Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K973365
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    1998-06-15

    (280 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    864.7470
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Applicant Name (Manufacturer) :

    EXPRESS-MED, INC.

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The intended use of Express-Med's A1c-EXPRESS is for the determination of percent of hemoglobin A1c in human whole blood samples. Clinically, Express-Med's A1c-EXPRESS is intended to be used as a measure of longterm glycemic control in patients with diabetes mellitus. This product will be available to patients through Point of Care offices.

    Preferably, A1c-EXPRESS should be used in conjunction with other diabetes management tools, including consultation with health care professionals, goal-setting, education, exercise, diet, and, when prescribed, medication.

    A1c-EXPRESS does not replace daily blood glucose monitoring.

    There are no known contraindications.

    The kit should be kept out of reach of children.

    Device Description

    Not Found

    AI/ML Overview

    This document is a 510(k) clearance letter for the A1c-EXPRESS Hemoglobin A1c Sample Collection Kit. As such, it does not contain the detailed study information or acceptance criteria typically found in a clinical study report or a premarket approval (PMA) application. A 510(k) demonstrates substantial equivalence to a predicate device, not necessarily independent clinical performance criteria with a new study.

    Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information based solely on the provided text. The document refers to "indications for use" and that the device is "substantially equivalent" to previously marketed devices, but does not include:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance.
    2. Sample size used for the test set or data provenance.
    3. Number and qualifications of experts for ground truth.
    4. Adjudication method.
    5. MRMC comparative effectiveness study results.
    6. Standalone algorithm performance.
    7. Type of ground truth used.
    8. Sample size for the training set.
    9. How ground truth for the training set was established.

    To obtain this information, one would typically need to refer to the original 510(k) summary or submission documents, which are usually more detailed than the clearance letter itself.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1