(239 days)
Not Found
Not Found
No
The document describes a standard ELISA test system and an automated version (Aptus) for qualitative determination of antibodies. There is no mention of AI, ML, or related concepts in the intended use, device description, or other sections.
No.
Explanation: The device is an in vitro diagnostic ELISA test system used to detect antibodies for diagnostic purposes, not to treat a disease or condition.
Yes
The device is an ELISA test system intended for an "in vitro diagnostic use" to "evaluate serologic evidence of primary or active infection with Rubella." This explicitly states its purpose in diagnosing a medical condition.
No
The device description clearly states it is an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test system, which is a laboratory-based assay involving physical reagents and processes, not solely software. While it mentions an "automated (Aptus) Application," this appears to be an automated system for running the ELISA, not a standalone software device.
Yes, this device is an IVD (In Vitro Diagnostic).
The "Intended Use / Indications for Use" section explicitly states: "The test is intended to be used to evaluate serologic evidence of primary or active infection with Rubella and is for in vitro diagnostic use."
The "Device Description" also mentions it is an "enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) designed for the manual or automated (Aptus), qualitative determination of IgM-class antibody to rubelia virus in human serum." This describes a test performed on a sample taken from the body (human serum) to diagnose a condition (Rubella infection), which is the definition of an in vitro diagnostic device.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
The Rubella IgM ELISA test system is and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) designed for the manual or automated (Aptus), qualitative determination of IgM-class antibody to rubelia virus in human serum. The test is intended to be used to evaluate serologic evidence of primary or active infection with Rubella and is for in vitro diagnostic use.
Product codes
83 LFX
Device Description
Not Found
Mentions image processing
Not Found
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
Not Found
Anatomical Site
Not Found
Indicated Patient Age Range
Not Found
Intended User / Care Setting
Not Found
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)
Not Found
Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)
Not Found
Predicate Device(s)
Not Found
Reference Device(s)
Not Found
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information
Not Found
§ 866.3510 Rubella virus serological reagents.
(a)
Identification. Rubella virus serological reagents are devices that consist of antigens and antisera used in serological tests to identify antibodies to rubella virus in serum. The identification aids in the diagnosis of rubella (German measles) or confirmation of a person's immune status from past infections or immunizations and provides epidemiological information on German measles. Newborns infected in the uterus with rubella virus may be born with multiple congenital defects (rubella syndrome).(b)
Classification. Class II. The special controls for this device are:(1) National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards':
(i) 1/LA6 “Detection and Quantitation of Rubella IgG Antibody: Evaluation and Performance Criteria for Multiple Component Test Products, Speciment Handling, and Use of the Test Products in the Clinical Laboratory, October 1997,”
(ii) 1/LA18 “Specifications for Immunological Testing for Infectious Diseases, December 1994,”
(iii) D13 “Agglutination Characteristics, Methodology, Limitations, and Clinical Validation, October 1993,”
(iv) EP5 “Evaluation of Precision Performance of Clinical Chemistry Devices, February 1999,” and
(v) EP10 “Preliminary Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitive Clinical Laboratory Methods, May 1998,”
(2) Centers for Disease Control's:
(i) Low Titer Rubella Standard,
(ii) Reference Panel of Well Characterized Rubella Sera, and
(3) World Health Organization's International Rubella Standard.
0
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image is a black and white logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular border with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES • USA" written around it. Inside the circle is a stylized image of an eagle with three lines representing its wings and body.
Food and Drug Administration 2098 Gaither Road Rockville MD 20850
JUL 20 1999
Mark J. Kopnitsky Vice President of Research & Development Zeus Scientific, Inc. 200 Evans Way Branchburg, NJ 08876
Re: K984180
Trade Name: The Aptus (automated) Application of the Rubella IgM ELISA
Regulatory Class: III Product Code: 83 LFX Dated: November 19, 1998 Received: November 23, 1998
Dear Mr. Kopnitsky:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration. listing of devices, good manufacturing practice. labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Current Good Manufacturing Practice requirements, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (OS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic QS inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
1
Page 2
Under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA-88), this device may require a CLIA complexity categorization. To determine if it does, you should contact the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) at (770)488-7655.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4588. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll free number (800) 638-2041 or at (301) 443-6597 or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsmamain.html"
Sincerely yours,
Steven Butman
Steven I. Gutman, M.D., M.B.A. Director Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
2
510(k) Number (if known): ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Aptus (automated) Application for the Rubella IgM ELISA Device Name: Test System
Indications for Use:
The Rubella IgM ELISA test system is and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) designed for the manual or automated (Aptus), qualitative determination of IgM-class antibody to rubelia virus in human serum. The test is intended to be used to evaluate serologic evidence of primary or active infection with Rubella and is for in vitro diagnostic use.
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE -- CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Prescription Use
OR
Over-The-Counter Use
i i
(Per 21 CFR 801,109)
2-96)
Woody Dubois
(Division Sign Off)
Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices
510(k) Number K984180
(Optional Format 1-