Search Results
Found 28 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(36 days)
The CarboClear® Hybrid Pedicle Screw System is intended to provide rigid immobilization and stabilization of lumbar and/or sacral segments as an adjunct to fusion in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at up to three levels from L2 to S1, with up to Grade I spondylolisthesis. DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. Patients should be skeletally mature and have at least six months of nonoperative treatment.
The CarboClear® Hybrid Pedicle Screw System is intended to be used with intervertebral body fusion device/s implanted at the same spinal level/s with autogenous and/or allogenic bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft.
The CarboClear® Hybrid Pedicle Screw System is composed of implants in various dimensions, used to build a spinal construct; and of a set of instruments, intended to assist in the insertion and placement of the implants.
The CarboClear® Hybrid Pedicle Screws, including CarboClear® Hybrid Fenestrated Screws, are made of carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK), with titanium alloy tulip. Their threaded portion is encased within a thin titanium shell. They are used with a compatible titanium alloy set screw, and with CarboClear CFR-PEEK rods. The implants may include tantalum markers. CarboClear titanium alloy rod is also offered.
The implants are supplied sterile, and are intended for single use.
The CarboClear® Hybrid implants may be implanted in an open approach or using a minimally invasive surgery (MIS) approach.
This document is a 510(k) premarket notification decision letter from the FDA regarding the CarboClear® Hybrid Pedicle Screw System. It declares the device substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicate devices.
However, the provided text does not contain any information about acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets those criteria in the context of AI/ML performance. The document focuses on the mechanical and material properties of a surgical implant (pedicle screw system), not a software device or an AI/ML algorithm.
Therefore, I cannot extract the requested information (acceptance criteria table, sample size, expert information, adjudication, MRMC, standalone performance, ground truth, training set details) from this document as it pertains to a different type of medical device and regulatory review process.
The document covers:
- Device Name: CarboClear® Hybrid Pedicle Screw System
- Regulation Name: Thoracolumbosacral Pedicle Screw System (21 CFR 888.3070)
- Regulatory Class: Class II
- Purpose of Submission: Expansion of indications for use (specifically, longer rods).
- Performance Data Mentioned: Previously conducted static and dynamic tests according to ASTM F1717 and ASTM F1798, showing comparability to predicate devices.
- Conclusion: Substantial equivalence to predicate devices based on intended use, design, dimensions, materials, technological characteristics, principles of operation, and performance.
It explicitly states: "No new performance testing was necessary to support the current submission." This further confirms that no new clinical or AI/ML performance study was conducted for this specific submission.
To answer your request, you would need a document related to an AI/ML medical device submission, typically found in a "Clinical Performance" or "Software Validation" section of a 510(k) summary or a similar regulatory filing for AI/ML products.
Ask a specific question about this device
(247 days)
The CarboClear® X Pedicle Screw System is intended to provide rigid immobilization and stabilization of lumbar and/or sacral segments as an adjunct to fusion in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at up to three levels from L2 to S1, with up to Grade I spondylolisthesis. DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. Patients should be skeletally mature and have at least six months of non-operative treatment.
The CarboClear® X Pedicle Screw System is intended to be used with intervertebral body fusion device/s implanted at the same spinal level/s with autogenous and/or allogenic bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft.
The CarboClear® X Pedicle Screw System is composed of implants in various dimensions, used to build a spinal construct; and of a set of instruments, intended to assist in the insertion and placement of the implants.
The implants include pedicle screws, rods, and a locking element (set screw). They are made of carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK). The threaded portion of the pedicle screws is encased within a thin titanium shell. The implants may include tantalum markers. Titanium alloy rod is also available.
The implants are supplied sterile, and are intended for single use.
The CarboClear® X implants may be implanted in an open approach or using a minimally invasive surgery (MIS) approach.
The provided text describes the 510(k) premarket notification for the CarboClear® X Pedicle Screw System. This document is a regulatory submission for a medical device, specifically spinal implants. It focuses on demonstrating that the new device is substantially equivalent to existing predicate devices already on the market.
Crucially, this document does not describe studies proving device meets acceptance criteria related to AI/software performance or diagnostic accuracy. It primarily discusses the mechanical performance and material equivalence of a physical implant system (pedicle screws) to predicate devices, and an expansion of its indications for use.
Therefore, many of the requested items related to AI/software performance, ground truth establishment, expert adjudication, and MRMC studies are not applicable to the information contained within this regulatory submission.
However, I can extract information relevant to the device's performance as understood in the context of this specific regulatory submission for a physical medical device:
Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance (Mechanical/Physical)
For this type of medical device (pedicle screws), "acceptance criteria" and "performance" relate to mechanical and material characteristics rather than diagnostic accuracy.
