Search Results
Found 2 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(42 days)
KINSA, Inc.
The Kinsa QuickCare Thermometer is used for the intermittent measurement and monitoring of human body temperature, orally, rectally and under the arm. The device is for the adult and pediatric population.
The Kinsa QuickCare Thermometer is a battery powered, thermistor based predictive Bluetooth low energy (BLE) enabled thermometer used for the measurement and monitoring of human body temperature. Body temperature can be measured with the Kinsa QuickCare Thermometer orally, axillary (under the arm), and rectally. The thermometer is reusable for clinical and/or home use on people of all ages with adult supervision. The device can be used with as a standalone device or in conjunction with the Kinsa App on a compatible BLE enabled smartphone.
The Kinsa QuickCare Thermometer is a clinical electronic thermometer. The provided document is a 510(k) summary for its premarket notification to the FDA. The document focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device, rather than providing a detailed study proving the device meets individual acceptance criteria in the manner one might expect for a new algorithmic device with novel performance claims.
Here's a breakdown of the information requested, based on the provided text:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
Acceptance Criteria (Standard) | Reported Device Performance (Compliance) |
---|---|
Accuracy (Temperature Measurement) | ± 0.2°C within measurement range of 32 to 42.8°C (89.6 to 109.2°F) |
ISO 80601-2-56:2009 (Medical Electrical Equipment – Part 2-56: Particular Requirements For Basic Safety And Essential Performance Of Clinical Thermometers For Body Temperature Measurement) | Design Verification results confirmed the device meets the product requirements set by Kinsa and the performance standard requirements of ISO 80601-2-56:2009. Performance comparison with the predicate device demonstrates laboratory accuracy of the subject device is the same as the predicate device over the same temperature range. |
Biocompatibility (AAMI/ANSI/ISO 10993-5:2009 /(R)2014 for cytotoxicity; ISO 10993-10:2010 for irritation and sensitization) | All skin contacting materials have been tested successfully for biocompatibility. |
Electrical and Mechanical Safety & Essential Performance (AAMI/ANSI ES 60601-1:2005/(R)2012; IEC 60601-1-11:2015) | Electrical and Mechanical Safety as well as essential performance was confirmed through compliance testing. |
Electromagnetic Compatibility (IEC 60601-1-2:2014) | Electromagnetic Compatibility was confirmed through compliance testing. |
Software Verification and Validation (FDA "Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices" (May 11, 2005)) | Software Verification and Validation results confirmed the firmware and software units meet the software requirements specifications and the system performs as intended. |
Labeling Verification (FDA "Guidance on the Content of Premarket Notification [510(k)] Submission for Clinical Electronic Thermometers) | Labeling verification per the recommendations. |
Cybersecurity Management (FDA guidance document "Content of Premarket Submissions for Management of Cybersecurity in Medical Devices (October 2, 2014)") | Cybersecurity management has been addressed. |
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance
The document does not specify a separate "test set" in the context of clinical studies for performance metrics like sensitivity, specificity, or predictive values. The testing described is primarily design verification and validation against established standards.
For accuracy, which is the most relevant performance metric here, the document states: "Performance comparison with the predicate device demonstrates laboratory accuracy of the subject device is the same as the predicate device over the same temperature range." It does not provide the sample size of individuals or the number of measurements taken during this laboratory accuracy comparison. The data provenance is implied to be laboratory testing rather than real-world clinical data.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g., radiologist with 10 years of experience)
This information is not applicable or provided. The device measures a physical parameter (temperature), and the "ground truth" for accuracy is established by a reference thermometer in a laboratory setting, not by human expert interpretation.
4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set
Not applicable. Temperature measurement accuracy is not typically adjudicated by expert consensus in this manner.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
Not applicable. The Kinsa QuickCare Thermometer is a direct measurement device, not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool that would involve human readers interpreting images or data with or without AI assistance. The Bluetooth functionality is for data transmission, not for an AI-powered interpretive aid.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done
The device itself is a "standalone" measurement device. The performance data presented (accuracy, safety, EMC, etc.) relates to the device's intrinsic operation. While it can connect to an app, its core function of temperature measurement and predictive algorithm acts "stand-alone" in terms of measurement generation. No specific "algorithm only" study report is detailed beyond stating that "Software Verification and Validation results confirmed the firmware and software units meet the software requirements specifications and the system performs as intended."
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)
For accuracy, the ground truth is established by reference temperature measurements in a laboratory setting, typically using a calibrated high-precision thermometer. For other aspects like safety and EMC, the ground truth is compliance with the specified international standards.
8. The sample size for the training set
This is not applicable as the Kinsa QuickCare Thermometer is a traditional electronic thermometer that uses a thermistor and a predictive algorithm, not a machine learning or AI model that requires a "training set" in the typical sense for image interpretation or pattern recognition. The predictive algorithm is likely based on mathematical modeling and calibration, not statistical learning from a large dataset.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
Not applicable, as there is no "training set" cited for a machine learning model. The predictive algorithm's parameters would have been established through engineering design, calibration against known temperature references, and validation against a variety of temperature profiles.
Ask a specific question about this device
(112 days)
KINSA, INC.
The Kinsa Smart Thermometer is intended to measure the human body temperature orally, rectally, or under the arm, and the devices are reusable for clinical or home use on people of all ages.
