(197 days)
Evita 4 is a time cycled, constant volume, long term, intensive care ventilator for adults and children with a body weight of at least 3 kg.
Intended Environment for the device:
- hospital use
- inner clinical transport
The Evita 4 with the Software version 3.0 is a time cycled, constant volume ventilator The Evita + with the Oct.ware is microprocessor controlled and provides the following ventilation modes:
- CMV/assist
- SIMV
- MMV
- SB
- CPAP
- ASB/PSV
- PCV+
- APRV
- Apnea Ventilation
- ILV
This is a regulatory submission for a medical device (ventilator) and does not contain the kind of detailed study information (acceptance criteria, sample sizes, ground truth establishment, etc.) that would typically be found in a clinical study report or a 510(k) submission for a diagnostic AI/ML device.
The provided document, a 510(k) Summary, primarily focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices, not on proving device performance against specific clinical acceptance criteria through a dedicated study with experts establishing ground truth.
Therefore, many of the requested fields cannot be extracted directly from this document. I will fill in what can be inferred or stated as "Not applicable/Provided" based on the content.
Here's an analysis based on the provided text:
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
The document does not explicitly state acceptance criteria in a quantitative manner as one would expect for a diagnostic device. Instead, it relies on demonstrating "substantial equivalence" to predicate devices. The "performance" is implicitly deemed acceptable if it is equivalent to the legally marketed predicate devices.
| Acceptance Criteria (Inferred from Substantial Equivalence Claim) | Reported Device Performance (Summary of Equivalence) |
|---|---|
| Classification: Intensive Care Ventilator | Yes |
| Operating Principle: Time cycled, volume constant, pressure controlled | Yes |
| Software controlled | Yes |
| Gas delivery system: Fast "High Pressure Servo Valve", microprocessor controlled | Yes |
| Intended Use: For adults and children with body weight >= 3 kg | Identical to predicate Evita 4 (K 961687) |
| Modes of Ventilation | Identical to predicate Evita 4 (K 961687) |
| Ventilator Settings | Identical to predicate Evita 4 (K 961687) |
| Flow Trigger Sensitivity | Identical to predicate Evita 4 (K 961687) |
| Parameter setting | Identical to predicate Evita 4 (K 961687) |
| Monitors/Indicators | Identical to predicate Evita 4 (K 961687) |
| Pressure Limitation | Identical to predicate Evita 4 (K 961687) |
| Alarm Functions | Identical to predicate Evita 4 (K 961687) |
| Displayed Values | Identical to predicate Evita 4 (K 961687) |
| Displayed Curves | Identical to predicate Evita 4 (K 961687) |
| Intermittent PEEP | Identical with Evita 2 dura (K 970165) |
| Inspiration Hold | Identical with Evita 2 dura (K 970165) |
| Apnea Ventilation | Identical with Evita 2 dura (K 970165) |
| Nebulization | Identical with Evita 2 dura (K 970165) |
| Nebulization in pediatric mode | Identical with Evita 2 dura (K 970165) |
| Suction Help Mode | Identical with Evita 2 dura (K 970165) |
| Switch over function | Identical with Evita 2 dura (K 970165) |
| Leak-Compensation | Identical with Evita 2 dura (K 970165) |
| Minute Volume-Leak | Identical with Evita 4 (K 961687) |
| Overall Safety and Efficiency | Substantially equivalent to predicate devices |
2. Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)
- Sample Size: Not applicable/Provided. This document does not describe a clinical study with a "test set" in the context of diagnostic performance evaluation. The substantial equivalence claim is based on comparing technical specifications and intended use.
- Data Provenance: Not applicable/Provided. No specific "data" in terms of patient results is discussed. The device is manufactured by Dräger Medizintechnik GmbH, Lübeck, Germany, and sold in the United States.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)
- Number of experts: Not applicable/Provided. This document does not pertain to an AI/ML diagnostic device requiring expert-established ground truth.
- Qualifications of experts: Not applicable/Provided.
4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set
- Adjudication method: Not applicable/Provided.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
- MRMC study: No. This is a ventilator, not an AI-assisted diagnostic device for human readers.
- Effect size: Not applicable.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
- Standalone performance: Not applicable in the context of an AI/ML algorithm. This device is a ventilator, designed to be used by trained medical professionals. Its "performance" refers to its mechanical and software functions meeting specifications, not an algorithm's diagnostic output.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)
- Type of ground truth: Not applicable in the traditional sense of diagnostic device evaluation. The "ground truth" for a ventilator's performance would be its adherence to established electrical, mechanical, and software specifications, and its ability to safely and effectively deliver ventilation as intended, as demonstrated through engineering tests and comparison to legally marketed predicate devices.
