Dexcom Smart Basal

K252818 · Dexcom, Inc. · QRX · Nov 18, 2025 · Clinical Chemistry

Device Facts

Record IDK252818
Device NameDexcom Smart Basal
ApplicantDexcom, Inc.
Product CodeQRX · Clinical Chemistry
Decision DateNov 18, 2025
DecisionSESE
Submission TypeTraditional
Regulation21 CFR 862.1358
Device ClassClass 2
AttributesSoftware as a Medical Device, Therapeutic

Indications for Use

The Dexcom Smart Basal insulin dose calculator is software intended for the management of type 2 diabetes in persons aged 18 years and older requiring long-acting insulin. This is not for use for patients on fast-acting insulin. The Dexcom Smart Basal insulin dose calculator calculates a dose of basal (long-acting) insulin using logged doses and glucose measurements from an integrated continuous glucose monitor (iCGM). The Dexcom Smart Basal insulin dose calculator requires a prescription and initial configuration by a healthcare provider.

Device Story

Dexcom Smart Basal is a cloud-based software system for type 2 diabetes management; requires prescription and HCP configuration. Inputs: iCGM glucose data, patient-logged basal insulin doses, and HCP-defined treatment parameters. Operation: algorithmic software processes inputs to generate daily basal insulin dose recommendations and titration episode status. Used by patients via mobile app and by providers via web interface. Output: basal dose recommendation; informs patient titration. Benefits: optimizes basal insulin dosing; improves time-in-range (TIR) for glycemic control.

Clinical Evidence

Prospective, multi-center, single-arm study (N=14) in adults with type 2 diabetes. Primary endpoint: change in TIR (70-180 mg/dL) over 35 days vs. 10-day baseline. Results: Mean TIR increased from 30.8% to 51.5% (p=0.0017). No severe hypoglycemia, DKA, or HHS reported. 96.5% of 401 system-generated dose recommendations were accepted by HCPs without modification. In-silico testing validated algorithm robustness against edge cases and CGM sensor bias (10-day vs. 15-day G7).

Technological Characteristics

Cloud-based software system; server-side titration algorithm. Components: Therapeutic Services (server), Therapeutic/Host Portals (web), Host App (mobile). Connectivity: Networked/Cloud-hosted. Software: Major level of concern; complies with IEC 62304. Cybersecurity: Complies with FDA guidance. Compatible with glargine U-100 insulin and Dexcom G7 CGM.

Indications for Use

Indicated for management of type 2 diabetes in adults aged 18+ requiring long-acting insulin. Contraindicated for patients on fast-acting insulin.

Regulatory Classification

Identification

An insulin therapy adjustment device is a device intended to incorporate biological inputs, including glucose measurement data from a continuous glucose monitor, to recommend insulin therapy adjustments as an aid in optimizing insulin therapy regimens for patients with diabetes mellitus.

Special Controls

(b) Classification: Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are - 1. Design verification and validation must include the following: - (i) A complete description of the required data inputs, including timeframe over which data inputs must be collected and number of data points required for accurate recommendations. - (ii) A complete description of the types of device outputs and insulin therapy adjustment recommendations, including how the recommendations are generated. - (iii)Robust data demonstrating the clinical validity of the device outputs and insulin therapy recommendations. - (iv)A robust assessment of all input data specifications, including accuracy requirements for continuous glucose monitors and other devices generating data inputs, to ensure accurate and reliable therapy adjustment recommendations. This assessment must include adequate clinical justification for each specification. - (v) A detailed strategy to ensure secure and reliable means of data transmission to and from the device, including data integrity checks, accuracy checks, reliability checks, and security measures. - (vi)Robust data demonstrating that users can understand and appropriately interpret recommendations generated by the device. - (vii) An appropriate mitigation strategy to minimize the occurrence of dosing recommendation errors, and to mitigate the risk to patients of any residual dosing recommendation errors to a clinically acceptable level. - 2. The device must not be intended for use in implementing automated insulin dosing. - 3. Your 809.10(b) labeling must include: - (i) The identification of specific insulin formulations that have been demonstrated to be compatible with use of the device. - (ii) A detailed description of the specifications of compatible devices that provide acceptable input data (e.g., continuous glucose monitors, insulin pumps) used to provide accurate and reliable therapy adjustment recommendations. - (iii) A detailed description of all types of required data (inputs) and dosing recommendations (outputs) that are provided by the device. - (iv) A description of device limitations, and instructions to prevent possible disruption of accurate therapy adjustment recommendations (e.g., time zone changes due to travel).

