(305 days)
The Endobronchial Tube is used to isolate the left or right lung of a patient for surgery, one lung ventilation or one lung anesthesia.
The Endobronchial Tube is made of Polyvinylchloride and is available in sizes 26fr to 41fr. They are designated as double lumen tube with 2 cuffs and separate 15mm connectors for isolating and ventilating one lung during surgical procedures. The tubes contain an x-ray opaque line that runs through the tube making them detectable by x-ray. Environments of use: Hospital-OR and ICU
The provided text describes the 510(k) submission for the "Endobronchial Tube" by Henan Tuoren Medical Device Co., Ltd. and its substantial equivalence to a predicate device (Well LEAD Endobronchial Tubes, K092886). The evaluation primarily relies on non-clinical testing (bench testing and biocompatibility assessments) to demonstrate that the proposed device meets established standards and performs comparably to the predicate.
Here's an analysis of the requested information based on the provided text:
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
The document provides a detailed table of performance testing for the Endobronchial Tube.
| Type of Bench Test | Referenced Standard | Acceptable Criteria | Reported Device Performance (Pass/fail) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cuff diameter | ISO 5361: 2012 | The maximum cuff diameter shall be within ± 0.5mm of the nominal value when tested according to ISO 5361 Annex B. | Pass |
| Cuffed tube collapse test | ISO 5361: 2012 | The steel ball shall pass freely through the tube when tested according to ISO 5361 Annex C. | Pass |
| Cuff herniation test | ISO 5361: 2012 | No part of the inflated cuff shall reach beyond the nearest edge of the bevel when tested according to ISO 5361 Annex D. | Pass |
| Seal testing | ISO 5361: 2012 | The leakage limit is ≤2.0ml/h at cuff pressures not to exceed 2.7 kPa (27 cmH2O) when tested according to ISO 5361 Annex G. | Pass |
| Sealing of cuff inflating system | Not explicitly referenced | No air leakage happens under the condition of continuous 3kPa positive pressure imposition for 10 seconds. | Pass |
| Sealing of connector assembly | Not explicitly referenced | No air leakage happens on any joints under the condition of continuous 6kPa gas pressure imposition to lumen of main tube (shaft) for 60 seconds. | Pass |
| Inflating tube (outside diameter) | ISO 5361: 2012 | The inflating tube shall have an outside diameter of not more than 3.0mm. | Pass |
| Inflating tube (angle) | ISO 5361: 2012 | The angle between the inflating tube and the Endobronchial tube at the point of separation shall not exceed 45°. | Pass |
| Kink resistance test | ISO 5361: 2012 | The steel ball shall pass freely through the lumen of the tube when tested according to ISO 5361 Annex H. | Pass |
| Gauging of One Way Valve | ISO 594/1 1986 | The plane of the maximum diameter at the opening of the female conical fitting of One Way Valve lie between the two limit planes of the gauge. | Pass |
| Liquid leakage of One Way Valve | ISO 594/1 1986 | No leakage sufficient to form a falling drop of water. | Pass |
| Air leakage of One Way Valve | ISO 594/1 1986 | Continued formation of air bubbles not be evident. | Pass |
| Separation force of One Way Valve | ISO 594/1 1986 | The conical fitting under test remain attached to the test fixture. | Pass |
| Stress cracking (One Way Valve) | ISO 594/1 1986 | There shall be no evidence of stress cracking of the conical fitting. | Pass |
| Security of construction of suction catheter | ISO 8836-2007 | The force required to detach any component permanently attached to the shaft shall be not less than that specified in standard. | Pass |
| Shaft resistant to negative pressure (suction catheter) | ISO 8836-2007 | A vacuum source at 40kPa below ambient pressure for 15s at a temperature of 23°C ±2°C with the patient end occluded, the shaft shall not collapse. | Pass |
| 15mm connector | ISO5356-1: 2004 | Comply with the ISO5356-1: 2004. | Pass |
| Burst Testing (Cuff burst) | Not explicitly referenced | The volume of injected gas when cuff bursting happens is larger than 40ml during inflation of endobronchial tube. | Pass |
| Burst Testing (Bursting between cuff and main tube) | Not explicitly referenced | There should be no fracture on junctions while inflated 30kpa gas. | Pass |
| Bond Strength | Not explicitly referenced | The joints of endobronchial tube should be firm bonding. When an axial force of 50±5N is applied at 50±5mm/min, the testing portion (between connector and...) [The sentence is cut off here, but "Pass" is indicated] | Pass |
| Air flow resistance | Not explicitly referenced | Pressure increment should no more than 0.2Kpa/h when testing the endobronchial tube under the specified flow rate (3, 6, 9L/min). | Pass |