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:
| Acceptance Criteria Category | Specific Test Standard | Performance/Result | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mechanical Stability | ASTM F1717 | Results comparable to predicate devices. | Includes static and dynamic tests for spinal implant constructs. |
| Axial Gripping Capacity | ASTM F1798 | Results comparable to predicate devices. | Relates to the ability of the screws to grip the bone. |
| Torsional Gripping Capacity | ASTM F1798 | Results comparable to predicate devices. | Relates to the rotational stability of the screws in the bone. |
| Static Flexion-Extension | ASTM F1798 | Results comparable to predicate devices. | Simulates spinal movement. |
| Material Equivalence | Not explicit standard, but inferred | Components (pedicle screws, rods, locking elements) made of carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK). Threaded portion of screws encased in thin titanium shell. Tantalum markers may be included. Titanium alloy rod also available. | Compared to predicate devices, especially the primary predicate, the subject device's implant components are "the same." |
| Geometric Equivalence | Not explicit standard, but inferred | Subject device includes "longer rods" compared to primary predicate. Otherwise, implant components are "the same." | This is the basis for the "expansion of indications for use." |
2. Sample size used for the test set and data provenance:
- The document mentions "Performance Data" from mechanical tests (ASTM F1717, ASTM F1798). It does not specify the sample size for these tests (e.g., number of constructs tested, number of screws).
- The data provenance is not explicitly stated beyond being part of this 510(k) submission by CarboFix Orthopedics Ltd. (Israel-based company). It's scientific laboratory data gathered for regulatory purposes, typically conducted in a controlled lab environment. It is prospective testing for the submission, not retrospective data.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and qualifications of those experts:
- This is not applicable. The "ground truth" for mechanical testing is established by engineering standards (e.g., ASTM standards) and the physical measurements obtained from those tests, not by expert human interpretation.
4. Adjudication method for the test set:
- Not applicable for mechanical testing.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:
- Not applicable as this is not an AI/software device.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:
- Not applicable as this is not an AI/software device.
7. The type of ground truth used:
- The "ground truth" for this device's performance relies on objective physical measurements derived from standardized mechanical testing (e.g., load-displacement curves, fatigue life) compared against established performance benchmarks within the specific ASTM standards for spinal implants and demonstrating comparability to predicate devices.
8. The sample size for the training set:
- Not applicable as this is not an AI/software device.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established:
- Not applicable as this is not an AI/software device.
Summary regarding the provided document:
The provided document (a 510(k) clearance letter and summary) is for a physical medical device (pedicle screw system), not an AI/software device. As such, the "acceptance criteria" and "performance studies" described are entirely focused on the mechanical and material properties of the implant, demonstrating its substantial equivalence to already cleared devices. The detailed questions about AI, ground truth, experts, and MRMC studies are not relevant to the content of this specific regulatory submission.
Ask a specific question about this device
(29 days)
CarboClear® Hybrid Pedicle Screw System (Oncological)
The CarboClear® Hybrid Pedicle Screw System is intended to restore the integrity of the spinal column even in the absence of fusion for a limited time period in patients with advanced stage tumors involving the thoracic and lumbar spine in whom life expectancy is of insufficient duration to permit achievement of fusion.
CarboClear® Hybrid Pedicle Screw System (DDD)
The CarboClear® Hybrid Pedicle Screw System is intended to provide rigid immobilization and stabilization of lumbar and/or sacral segments as an adjunct to fusion in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one level from L2 to S1, with up to Grade I spondylolisthesis. DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. Patients should be skeletally mature and have at least six months of non-operative treatment. The CarboClear® Hybrid Pedicle Screw System is intended to be used with an intervertebral body fusion device implanted at the same spinal level with autogenous and/or allogenic bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft.
CarboClear® Hybrid Navigated Instruments
CarboClear® Hybrid Navigated Instruments are intended to be used during the preparation and placement of CarboClear® Hybrid Pedicle Screws during spinal surgery to assist the surgeon in precisely locating anatomical structures. CarboClear® Hybrid Navigated Instruments are designed for use with the Medtronic StealthStation® System, which is indicated for any medical condition in which the use of stereotactic surgery may be appropriate, and where reference to a rigid anatomical structure, such as vertebra, can be identified relative to a CT or MR based model, fluoroscopy images, or digitized landmarks of the anatomy.
CarboClear® Hybrid Fenestrated Pedicle Screw System
When used in conjunction with High V+® Bone Cement, the CarboClear® Hybrid Fenestrated Pedicle Screw System is intended to restore the integrity of the spinal column even in the absence of fusion for a limited time period in patients with advanced stage tumors involving the thoracic and lumbar spine in whom life expectancy is of insufficient duration to permit achievement of fusion. The CarboClear® Hybrid Fenestrated Pedicle Screw System augmented with High V+® Bone Cement is for use at spinal levels where the structural integrity of the spine is not severely compromised.
When used without cement, the CarboClear® Hybrid Fenestrated Pedicle Screws are intended: (a) to restore the integrity of the spinal column even in the absence of fusion for a limited time period in patients with advanced stage tumors involving the thoracic and lumbar spine in whom life expectancy is of insufficient duration to permit achievement of fusion.
(b) to provide rigid immobilization and stabilization of lumbar and/or sacral segments as an adjunct to fusion in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one level from L2 to S1, with up to Grade I spondylolisthesis. DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. Patients should be skeletally mature and have at least six months of non-operative treatment. The CarboClear® Hybrid Pedicle Screw System is intended to be used with an intervertebral body fusion device implanted at the same spinal level with autogenous and/or allogenic bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft.
