(308 days)
Sterile Water and Saline Solutions are defined as an accessory to a device that is intended For Device Cleaning and Irrigation.
Automated Liquid Packaging, Inc. Sterile Water and Saline Solutions are products that have been used in the medical community for decades. The only ingredient in the two solutions other than water is Sodium Chloride; there are no preservatives or stabilizers.
The irrigation bottle is manufactured of 100% low density polyethylene (LDPE) and contains no color or chemical additives.
The two solutions are sterile, aseptically filled and are hermetically sealed for single use only.
The provided document is limited to a 510(k) summary for Sterile Water and Saline Bottles for Irrigation. This type of document is for a medical device and typically does not contain the detailed clinical study information such as acceptance criteria, statistical analysis, and expert adjudication that would be found in a submission for an AI/ML-driven diagnostic device.
Here's an analysis based on the lack of this information in the provided document, addressing each point:
-
A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance:
- Acceptance Criteria: Not specified in the document. For a product like sterile water and saline solutions, acceptance criteria would likely relate to sterility, chemical composition (e.g., sodium chloride concentration), pH, particulate matter, and container integrity, as well as biological compatibility with ISO 10993 standards. However, specific thresholds are not provided.
- Reported Device Performance: The document states, "All materials used in the fabrication of Sterile Water and Saline Solutions were evaluated through biological qualification safety tests as outlined in ISO 10993 Part-1 'Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices'. These materials also were tested in accordance with industry recognized test methods and were found to be acceptable for the intended use." No specific performance metrics (e.g., success rates, purity levels, sterility assurance levels) or quantitative results are provided.
-
Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g., country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective):
- This information is not applicable and not present in the document. The testing described is material qualification and product performance testing (e.g., sterility, biological safety), not a clinical trial with a test set of patient data.
-
Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g., radiologist with 10 years of experience):
- This information is not applicable and not present. Ground truth, in the context of diagnostic AI/ML, refers to a definitive diagnosis or outcome. For this device, "ground truth" would relate to laboratory test results (e.g., sterility tests, chemical analysis) rather than expert clinical interpretation of patient data.
-
Adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set:
- Not applicable and not present. Adjudication methods are used in clinical studies where multiple human readers or experts disagree on an outcome. The testing performed for this device would involve laboratory methods with pre-defined pass/fail criteria.
-
If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:
- Not applicable and not present. This type of study is relevant for AI-powered diagnostic tools that assist human interpretation. The sterile water and saline solutions are not an AI device.
-
If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:
- Not applicable and not present. This refers to the performance of an AI algorithm independently. The device in question is a physical product (sterile solutions), not an algorithm.
-
The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc):
- The "ground truth" for this device's performance would be established through laboratory testing results (e.g., microbiological cultures for sterility, chemical assays for composition, physical testing for container integrity) against established standards (e.g., USP monographs, ISO 10993 for biocompatibility). The document vaguely refers to "biological qualification safety tests as outlined in ISO 10993 Part-1" and "industry recognized test methods."
-
The sample size for the training set:
- Not applicable and not present. Training sets are used for machine learning models. The manufacturer performed product performance and material safety testing, not AI model training.
-
How the ground truth for the training set was established:
- Not applicable and not present. As there is no AI model or training set, this question is not relevant to the provided document.
Summary for the given document:
The provided 510(k) summary for Sterile Water and Saline Bottles for Irrigation, USP, describes a conventional medical device. It focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device based on intended use and performance attributes. The "study" mentioned is the "Summary of testing" which involved:
- Evaluating materials through biological qualification safety tests as outlined in ISO 10993 Part-1 "Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices."
- Testing materials "in accordance with industry recognized test methods."
The objective of these tests was to confirm that the materials and the final product were "acceptable for the intended use" (device cleaning and irrigation) and met safety standards, rather than proving diagnostic accuracy or human reader improvement for an AI/ML product. The document does not provide specific data, acceptance criteria thresholds, sample sizes for these tests, or details about how the ground truth for these tests was established beyond adherence to "industry recognized test methods" and ISO 10993.
§ 880.6740 Vacuum-powered body fluid suction apparatus.
(a)
Identification. A vacuum-powered body fluid suction apparatus is a device used to aspirate, remove, or sample body fluids. The device is powered by an external source of vacuum. This generic type of device includes vacuum regulators, vacuum collection bottles, suction catheters and tips, connecting flexible aspirating tubes, rigid suction tips, specimen traps, noninvasive tubing, and suction regulators (with gauge).(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 880.9.