| Radiopaque test | Not explicitly referenced | When exposing the Endobronchial tube with the low dose rays, the X-ray machine should have film development. | Pass |
| Endotoxin test | USP36_NF31<85> | 0.25EU/ml, 20EU/Device. | Pass |
| In vitro cytotoxicity | ISO10993-5:2009 | No potential toxicity to L-929 cells under specified test conditions (using MTT method MEM extract and MTT method MEM with 10% FBS extract). | Pass |
| Skin sensitization Test (Guinea Pig) | ISO10993-10:2010 | No significant evidence of causing skin sensitization in the guinea pig under specified test conditions (using 0.9% sodium chloride injection extract and sesame oil extract). | Pass |
| Oral Mucosa Irritation test | ISO10993-10:2010 | No significant evidence of causing oral irritation in the hamster under specified test conditions (using 0.9% sodium chloride extract and sesame oil extract). | Pass |
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)
The document does not specify the exact sample size for the mechanical performance tests, biocompatibility tests, or endotoxin tests. It mentions "non-clinical testing was performed" and provides "Test result" for each criterion. The data provenance is not explicitly stated in terms of country of origin for the testing, but the manufacturer is Henan Tuoren Medical Device Co., Ltd, China. The testing described is clearly prospective for the device being submitted, as it was performed to demonstrate compliance with standards.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)
This product is a medical device (Endobronchial Tube, Class II), not an AI or imaging diagnostic device. Therefore, the concept of "experts establishing ground truth for a test set" in the context of image interpretation or clinical diagnosis is not applicable here. The "ground truth" for this device's performance is established by adherence to engineering and biocompatibility standards and quantified through objective physical and chemical measurements.
4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set
Not applicable. This is not a study involving human interpretation or subjective adjudication. The tests involve objective measurements against predefined criteria in recognized standards (e.g., ISO).
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
Not applicable. This is not an AI diagnostic device. No MRMC study was performed or required.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done
Not applicable. This is not an algorithm or AI device. The performance is assessed based on the physical properties and biological compatibility of the device itself.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)
The "ground truth" for this device's performance assessment is primarily defined by:
- Engineering Standards: Specific requirements and limits outlined in international standards like ISO 5361, ISO 594/1, ISO 8836, and ISO 5356-1.
- Biocompatibility Standards: Criteria for no toxicity, sensitization, or irritation as per ISO 10993 series.
- Safety Standards: Endotoxin limits as per USP.
These standards provide objective, measurable criteria which serve as the ground truth against which the device's performance is evaluated.
8. The sample size for the training set
Not applicable. This is a physical medical device, not a machine learning model. There is no "training set" in the context of data for an algorithm.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
Not applicable. As there is no training set, there is no ground truth established for it. The standards mentioned in point 7 serve as the universally accepted benchmarks for this type of device.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features a stylized eagle-like symbol composed of three overlapping profiles facing right. The profiles are rendered in black and create a sense of depth. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" is arranged in a circular fashion around the symbol.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
June 10, 2016
Henan Tuoren Medical Device Co., Ltd C/O Long Yang COO Shenzhen Hlongmed Biotech Company R15-08, East Building, Yihai Plaza, Chuangye Road, Nanshan District, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518054 China
Re: K152251 Trade/Device Name: Endobronchial Tube Models: Left: Fr26, Fr28, Fr31, Fr32, Fr33, Fr35, Fr37, Fr39, Fr41; Right: Fr26, Fr28, Fr31, Fr32, Fr33, Fr35, Fr37, Fr39, Fr41 Regulation Number: 21 CFR 868.5740 Regulation Name: Tracheal/Bronchial Differential Ventilation Tube Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: CBI Dated: May 6, 2016 Received: May 12, 2016
Dear Long Yang:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug. and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR
{1}------------------------------------------------
Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical devicerelated adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours.