High V+® Bone Cement
When used in conjunction with the CarboClear® Hybrid Fenestrated Pedicle Screw System, High V +® Bone Cement is intended to restore the integrity of the spinal column even in the absence of fusion for a limited time period in patients with advanced stage tumors involving the thoracic and lumbar spine in whom life expectancy is of insufficient duration to permit achievement of fusion. High V+® Bone Cement is limited to use at spinal levels where the structural integrity of the spine is not severely compromised.
CarboClear® X Fenestrated Pedicle Screw System
When used in conjunction with High V+® Bone Cement, the CarboClear® X Fenestrated Pedicle Screw System is intended to restore the integrity of the spinal column even in the absence of fusion for a limited time period in patients with advanced stage tumors involving the thoracic and lumbar spine in whom life expectancy is of insufficient duration to permit achievement of fusion. The CarboClear® X Fenestrated Pedicle Screw System augmented with High V+® Bone Cement is for use at spinal levels where the structural integrity of the spine is not severely compromised.
When used without cement, the CarboClear® X Fenestrated Pedicle Screw System is intended: (a) to restore the integrity of the spinal column even in the absence of fusion for a limited time period in patients with advanced stage tumors involving the thoracic and lumbar spine in whom life expectancy is of insufficient duration to permit achievement of fusion.
(b) to provide rigid immobilization and stabilization of lumbar and/or sacral segments as an adjunct to fusion in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one level from L2 to S1, with up to Grade I spondylolisthesis. DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. Patients should be skeletally mature and have at least six months of non-operative treatment. The CarboClear® X Pedicle Screw System is intended to be used with an intervertebral body fusion device implanted at the same spinal level with autogenous and/or allogenic bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft.
High V+® Bone Cement
When used in conjunction with the CarboClear® X Fenestrated Pedicle Screw System, High V+® Bone Cement is intended to restore the integrity of the spinal column even in the absence of fusion for a limited time period in patients with advanced stage tumors involving the thoracic and lumbar spine in whom life expectancy is of insufficient duration to permit achievement of fusion. High V+® Bone Cement is limited to use at spinal levels where the structural integrity of the spine is not severely compromised.
The CarboClear® Hybrid Pedicle Screw System is composed of implants in various dimensions, used to build a spinal construct; and of a set of instruments, intended to assist in the insertion and placement of the implants.
The CarboClear® Hybrid Pedicle Screws, including CarboClear® Hybrid Fenestrated Screws, are made of carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK), with titanium alloy tulip. Their threaded portion is encased within a thin titanium shell. They are used with a compatible titanium alloy locking element, and with CarboClear X CFR-PEEK rods and trans-connectors. The implants may include tantalum markers. CarboClear X titanium alloy rod is also offered.
The implants are supplied sterile, and are intended for single use.
The CarboClear® Hybrid implants may be implanted in an open approach or using a minimally invasive surgery (MIS) approach.
The CarboClear® Hybrid Navigated Instruments are manually operated instruments, intended to be used with Medtronic's StealthStation® Navigation System, to assist surgeons in precisely locating anatomical structures for preparation and placement of CarboClear® Hybrid pedicle screws, respectively, during spinal surgery.
The CarboClear® Hybrid Fenestrated Pedicle Screws and CarboClear® X Fenestrated Pedicle Screws are cannulated polyaxial pedicle screws in various dimensions, with lateral fenestrations near screws' distal tip, which allow controlled delivery of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement (High V+® Bone Cement) into the vertebral body in oncological patients.
These implants may also serve as traditional cannulated pedicle screws when used without bone cement.
The High V+ Bone Cement is a self-curing, high viscosity, radiopaque PMMA based bone cement. It is provided sterile in two components: 20 grams of powder and 8.6 grams of liquid. The powder component consists of polymethylmethacrylate, with barium sulfate and hydroxyapatite as radiopacifier, and benzoyl peroxide as an initiator. The liquid component comprises methylmethacrylate monomer, with N.N-dimethyl-p-toluidine as a promoter, and hydroquinone as a stabilizer. The powder and liquid components are mixed into homogenous paste, to initiate the polymerization reaction.
This document is a 510(k) Pre-market Notification from the FDA, confirming substantial equivalence for several CarboFix Orthopedics Ltd. devices. It does not describe any acceptance criteria or studies performed to prove the device meets acceptance criteria in the context of device performance or clinical endpoints.
Instead, it primarily addresses the substantial equivalence of the new devices to existing predicate devices based on:
- Intended Use & Indications for Use: These are compared to ensure they align, indicating what the devices are designed for.
- Technological Characteristics: Materials, design, and operating principles are compared. The key difference noted for the hybrid system is the screw tulip and locking element material.
- Performance Data (Bench Testing): This section specifically mentions mechanical performance characteristics evaluated through bench testing.
Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information regarding acceptance criteria and studies in the context of clinical performance or diagnostic accuracy, as this document does not contain such details. The studies mentioned are engineering/mechanical tests.
However, I can extract the available information regarding the performance data.
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
Based on the provided document, the "acceptance criteria" are implied by the comparison to predicate devices, and the "reported device performance" refers to mechanical test results. The document states:
"Performance characteristics included static and dynamic compression bending tests according to ASTM F1717, as well as static flexion-extension test, axial gripping capacity test, and torsional gripping capacity test according to ASTM F1798. The results of the tests are comparable to those of the predicate devices, demonstrating substantially equivalent performance of the subject and predicate devices."
Table: Acceptance Criteria (Implied) and Reported Device Performance
| Device Performance Metric (Mechanical Testing) | Acceptance Criteria (Implied) | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Static and Dynamic Compression Bending | Performance comparable to predicate devices (ASTM F1717) | Results comparable to those of the predicate devices. |
| Static Flexion-Extension | Performance comparable to predicate devices (ASTM F1798) | Results comparable to those of the predicate devices. |
| Axial Gripping Capacity | Performance comparable to predicate devices (ASTM F1798) | Results comparable to those of the predicate devices. |
| Torsional Gripping Capacity | Performance comparable to predicate devices (ASTM F1798) | Results comparable to those of the predicate devices. |
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)
The document does not specify the sample size for the mechanical performance tests, nor does it mention data provenance (e.g., country of origin, retrospective or prospective) as these are bench tests, not clinical studies involving patient data.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)
Not applicable. The performance data discussed are from mechanical bench tests of the physical medical device components, not from studies involving human interpretation or clinical ground truth.
4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set
Not applicable. This is not a clinical or diagnostic study involving adjudication of human assessments.
5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
Not applicable. This document does not describe studies involving AI or human readers.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done
Not applicable. This document does not describe studies involving algorithms or software performance in a diagnostic context. The "Navigated Instruments" are physical instruments used with a navigation system, not a standalone diagnostic algorithm.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)
Not applicable. The "ground truth" for the mechanical tests would be the established engineering standards (ASTM F1717, ASTM F1798) and the performance of the predicate devices. It is not clinical or diagnostic ground truth.
8. The sample size for the training set
Not applicable. There is no mention of a "training set" as this is not a machine learning or AI-driven device.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
Not applicable, as there is no training set for an AI/ML model mentioned in this document.
Ask a specific question about this device
(100 days)
The CarboClear® Posterior Cervical Screw System is intended to restore the integrity of the spinal column even in the absence of fusion for a limited time period in patients with advanced stage tumors involving the cervical spine in whom life expectancy is of insufficient duration to permit achievement of fusion.
The CarboClear® Posterior Cervical Screw System ("CarboClear® System") is composed of implants in various dimensions, used to build a spinal construct; and of a set of instruments, intended to assist in the insertion and placement of the implants. The CarboClear® System is a posterior, cervical screw fixation system, intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of cervical spinal segments in oncological patients.
The CarboClear® System implants include posterior screws, rods and locking elements (set screw). The implants are made mainly of carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK). The threaded portion and the spherical head of the screw are encased within a thin titanium shell, and may include a tantalum marker.
I am sorry, but the provided text does not contain information about the acceptance criteria and the study that proves a device meets acceptance criteria in the context of an AI/ML-driven medical device. The document is a 510(k) clearance letter from the FDA for a CarboClear® Posterior Cervical Screw System, which is a physical implant, not a software or AI/ML device.
The document discusses:
- Device Name: CarboClear® Posterior Cervical Screw System
- Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3075 (Posterior Cervical Screw System)
- Regulatory Class: Class II
- Product Code: NKG
- Indications for Use: Restoring spinal column integrity in patients with advanced stage tumors involving the cervical spine for a limited time.
- Device Description: Implants (screws, rods, locking elements) made of carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK, with titanium shells and tantalum markers, and associated instruments.
- Substantial Equivalence: Comparison to predicate devices (Synapse OCT System, Mesa Mini Spinal System, CarboClear® X Pedicle Screw System) based on indications for use, design, materials, technological characteristics, principles of operation, and performance characteristics (static and dynamic tests according to ASTM standards).
There is no mention of an AI/ML component, algorithm performance, ground truth establishment, expert review, or any of the specific criteria related to an AI/ML performance study as requested in your prompt.
Therefore, I cannot extract the information required to populate the table or answer the questions related to acceptance criteria and study proving device meets acceptance criteria for an AI/ML device from this document.
Ask a specific question about this device
(67 days)
The CarboClear® Pedicle Screw System is intended to provide rigid immobilization of lumbar and/or sacral segments as an adjunct to fusion in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one level from L2 to S1, with up to Grade I spondylolisthesis. DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. Patients should be skeletally mature and have at least six months of non-operative treatment. The CarboClear® Pedicle Screw System is intended to be used with an intervertebral body fusion device implanted at the same spinal level with autogenous and/ or allogenic bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graff.