8. The sample size for the training set
- Sample size for training set: Not applicable/Provided. This document does not describe an AI/ML device that undergoes training on a dataset.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
- Ground truth for training set: Not applicable/Provided.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Dräger
4 1888 SEP
file: 510kstate.RTF Date: June, 1998 Author: Frank Clanzett
510(k) SUMMARY Summary of Safety and Effectiveness
APPLICANTS NAME AND ADDRESS:
Drager Inc. Critical Care Systems 3136 Quarry Road Telford , PA 18969
APPLICANTS TELEPHONE NUMBER: (215)-721-6917
APPLICANTS FACSIMILE NUMBER: (215)-721-6915
APPLICANTS CONTACT PERSON:
Harald Kneuer Regulatory Affairs Manager
DATE THE SUMMARY WAS PREPARED: February, 1998
DEVICE NAME:
Trade Name: Common Name: Classification Name: Evita 4 Evita 4 Ventilator, Continuous (per 21 CFR 868.5895)
LEGALLY MARKETED DEVICE TO WHICH DRÄGER IS CLAIMING SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE:
Evita 4 - Manufactured by Dräger Medizintechnik GmbH, Lübeck, Germany and sold in the United States by Dräger, Inc.
Evita 2 dura- Manufactured by Dräger Medizintechnik GmbH, Lubeck, Germany and sold in the United States by Dräger, Inc.
Servo 300 - Sold in the United States by Siemens
{1}------------------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION OF THE DEVICE:
The Evita 4 with the Software version 3.0 is a time cycled, constant volume ventilator The Evita + with the Oct.ware is microprocessor controlled and provides the following ventilation modes:
| - CMV/assist | Controlled Mandatory VentilationControlled and assisted volume contant ventilation with the options:- CPV Continuous Positive Pressure Ventilation- PLV Pressure Limited Ventilation- AutoFlow For automatic regulation of inspiratory flow- IRV Inversed Ratio Ventilation |
|---|---|
| - SIMV | Synchronized Intermittent Mandatory VentilationProcedure for weaning patients off the ventilator after they have started spontaneous breathing. With the options:- PLV- AutoFlow |
| - MMV | Mandatory Minute Volume VentilationSpontaneous breathing with automatic adjustment of mandatory ventilation to the patients minute volume requirement. With the options:- PLV- AutoFlow |
| - SB | Spontaneous BreathingSpontaneous breathing at ambient pressure |
| - CPAP | Continuous Positive Airway PressureSpontaneous breathing with positive airway pressure |
| - ASB/PSV | Assisted Spontaneous Breathing / Pressure Support VentilationPressure supported spontaneous breathing |
| - PCV+ | Pressure Controlled VentilationPressure controlled ventilation combined with free spontaneous breathing during the complete breathing cycle, and adjustable pressure increase to CPAP level |
| - APRV | Airway Pressure Release VentilationSpontaneous breathing on two pressure levels with long time ranges - independently adjustable |
| - Apnea Ventilation | For switching over automatically to volume controlled mandatory ventilation if breathing stops |
| - ILV | Independent Lung VentilationSeparate, differentiated, synchronized ventilation with one Evita 4 for each lung |
{2}------------------------------------------------
Dräger
tensive Care Ventilator Data Comparison Sheet
| Specification | Evita 4 (K 961687) | Evita 2 dura (K 970165) | Servo 300 (K902859) | Evita 4 SW 3.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Dräger | Dräger | Siemens | Dräger |
| Classification: Intensive CareVentilator | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Operating Principle: Timecycled, volume constant,pressure controlled | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Software controlled | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Contoll Software: Version 3.0 | No (1.0) | Yes | N.A. | Yes |
| Gas delivery system: Fast"High Pressure Servo Valve",microprocessor controlled | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Intended Use | Evita 4 is a time cycled, constant volume, longterm, intensive careventilator for adults andchildren with a bodyweight of at least 3 kg. | like Evita 4 (K 961687) | N.A. | Evita 4 is a time cycled,constant volume, longterm, intensive careventilator for adults andchildren with a bodyweight of at least 3 kg |
| Specification | Evita 4 (K 961687) | Evita 2 dura (K 970165) | Servo 300 (K902859) | Evita 4 SW 3.0 |
| Modes of Ventilation: | - | - | - | identical with Evita 4510(k) no: K 961687 |
| Ventilator Settings | - | - | - | identical with Evita 4510(k) no: K 961687 |
| Flow Trigger Sensivity | - | - | - | identical with Evita 4510(k) no: K 961687 |
| Parameter setting | - | - | - | identical with Evita 4510(k) no: K 961687 |
| Monitors/Indicators | - | - | - | identical with Evita 4510(k) no: K 961687 |
