Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    Why did this record match?
    Applicant Name (Manufacturer) :

    Beckman Coulter Biomedical GmbH

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The DxA 5000 is a high-speed, modular, automated sample handling system that performs pre-analytical and postanalytical sample processing and storage. The automation system also sorts, routes, and presents sample tubes to analyzers for analysis. The DxA 5000 also consolidates a variety of analytical instruments, such as an Immunoassay analyzer, into a unified workstation on a track system.

    The DxI 800 Access Immunoassay System is a microcomputer controlled, random and continuous access analyzer that includes an external computer. This computer stores the system user interface (UI) software and allows the operator to interface with and direct the instrument software. The UniCel DxI 800 System uses enzyme immunoassays (utilizing paramagnetic particle solid phase and chemiluminescent detection) for the quantitative or qualitative or qualitative determination of various analyte concentrations found in human body fluids. The UniCel DxI 800 System is an in vitro diagnostic device for use in the clinical laboratory.

    The Access Ferritin assay is a paramagnetic particle, chemiluminescent immunoassay for the quantitative determination of ferritin levels in human serum and plasma (heparin) using the Access Immunoassay Systems. Measurements of ferritin aid in the diagnosis of diseases affecting iron metabolism.

    The Access Folate assay is a paramagnetic particle, chemiluminescent immunoassay for the quantitative determination of folic acid levels in human serum and plasma (heparin) or red blood cells using the Access Immunoassay Systems. Folate levels in serum and plasma (heparin) or red blood cells are used to assess folate status. The serum folate level is an indicator of recent folate intake. A low RBC folate value can indicate a prolonged folate deficiency. Folic acid measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of megaloblastic anemia.

    The Access TSH (3rd IS) assay is a paramagnetic particle, chemiluminescent immunoassay for the quantitative determination of human thyroid-stimulating hormone (thyrotropin, TSH, hTSH) levels in human serum and plasma using the Access Immunoassay Systems. This assay is capable of providing 3rd generation TSH results. Measurements of thyroid stimulating hormone produced by the anterior pituitary are used in the diagnosis of thyroid or pituitary disorders.

    The Access Vitamin B12 assay is a paramagnetic particle, chemiluminescent immunoassay for the quantitative determination of vitamin B12 levels in human serum and plasma (heparin) using the Access Immunoassay Systems. Measurements obtained by this device are used in the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal malabsorption.

    Device Description

    The DxA system is a high throughput automated sample handling system which can perform the pre and post analytical processing of sample tubes. DxA can identify and track samples, perform centrifugation, decapping, delivery of samples to connected analyzers, recapping, storing in either non-refrigerated or refrigerated storage, and sorting to output racks.

    The DxA integrates perianalytic (pre and post analysis) functions with analytical instruments (Beckman Coulter, and other manufacturer's) via a track system to provide fully integrated testing solutions.

    AI/ML Overview

    This document focuses on the substantial equivalence of the DxA 5000 automated sample handling system and related immunoassay tests (Ferritin, Folate, TSH, Vitamin B12) to previously cleared devices. It describes engineering performance studies rather than clinical efficacy studies. Therefore, many of the typical clinical study criteria requested (like multi-reader multi-case studies, effect size of human improvement with AI, number of experts for ground truth, sample size for training sets) are not applicable or detailed in this submission.

    Based on the provided text, here's a breakdown of the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets them:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

    The document states that "The acceptance criteria were met for all method comparisons thereby demonstrating the following:"

    Acceptance Criteria / Performance AspectReported Device Performance
    Equivalence (DTS barcode identification process)Equivalence between the predicate lab automation system Power Processor and the candidate one, DxA 5000 in terms of the DTS barcode identification process was demonstrated. (Specific metrics for "equivalence" are not detailed in the provided text, but it's stated as "met").
    Equivalence (pre-analytical processing)Equivalence between the predicate lab automation system Power Processor and the candidate one, DxA 5000 in terms of pre-analytical processing was demonstrated. (Specific metrics for "equivalence" are not detailed, but it's stated as "met").
    Method Comparison (TSH, Ferritin, Folate, B12 Assays)For all method comparisons (TSH (3rd IS), Ferritin, Folate and B12 assays), results were within the specifications when the candidate (DxA 5000 connected to UniCel DxI 800 Access Immunoassay System) was compared to the predicate (Power Processor connected to UniCel DxI 800 Access Immunoassay System). (Specific specifications are not provided, but compliance is affirmed).
    Software Design, Development, and VerificationAll software design, development, and verification activities have been completed. (This is a qualitative statement of completion rather than a specific performance metric).

    2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance

    • Sample Size: The document does not specify the exact sample sizes used for the method comparison studies. It mentions that the studies utilized CLSI EP09, which is a guideline for method comparison and bias estimation using patient samples, but the number of samples is not disclosed.
    • Data Provenance: Not specified in the provided text (e.g., country of origin, retrospective/prospective). However, given it's a 510(k) submission for an in vitro diagnostic device, the studies are typically conducted in a controlled laboratory setting, often in a prospective manner or using banked samples that meet specific criteria.

    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts

    This information is not applicable and not provided in the document. The acceptance criteria and performance relate to the comparability of the new automation system and immunoassay tests against predicate devices, not against a "ground truth" established by experts for diagnostic accuracy in a clinical setting in the way an AI imaging device might. The "ground truth" here is the performance of the predicate device/system.

    4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

    This information is not applicable and not provided. Adjudication methods are typically used in studies where human readers are interpreting data (e.g., medical images) and their interpretations need to be reconciled to establish a consensus ground truth. This is an engineering/analytical performance study for a laboratory automation system and immunoassay tests.

    5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

    This information is not applicable and not provided. MRMC studies are relevant for imaging devices where human readers are involved in the diagnostic process. This document concerns a laboratory automation system and immunoassay tests, not an AI-assisted diagnostic imaging tool.

    6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

    The studies described are for the performance of the integrated system (DxA 5000 connected to the DxI 800 Access Immunoassay System running specific assays). While the system operates largely automatically (an "algorithm only" in the sense that the mechanical and analytical processes are automated), its performance is compared to a human-operated predicate system or another automated system. This is not an "AI algorithm only" study in the context of diagnostic decision support, but rather an automated analytical system comparison.

    7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)

    The "ground truth" in this context is the performance of the legally marketed predicate devices/systems:

    • Power Processor Sample Processing System (K110413) for the DxA 5000's automation features.
    • Beckman Coulter UniCel® DxI 800 Access® Immunoassay System (K023764), Access® Ferritin assay (K926221), Access® Folate assay (K060774), Access® HYPER sensitive hTSH assay (K042281), and Access® Vitamin B12 assay (K955436) for the immunoassay performance in conjunction with the automation system.

    The study aimed to demonstrate that the new device system yielded results "within specifications" when compared to the predicate, implying the predicate's performance served as the benchmark or "ground truth" for equivalence.

    8. The sample size for the training set

    This information is not applicable and not provided. This is a 510(k) submission for laboratory equipment and assays, not a machine learning/AI device requiring a "training set" in the computational sense. The "development" for such systems involves rigorous engineering, analytical validation, and verification based on established chemical, biological, and mechanical principles.

    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

    This information is not applicable for the reasons stated in point 8.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1