K Number
K994254
Date Cleared
2000-03-14

(88 days)

Product Code
Regulation Number
874.1090
Panel
EN
Reference & Predicate Devices
AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
Intended Use

The Interacoustics AT235 Impedance Audiometer is an electroacoustic test instrument that produces controlled levels of test tones and signals intended for use in conducting diagnostic hearing evaluations and assisting in the diagnosis of possible otologic disorders. It features tympanometry, acoustic reflex and air conduction audiometry.

Device Description

The Interacoustics AT235 Impedence Audiometer is an electroacoustic test instrument that produces controlled levels of test tones and signals intended for use in conducting diagnostic hearing evaluations and assisting in the diagnosis of possible otologic disorders. It features tympanometry, acoustic reflex and air conduction audiometry.

AI/ML Overview

Here's a breakdown of the acceptance criteria and study information for the Interacoustics AT235 Impedance Audiometer, based on the provided text:

Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

The submission does not explicitly state "acceptance criteria" in the form of specific performance metrics with numerical thresholds (e.g., "accuracy must be > 90%"). Instead, the basis for clearance is substantial equivalence to a predicate device and compliance with relevant performance and safety standards. The "reported device performance" is implicitly that it meets these standards and functions similarly to the predicate.

Acceptance Criteria (Implicit)Reported Device Performance (Implicit)
Functional Equivalence to Predicate:The device performs the same functions (tympanometry, acoustic reflex, air conduction audiometry) as the predicate (Interacoustics AT22t).
- Indication for UseIdentical to the predicate device.
- Display DescriptionDigital (same as predicate).
- Probe Tone Frequency: 226Hz ± 3%Same as predicate.
- Probe Tone Intensity: 85dB SPL ± 3dBSame as predicate.
- Compliance Range: 0,1 to 5 mlSame as predicate.
- TransducersSame as predicate (TDH39, Contralateral Earphone, Probe with Probe Tip).
- Patient Response UnitSame as predicate (Handheld Push Button Switch).
- Compatible Windows SoftwareSame as predicate.
- TestsSame as predicate (Tympanometry, Acoustic Reflex and Air Conduction Audiometry).
- Audiometer Calibration: ISO/R 389-1991Same as predicate.
- Power: 100-120 V or 220-240VSame as predicate.
Compliance with Performance Standards:The device is in compliance with all listed standards.
- Audiometer StandardsANSI 3.6-1989, IEC 645-1-1992 Type 4
- Impedance Audiometer StandardsANSI 3.39-1987, IEC 1027-1991 Type 2
Compliance with Safety Standards:The device is in compliance with the listed safety standard.
- Safety StandardIEC 601-1-1988

Differences noted vs. Predicate:

  • Available Frequencies: AT235 includes 125 Hz, while AT22t does not.
  • Pressure Range: AT235: +300 to -600daPa; AT22t: +200 to -300daPa.
  • Impedance Calibration: AT235 lists ANSI S 3.39-1987, IEC 1027-1991; AT22t lists none (assumed to be covered by the AT235's more detailed listing for calibration standards).
  • Size and Weight: AT235: 14" x 10" x 4"; 6 lbs.; AT22t: 14" x 16" x 6"; 15.5 lbs.

Study Information

The provided text describes a comparison of the new device (Interacoustics AT235) to a predicate device (Interacoustics AT22t). This is a common approach for 510(k) submissions to demonstrate substantial equivalence, rather than a clinical study in the typical sense with patient cohorts and statistical outcomes.

  1. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance: Not applicable. This submission relies on a comparison of device specifications and compliance with recognized standards. There is no mention of a "test set" of patient data or clinical samples.

  2. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: Not applicable. Ground truth, in a clinical context, is not established for this type of submission. The "ground truth" here is adherence to engineering and performance standards, and comparison to an established predicate device.

  3. Adjudication method: Not applicable.

  4. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done: No.

  5. If a standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done: No. This is a medical device, not an algorithm. The device itself performs the measurements.

  6. The type of ground truth used: Not applicable in a clinical sense. The "ground truth" for this submission are the established industry performance and safety standards (e.g., ANSI, IEC) and the specifications of the legally marketed predicate device.

  7. The sample size for the training set: Not applicable. There is no training set mentioned, as this is not an AI/ML device.

  8. How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable.

§ 874.1090 Auditory impedance tester.

(a)
Identification. An auditory impedance tester is a device that is intended to change the air pressure in the external auditory canal and measure and graph the mobility characteristics of the tympanic membrane to evaluate the functional condition of the middle ear. The device is used to determine abnormalities in the mobility of the tympanic membrane due to stiffness, flaccidity, or the presence of fluid in the middle ear cavity. The device is also used to measure the acoustic reflex threshold from contractions of the stapedial muscle, to monitor healing of tympanic membrane grafts or stapedectomies, or to monitor followup treatment for inflammation of the middle ear.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls). The device, when it is a tympanometer or auditory impedance tester that complies with FDA-recognized consensus standard ANSI S3.39, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 874.9.