Search Filters

Search Results

Found 2 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K210937
    Date Cleared
    2022-05-12

    (409 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    880.2910
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Predicate For
    N/A
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Electronic Thermometers (AET-F101, AET-F221, AET-F241) are intended to measure human body temperature orally or under the arm. The devices are reusable for clinical or home use on people of all ages.

    Device Description

    Electronic Thermometer, Model: AET-F101, AET-F221, AET-F231, AET-F241

    AI/ML Overview

    I am sorry, but the provided text is an FDA 510(k) clearance letter for an Electronic Thermometer. It does not contain information about the acceptance criteria, device performance, or any studies using AI or human readers. The document is a regulatory approval and does not detail the technical performance evaluation in the way requested in your prompt.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    K Number
    K212257
    Date Cleared
    2022-05-04

    (289 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    880.2910
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Predicate For
    N/A
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Electronic Thermometers(AET-E201, AET-E21, AET-E231, AET-E241, AET-E241, AET-E251, AET-E301, AET-E311) are intended to measure the human body temperature orally, or axillary, and the devices are non-sterile, reusable for clinical or home use on people of all ages.

    Device Description

    Not Found

    AI/ML Overview

    This is an FDA clearance letter for a medical device (Electronic Thermometer), not a study report. Therefore, the document does not contain the requested information regarding acceptance criteria and a study proving the device meets those criteria.

    The letter confirms that the device is substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicate devices, meaning it has similar indications for use, technological characteristics, and safety and effectiveness. The FDA clearance process for a 510(k) often involves demonstrating compliance with recognized standards or conducting comparison testing against a predicate device, but the details of such testing (like specific acceptance criteria, sample sizes, ground truth, etc.) are typically found in the 510(k) submission itself, not in the clearance letter.

    Therefore, I cannot provide the requested table and information based on the provided text.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1