The CarboClear® Pedicle Screw System is composed of implants in various dimensions, used to build a spinal construct; and of a set of instruments, intended to assist in the insertion and placement of the implants. The CarboClear® implants include pedicle screws, rods and locking elements. The implants are made of carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK). The threaded portion of the pedicle screws is encased within a thin titanium shell. The implants include tantalum markers. The implants are supplied sterile, and are intended for single use.
The provided text describes the CarboClear® Pedicle Screw System, a medical device for spinal stabilization, and its 510(k) submission to the FDA. The submission focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to existing predicate devices rather than proving the device meets specific acceptance criteria through a standalone study with a defined test set, ground truth, and expert adjudication as might be seen for AI/ML devices. Therefore, much of the requested information regarding acceptance criteria and study methodology for proving device performance through such studies is not available in this document.
However, based on the provided text, here's what can be extracted regarding performance and substantiation:
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
The document does not explicitly state quantitative acceptance criteria for device performance in a table format. Instead, it relies on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices through various tests.
| Acceptance Criteria (Implied by Substantial Equivalence to Predicates) | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|
| Mechanical performance comparable to predicate devices in static and dynamic tests. | Performance testing (per ASTM F1717, F1798, F2193, F543, fatigue lateral bending-axial rotation, rod creep tests): "The test results were found to be comparable to those of predicate devices, as applicable, demonstrating substantially equivalent mechanical performance of the subject system." |
| Clinical performance comparable to predicate devices for the specified indications for use. | Clinical data: "Clinical data for the CarboClear® Pedicle Screw System was presented for the target population specified in the indications for use statement, and supports the substantially equivalent performance of the subject system." |
2. Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)
The document does not specify a "test set" in the context of an AI/ML algorithm evaluation. Instead, it refers to "Performance data" and "Clinical data."
- Performance Data (Mechanical Testing): The sample size for mechanical tests (e.g., number of screws, rods tested) is not provided. The data provenance is laboratory testing conducted according to ASTM standards. Country of origin not specified, but the applicant is based in Israel.
- Clinical Data: The sample size for clinical data (e.g., number of patients) is not provided. The provenance (country of origin, retrospective/prospective) is also not specified.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)
This information is not applicable to the type of submission described. The document does not describe a study involving expert-established ground truth for a test set, as would be relevant for an AI/ML device.
4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set
This information is not applicable. There is no mention of an adjudication method as it relates to expert review of a test set.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
A multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study is not mentioned. The device is a physical pedicle screw system, not an AI/ML-driven diagnostic or assistive tool for human readers.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
This information is not applicable. The device is a physical implant, not an algorithm.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)
For the mechanical performance, the "ground truth" is established by adherence to recognized ASTM standards and comparison to predicate device performance. For clinical performance, the "ground truth" would likely be patient outcomes, but the specific type of clinical ground truth (e.g., imaging follow-up, functional scores, fusion rates) is not detailed.
8. The sample size for the training set
This information is not applicable. The device is not an AI/ML model that requires a training set.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
This information is not applicable. The device is not an AI/ML model that requires a training set with established ground truth.
Ask a specific question about this device
(61 days)
The CarboClear® X Pedicle Screw System is intended to restore the integrity of the spinal column even in the absence of fusion for a limited time period in patients with advanced stage tumors involving the thoracic and lumbar spine in whom life expectancy is of insufficient duration to permit achievement of fusion.
CarboClear® X Navigated Instruments are intended to be used during the preparation and placement of CarboClear® X Pedicle Screws during spinal surgery to assist the surgeon in precisely locating anatomical structures. CarboClear® X Navigated Instruments are designed for use with the Medtronic System, which is indicated for any medical condition in which the use of stereotactic surgery may be appropriate, and where reference to a rigid anatomical structure, such as vertebra, can be identified relative to a CT or MR based model, fluoroscopy images, or digitized landmarks of the anatomy.
When used in conjunction with High V+ ® Bone Cement, the CarboClear® X Fenestrated Pedicle Screw System is intended to restore the integrity of the spinal column even in the absence of fusion for a limited time period in patients with advanced stage tumors involving the thoracic and lumbar spine in whom life expectancy is of insufficient duration to permit achievement of fusion. The CarboClear® X Fenestrated Pedicle Screw System augmented with High V+® Bone Cement is for use at spinal levels where the structural integrity of the spine is not severely compromised.
When used in conjunction with the CarboClear® X Fenestrated Pedicle Screw System, High V+® Bone Cement is intended to restore the integrity of the spinal column even in the absence of fusion for a limited time period in patients with advanced stage tumors involving the thoracic and lumbar spine in whom life expectancy is of insufficient duration to permit achievement of fusion. High V+® Bone Cement is limited to use at spinal levels where the structural integrity of the spine is not severely compromised.
The CarboClear® X Pedicle Screw System is composed of implants in various dimensions, used to build a spinal construct; and of a set of instruments, intended to assist in the insertion and placement of the implants. The implants for minimally invasive surgical procedures include pedicle screws, rods, and a set screw (locking element). They are made of carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK). The threaded portion of the pedicle screws is encased within a thin titanium shell. Implants may include tantalum markers. The implants are supplied sterile, and are intended for single use.
