(88 days)
eVENT™ Allergen Barriers have been designed exclusively for allergy sufferers wishing to reduce their exposure to house dust mite allergens in mattresses, pillows and duvel/comforters.
eVENT™ Allergen Barriers consist of mattress, pillow and duvet/comforter encasings. The products consist of an expanded PTFE membrane laminated to a synthetic or synthetic/natural combination fabric. The expanded PTFE membrane provides a moisture-vapor & air permeable ("breathable") barrier with pores too small to allow passage to either house dust mites or their allergen containing fecal droppings. The fabric component provides a strong, easily maintained support for the ePTFE membrane. EVENT™ Allergen Barrlers are soft, comfortable and easy to clean; They are simply damp-dusted when the bed sheets are changed. Allergydirect.com's membrane manufacturing process is sufficiently controlled to ensure uniform nominal pore sizes too small to permit the Allergen Barners provide high levels of protection from house dust mite allergens. The membrane's vapor permeable characteristics help promote sleeping comfort. Thus, eVENT™ Allergen Barriers serve as an effective barrier between a patient and a cause of their allergies; this results in a healthier, more comfortable sleeping environment.
The acceptance criteria and study proving meeting those criteria for the eVENT™ Allergen Barriers are described below, based on the provided FDA 510(k) summary.
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
| Acceptance Criteria Category | Specific Acceptance Criteria (Inferred) | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Allergen Barrier Effectiveness | Pore size too small to allow passage of house dust mites or their allergen-containing fecal droppings. | "membrane's vapor permeable characteristics help promote sleeping comfort. Thus, eVENT™ Allergen Barriers serve as an effective barrier between a patient and a cause of their allergies; this results in a healthier, more comfortable sleeping environment." and "Laboratory tests demonstrate eVENT™ Allergen Barriers' ability to serve as a barrier to house dust mites and their fecal matter." |
| Breathability / Comfort | More "breathable" than comparable predicate devices to promote sleeping comfort. | "eVENT™ Allergen Barriers are over 2 times (Modified Desiccant Method [MDM] dry method) more 'breathable' than the comparable Allergy Control Products' ACb™ Elite and over 4 times more 'breathable' than Allergy Control Products' ACb™ Sheer." |
| Durability / Support | Fabric component provides strong support for the ePTFE membrane. | "The fabric component provides a strong, easily maintained support for the ePTFE membrane." |
| Maintainability | Easily cleaned and maintained. | "eVENT™ Allergen Barrlers are easily maintained, requiring only damp dusting when the bed sheets are changed." and "Additional testing demonstrates eVENT™ Allergen Barrier's strength, softness and ease of cleaning." |
| Softness / Comfort | Soft and comfortable. | "eVENT™ Allergen Barrlers are soft, comfortable and easy to clean" and "softness." |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
The document does not explicitly state a specific numerical sample size for the test set. It mentions "Laboratory tests" and "Additional testing" without detailing the number of units tested.
The data provenance is not explicitly stated. Given that the submission is to the FDA for a US market, it is likely the testing was conducted in a controlled laboratory environment. The nature of the tests (material properties) suggests these were likely prospective, controlled laboratory tests rather than retrospective or prospective clinical data from human subjects.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts
This information is not provided in the document. The tests described are primarily material property tests (e.g., breathability, pore size inference, strength), which typically rely on standardized laboratory methods rather than expert consensus on interpretation.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
This information is not provided in the document. As mentioned above, the tests are primarily objective material property measurements, not requiring adjudication of subjective interpretations.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
A Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was not done. This device is an allergen barrier, not an AI-powered diagnostic or assistive tool for human readers. Therefore, the concept of "human readers improving with AI vs. without AI assistance" is not applicable.
6. If a Standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
This is not applicable as the device is a physical product (allergen barrier), not an algorithm or software.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
The ground truth used for demonstrating device performance appears to be:
- Direct measurement of material properties: For "breathability," the "Modified Desiccant Method (MDM) dry method" was used.
- Inferred physiological effect based on physical properties: The barrier effectiveness against dust mites and their fecal matter is based on the controlled manufacturing process to ensure "uniform nominal pore sizes too small to permit the Allergen Barners provide high levels of protection from house dust mite allergens." This implies physical measurement of pore size or validation that the pore size effectively blocks the allergens.
- Performance against established standards/comparable devices: The breathability was compared directly to "comparable Allergy Control Products' ACb™ Elite and over 4 times more 'breathable' than Allergy Control Products' ACb™ Sheer."
- Qualitative assessment of physical characteristics: Softness, comfort, and ease of cleaning were likely assessed through testing that demonstrated these attributes, although specific methods are not detailed.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
This is not applicable as the device is a physical product, not a machine learning model requiring a training set.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set was Established
This is not applicable as the device is a physical product, not a machine learning model.
