Search Results
Found 7 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(228 days)
Blue Powdered Latex Examination Gloves, Non-sterile is a disposable medical device made from natural rubber latex compound. It is intended to be worn on the hands as barrier against potentially infectious materials and other contamination.
Latex Patient Examination Gloves, LYY, Powdered
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
TEST | REQUIREMENT | IN-HOUSE QUALITY PERFORMANCE |
---|---|---|
1. Water Leak Test (1000ml) | GII, AQL 2.5 | Pass GI, AQL 1.5 |
2. Length (mm) | ||
Size: XS | Min. 220 | Minimum 290 mm for all sizes |
S | Min. 230 | Minimum 290 mm for all sizes |
M | Min 230 | Minimum 290 mm for all sizes |
L | Min 230 | Minimum 290 mm for all sizes |
XL | - | Minimum 290 mm for all sizes |
3 Palm Width (mm) | ||
Size : XS | $70\pm10$ | 75-78 |
S | $80\pm10$ | 82-86 |
M | $90\pm10$ | 92-95 |
L | $100\pm10$ | 103-109 |
XL | - | 111-115 |
4. Thickness (mm) (Single layer) | ||
Finger | Min 0.08 | Min 0.10 |
Palm | Min 0.08 | Min 0.10 |
5. Physical Properties | ||
Before Ageing | ||
Tensile Strength (MPa) | Min. 14 | Min 18 |
Ultimate Elongation (%) | Min 700 | Min 700 |
After Ageing | ||
Tensile Strength (MPa) | Min.14 | Min. 14 |
Ultimate Elongation (%) | 500 | 500 |
6. Powder Content | ASTM 6124 | Below 10.0 mg/glove |
7. Protein Content | ASTM 5712 | Below 200 µg/dm² |
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g., country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)
The data provenance and sample size for the test set are not specified in the provided text.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g., radiologist with 10 years of experience)
Not applicable. The study is about the quality performance of examination gloves, not an AI diagnostic device requiring expert interpretation of medical images.
4. Adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set
Not applicable. The study is about the quality performance of examination gloves, not an AI diagnostic device requiring expert adjudication.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
Not applicable. This is not an AI diagnostic device.
6. If a standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
Not applicable. This is not an AI diagnostic device.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.)
The ground truth for the performance of the gloves is based on industry standards and regulatory requirements, specifically:
- ASTM D 3578-01 Standard
- FDA's pinhole requirement
- FDA's minimum powder residual content
- CMDR requirement
- CGSB requirement
- Label Claim of 200 µg/dm² or less of total water extractable protein content (based on ASTM 5712)
- Biocompatibility Test (Primary Dermal Irritation Study and Dermal Sensitization Study).
8. The sample size for the training set
Not applicable. The provided document concerns the physical and chemical properties of examination gloves, not an AI model that requires a training set.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
Not applicable. The provided document concerns the physical and chemical properties of examination gloves, not an AI model.
Ask a specific question about this device
(176 days)
Blue Powder Free Latex Examination Gloves, Non-Sterile is a disposable medical device made from natural rubber latex compound. It is intended to be worn on the hands as a barrier against potentially infectious materials and other contamination.
Latex Patient Examination Gloves, LYY, Powder Free
The provided text describes a 510(k) submission for Blue Powder Free Latex Examination Gloves, Non-Sterile. This submission focuses on medical gloves, which are physical products, not an AI/ML powered device. As such, the concept of "acceptance criteria" and "study" in the context of an AI/ML device's performance metrics (like accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, sample sizes for training/test sets, ground truth establishment, expert adjudication, MRMC studies, or standalone performance) is not applicable here.
The document primarily addresses the glove's compliance with established industry standards and FDA requirements for medical devices, specifically patient examination gloves.
Here's a breakdown of the relevant information provided, adapted to the context of a medical glove:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:
The document broadly states that the device "meets ASTM D 3578-01 Standard and FDA's requirement" for quality performance. It also states the device "pass the Biocompatibility Test." Specific numerical performance metrics (like AQL levels for pinholes) are not detailed in this excerpt but would be part of the underlying test reports.
Acceptance Criteria Category | Reported Device Performance |
---|---|
Quality Performance | Meets ASTM D 3578-01 Standard and FDA's requirement |
Biocompatibility | Pass the Biocompatibility Test (Primary Dermal Irritation Study And the Dermal Sensitization Study) |
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance:
- Test Set Sample Size: Not explicitly stated in the provided text for the quality performance or biocompatibility tests. These would typically be specified in the full test reports referenced by the 510(k) submission.
- Data Provenance: The manufacturing entity is MultiSafe Sdn. Bhd. located in Malaysia. The testing would have been conducted to meet US FDA requirements and international standards (ASTM D 3578, ISO 11193, EN 455). The origin of the raw data/samples tested would be from the manufacturing process in Malaysia.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:
This concept is not applicable for a medical glove submission. Ground truth for a physical medical device like a glove is established through adherence to standardized physical, chemical, and biological testing protocols, not expert consensus on interpretations.
4. Adjudication method for the test set:
This concept is not applicable for a medical glove submission. Adjudication is relevant for diagnostic interpretations, not for physical product testing against standardized specifications.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:
This concept is not applicable as this is a medical glove, not an AI-powered diagnostic device.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done:
This concept is not applicable as this is a medical glove, not an algorithm.
7. The type of ground truth used:
For a medical glove, the "ground truth" is defined by:
- Standardized Physical and Performance Specifications: E.g., ASTM D 3578-01 for dimensions, tensile strength, elongation, and barrier integrity (absence of pinholes at specified AQL levels).
- Biocompatibility Standards: Absence of irritation or sensitization as determined by standardized in-vivo (animal or human patch) tests.
- Chemical Properties: Compliance with limits for extractable proteins (for latex gloves) if applicable.
8. The sample size for the training set:
This concept is not applicable as this is a medical glove. There is no "training set" in the context of an AI/ML algorithm. The "training" for glove manufacturing would refer to process control and quality system implementation.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established:
This concept is not applicable as this is a medical glove.
Ask a specific question about this device
(71 days)
Ask a specific question about this device
(72 days)
Ask a specific question about this device
(62 days)
Ask a specific question about this device
(55 days)
Ask a specific question about this device
(113 days)
A powdered patient examination glove is a disposable device made of natural rubber latex that bears powder to facilitate donning and is intended to be worn on the hand or finger (s) for medical purposes to provide a barrier against potentially infectious materials and other contaminants.
Powdered Latex Examination Gloves, Non-sterile
This document is a 510(k) clearance letter from the FDA for "Multisafe Powdered Latex Examination Gloves, Nonsterile." It does not contain any information regarding acceptance criteria, study details, or device performance metrics like sensitivity, specificity, or accuracy that would be relevant to AI/ML medical devices.
The letter is a regulatory document confirming that the device is substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicate devices and can be marketed. It refers to general controls, GMP regulations, and labeling requirements.
Therefore, it is impossible to extract the requested information (acceptance criteria, study details, sample sizes, ground truth, expert qualifications, etc.) for an AI/ML device from this document.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1