CarboClear® X Navigated Instruments are manually operated, instruments intended to be used with the Medtronic StealthStation® Navigation System, to assist surgeons in precisely locating anatomical structures for preparation and placement of CarboClear® X pedicle screws during spinal surgery.
The CarboClear® X Fenestrated Pedicle Screw System consists of cannulated polyaxial pedicle screws in various dimensions, with lateral fenestrations near the screws' distal tip, which allow controlled delivery of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement (High V+® Bone Cement) into the vertebral body. The Screws are implanted with the components of the CarboClear® X Pedicle Screw System. The CarboClear® X Fenestrated Screw System is made of carbon fiberreinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK). The threaded portion of the screws is encased within a thin titanium shell, and includes a small tantalum marker. The CarboClear® X Fenestrated Screw System is supplied sterile, and is intended for single use.
High V+® Bone Cement is self-curing, high viscosity, radiopaque PMMA based bone cement. It is provided sterile in two components: 20 grams of powder and 8.6 grams of liquid. The powder component consists of polymethylmethacrylate, with barium sulfate and hydroxyapatite as radiopacifier, and benzovl peroxide as an initiator. The liquid component comprises methylmethacrylate monomer, with N.N-dimethyl-p-toluidine as a promoter, and hydroquinone as a stabilizer. The powder and liquid components are mixed into homogenous paste, to initiate the polymerization reaction.
The provided document is a 510(k) summary for the CarboClear® X Pedicle Screw System and related components. It does not contain any information regarding acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets specific acceptance criteria in the context of an AI/algorithm-driven medical device.
Instead, this document focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices through design validation, including engineering analyses and testing. The purpose of this submission is to add a minimally invasive surgery approach option to previously cleared devices.
Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request for:
- A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance: This document doesn't provide performance metrics against specific acceptance thresholds for an AI/algorithm.
- Sample size and data provenance for a test set: Not applicable, as there's no mention of an algorithm test set.
- Number of experts and their qualifications for ground truth: Not applicable.
- Adjudication method for the test set: Not applicable.
- MRMC comparative effectiveness study: Not applicable, as this is not an AI-assisted diagnostic device.
- Standalone algorithm performance: Not applicable.
- Type of ground truth used: Not applicable.
- Sample size for the training set: Not applicable.
- How ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable.
The document describes a typical 510(k) submission for a physical medical device (pedicle screw system), where substantial equivalence is demonstrated through material properties, design specifications, and mechanical testing, rather than clinical performance of an AI algorithm.
Ask a specific question about this device
(27 days)
The CarboClear® X Pedicle Screw System is intended to restore the integrity of the spinal column even in the absence of fusion for a limited time period in patients with advanced stage tumors involving the thoracic and lumbar spine in whom life expectancy is of insufficient duration to permit achievement of fusion.
CarboClear® X Navigated Instruments are intended to be used during the preparation and placement of CarboClear® X Pedicle Screws during spinal surgery to assist the surgeon in precisely locating anatomical structures. CarboClear® X Navigated Instruments are designed for use with the Medtronic StealthStation® System, which is indicated for any medical condition in which the use of stereotactic surgery may be appropriate, and where reference to a rigid anatomical structure, such as vertebra, can be identified relative to a CT or MR based model, fluoroscopy images, or digitized landmarks of the anatomy.
The CarboClear X Pedicle Screw System is composed of implants in various dimensions, used to build a spinal construct; and of a set of instruments, intended to assist in the insertion and placement of the implants. The implants include pedicle screws, rods, a set screw and transverse connectors. They are made of carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK). The threaded portion of the pedicle screws is encased within a thin titanium shell, and includes a small tantalum marker. The implants are supplied sterile, and are intended for single use.
CarboClear® X Navigated Instruments are reusable, manually operated, instruments, including probes, bone taps and a screwdriver. These instruments are intended to be used with the Medtronic StealthStation® Navigation System, to assist surgeons in precisely locating anatomical structures for preparation and placement of CarboClear® X Pedicle Screws during spinal surgery.
The provided document is a 510(k) premarket notification summary for the CarboClear® X Pedicle Screw System and CarboClear® X Navigated Instruments. It focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices, rather than establishing de novo acceptance criteria and proving performance against them in a clinical study.
Therefore, the document does not contain the acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets acceptance criteria in the way requested by the prompt for a typical AI/medical device performance evaluation.
The "Performance Data and Substantial Equivalence" section describes the types of tests conducted:
- For CarboClear® X Pedicle Screw System: Tests according to ASTM F1717 and ASTM F1798. These are standards for mechanical testing of spinal implants and pedicle screw systems, respectively.
- For CarboClear® X Navigated Instruments: Engineering analysis - comparative dimensional measurements.
These tests are designed to show that the new device performs similarly to previously cleared predicate devices, not to set and individually meet new "acceptance criteria" for a novel device performance claim.
Therefore, I cannot populate the requested table and sections as the information is not present in the provided text. The document describes a substantial equivalence pathway, where the performance is compared to predicates rather than against newly established acceptance criteria based on clinical outcomes or specific performance metrics.