{0}------------------------------------------------
NOV - 8 1999
FDA 510(K) Summary
| Submitter: | Allergydirect.com8800 East 63rd StreetKansas CityMissouri, 64133Tel: 816 356 0200Fax: 816 246 9592 |
|---|---|
| Contact: | Gavin McLachlan - Ext. 542Director |
| Date Prepared: | November 3, 1999. |
| Device Names: | eVENT™ Allergen BarrierseVENT™ Mattress encasingeVENT™ Duvet encasingeVENT™ Pillow EncasingeVENT™ Bedding System |
| Common Name: | Mattress/Bedding Material Covers |
| Classification Name: | Mattress Cover for Medical Purposes |
| Comparable Products: | Allergy Control™ ProductsACb™ EliteACb™ Sheer |
| Product Description: | eVENT™ Allergen Barriers consist of mattress, pillow and duvet/comforterencasings. The products consist of an expanded PTFE membranelaminated to a synthetic or synthetic/natural combination fabric. Theexpanded PTFE membrane provides a moisture-vapor & air permeable("breathable") barrier with pores too small to allow passage to either housedust mites or their allergen containing fecal droppings. The fabriccomponent provides a strong, easily maintained support for the ePTFEmembrane. EVENT™ Allergen Barrlers are soft, comfortable and easy toclean; They are simply damp-dusted when the bed sheets are changed.Allergydirect.com's membrane manufacturing process is sufficientlycontrolled to ensure uniform nominal pore sizes too small to permit the |
{1}------------------------------------------------
Allergen Barners provide high levels of protection from house dust mite allergens. The membrane's vapor permeable characteristics help promote sleeping comfort. Thus, eVENT™ Allergen Barriers serve as an effective barrier between a patient and a cause of their allergies; this results in a healthier, more comfortable sleeping environment.
Intended Use:
Expanded PTFE products are widely used as fabrics for outdoor wear; as industrial filtration devices; in electrical components; as implantable medical devices; and as non-implanted health care products such as cast liners. PTFE is an inert, blocompatible polymer, the safety of which is well documented in medical and scientific literature.
Asthma, eczema and allergic rhinitis are chronic conditions or diseases that are frequently managed to some extent by allergen avoidance techniques. Recent medical literature reports that the frequency and/or severity of these diseases are often associated with patjent allergy to the fecal droppings of house dust mites. House dust mites are found in high concentrations in bedding materials. eVENT™ Allergen Barriers have been designed exclusively for allergy sufferers wishing to reduce their exposure to house dust mite allergens in mattresses, pillows and duvel/comforters.
Product Performance:
The combination of the ePTFE membrane and the fabric substrate result in bedding covers which are more comfortable than the vinyl or other plastic bedding covers currently available. Test data demonstrating that eVENT™ Allergen Barriers are over 2 times (Modified Desiccant Method [MDM] dry method) more "breathable" than the comparable Allergy Control Products' ACb" Elite and over 4 times more "breathable" than Allergy Control Products' ACb Sheer are included, eVENT™ Allergen Barrlers are easily maintained, requiring only damp dusting when the bed sheets are changed.
{2}------------------------------------------------
STATEMENT OF SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE TO THE PREDICATE DEVICES
The use of barrier products is well established as a means of allergen avoidance. eVENT™ Allergen Barners provide an appropriate barrier to house dust mites and their allergenic fecal matter, while providing a very comfortable sleeping surface. eVENT™ Allergen Barriers are substantially equivalent to the currently marketed predicate devices produced by Allergy Control Products, Inc.
Both the predicate and applicant devices are intended for use as allergen barriers on bedding materials. The products are substantially equivalent in terms of material and construction. The use, care of, and handling of eVENT™ Allergen Barriers is similar to that of the predicate barrier products, and will present little difference for users. Laboratory tests demonstrate eVENT™ Allergen Barriers' ability to serve as a barrier to house dust mittes and their fecal matter. Additional testing demonstrates eVENT" Allergen Barrier's strength, softness and ease of cleaning.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized design featuring three abstract human figures, possibly representing people or families. The figures are connected and appear to be in motion.
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
NOV - 8 1999
Mr. Gavin McLachlan Director Allergy Direct™ 8800 East 63rd Street Kansas City, MO 64133
Re : K992702 eVENT™ Allergen Barriers Trade Name: Regulatory Class: I Product Code: FMW Dated: July 29, 1999 Received: August 12, 1999
Dear Mr. McLachlan:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions The general controls provisions of the Act of the Act. include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. ਰ substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Good Manufacturing Practice for Medical Devices: General (GMP) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic GMP inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP requlation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any
{4}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Mr.McLachlan
obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510 k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4692. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsmamain.html".
Sincerely yours,
K. Ataturk
thy A. Ulatowsk Director Division of Dental, Infection Control and General Hospital Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{5}------------------------------------------------
l of l Page
510(k) Number (if known): K982702
Device Name; eVENT™ Allergen Barriers
Indications For Use:
45 ros allery allergens નેઝ
Aller Dillow QUE Th
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Prescription Use (Per 21 CFR 801.109) OR
Over-The-Counter Use
(Optional Format 1-2-96)
Patricia Crescente
(Division Sign-Off) Division of Dental, Infection Control, and General Hospital D 510(k) Number
§ 880.6190 Mattress cover for medical purposes.
(a)
Identification. A mattress cover for medical purposes is a device intended for medical purposes that is used to protect a mattress. It may be electrically conductive or contain a germicide.(b)
Classification. Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 880.9. If the device is not labeled or otherwise represented as sterile, it is also exempt from the current good manufacturing practice requirements of the quality system regulation in part 820 of this chapter, with the exception of § 820.180, with respect to general requirements concerning records, and § 820.198, with respect to complaint files.