Search Results

The BD GeneOhm™ MRSA ACP Assay is a qualitative in vitro diagnostic test for the direct detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) DNA from nasal swabs in patients at risk for nasal colonization. The test utilizes polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the amplification of MRSA DNA and fluorogenic target-specific hybridization probes for the detection of the amplified DNA. The BD GeneOhm™ MRSA ACP Assay is intended to aid in the prevention and control of MRSA infections in healthcare settings. It is not intended to diagnose MRSA infections nor to guide or monitor treatment for MRSA infections. Concomitant cultures are necessary only to recover organisms for epidemiological typing or for further susceptibility testing.

The BD GeneOhm™ MRSA ACP Assay is a qualitative in vitro diagnostic test for the direct detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) DNA from nasal swabs. A nasal specimen is collected and transported to the laboratory using a recommended swab. The lysis of bacterial cells in nasal swab specimens is performed using the BD GeneOhm™ MRSA ACP Lysis kit. An aliquot of the lysate is added to prepared PCR reagents which contain MRSA-specific primers that will amplify in the presence of genetic target. The assay also includes an Internal Control (IC) to monitor for the presence of inhibitors in the PCR reaction and to confirm the integrity of assay reagents. Controls and specimen lysates are added to disposable reaction tubes and placed in the SmartCycler® II instrument. The amplification, detection and results interpretation are automatically performed by the SmartCycler® II software. The BD GeneOhm™ MRSA ACP Assay procedure can be performed within 2 hours, depending on the number of specimens processed. To recover MRSA for epidemiological typing or for further antibiotic susceptibility testing, appropriate culture media can be inoculated during or up to 24 hours after specimen preparation. The primers and probes in the BD GeneOhm™ MRSA ACP Assay detect a proprietary sequence inserted into the S. aureus chromosome indicating the presence of MRSA DNA. Amplification of IC and MRSA DNA are detected using specific hybridization probes that bind to a specific sequence of the amplified target. Differentiation of MRSA DNA and IC is done using molecular beacons which contain different fluorometric properties. The beacon-target hybrid fluoresces at a different wavelength for MRSA and IC and the emitted light from this reaction is measured by the SmartCycler® II instrument. MRSA or IC specific amplicons are detected simultaneously in two different fluorescence channels on the SmartCycler and can therefore be differentiated. The operation of the SmartCycler® II instrument is based on the proprietary microprocessor-controlled I-CORE® (Intelligent Cooling/Heating Optical Reaction) module.

Here's a summary of the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device (BD GeneOhm™ MRSA ACP Assay) meets them, based on the provided text:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:

The document doesn't explicitly state "acceptance criteria" as a separate, pre-defined set of values. Instead, it presents performance data from a clinical trial and analytical studies. Here, I've inferred the implied acceptance criteria based on the reported results and typical expectations for such devices. The "reported performance" column directly quotes or summarizes the study findings.

2. Sample Size and Data Provenance:

• Test Set (Clinical Study):
  • Sample Size: 1216 specimens (results summarized, 1228 specimens mentioned for overall prevalence).
  • Data Provenance: Multi-site prospective investigational study. The document states "Three (3) investigational centers participated in the study." The countries of origin are not specified, but the applicant's address is in Quebec, Canada, implying the study might have been conducted there or in the US (given FDA submission).

3. Number of Experts and Qualifications for Ground Truth (Clinical Study):

• The document describes the "Comparative Reference Method" used to establish ground truth for the clinical study. This method involved:
  • Initial analysis on selective chromogenic media.
  • Subculture on Blood Agar (BA) of presumptive S. aureus colonies.
  • Identification confirmed with an agglutination test.
  • Methicillin-resistance confirmed by cefoxitin disk diffusion susceptibility testing.
• Number of Experts/Qualifications: The document does not specify the number or qualifications of experts involved in performing or interpreting these reference method tests. This is a standard microbiology laboratory process, typically performed by trained microbiologists or medical technologists.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set:

• The document does not specify an adjudication method for discrepant results between the BD GeneOhm™ MRSA ACP Assay and the Comparative Reference Method. Standard practice often involves a third, more definitive test or expert review in such cases, but it is not mentioned here.

5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study:

• No, an MRMC comparative effectiveness study was not done. This study is a standalone performance evaluation of the device against a reference method. It does not assess human reader performance with or without AI assistance, as it is a molecular diagnostic assay for direct detection of DNA.

6. Standalone Performance Study:

• Yes, a standalone performance study was done. The entire "Performance Data" section (Clinical Performance, Analytical Sensitivity, Analytical Inclusivity, Analytical Specificity, Interfering Substances, Reproducibility, Carry-Over Contamination) describes the algorithm's (BD GeneOhm™ MRSA ACP Assay) performance directly, without human interpretation as part of the evaluated output. The results are automatically generated by the SmartCycler® II software.

7. Type of Ground Truth Used (Clinical Study):

• Culture-based microbiology with confirmatory testing. The ground truth for the clinical study was established by a "Comparative Reference Method" which consisted of:
  • Culture on selective chromogenic media.
  • Subculture on Blood Agar.
  • Agglutination test for S. aureus identification.
  • Cefoxitin disk diffusion susceptibility testing for methicillin resistance. This is considered a gold standard or definitive method for phenotypic MRSA identification in clinical microbiology.

8. Sample Size for the Training Set:

• The document does not mention a training set or its sample size. This is typical for a pre-market submission of a molecular diagnostic assay. These assays are generally designed and validated based on known genetic targets and wet-lab analytical studies rather than machine learning models that require explicit training sets. The development process would involve extensive analytical testing to optimize primers and probes, which is different from training a machine learning algorithm.