Ask a specific question about this device
(15 days)
The CarboClear® X Pedicle Screw System is intended to restore the integrity of the spinal column even in the absence of fusion for a limited time period in patients with advanced stage tumors involving the thoracic and lumbar spine in whom life expectancy is of insufficient duration to permit achievement of fusion.
The CarboClear X Pedicle Screw System is composed of implants in various dimensions, used to build a spinal construct; and of a set of instruments, intended to assist in the insertion and placement of the implants.
The implants include pedicle screws, rods, locking components (a set screw and a nut) and transverse connectors. The implants are made of carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK). The threaded portion of the pedicle screws is encased within a thin titanium shell, and includes a small tantalum marker.
The implants are supplied sterile, and are intended for single use.
This document is a 510(k) summary for the CarboClear® X Pedicle Screw System, a medical device. It does not present acceptance criteria or a study proving that an AI/ML powered device meets acceptance criteria.
Instead, it provides:
- Device Name: CarboClear® X Pedicle Screw System
- Intended Use/Indications for Use: To restore the integrity of the spinal column (even in the absence of fusion for a limited time) in patients with advanced stage thoracic and lumbar spine tumors who have insufficient life expectancy to permit fusion.
- Regulation Number and Device Class: 21 CFR §888.3070; Class II
- Product Code: NKB
- Predicate Devices: CarboClear® Pedicle Screw System (K173487, K182377, K201926) as the primary predicate, and several additional predicate devices from other manufacturers.
- Performance Data: Static and dynamic tests were performed according to ASTM F1717 and ASTM F1798.
- Conclusion: The device is substantially equivalent to its predicate devices based on intended use, design, material, dimensions, technological characteristics, and principles of operation, and its performance test results are comparable.
Therefore, since the provided text relates to a traditional medical device (pedicle screw system) and not an AI/ML powered device, I cannot extract the information requested in your prompt regarding acceptance criteria and studies for an AI/ML device.
Ask a specific question about this device
(28 days)
The CarboClear® Pedicle Screw System is intended to restore the integrity of the spinal column even in the absence of fusion for a limited time period in patients with advanced stage tumors involving the thoracic and lumbar spine in whom life expectancy is of insufficient duration to permit achievement of fusion.
The CarboClear® II Pedicle Screw System is intended to restore the integrity of the spinal column even in the absence of fusion for a limited time period in patients with advanced stage tumors involving the thoracic and lumbar spine in whom life expectancy is of insufficient duration to permit achievement of fusion.
The CarboClear® and CarboClear® II Pedicle Screw Systems are composed of implants in various dimensions, used to build a spinal construct; and of a set of instruments, intended to assist in the insertion and placement of the implants.
The implants include pedicle screws, rods, locking elements and transverse connectors. The implants are made of carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK). The threaded portion of the pedicle screws is encased within a thin titanium shell, and includes a small tantalum marker.
The implants are supplied sterile, and are intended for single use.
This document is a 510(k) Premarket Notification and does not describe acceptance criteria for a device's performance based on clinical study data, nor does it detail a study proving such performance. Instead, it focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices, primarily through mechanical performance testing rather than clinical outcomes or diagnostic accuracy.
Therefore, many of the requested elements (e.g., sample size for test sets, expert adjudication, MRMC studies, ground truth for training/test sets) are not applicable or findable within this document, as they relate to clinical or AI/diagnostic performance studies, which were not the basis for this specific device clearance.
The "device" in this context is a CarboClear® Pedicle Screw System and CarboClear® II Pedicle Screw System, which are medical implants. The "performance" being evaluated here is primarily mechanical performance, not diagnostic accuracy or human-in-the-loop improvement for complex medical tasks often associated with AI/diagnostic devices.
Here's an attempt to answer the questions based on the provided document, highlighting what is (and isn't) present:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The document does not specify quantitative "acceptance criteria" in the way one might for a diagnostic device (e.g., minimum sensitivity/specificity). Instead, it states that the performance characteristics (mechanical) were evaluated against standards, and the results were comparable to predicate devices. This implies the acceptance criterion was "comparable mechanical performance" as demonstrated by meeting specified ASTM standards.
| Acceptance Criteria (Implied) | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|
| Mechanical performance comparable to predicate devices and meeting relevant ASTM standards. | "The results of the tests are comparable to those of the predicate devices, as applicable, demonstrating substantially equivalent mechanical performance of the subject device." Specific quantitative results (e.g., fatigue strength, pull-out force) are not provided in this summary, only that they met the standard of comparability. |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
- Sample Size: The document does not specify mechanical test sample sizes. Mechanical testing typically involves a set number of samples per test condition (e.g., n=6 for fatigue testing). These are in vitro tests, not patient data.
