Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K050571
    Device Name
    ABSOLUTE AMERICA
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2005-11-02

    (243 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    872.6640
    Panel
    Dental
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Predicate For
    N/A
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Absolute America is a dental operative unit intended as an operative tool for therapeutic use on people by personnel highly skilled in dental practices, such as dentists, dental assistants and dental hygienists.

    Device Description

    Eurodent dental operative unit is an electrical device with air and water connections. It is composed from:

    • A patient treatment chair moved electrically -
    • an hydric group with cuspidor and inside all suction , water, air and electrical circuits ・
    • a dentist's instrument board -
    • an assistant board -
    • an electrical footswitch that controls same unit functions -
    • a dental light
    AI/ML Overview

    I am sorry, but based on the provided text, there is no information about acceptance criteria, device performance, sample sizes, data provenance, expert qualifications, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone performance, or ground truth details.

    The document is a 510(k) summary for a dental operative unit, and it primarily focuses on:

    • Device Description: What the device is composed of.
    • Intended Use: How the device is meant to be used and by whom.
    • Summary of Substantial Equivalence Comparison: Comparing the device to legally marketed predicate devices, stating they use similar components, design, technical characteristics, and mode of operation.
    • FDA Communication: A letter from the FDA confirming the substantial equivalence determination, allowing the device to be marketed, and outlining regulatory requirements.
    • Indication for Use form: Reiteration of the intended use.

    This type of submission (510(k)) for a Class I device often relies on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device rather than extensive clinical studies with specific performance metrics and acceptance criteria as one might find for a Class II or Class III device. Therefore, the detailed study information you are asking for is not present in this document.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1