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established:

• As no "training set" in the context of a machine learning algorithm is mentioned, this point is not applicable. The assay's design relies on detecting specific, known MRSA DNA sequences rather than learning from data. The performance is validated against established microbiological methods as described for the clinical and analytical studies.

Ask a specific question about this device

The BD GeneOhm™ Cdiff Assay is a rapid in vitro diagnostic test for the direct, qualitative detection of C. difficile toxin B gene (todB) in human liquid or soft stool specimens from patients suspected of having Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD). The test, based on real-time PCR, is intended for use as an aid in diagnosis of CDAD. The test is performed directly on the specimen, utilizing polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the amplification of specific targets and fluorogenic target-specific hybridization probes for the detection of the amplified DNA.

The BD GeneOhm™ Cdiff Assay is a rapid in vitro diagnostic test for the direct, qualitative detection of C. difficile toxin B gene (todB) in human liquid or soft stool specimens from patients suspected of having Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD). The test, based on real-time PCR, is intended for use as an aid in diagnosis of CDAD. The test is performed directly on the specimen, utilizing polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the amplification of specific targets and fluorogenic target-specific hybridization probes for the detection of the amplified DNA.

A liquid or soft stool specimen is collected and transported to the laboratory. A sterile dry swab is dipped into the liquid or soft stool material and processed. For testing, the swab is eluted in sample buffer and the specimen is lysed. An aliquot of the lysate is added to PCR readents which contain the tcdB specific primers used to amplify the genetic target of Clostridium difficile, if present. The assay also includes an internal control (IC) to detect PCR inhibited specimens and to confirm the integrity of assay reagents. Amplified targets are detected with hybridization probes labelled with quenched fluorophores (molecular beacons). The amplification, detection and interpretation of the signals are done automatically by the Cepheid SmartCycler® software. The entire procedure takes about 75 to 90 minutes, depending on the number of specimens processed.

Here's a breakdown of the acceptance criteria and the study details for the BD GeneOhm™ Cdiff Assay, based on the provided 510(k) summary:

Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance

The acceptance criteria are implied by the reported performance metrics. The device needed to demonstrate sufficient sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility compared to a recognized reference method to be considered substantially equivalent.

Details of the Study

1. Sample Size and Data Provenance:
   • Clinical Study (Test Set):
     • Total Specimens Tested: 1108
     • Reportable Results: 1090
     • Fresh Specimens (First Dataset): 835 specimens
     • Frozen Specimens (Second Dataset): 255 specimens (retested from aliquots of original stool specimens after an issue with the reference assay at one site)
     • Data Provenance: Multi-site prospective investigational study conducted at four medical centers (two in Canada and two in the United States).
2. Number of Experts and Qualifications for Ground Truth (Clinical Study):
   • The document does not specify the number of experts used or their qualifications for establishing the ground truth directly. It refers to the "Reference Cytotoxicity Assay" as the comparator method.
3. Adjudication Method (Clinical Study):
   • The document does not explicitly describe an adjudication method for discrepancies between the device and the reference assay in the clinical study. It notes that for 21 out of 34 samples that were positive by the reference assay and negative by the BD GeneOhm™ Cdiff Assay, further testing (Cytotoxicity Assay on isolated strains, standard PCR with alternative primers, and bi-directional sequencing) was performed to verify the presence of toxigenic C. difficile. This implies a form of ad-hoc adjudication for discordant results rather than a pre-defined process for all cases.
4. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study:
   • No, an MRMC comparative effectiveness study involving human readers with and without AI assistance was not performed. This device is an in vitro diagnostic (IVD) assay, not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool for human interpretation. The "interpretation of the signals are done automatically by the Cepheid SmartCycler® software."
5. Standalone Performance:
   • Yes, the performance characteristics reported (sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV) are for the device (BD GeneOhm™ Cdiff Assay) in standalone mode, directly compared against the reference method. There is no human-in-the-loop performance described for the primary clinical effectiveness assessment.
6. Type of Ground Truth Used (Clinical Study):
   • The primary ground truth for the clinical study was the Reference Cytotoxicity Assay on liquid or soft stool specimens. For discordant results, further molecular testing (standard PCR with alternative primers and bi-directional sequencing) was used to verify the presence of the tcdB gene or toxigenic C. difficile. This indicates a combination of phenotypic (cytotoxicity) and genotypic (molecular) methods to establish the most accurate ground truth.
7. Sample Size for the Training Set:
   • The document describes performance characteristics of a completed assay rather than an algorithm trained on a dataset. Therefore, there is no explicit "training set" sample size mentioned in the context of machine learning model development. The analytical studies (specificity, sensitivity, reproducibility) served to characterize the assay's performance against known samples.
8. How Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established:
   • As there's no explicitly defined "training set" in the context of a machine learning algorithm, this question is not directly applicable. For the analytical studies:
     • Analytical Specificity: Strains were identified and confirmed as non-target organisms or C. difficile lacking the tcdB gene. The "neg" result indicates the absence of the target gene.
     • Analytical Sensitivity (LOD): Used a specific C. difficile strain (ATCC 43255) with known concentrations (DNA copies/CFU) and confirmed with other toxigenic strains. This involved careful preparation and quantification of known positive samples.
     • Reproducibility: Involved simulated specimens, with "low positive," "moderate positive," and "negative" categories established by inoculating known quantities of C. difficile (ATCC 43255) into simulated bowel flora.

Ask a specific question about this device