent, checked over-flow, level switches and sprayer. Repressurizing pump(s) are used to deliver the water to the hemodialysis system. Deionization is used either to polish the RO water or to remove total dissolved solids (TDS) from the influent water. The latter will occur either in emergency conditions when an RO is being used in the system and it is being by-passed or as an alternative to an RO unit. When PE MB DI tanks are used, two tanks are always used with resistivity indicators/alarms following each one. Then following the tanks are a resin trap, sub-micron filter(s), and optionally a shut-down valve and ultraviolet (UV) disinfection. The system is self-monitored and alarms are activated when operator attention is needed. Pressure gauges and sample ports are strategically placed throughout the system for system performance monitoring. A conductivity monitor/controller is placed in sight of the nurses' station. Its probe is located at the end of the watertreatment system. Alarms at site and/or remotely located near the nurses' station sound when an alarm condition exists with the RO unit, the water level in the tank drops to a pre-set level, the conductivity at the exit of the watertreatment system exceeds the pre-set level, and if PE MB DI tanks are used, the outlet resistivity falls below the pre-set limit.

Here's an analysis of the provided text, focusing on acceptance criteria and the study used to demonstrate compliance:

Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance Study

The Nelson Water Treatment System for Hemodialysis is designed to provide purified water meeting AAMI (Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation) standards for hemodialysis use.

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

The acceptance criteria for the device are the AAMI standards for water used in hemodialysis. The reported device performance is based on measurements taken from a system installation after 48 hours of residence time.

Note: For Mercury, the reported permeate (0.0002 mg/L) exactly matches the AAMI Standard (0.0002 mg/L), indicating it meets the standard.

2. Sample Size for the Test Set and Data Provenance

• Sample Size: The data presented appears to be from a single installation in Houston. The results are from measurements taken "after 48 hours of residence time in system." This implies a limited, possibly single, sample for each component at a specific time point.
• Data Provenance: The data is stated to be from "an installation in Houston meeting the design specifications of the proposed system." This suggests the data is retrospective measurements from an existing operational system. The country of origin is the USA.

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of those Experts

This information is not provided in the document. The ground truth (AAMI Standards) is a predefined regulatory standard, not established by experts for this specific testing.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

This information is not applicable/provided. The evaluation is against predetermined AAMI standards, not human interpretation requiring adjudication.

5. If a Multi Reader Multi Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done

No, a Multi Reader Multi Case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was not done. This type of study is relevant for evaluating the impact of AI on human reader performance, which is not pertinent to a water purification system's performance evaluation against chemical/physical standards.

6. If a Standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done

No, a standalone algorithm performance study was not done in the context of an AI algorithm. The device itself is a physical water purification system, and its performance is assessed directly by measuring the water produced.

7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

The ground truth used is established regulatory/industry standards (AAMI Standards) for water quality in hemodialysis.

8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

This information is not applicable/provided. This device is a physical system, not an AI model that requires a training set. The "design specifications" mentioned for the Houston installation would be based on engineering principles and AAMI standards, not a data training set.

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set was Established

This information is not applicable/provided, as there is no training set for this type of device. The design and performance targets are based on the AAMI Standards.

Ask a specific question about this device