Search Results

Not Found

Pro-Flex is a redesign of the traditional electronic thermometer with more convenient and comfortable features. It has flexible and soft probe make user comfortable in using. It also has insertion guide to prevent over insertion when use in rectal. The funnel shape of the probe is also fit the contour of baby's underarm so the tip of the probe will be in the same middle position of the armpit every time it is used.

The provided text is a 510(K) summary for a digital pacifier thermometer called "Pro-Flex". This type of document is a submission to the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) for pre-market notification, demonstrating that a new device is substantially equivalent to a legally marketed predicate device.

Unfortunately, the provided text does not contain the detailed information required to answer your questions about acceptance criteria and study design for performance evaluation.

Here's why and what's missing:

• Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance: The document states that the device is "made to meet the ASTM 1112-86, 'Standard Specification for Electronic Thermometer for Intermittent Determination of Patient Temperature'". This ASTM standard would define the acceptance criteria for accuracy and other performance metrics for electronic thermometers. However, the document does not report the actual performance of the Pro-Flex device against these criteria. It only states that it is made to meet the standard, not that it has been tested and met the standard with specific results.
• Study Details (Sample Size, Ground Truth, Experts, Adjudication, MRMC, Standalone, Training Set): The document is a general summary of the device's design, materials, and substantial equivalence claim. It does not describe any specific clinical or performance study that would involve a test set, ground truth establishment, expert readers, or any of the other detailed elements you've asked for. It refers to the manufacturer being ISO 9001 certified and using materials similar to other legally marketed devices, which speaks to manufacturing quality and material safety, but not specific performance testing results for this particular device.

In summary, based only on the provided text, I cannot complete the table or answer your numbered questions. The 510(k) summary provides a high-level overview but lacks the granular data from performance studies. For a medical device like this, the actual performance data and how it was collected would typically be in a separate, more detailed technical report or study report that accompanies the 510(k) submission.

Ask a specific question about this device