Tejashri Purohit-Sheth, M.D.
Tejashri Purohit-Sheth, M.D. Clinical Deputy Director DAGRID/ODE/CDRH FOR
Erin I. Keith, M.S. Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Respiratory, Infection Control and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known)
Device Name
Endobronchial Tube
Models: Left: Fr26, Fr31, Fr32, Fr33, Fr35, Fr37, Fr39, Fr41; Right: Fr26, Fr28, Fr33, Fr33, Fr33, Fr37, Fr39, Fr41
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Endobronchial Tube is used to isolate the left or right lung of a patient for surgery, one lung ventilation or one lung anesthesia.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) |
|---|
| ------------------------------------------------- |
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Druq Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
TUOREN Henan Tuoren Medical Device Co., Ltd
510(k) Summary
(as required by 807.92(c))
The assigned 510(K) number is: K152251
Date of Summary: June 9, 2016
1. Submitter information
Manufacturer Name: Henan Tuoren Medical Device Co., Ltd
Address: Weiyuan Industrial Zone, Menggang ,Changyuan Country, Henan, China
Establishment Registration Number: 3006984712
Contact Person and Title: Meizi Zhang/Manager of Registration Department
Tel: 0086-13633736073
Fax: 0086-373-8605321
Email: 13633736073@163.com
2. Contact person
2.1 Primary Contact Person
Long Yang (COO) Shenzhen Hlongmed Biotech Company R1508, East Building, Yihai Plaza, Chuangye Road, Nanshan District,Shenzhen, P.R. China Tel: 0086-755-86664986 Fax: 0086-755-86664933 E-mail: yanglong@hlongmed.com
2.2 Secondary Contact Person
Meizi Zhang(Manager of Registration Department) Henan Tuoren Medical Device Co., Ltd Tel: 0086-13633736073
3. Device Classification
| Device Sponsor | Henan Tuoren Medical Device Co., Ltd |
|---|---|
| ---------------- | -------------------------------------- |
{4}------------------------------------------------
| Trade/Device Name | Endobronchial Tube |
|---|---|
| Model | Left: Fr26, Fr28, Fr31, Fr32, Fr33, Fr35, Fr37, Fr39, Fr41Right: Fr26, Fr28, Fr31, Fr32, Fr33, Fr35, Fr37, Fr39, Fr41 |
| Common Name | Endobronchial Double Lumen Tube |
| Classification Name | Tube, Tracheal/Bronchial, Differential Ventilation (W/Wo Connector) |
| Regulatory Class | Class II |
| Classification regulation | 21CFR 868.5740 |
| Review Panel | Anesthesiology |
| Regulation Medical Specialty | Anesthesiology |
| Regulation Name | Tracheal/bronchial differential ventilation tube |
| Product Code | CBI |
OREN Henan Tuoren Medical Device Co., Ltd
4. Intended Use/ Indications for Use
The Endobronchial Tube is used to isolate the left or right lung of a patient for surgery, one lung ventilation or one lung anesthesia.
