(33 days)
This is a medical glove to be worn on the hand of health care and similar personnel to prevent contamination between health care personnel and the patient.
Class I latex patient examination gloves 80LYY, powder free and meeting all the requirements of ASTM-D3578-95 Standard Specification for Latex Examination Gloves for Medical Application.
I am sorry. I cannot fulfill this request. The provided text describes the safety and effectiveness of latex examination gloves, which is a medical device, but it lacks the specific information required to address your questions about acceptance criteria for an AI/ML powered medical device. The text does not mention any AI or machine learning components, nor does it detail studies involving human readers or ground truth established by experts in the context of AI.
{0}------------------------------------------------
APPENDIX H
510(k) SUMMARY
SUMMARY OF THE SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS FOR ROYAL SHIELD POWDER FREE LATEX EXAMINATION GLOVES WITH PINEAPPLE SCENT AND PROTEIN CONTENT LABELING
Contact person : Ong Lay Mau
This summary of safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of SMDA 1990.
Device Information:
Trade Name - ROYAL SHIELD POWDER FREE LATEX EXAM GLOVES Common Name - Exam gloves Classification Name - Patient examination glove (per 21 CFR 880.6250) Classification Information - Class I latex patient examination glove 80L Y Y , powder free and meeting all the requirements of ASTM-D3578-95 Standard Specification for Latex Examination Gloves for Medical Application.
Device Description:
Class I latex patient examination gloves 80LYY, powder free and meeting all the requirements of ASTM-D3578-95 Standard Specification for Latex Examination Gloves for Medical Application.
Intended Use of Device:
A medical glove to be worn on the hand of the health care and similar personnel to prevent contamination between health care personnel and patient.
Technological Characteristics of Device:
1. Dimension
| DIMENSION | ASTM D3578-95 | ROYAL SHIELD |
|---|---|---|
| X-SmallSmallMediumLarge | 70 mm +/- 10 mm80 mm +/- 10mm95 mm +/- 10mm111mm +/- 10mm | 70 - 75 mm80 - 85 mm90 - 97 mm105 - 111 mm |
| Length | 230 mm minimumfor all sizes | 242mm |
| Thickness -FingerPalm | 0.08mm min0.08mm min | 0.08 mm min0.08 mm min |
{1}------------------------------------------------
| TENSILE STRENGTH | ULTIMATE ELONGATION | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASTM-D3578-95 | SHIELD's | ASTM-D3578-95 | SHIELD's | ||
| Before Aging | 14.0 Mpa min | 21.0 Mpa | 700 % | 800% | |
| After Aging22 hrs @100C | 14.0 Mpa min | 16.0 Mpa | 500% | 750% |
-
- Physical Properties (ASTM-D3578-95 Standard Specification for Latex Exam Gloves)
3. Water Tight Test
Using the FDA specified 1,000 ml water leak test, 80 pieces of each size of the gloves were tested and our results are as given below:
| BATCH # | SIZE | SAMPLE SIZE | LEAK STATUS | NUMBERLEAKED |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9903031019 | X-Small | 200 | Yes | 2 |
| 9903222024 | Small | 200 | Yes | 2 |
| 9904011027 | Medium | 200 | Yes | 1 |
| 9903162023 | Large | 200 | Yes | 4 |
The above figures are within the FDA/ ASTM requirements for latex exam gloves of 4.0% AQL.
4. Biocompatibility
The test results below show that the gloves meet FDA biocompatibility requirements:
BIOCOMPATIBILITY TESTS
Primary Dermal Irritation Test
Skin Sensitization Study
RESULTS
Not a primary irritant
Not a sensitiser
{2}------------------------------------------------
5. Total Residual Powder Content & Presence of Cornstarch
.
| TESTS | FDA INTERNALREQUIREMENT | SHIELD's |
|---|---|---|
| Residual PowderContent perASTM D 6124-97 | 2 mg/glove max | Range: 1.5-1.9mg/gloveMean : 1.7 mg/glove |
| Presence of Cornstarch | Negative | Negative |
6. Residual Protein Level
| TESTS | FDA ALLOWABLE LEVEL | CLAIMED LEVEL |
|---|---|---|
| ASTM D 5712-95 | < 50 µg/g | < 50 µg/gRange: 27-33Mean: 30 |
Conclusion :-
The data presented indicate that the Royal Shield Powder Free latex examination glove with Pineapple scent
-
- meets/exceeds ASTM- D3578-95 Standard Specifications For Latex Examination Glove,
-
- meets FDA pinhole requirements,
-
- meets SHIELD's labeling claim of its being a powder free glove.