The Kinsa Smart Thermometer product is a thermometer that connects to a Smartphone or another mobile device (e.g. an iPod Touch). The product will read body temperature the same way a clinical digital thermometer does by being placed under the tongue in the mouth, rectum or alternatively, or under the arm. Like other clinical digital thermometers, the Kinsa Smart Thermometer is a thermistor-based product; however, it has the advantage of being read on a mobile device display. Unlike other clinical digital thermometers, the Kinsa Smart Thermometer product requires no batteries or LCD displays. The Kinsa Smart Thermometer is reusable for clinical or home use on people of all ages.
The Kinsa Smart Thermometer will connect to Smartphones or other mobile devices via a headphone jack that accepts a microphone input. In this document the terms Smartphone, smartohone and mobile device are used interchangeably and are defined to include the following products: Apple iPhones 5, 4S and the Apple iPod Touch 5.
The Kinsa Smart Thermometer consists of four components:
- A. Thermometer (probe).
- B. An adapter to setup each Smartphone for temperature reading (only needed once per Smartphone).
- C. An optional, flexible extension cord that can be used to lengthen the distance between the thermometer and Smartphone so users can see the Smartphone screen while taking a temperature.
- D. Software.
Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and study information for the Kinsa Smart Thermometer, based on the provided text:
Key Takeaway: The provided 510(k) summary focuses primarily on equivalence to a predicate device and compliance with established standards (ASTM E1112-00) for clinical electronic thermometers. It does not detail a specific study proving the device meets novel acceptance criteria in the way one might expect for a new AI/ML-driven medical device. Instead, the acceptance criteria are largely implied by compliance with the ASTM standard and comparison to the predicate.
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
Given that the document emphasizes compliance with ASTM E1112-00 (reapproved 2011), the acceptance criteria are drawn from general requirements for clinical electronic thermometers specified in this standard and the performance metrics compared to the predicate device.
Metric (Acceptance Criterion implied by ASTM/Predicate) | Reported Device Performance (Kinsa Smart Thermometer) |
---|---|
Measurement Range | 35.0 to 42.0°C |
Accuracy | 95.0°F - 107.6°F/±0.2°F (35.0°C - 42.0°C/±0.1°C) |
Response Time | 15 seconds |
Compliance with ASTM E1112-00 | Compliant with ASTM E1112-00 (Reapproved 2011) |
Compliance with AAMI/IEC 60601-1:2005+A1:2012(E) | Compliant |
Compliance with AAMI/ANSI/IEC 60601-1-2:2007 | Compliant |
Note: The document explicitly states, "The Kinsa Smart Thermometer meets and exceeds ASTM standards for accuracy and meets ISO standards for accuracy." This indicates that the ASTM E1112-00 standard itself defines the primary acceptance criteria for accuracy.
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
The provided document does not specify a separate test set sample size or data provenance (e.g., country of origin, retrospective/prospective) for a study demonstrating performance against acceptance criteria. The information focuses on compliance with standards rather than a clinical validation study with a defined patient cohort.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications
This information is not applicable and not provided in the document. The regulatory pathway for this device, a Class II thermometer, relies on established physical measurement standards (like ASTM E1112-00) and comparison to a predicate device, not on expert adjudication of diagnostic outputs from images or complex data. Therefore, "ground truth" in the context of expert consensus, as might be used for AI/ML imaging devices, is not relevant here.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
Not applicable and not provided. As explained above, the assessment relies on metrological standards, not expert adjudication.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done
No, a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was not done. This type of study is relevant for diagnostic imaging devices where human readers interpret data, often with AI assistance. The Kinsa Smart Thermometer is a direct measurement device; its function is to provide a temperature reading, not to assist humans in interpreting complex diagnostic information.
6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done
The device itself is a measurement instrument. Its "standalone" performance is its ability to accurately measure temperature according to the specified standards, which is what the compliance with ASTM E1112-00 addresses. However, it's important to note that the device relies on a mobile device for display and processing, so it's not truly "standalone" in operation like a conventional digital thermometer. The "algorithm only" aspect refers to the software that processes the signal from the thermistor to display the temperature. The document states this software "displays the precise temperature on the screen" and implicitly meets the ASTM accuracy standards.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
The "ground truth" for the Kinsa Smart Thermometer's performance is established through metrological reference standards and calibrated instruments as defined by standards like ASTM E1112-00. This standard specifies the test methods and performance requirements for electronic thermometers, which would involve comparing the device's readings against highly accurate, traceable temperature references. It does not involve expert consensus, pathology, or outcomes data in the way an AI/ML diagnostic system would.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
The document does not specify a "training set" sample size. The Kinsa Smart Thermometer is a sensor-based device with a processing algorithm, not a machine learning model developed through training data in the conventional sense. Its "training" would be more akin to calibration and engineering development to ensure accurate signal processing, rather than learning from a large dataset of patient temperatures.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
Not applicable in the context of "training set" for a machine learning model. The fundamental "ground truth" for its development would be the physical principles of thermistor operation and the metrological standards for temperature measurement. Engineers would have designed and calibrated the device and its processing software to adhere to these known physical laws and the accuracy requirements of ASTM E1112-00 using reference thermometers.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1