5. Predicate Device
Well LEAD Endobronchial Tubes(K092886)
6. Device Description
The Endobronchial Tube is made of Polyvinylchloride and is available in sizes 26fr to 41fr. They are designated as double lumen tube with 2 cuffs and separate 15mm connectors for isolating and ventilating one lung during surgical procedures. The tubes contain an x-ray opaque line that runs through the tube making them detectable by x-ray. Environments of use: Hospital-OR and ICU
7. Substantial Equivalence
Henan Tuoren Medical Device Co., Ltd claims the proposed devices to be substantially equivalent to the devices previously cleared by FDA in K092886. Henan Tuoren Medical
{5}------------------------------------------------
TUOREN Henan Tuoren Medical Device Co., Ltd
Device Co.. Ltd claims this equivalence because the proposed devices have an equivalent intended use, manufacturing materials, operating principles and physical operational specifications as compared to the predicate devices. The similarities and differences between the proposed and predicate devices have been identified and explained in the comparison matrix, the comparison matrix can be referred to the below table. The differences between subject device and the predicate device is just the size and packaging, these differences do not effect substantial equivalence, the analysis and justification is: For the size differences, all models of proposed devices comply to the same standard ISO 5361 compared to predicate devices. For the packaging differences, the multi-functional joint of proposed device comply to the same standard ISO 5356-1 compared to predicate devices, and the suction catheters of proposed devices comply to the same standard ISO 8836 compared to predicate devices..
{6}------------------------------------------------
| Item | Element Of Comparison | Proposed Device | Predicate Device | S/D* |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Classification Name | Tube, Tracheal/Bronchial, Differential Ventilation(W/Wo Connector) | Tube, Tracheal/Bronchial, Differential Ventilation(W/Wo Connector) | S |
| 2 | Regulatory Class | Class II | Class II | S |
| 3 | Classification regulation | 21CFR 868.5740 | 21CFR 868.5740 | S |
| 4 | Classification Panel | Anesthesiology | Anesthesiology | S |
| 5 | Product Code | CBI | CBI | S |
| 6 | Regulation Name | Tracheal/bronchial differential ventilation tube | Tracheal/bronchial differential ventilation tube | S |
| 7 | IndicationsforUse/Intended Use | Endobronchial Tubes is used to isolate the left or theright lung of a patient for surgery,one lung ventilationor one lung anesthesia. | The Well Lead Endobronchial Tubes is used toisolate the left or the right lung of a patient forsurgery,one lung ventilation or one lung anesthesia. | S |
| 8 | Directions for Use | Prescription Use | Prescription Use | S |
| 9 | Patient Population | Patients undergoing surgical procedure requiringisolation of one lung | Patients undergoing surgical procedure requiringisolation of one lung | S |
| 10 | Patient contact Material | Tube-PVC and Cuff-PVC | Tube-PVC and Cuff-PVC | S |
| 11 | Size(Fr) | 26 to 41 French | 28 to 41 French | D, does not affect theproduct performance |
| 12 | Design Features | Double lumen shaft, 2 cuffs, Stylet, Carlens adapter | Double lumen shaft, 2 cuffs, Stylet, Carlens adapter | S |
| 13 | CompositionofEndobronchial Tubes | main tube, cuff, connector, inflating tube, valve, pilotballoon | main tube, cuff, connector, inflating tube, valve,pilot balloon | S |
| 14 | Angle of bevel | 70° | 70° | S |
| 15 | Radius of curvature | 140mm | 140mm | S |
| Item | Element Of Comparison | Proposed Device | Predicate Device | S/D* |
| 16 | Radiopaque line | Yes | Yes | S |
| 17 | Connection to ventilationsource | 15mm connector | 15mm connector | S |
| 18 | Shelf-life | 5 years | 5 years | S |
| 19 | Single UseSingle patient, disposable | Yes | Yes | S |
| 20 | Method of sterilization | Ethylene Oxide Sterilized per ISO 11135 | Ethylene Oxide Sterilized per ISO 11135 | S |
| 21 | The Sterility AssuranceLevel | SAL 10-6 | SAL 10-6 | S |