*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are:(1) Design verification and validation must include the following: (i) A complete description of the required data inputs, including timeframe over which data inputs must be collected and number of data points required for accurate recommendations; (ii) A complete description of the types of device outputs and insulin therapy adjustment recommendations, including how the recommendations are generated; (iii) Robust data demonstrating the clinical validity of the device outputs and insulin therapy recommendations; (iv) A robust assessment of all input data specifications, including accuracy requirements for continuous glucose monitors and other devices generating data inputs, to ensure accurate and reliable therapy adjustment recommendations. This assessment must include adequate clinical justification for each specification; (v) A detailed strategy to ensure secure and reliable means of data transmission to and from the device, including data integrity checks, accuracy checks, reliability checks, and security measures; (vi) Robust data demonstrating that users can understand and appropriately interpret recommendations generated by the device; and (vii) An appropriate mitigation strategy to minimize the occurrence of dosing recommendation errors, and to mitigate the risk to patients of any residual dosing recommendation errors to a clinically acceptable level. (2) The device must not be intended for use in implementing automated insulin dosing. (3) Your 21 CFR 809.10(b) labeling must include: (i) The identification of specific insulin formulations that have been demonstrated to be compatible with use of the device; (ii) A detailed description of the specifications of compatible devices that provide acceptable input data (e.g., continuous glucose monitors, insulin pumps) used to provide accurate and reliable therapy adjustment recommendations; (iii) A detailed description of all types of required data (inputs) and dosing recommendations (outputs) that are provided by the device; and (iv) A description of device limitations, and instructions to prevent possible disruption of accurate therapy adjustment recommendations (e.g., time zone changes due to travel).

Predicate Devices

Related Devices

Submission Summary (Full Text)

