(86 days)
The intended use for this device is to serve as support for prosthetic devices to restore patient chewing function.
Steri-Oss 3.25 mm Replace Implant: This device is designed to serve as support for prosthetic devices to restore patient chewing function.
This implant is 3.25 mm in diameter, 10 to 16 mm in length, and is fabricated from titanium allov. They are threaded and have a superior external hex. The threaded portion of the implant body has a 50 micron thick plasma sprayed titanium powder coating, and the surface of the external hex is anodized magenta in color.
The provided text describes a 510(k) submission for a dental implant and explicitly states "Performance Data: Not applicable." This indicates that no specific studies proving the acceptance criteria for the device were conducted or required for this particular submission. The submission relies on claiming substantial equivalence to predicate devices.
Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information about acceptance criteria and a study proving the device meets them because the document clearly states that performance data is not applicable.
However, if this were a different kind of medical device submission where performance data was applicable, here's how I would structure the answer based on your request, using placeholders for the missing information:
Acceptance Criteria and Study to Prove Device Performance
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
| Acceptance Criteria (e.g., Accuracy, Sensitivity, Specificity, Precision, etc.) | Threshold/Target Value (e.g., >90%,
§ 872.3640 Endosseous dental implant.
(a)
Identification. An endosseous dental implant is a prescription device made of a material such as titanium or titanium alloy that is intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw arches to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, in order to restore a patient's chewing function.(b)
Classification. (1) Class II (special controls). The device is classified as class II if it is a root-form endosseous dental implant. The root-form endosseous dental implant is characterized by four geometrically distinct types: Basket, screw, solid cylinder, and hollow cylinder. The guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Root-Form Endosseous Dental Implants and Endosseous Dental Implant Abutments” will serve as the special control. (See § 872.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.)(2)
Classification. Class II (special controls). The device is classified as class II if it is a blade-form endosseous dental implant. The special controls for this device are:(i) The design characteristics of the device must ensure that the geometry and material composition are consistent with the intended use;
(ii) Mechanical performance (fatigue) testing under simulated physiological conditions to demonstrate maximum load (endurance limit) when the device is subjected to compressive and shear loads;
(iii) Corrosion testing under simulated physiological conditions to demonstrate corrosion potential of each metal or alloy, couple potential for an assembled dissimilar metal implant system, and corrosion rate for an assembled dissimilar metal implant system;
(iv) The device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible;
(v) Sterility testing must demonstrate the sterility of the device;
(vi) Performance testing to evaluate the compatibility of the device in a magnetic resonance (MR) environment;
(vii) Labeling must include a clear description of the technological features, how the device should be used in patients, detailed surgical protocol and restoration procedures, relevant precautions and warnings based on the clinical use of the device, and qualifications and training requirements for device users including technicians and clinicians;
(viii) Patient labeling must contain a description of how the device works, how the device is placed, how the patient needs to care for the implant, possible adverse events and how to report any complications; and
(ix) Documented clinical experience must demonstrate safe and effective use and capture any adverse events observed during clinical use.