| 22 | EO and ECH residual | The ethylene oxide residual is conform to ISO10993:7 for Limited Exposure Devices of 4mg/dayfor EO and 9/mg/day for ECH. | The ethylene oxide residual is conform to ISO10993:7 for Limited Exposure Devices of 4mg/dayfor EO and 9/mg/day for ECH. | S |
| 23 | Biocompatibility | 1.Cytotoxicity testing per 10993-52. Sensitization testing per ISO 10993-103.Irritation Test per ISO 10993-10All the test passed. | 1. Cytotoxicity testing per 10993-52. Sensitization testing per ISO 10993-103. Irritation Test per ISO 10993-10All the test passed. | S |
| 24 | Applied Standards | ISO 5361ISO 10993-1ISO 10993-5ISO 10993-10ISO 11135ISO 10993-7 | ISO 5361ISO 10993-1ISO 10993-5ISO 10993-10ISO 11135ISO 10993-7 | S |
| 25 | Packaging | Sterile, packed with a multi-functional joint and threeSuction Catheters | Sterile, packed with switch connector and twosuction catheters | D, does not affect the product performance |
| 26 | Environments of use | Hospital-OR and ICU | Hospital-OR and ICU | S |
{7}------------------------------------------------
{8}------------------------------------------------
TUORen Henan Tuoren Medical Device Co., Ltd
8. Product Performance Testing
All testing that is required by the required standards has been performed. Non-clinical testing was performed and included standards such as ISO 5361 and ISO 10993-1. The Endobronchial Tube have been found to fall within the required limits of the testing. The test results can be found in both the Biocompatibility (Section16) and the Performance Testing_Bench (Section19) of this submission. Therefore we have concluded that the Endobronchial Tube are substantially equivalent.
A brief summary of tests relied upon to demonstrate substantial equivalence to the predicate can be found in the table below:
| Type of Test | Referenced Standard | Test result |
|---|---|---|
| in vitro cytotoxicity | ISO10993-5:2009 | Under the conditions of using ISO10993-5: 2009test method MTT method MEM extract, the testarticle Endobronchial Tube extract showed nopotential toxicity to L-929 cells. |
| Under the conditions of using ISO10993-5: 2009test method MTT method MEM with 10% FBSextract, the test article Endobronchial Tube extractshowed no potential toxicity to L-929 cells. | ||
| Skin sensitizationTest using GuineaPig Maximizationtest | ISO10993-10:2010 | Under the conditions of using ISO10993-10: 2010test methods guinea pig maximization test 0.9%sodium chloride injection extract, the test articleEndobronchial Tube extract showed no significantevidence of causing skin sensitization in the guineapig; |
| Under the conditions of using ISO10993-10:2010test methods guinea pig maximization test sesameoil extract, the test article Endobronchial Tubeextract showed no significant evidence of causingskin sensitization in the guinea pig; |
1) Biocompatibility testing
{9}------------------------------------------------
| Type of Test | Referenced Standard | Test result |
|---|---|---|
| Oral MucosaIrritation test | ISO10993-10:2010 | Under the conditions of using ISO10993-10:2010test methods 0.9% sodium chloride extract, the testresult showed that the test article EndobronchialTube extract show no significant evidence ofcausing oral irritation in the hamster.Under the conditions of using ISO10993-10:2010test methods sesame oil extract, the test resultshowed that the test article Endobronchial Tubeextract show no significant evidence of causingoral irritation in the hamster. |
TUOREN Henan Tuoren Medical Device Co., Ltd
2) Performance Testing
| Type of Bench Test | Reference standards | Acceptable Criteria | Pass/fail |
|---|---|---|---|
| cuff diameter | ISO 5361: 2012 | The maximum cuff diameter shall be within ± 0.5mm of the nominal value when tested according to ISO 5361 Annex B | Pass |
| cuffed tube collapse test | ISO 5361: 2012 | the steel ball shall pass freely through the tube when tested according to ISO 5361 Annex C | Pass |
| Cuff herniation test | ISO 5361: 2012 | no part of the inflated cuff shall reach beyond the nearest edge of the bevel when tested according to ISO 5361 Annex D | Pass |