-
- meets the protein labeling claim level at <50 µg/g
{3}------------------------------------------------
DUSTING OR DONNING POWDER 12.0
Contents for items 9.0 to 12.0 are similar to those contained in our previous submission and granted a 510(k) # K 953496 attached as APPENDIX C.
13.0 'POWDER-FREE GLOVES'
APPENDIX D-1 shows the Process Flow Chart, with the addition of a scenting step. There is also an optional step of lightly chlorinating the gloves during the washing stage as devicted in APPENDIX D-2, as well as a slight change of the polymer coating materials to the ones given as per APPENDICES D-3 AND D-4. All the rest of the process is as per previous submission.
15.0 WATER SOLUBLE PROTEIN LEVEL OF GLOVES WITH A PROTEIN LABELING CLAIM:
As per 510(k) # K953496 except that the sampling frequency is now at once a week per machine. APPENDIX E-1 show the consistency of the protein level while APPENDIX E-2 shows that scenting the glove does not change the protein content of the resultant glove at all.
17.0 COLOR or FLAVOR ADDITIVE
No color additive is used except for the titanium dioxide used in the basic formulation.
The Pineapple scent used is 258212 Pineapple Flavor, nature-identical, artificial.
Please refer to :-
APPENDIX -F Product Specification & MSDS
18.0 GLOVE BIOCOMPATIBILITY
We enclose the bio-compatibility data as per APPENDIX-G .
- (a) Primary Dermal Irritation Test Study # T99-0008-2
Result : Negative Conclusion : Glove is considered not a primary dermal irritant.
(b) Skin Sensitization Study (BUEHLER) Study - Study # T99-0008-2 by CPTC
Result : negative Conclusion : Glove is considered not a sensitiser.
{4}------------------------------------------------
Shelf Life Expiration Data: 19.0
For this particular version of gloves, there is as yet insufficient data to indicate an expiration date for the gloves.
SMDA 510 (K) REQUIREMENT 21.0
:
APPENDIX-H gives a summary of the safety and effectiveness information upon which the substantial equivalence determination is based.
b
{5}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/5/Picture/1 description: The image is a black and white circular logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features the department's emblem, which consists of a stylized caduceus with three intertwined snakes and a bowl. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" is arranged around the upper half of the circle, following its curvature.
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
JUN 23 1999
Shield Gloves Manufacturer (M) Sdn. Bhd. c/o Mr. E.J. Smith Smith Associates P.O. Box 4341 21114 Crofton, MD
Re : K991746
Trade Name: Royal Shield™ Powder Free Pineapple Scented Latex Examination Gloves with Protein Content Labeling Claim (50 micrograms or less) Regulatory Class: I Product Code: LYY Dated: May 10, 1999 Received: May 21, 1999
Dear Mr. Smith:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual reqistration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Requlations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. ਸੀ substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Good Manufacturing Practice for Medical Devices: General (GMP) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic GMP inspections, the Food and Druq Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP requlation may result in requlatory action.
{6}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Mr. Smith
In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Reqister. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4692. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its internet address
"http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsmamain.html".
Sincerely yours,
Timothy A. Ulatowski
A. Ulatowski Timo ny Director Division of Dental, Infection Control, and General Hospital Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{7}------------------------------------------------
INDICATIONS FOR USE STATEMENT
Applicant: Shield Gloves Manufacturer (M) Sdn Bhd,
510K Number:
Device Name: Royal Shield Powder Fre on ICREGIONS a ontent Labelma with Indications For Use :
This is a medical glove to be worn on the hand of health care and similar personnel to prevent contamination between health care personnel and the patient.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Concurrence of CDRH Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Prescription Use ... ... Per 21 CFR 801.109
OR
Over-The-Counter...X
Qhin Si him
(Division Sign-Off) Division of Dental, Infection Control, and General Hospital De 510(k) Number
§ 880.6250 Non-powdered patient examination glove.
(a)
Identification. A non-powdered patient examination glove is a disposable device intended for medical purposes that is worn on the examiner's hand or finger to prevent contamination between patient and examiner. A non-powdered patient examination glove does not incorporate powder for purposes other than manufacturing. The final finished glove includes only residual powder from manufacturing.(b)
Classification. Class I (general controls). The device, when it is a finger cot, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 880.9.