Search Filters

Search Results

Found 3 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K010920
    Date Cleared
    2001-06-22

    (87 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    884.2660
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Predicate For
    N/A
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use
    Device Description
    AI/ML Overview
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    K Number
    K002781
    Date Cleared
    2000-11-29

    (84 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    870.2900
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Predicate For
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use
    Device Description
    AI/ML Overview
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    K Number
    K973970
    Date Cleared
    1998-10-06

    (354 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    870.2700
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Predicate For
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The compatible Medical Cables, Inc. SpO2 Finger Probe has the same intended use as the predicate probes, i.e. recommended for use in short term continuous noninvasive SpO2 saturation and pulse rate monitoring on patients weighing greater than 40kg. The intended environment of use of the Medical Cables SpO2 Finger Probe is the same as the predicate probe, i.e. in a medical or clinical environment under the direction of a physician.

    Device Description

    SpO2 Finger Probe Models P856RA, P861RA, P862RA, P867RA, and P876RA

    AI/ML Overview

    I cannot provide information about the acceptance criteria and study as the provided text is a 510(k) clearance letter for a medical device and does not contain the details of acceptance criteria or the study that proves the device meets those criteria. The letter primarily states that the device has been reviewed and determined to be substantially equivalent to previously marketed devices.

    To answer your request, I would need access to the actual 510(k) submission document or a summary thereof, which would detail the performance data and the methods used to establish substantial equivalence.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1