{0} FDA U.S. FOOD &amp; DRUG ADMINISTRATION # 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ## I Background Information: A 510(k) Number K252818 B Applicant Dexcom, Inc. C Proprietary and Established Names Dexcom Smart Basal D Regulatory Information | Product Code(s) | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | QRX | Class II | 21 CFR 862.1358 – Insulin Therapy Adjustment Device | CH – Clinical Chemistry | A Purpose for Submission: New Device ## II Intended Use/Indications for Use: A Intended Use(s): See Indications for Use below. B Indication(s) for Use: The Dexcom Smart Basal insulin dose calculator is software intended for the management of type 2 diabetes in persons aged 18 years and older requiring long-acting insulin. This is not for use for patients on fast-acting insulin. The Dexcom Smart Basal insulin dose calculator calculates a dose of basal (long-acting) insulin using logged doses and glucose measurements from an integrated continuous glucose monitor (iCGM). The Dexcom Smart Basal insulin dose calculator requires a prescription and initial configuration by a healthcare provider. C Special Conditions for Use Statement(s): Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002 www.fda.gov {1} Rx – For Prescription Use Only The Dexcom Smart Basal system is not intended to be used with automated insulin dosing (AID) systems or fast-acting insulin. The Dexcom Smart Basal system is compatible with glargine U-100 insulin only. Only use glargine U-100, as it is the only insulin type tested and confirmed to be safe for use with the Dexcom Smart Basal system. The Dexcom Smart Basal system is not recommended for use during pregnancy. The Dexcom Smart Basal system has not been tested with individuals who are pregnant. ## III Device Description The Dexcom Smart Basal System is a basal insulin (long-acting insulin) dose calculator intended for use by individuals with type 2 diabetes. It requires a prescription and initial configuration by a healthcare provider (HCP). The Smart Basal System is a software system designed to optimize and recommend basal insulin doses for Dexcom CGM App Users (patients) using their CGM data, insulin dose logs, and HCP-entered patient-specific treatment parameters. The Dexcom Smart Basal System is comprised of applications that initiate and manage the basal titration process for Dexcom CGM App Users with Type 2 diabetes who may benefit from long-term insulin treatment. The Smart Basal System consists of cloud-based software components that function as a CGM-informed basal insulin dose calculator (subject device). The Smart Basal feature can be accessed via a module within a compatible CGM System mobile application for the patient to interact with (referred to as Host App), and a web-based user interface for the HCP (referred to as Host Portal). The Dexcom Smart Basal System contains the following subject software components: Therapeutic Services and Therapeutic Portal. In addition, the Dexcom Smart Basal System utilizes a compatible Host App and Host Portal to interact with the patient and HCP respectively. Therapeutic Portal and Host Portal are web-based applications. The Host Portal is a web-based application that directly interfaces with HCPs. The Therapeutic Portal is a server-based application that supports the creation, storage, and communication of the patient's treatment plan. Using the Therapeutic Portal (via Host Portal), HCPs create a basal treatment plan for patients that include patient-specific basal parameters, such as "initial dose" and "maximum dose" thresholds, and initiates the treatment for the particular patient (called an "episode"). Therapeutic Portal communicates directly with the Host App to initialize the system and to communicate dose recommendations generated by Therapeutic Services. The Host App is the mobile app that hosts the basal therapy optimization module that interfaces with the patient. A compatible Dexcom CGM mobile app functions as the Host App for the Smart Basal System. The mobile app collects Estimated Glucose Values (EGVs) from the wearable CGM sensor and transmits EGV data to Therapeutic Services. Values for patient-administered basal insulin doses entered in the Host App are communicated to Therapeutic Services as well. K252818 - Page 2 of 6 {2} Therapeutic Service is a server-based software component that includes the algorithm for basal insulin dose recommendations. Using the EGV values and insulin dose logs from the Host App, together with the patient's basal treatment plan from the Host Portal (via Therapeutic Portal), Therapeutic Services then generates a daily dose recommendation. This daily dose recommendation is sent to the Host Portal (via Therapeutic Portal) and the Host App (also via Therapeutic Portal) which the patient consults to administer and log the next dose. The daily basal insulin dose recommendation continues until one of the following criteria is met: 1) Therapeutic Services determines the basal optimization is complete; 2) the HCP stops the patient's treatment using the Therapeutic Portal (via Host Portal), 3) the patient stops the treatment via the Host App, or 4) the days in a titration episode for the patient reaches a fixed time limit. ## IV Substantial Equivalence Information: ### A Predicate Device Name(s): BlueStar CGM insulin dose calculator ### B Predicate 510(k) Number(s): K222888 ### C Comparison with Predicate(s): | Device & Predicate Device(s): | K252818 | K222888 | | --- | --- | --- | | Device Trade Name | Dexcom Smart Basal System | BlueStar CGM insulin dose calculator | | General Device Characteristic Similarities | | | | Intended Use/Indications For Use | Intended to calculate insulin doses based on CGM values and/or other relevant information | Same | | Principle of operation | Algorithmic software device | Same | | Age range of intended users | 18 years and older | Same | | Display to user | Calculated doses via mobile application and use a web-based portal for healthcare providers | Same | K252818 - Page 3 of 6 {3} | General Device Characteristic Differences | | | | --- | --- | --- | | Insulin type | Long-acting insulin | Fast-acting insulin | | Diabetes type | Type 2 diabetes | Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes | | Data inputs | CGM values and historic data, initial configuration from HCP, daily basal insulin log | Same and also carbohydrate information | | Titration episode length | Up to 90 days, unless terminated by the HCP or patient | Continuously as long as the patient is using the same bolus insulin | V Standards/Guidance Documents Referenced: ANSI/AAMI/ISO 14971:2019 Medical devices – Applications of risk management to medical devices ANSI/AAMI/IEC 62304:2006/A1:2016 Medical device software – Software life cycle processes [Including