| Pressure Limitation | - | - | - | identical with Evita 4510(k) no: K 961687 |
| Alarm Functions | - | - | - | identical with Evita 4510(k) no: K 961687 |
| Displayed Values | - | - | - | identical with Evita 4510(k) no: K 961687 |
| Displayed Curves | - | - | - | identical with Evita 4510(k) no: K 961687 |
| Specification | Evita 4 (K 961687) | Evita 2 dura (K 970165) | Servo 300 (K902859) | DrägerEvita 4 SW 3.0 |
| Special Functions | ||||
| Intermittend PEEP | Yes | Yes | - | identical with Evita 2dura |
| Inspiration Hold | No | Yes | - | identical with Evita 2dura |
| Apnea Ventilation | Yes | Yes | - | identical with Evita 2dura |
| Nebulization | Yes | Yes | - | identical with Evita 2dura |
| Nebulization in pediatric mode | No | Yes | - | identical with Evita 2dura |
| Suction Help Mode | Yes | Yes | - | identical with Evita 2dura |
| Switch over function | Yes | Yes | - | identical with Evita 2dura |
| Leak-Compensation | No | Yes | - | identical with Evita 2dura |
| Minute Volume-Leak | No | Yes | - | identical with Evita 4510(k) no. K 961687 |
| Physical Caracteristics |
{3}------------------------------------------------
4 of 6
{4}------------------------------------------------
{5}------------------------------------------------
INTENDED USE OF THE DEVICE
Evita 4 (SW 3.0) is a time cycled, constant volume, long term, intensive care ventilator for adults and children with a body weight of at least 3kg.
Intended Environment for the device:
- user facilities …
- inner clinical transport -
SUMMARY OF THE TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DEVICE COMPARED TO THE PREDICATE DEVICES:
The ventilator functions of the Evita 4 with the enhanced software version are substantially equivalent to the Evita 2 dura, the Evita 4 with the former software and the Servo 300 ventilators.
The Evita 4 with enhanced software integrates the same optional functions that are presently performed by the Evita 4 with the former software.
The device fulfils at least the same standards as the Evita 2 dura.
Therefore the device under review is substantial equivalent to the predicate devices concerning safety, efficiency and the intended use.
Flium
Frank Clanzett Regulatory Affairs Dräger Medizintechnik
{6}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/6/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features a stylized depiction of an eagle or bird with three curved lines representing its wings or feathers. The words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" are arranged in a circular fashion around the bird symbol.
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
4 1998 SEb
Mr. Harald Kneuer Drager Inc. Critical Care Systems 3136 Quarry Road Telford, PA 18969
K980642 Re : Evita 4 Requlatory Class: II (two) Product Code: 73 CBK Dated: June 12, 1998 Received: June 15, 1998
Dear Mr. Kneuer:
We have reviewed your Section 510 (k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Requlations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Current Good Manufacturing Practice requirements, as set forth in the Quality System Requlation (QS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic QS inspections, the Food and Druq Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP requlation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
{7}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Mr. Harald Kneuer
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4648. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification"(21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597, or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/dsmamain.html".
Sincerely yours,
Thomas J. Callehan
Thomas J. Callahan, Ph.D. Director Division of Cardiovascular, Respiratory, and Neurological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{8}------------------------------------------------
INTENDED USE STATEMENT OF THE EVITA 4, SW 3.0
Fivita 4 is a time cycled, constant volume, long term, intensive care ventilator for adults and children with a body weight of at least 3 kg.
Intended Environment for the device:
- hospital use
- inner clinical transport
Signature
Frank Clanzep (Regulatory Affairs)
- September 1998
Mark Kramis
: Division Sign-Off) Division of Cardiovascular, Respiratory, and Neurological Devices 510(k) Number_K980(e4Z
/ Prescription Use
§ 868.5895 Continuous ventilator.
(a)
Identification. A continuous ventilator (respirator) is a device intended to mechanically control or assist patient breathing by delivering a predetermined percentage of oxygen in the breathing gas. Adult, pediatric, and neonatal ventilators are included in this generic type of device.(b)
Classification. Class II (performance standards).