- Data Provenance: Not applicable for a mechanical performance study. The tests were performed in vitro to ASTM standards.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of those Experts
Not applicable. Ground truth and expert review are relevant for diagnostic or AI performance studies involving interpretation of medical data. This document describes mechanical testing of an orthopedic implant.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
Not applicable. Adjudication methods (like 2+1, 3+1) are used for resolving disagreements among human readers/experts in diagnostic studies. This is a mechanical performance study.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done, and its Effect Size
No. An MRMC study is relevant for diagnostic performance, evaluating how human readers perform with or without AI assistance on medical cases. This document covers mechanical testing of a pedicle screw system.
6. If a Standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
Not applicable. This is not an AI/algorithm-based diagnostic device. The performance refers to the physical mechanical properties of the implant itself.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
Not applicable in the context of diagnostic "ground truth." For mechanical testing, the "ground truth" is adherence to established engineering standards (ASTM F1717, F1798, F2193, F543) and demonstrable equivalence to predicate devices under these test conditions.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
Not applicable. This device is not an AI model requiring a training set.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
Not applicable.
Summary of why requested information is largely absent:
The provided text is a 510(k) summary for a pedicle screw system, which is an implantable medical device. The clearance is based on substantial equivalence to existing predicate devices, primarily demonstrated through mechanical performance testing (in vitro engineering tests) rather than clinical studies or diagnostic accuracy evaluations. Many of the questions posed directly relate to the methodology of AI/diagnostic device studies (e.g., human reader performance, training/test sets, expert ground truth, MRMC studies), which are not performed for this type of device clearance.
Ask a specific question about this device
(86 days)
CarboClear® Navigated Instruments are intended to be used during the preparation and placement of CarboClear® Pedicle Screws during spinal surgery to assist the surgeon in precisely locating anatomical structures. CarboClear® Navigated Instruments are designed for use with the Medtronic StealthStation® System, which is indicated for any medical condition in which the use of stereotactic surgery may be appropriate, and where reference to a rigid anatomical structure, such as vertebra, can be identified relative to a CT or MR based model, fluoroscopy images, or digitized landmarks of the anatomy.
CarboClear® Navigated Instruments are reusable, manually operated, instruments, including probes, bone taps and a screwdriver. These instruments are intended to be used with the Medtronic StealthStation® Navigation System, to assist surgeons in precisely locating anatomical structures for preparation and placement of CarboClear Pedicle Screws during spinal surgery.
The provided text is a 510(k) summary for the CarboClear® Navigated Instruments. It details the device's intended use, technological characteristics, and comparison to predicate devices, but lacks the specific details about acceptance criteria, numerical performance data, and the study design required to fully answer your request.
Here's an analysis based on the available information:
1. Table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance:
This information is not explicitly provided in the document. The text mentions "Performance testing demonstrates that the CarboClear® Navigated Instruments are substantially equivalent to the predicate devices" and "Design validation testing, including engineering analysis, compatibility testing and registration, was conducted to verify that the CarboClear® Navigation Instruments are appropriate for their intended use, to ensure functionality, accuracy and compatibility with the Medtronic StealthStation® System using the NavLock Tracker, and to demonstrate substantial equivalence to the predicate instruments."
However, specific metrics for accuracy, functionality, or any other performance aspect, along with their respective acceptance criteria, are not listed.
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance:
This information is not provided in the document. The text mentions "Compatibility testing evaluated the physical compatibility and connection between the NavLock Tracker and CarboClear® Navigated Instruments. Registration testing was performed to ensure that the instruments can be registered to the StealthStation® System." These activities imply testing, but the number of samples or the origin of the data (e.g., country, retrospective/prospective) is not disclosed.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:
This information is not provided in the document. It's likely that "ground truth" in this context would relate to successful navigation, compatibility, and registration, which might involve technical personnel or surgeons, but their number and qualifications are not mentioned.
4. Adjudication method for the test set:
This information is not provided in the document.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:
This type of study is not applicable to this device. The CarboClear® Navigated Instruments are physical surgical instruments used with a navigation system, not an AI or imaging diagnostic tool that would involve "human readers" or "AI assistance" in the sense of image interpretation. The device's function is to assist surgeons in locating anatomical structures during spinal surgery.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:
This is not applicable to this device. The device is explicitly designed for human use ("manually operated instruments") and in conjunction with the Medtronic StealthStation® System. It is not an autonomous algorithm.
7. The type of ground truth used:
Based on the description of performance testing, the "ground truth" would likely be:
- Physical Compatibility/Functionality: Successful connection and operation with the NavLock Tracker and StealthStation® System.
- Dimensional Accuracy: Comparison of physical dimensions of subject instruments to predicate instruments (mentioned in "Engineering analysis included comparative dimensional measurements").
- Registration Success: The ability of the instruments to be accurately registered with the StealthStation® System.
No mention of pathology, outcomes data, or expert consensus (in the sense of clinical diagnosis) for establishing ground truth is made.
8. The sample size for the training set:
This information is not provided and is not applicable in the context of this device. The CarboClear® Navigated Instruments are physical, reusable surgical tools. They are not an AI/ML algorithm that requires a "training set" in the traditional sense for learning or model development. The performance studies described are for verification and validation of the device's design and functionality.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established:
This information is not provided and is not applicable for the reasons stated above (no training set for this type of device).
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 3