Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K152251
    Date Cleared
    2016-06-10

    (305 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    868.5740
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Applicant Name (Manufacturer) :

    HENAN TUOREN MEDICAL DEVICE CO., LTD

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Endobronchial Tube is used to isolate the left or right lung of a patient for surgery, one lung ventilation or one lung anesthesia.

    Device Description

    The Endobronchial Tube is made of Polyvinylchloride and is available in sizes 26fr to 41fr. They are designated as double lumen tube with 2 cuffs and separate 15mm connectors for isolating and ventilating one lung during surgical procedures. The tubes contain an x-ray opaque line that runs through the tube making them detectable by x-ray. Environments of use: Hospital-OR and ICU

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text describes the 510(k) submission for the "Endobronchial Tube" by Henan Tuoren Medical Device Co., Ltd. and its substantial equivalence to a predicate device (Well LEAD Endobronchial Tubes, K092886). The evaluation primarily relies on non-clinical testing (bench testing and biocompatibility assessments) to demonstrate that the proposed device meets established standards and performs comparably to the predicate.

    Here's an analysis of the requested information based on the provided text:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

    The document provides a detailed table of performance testing for the Endobronchial Tube.

    Type of Bench TestReferenced StandardAcceptable CriteriaReported Device Performance (Pass/fail)
    Cuff diameterISO 5361: 2012The maximum cuff diameter shall be within ± 0.5mm of the nominal value when tested according to ISO 5361 Annex B.Pass
    Cuffed tube collapse testISO 5361: 2012The steel ball shall pass freely through the tube when tested according to ISO 5361 Annex C.Pass
    Cuff herniation testISO 5361: 2012No part of the inflated cuff shall reach beyond the nearest edge of the bevel when tested according to ISO 5361 Annex D.Pass
    Seal testingISO 5361: 2012The leakage limit is ≤2.0ml/h at cuff pressures not to exceed 2.7 kPa (27 cmH2O) when tested according to ISO 5361 Annex G.Pass
    Sealing of cuff inflating systemNot explicitly referencedNo air leakage happens under the condition of continuous 3kPa positive pressure imposition for 10 seconds.Pass
    Sealing of connector assemblyNot explicitly referencedNo air leakage happens on any joints under the condition of continuous 6kPa gas pressure imposition to lumen of main tube (shaft) for 60 seconds.Pass
    Inflating tube (outside diameter)ISO 5361: 2012The inflating tube shall have an outside diameter of not more than 3.0mm.Pass
    Inflating tube (angle)ISO 5361: 2012The angle between the inflating tube and the Endobronchial tube at the point of separation shall not exceed 45°.Pass
    Kink resistance testISO 5361: 2012The steel ball shall pass freely through the lumen of the tube when tested according to ISO 5361 Annex H.Pass
    Gauging of One Way ValveISO 594/1 1986The plane of the maximum diameter at the opening of the female conical fitting of One Way Valve lie between the two limit planes of the gauge.Pass
    Liquid leakage of One Way ValveISO 594/1 1986No leakage sufficient to form a falling drop of water.Pass
    Air leakage of One Way ValveISO 594/1 1986Continued formation of air bubbles not be evident.Pass
    Separation force of One Way ValveISO 594/1 1986The conical fitting under test remain attached to the test fixture.Pass
    Stress cracking (One Way Valve)ISO 594/1 1986There shall be no evidence of stress cracking of the conical fitting.Pass
    Security of construction of suction catheterISO 8836-2007The force required to detach any component permanently attached to the shaft shall be not less than that specified in standard.Pass
    Shaft resistant to negative pressure (suction catheter)ISO 8836-2007A vacuum source at 40kPa below ambient pressure for 15s at a temperature of 23°C ±2°C with the patient end occluded, the shaft shall not collapse.Pass
    15mm connectorISO5356-1: 2004Comply with the ISO5356-1: 2004.Pass
    Burst Testing (Cuff burst)Not explicitly referencedThe volume of injected gas when cuff bursting happens is larger than 40ml during inflation of endobronchial tube.Pass
    Burst Testing (Bursting between cuff and main tube)Not explicitly referencedThere should be no fracture on junctions while inflated 30kpa gas.Pass
    Bond StrengthNot explicitly referencedThe joints of endobronchial tube should be firm bonding. When an axial force of 50±5N is applied at 50±5mm/min, the testing portion (between connector and...) [The sentence is cut off here, but "Pass" is indicated]Pass
    Air flow resistanceNot explicitly referencedPressure increment should no more than 0.2Kpa/h when testing the endobronchial tube under the specified flow rate (3, 6, 9L/min).Pass
    Radiopaque testNot explicitly referencedWhen exposing the Endobronchial tube with the low dose rays, the X-ray machine should have film development.Pass
    Endotoxin testUSP36_NF310.25EU/ml, 20EU/Device.Pass
    In vitro cytotoxicityISO10993-5:2009No potential toxicity to L-929 cells under specified test conditions (using MTT method MEM extract and MTT method MEM with 10% FBS extract).Pass
    Skin sensitization Test (Guinea Pig)ISO10993-10:2010No significant evidence of causing skin sensitization in the guinea pig under specified test conditions (using 0.9% sodium chloride injection extract and sesame oil extract).Pass
    Oral Mucosa Irritation testISO10993-10:2010No significant evidence of causing oral irritation in the hamster under specified test conditions (using 0.9% sodium chloride extract and sesame oil extract).Pass

    2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

    The document does not specify the exact sample size for the mechanical performance tests, biocompatibility tests, or endotoxin tests. It mentions "non-clinical testing was performed" and provides "Test result" for each criterion. The data provenance is not explicitly stated in terms of country of origin for the testing, but the manufacturer is Henan Tuoren Medical Device Co., Ltd, China. The testing described is clearly prospective for the device being submitted, as it was performed to demonstrate compliance with standards.

    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)

    This product is a medical device (Endobronchial Tube, Class II), not an AI or imaging diagnostic device. Therefore, the concept of "experts establishing ground truth for a test set" in the context of image interpretation or clinical diagnosis is not applicable here. The "ground truth" for this device's performance is established by adherence to engineering and biocompatibility standards and quantified through objective physical and chemical measurements.

    4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

    Not applicable. This is not a study involving human interpretation or subjective adjudication. The tests involve objective measurements against predefined criteria in recognized standards (e.g., ISO).

    5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

    Not applicable. This is not an AI diagnostic device. No MRMC study was performed or required.

    6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done

    Not applicable. This is not an algorithm or AI device. The performance is assessed based on the physical properties and biological compatibility of the device itself.

    7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)

    The "ground truth" for this device's performance assessment is primarily defined by:

    • Engineering Standards: Specific requirements and limits outlined in international standards like ISO 5361, ISO 594/1, ISO 8836, and ISO 5356-1.
    • Biocompatibility Standards: Criteria for no toxicity, sensitization, or irritation as per ISO 10993 series.
    • Safety Standards: Endotoxin limits as per USP.

    These standards provide objective, measurable criteria which serve as the ground truth against which the device's performance is evaluated.

    8. The sample size for the training set

    Not applicable. This is a physical medical device, not a machine learning model. There is no "training set" in the context of data for an algorithm.

    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

    Not applicable. As there is no training set, there is no ground truth established for it. The standards mentioned in point 7 serve as the universally accepted benchmarks for this type of device.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1