| Seal testing | ISO 5361: 2012 | The leakage limit is ≤2.0ml/h at cuff pressures not to exceed 2,7 kPa (27 cmH2O) when tested according to ISO 5361 Annex G | Pass |
| / | Sealing of cuff inflating system:No air leakage happens under the condition of continuous 3kPa positive pressure imposition for 10 seconds | Pass | |
| / | Sealing of connector assembly:No air leakage happens on any joints under the condition of continuous 6kPa gas pressure imposition to lumen of main tube(shaft) for 60 seconds. | Pass | |
| inflating tube | ISO 5361: 2012 | The inflating tube shall have an outside diameter of not more than 3.0mm | Pass |
| ISO 5361: 2012 | The angle between the inflating tube and the Endobronchial tube at the point of separation shall not exceed 45°. | Pass | |
| Kink resistance test | ISO 5361: 2012 | the steel ball shall pass freely through the lumen of the tube when tested according to ISO 5361 Annex H | Pass |
| Gauging of One Way Valve | ISO 594/1 1986 | The plane of the maximum diameter at the opening of the female conical fitting of One Way Valve lie between the two limit planes of the gauge. | Pass |
| Liquid leakage of One Way Valve | ISO 594/1 1986 | no leakage sufficient to form a falling drop of water | Pass |
| Air leakage of One Way Valve | ISO 594/1 1986 | Continued formation of air bubbles not be evident | Pass |
| Separation force of One Way Valve | ISO 594/1 1986 | The conical fitting under test remain attached to the test fixture | Pass |
| Stress cracking | ISO 594/1 1986 | There shall be no evidence of stress cracking of the conical fitting | |
| Security of construction of suction catheter | ISO 8836-2007 | the force required to detach any component permanently attached to the shaft shall be not less than that specified in standard | Pass |
| Shaft resistant to negative pressure of suction catheter | ISO 8836-2007 | a vacuum source at 40kPa below ambient pressure for 15s at a temperature of 23°C ±2°C with the patient end occluded, the shaft shall not collapse | Pass |
| 15mm connector | ISO5356-1: 2004 | Comply with the ISO5356-1: 2004 | Pass |
| Burst Testing | / | Cuff burst: The volume of injected gas when cuff bursting happens is larger than 40ml during inflation of endobronchial tubebursting between cuff and main tube:There should be no fracture on junctions while inflated 30kpa gas. | Pass |
| Bond Strength | / | The joints of endobronchial tube should be firm bonding.When an axial force of 50±5N is applied at 50±5mm/min, the testing portion(between connector and | Pass |
| Henan Tuoren Medical Device Co., Ltd | |||
| Air flow resistance | / | Pressure increment should no more than 0.2Kpa/h when testing the endobronchial tube under the specified flow rate(3, 6, 9L/min) | Pass |
| Radiopaque test | / | When exposing the Endobronchial tube with the low dose rays, the X-ray machine should have film development. | Pass |
| Endotoxin test | USP36_NF31<85> | 0.25EU/ml, 20EU/Device | Pass |
{10}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/10/Picture/0 description: The image shows the word "TUORen" in blue font. The "O" in the word is a circle filled with a pattern of small dots. The font is sans-serif and the letters are connected.
TUORen Henan Tuoren Medical Device Co., Ltd
{11}------------------------------------------------
TU●Ren Henan Tuoren Medical Device Co., Ltd
9. Clinical Testing and animal testing
Clinical and animal testing were not performed for Endobronchial Tube as part of the premarket Notification requirements for this 510(k) submission and the subject of this premarket submission, Endobronchial Tube, did not require clinical and animal studies to support substantial equivalence.
10. Substantial Equivalence Conclusion
The information provided in the 510(k) submission is sufficient to demonstrate the substantial equivalence of subject device to the predicate device.
§ 868.5740 Tracheal/bronchial differential ventilation tube.
(a)
Identification. A tracheal/bronchial differential ventilation tube is a device used to isolate the left or the right lung of a patient for anesthesia or pulmonary function testing.(b)
Classification. Class II (performance standards).