Amendment 1 (2016)] ANSI/AAMI/IEC 62366-1:2015 + AMDI:2020 (Consolidated Text) Medical devices Part 1: Application of usability engineering to medical devices including Amendment 1 ANSI/AAMI HE75:2009/(R)2018 Human factors engineering – Design of medical devices VI Performance Characteristics: Clinical Testing A prospective, multi-center, single-arm study was conducted at two sites in the US to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Dexcom Smart Basal System in adult patients with type 2 diabetes. The study enrolled 14 participants aged 18 years and older who were initiating or optimizing glargine U-100 insulin therapy. The study was conducted in four phases: Phase 1 involved a 10-day run-in period with CGM training and baseline data collection. Phase 2 consisted of 10-35 days of active titration where HCPs reviewed daily algorithm-generated dose recommendations and communicated them to participants. Phase 3 involved 20 days of continued dosing with the final recommended dose while collecting outcome data. Phase 4 was a single day for post-titration assessments. Of note, as the system used in the clinical study was an early version of the submitted device, DexBasal, there was no user-facing interface at that time. Instead, the HCP would add the subject to the web portal and specify the treatment plan. Each day, the clinical staff used the HCP web K252818 - Page 4 of 6 {4} portal to review the system's recommended dose for glargine U-100, modify the dose if necessary, and communicate the dose to participants. Participants were instructed to log the provided dose into the Dexcom G7 mobile application. Among 401 total dose recommendations generated by the system, HCPs accepted 387 (96.5%) without modification. Fourteen recommendations (3.5%) were adjusted, with 13 of these adjustments due to a temporary API outage that prevented the system from receiving necessary input data, and one adjustment due to a patient logging error (double basal logged) that triggered a 0-unit recommendation that the HCP overrode The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the CGM-informed dose calculator for recommending doses of basal insulin using CGM metrics of time in range (TIR) of 70-180 mg/dL during the study compared to the 10-day run-in period. The clinical study CGM metric results are presented in the table below. Of the 14 subjects, over 35 days, 5 subjects reached "completion" with a safe and effective dose (positive termination of the device), 4 were estimated to be within 5 days of completion, 2 hit their HCP's maximum dose limit, 1 hit the algorithm maximum dose limit (1 u/kg), and 2 may or may not have reached completion. There were no reported adverse events due to use of the device. There was also no severe hypoglycemia, DKA, or HHS events. There was 1 psychiatric hospitalization unrelated to use of the device. Summary of 10-day G7 CGM Metrics – All subjects (N = 14) | Range (mg/dL) | % Time, Baseline, Mean (SD) | % Time, Post-Titration, Mean (SD) | % Difference, Mean (SD) | % Difference, Median (Q1, Q3) | P-value* | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 70-180 | 30.8 (24.4) | 51.5 (22.1) | 20.7 (23.0) | 16.0 (2.5, 43.7) | 0.0017 | | < 54 | 0.0 (0.0) | 0.0 (0.0) | 0.0 (0.0) | 0.0 (0.0, 0.0) | - | | < 70 | 0.0 (0.1) | 0.1 (0.2) | 0.1 (0.2) | 0.0 (0.0, 0.1) | - | | > 180 | 69.2 (24.5) | 48.4 (22.2) | -20.8 (23.1) | -15.9 (-43.7, -2.5) | 0.0017 | | > 250 | 34.5 (33.8) | 18.1 (22.7) | -16.4 (26.4) | -8.4 (-20.2, 0.6) | 0.0085 | *Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test was used For the 3 subjects who initiated basal insulin during this study, average TIR increased from 16.8% to 65.7%, average time above 180 mg/dL decreased from 83.2% to 34%, and the average time below 70 mg/dL was unchanged (0.0%) during the study. For all subjects, overnight (12:00 am – 6:00 am) CGM metrics showed an average TIR increase from 43.7% to 67.0%, average time above 180 mg/dL decreased from 56.2% to 32.7%, and the average time below 70 mg/dL was unchanged (0.1%). In-Silico Testing K252818 - Page 5 of 6 {5} After the clinical study, the sponsor made changes to the dosing algorithm to enhance device performance and robustness, particularly in edge/patient use error cases. The changes were tested in an *in silico* clinical trial re-run validation test to assess how changes made to the algorithm used in the clinical study impact the recommended doses compared to the recommended doses in the clinical study algorithm. Changes made to the clinical study algorithm between use in the clinical study and commercialization do not affect the safety and effectiveness of the device. The sponsor also performed a simulation to evaluate the impact of CGM sensor bias from the 10-day G7 CGM, used in the clinical study to support this device validation, and the 15-day G7 CGM, representing the intended CGM device for Smart Basal commercialization, on the glycemic safety and effectiveness of dose recommendations generated by this device. The validation considered systemic bias in estimated glucose values, which is a source of input error relevant to the Smart Basal algorithm’s operation. The validation results demonstrate that the Smart Basal algorithm maintains safe and effective dose recommendations when used with the 15-day G7 device. ## Software Dexcom provided software documentation consistent with FDA Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Device Software Functions and consistent with software with a major level of concern. Software documentation was acceptable. ## Cybersecurity Dexcom provided cybersecurity documentation consistent with FDA Guidance Cybersecurity in Medical Devices: Quality System Considerations and Content of Premarket Submissions. Cybersecurity documentation was acceptable. ## Human Factors A human factors study was conducted to assess if representative users of the Smart Basal System can safely use the system under representative conditions. Study subjects were representative of the device’s intended use population (healthcare providers and patients with type 2 diabetes). ## VII Proposed Labeling: The labeling supports the finding of substantial equivalence for this device. ## VIII Conclusion: The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision. K252818 - Page 6 of 6
Innolitics

Panel 1

/
Ready

Predicate graph will load when search results are available.

Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.

PDF viewer will load when search results are available.

Loading panels...

Select an item from Submissions

Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.

Section Matches

Results will appear here.

Product Code Matches

Results will appear here.

Special Control Matches

Results will appear here.

Loading collections...