(266 days)
The VACUTAINER® Brand PPT™ Plasma Preparation Tube with HDTA anticoagulant and a gel barrier material are evacuated blood collection which provide a means of collecting, processing and transporting blood in a closed plastic tube. When the Tube is .. used together with VACUPAINER® Brand needles and holders, it is a closed system for the collection of venous blood with the same indications identified here.
Blood collected in a tube containing HDTA anticoagulant and gel barrier material can be primarily used to provide undiluted plasma for use in molecular diagnostic test methods; including but not limited to Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and branched-DNA (bDNA). The specimen may also be used for other testing that requires an undiluted plasma sample as determined by the laboratory.
The VACUTAINER® Brand PPT™-Plasma Preparation Tube (blood collection The VACOTAINER® Brand Property is an evacuated plastic tube containing EDTA Antiocagana, processing and transporting blood in a blood obliobiler Rabe for Selleum NER® Brand PPT™ consists of a Closed plastic tube. The VAOS v. ... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (dipotassium or tripotassium) and a polymeric gel barrier material.
The provided text describes the 510(k) summary for the VACUTAINER® Brand PPT™-Plasma Preparation Tube, which is a blood specimen collection device. The studies are designed to demonstrate substantial equivalence to existing predicate devices, rather than establishing specific acceptance criteria for performance metrics of a novel device. The primary evaluation is focused on comparisons of HIV and HCV viral load measurements.
Here's an analysis of the requested information based on the provided text:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The document does not explicitly state numerical acceptance criteria in the typical sense (e.g., minimum sensitivity or specificity targets). Instead, the acceptance criterion for the device seems to be "statistically and clinically equivalent results" and "equivalent results" when compared to predicate devices for viral load determinations.
Given this, the table would look like this:
| Acceptance Criterion (Implicit) | Reported Device Performance (VACUTAINER® Brand PPT™) |
|---|---|
| Statistically and clinically equivalent results for HIV viral load measurements compared to predicate devices (non-gel separator EDTA tubes). | Study I (HIV): Demonstrated performance compared to control (Terumo Venoject K3EDTA) with paired aliquots of undiluted plasma. Studies III & IV (HIV): Demonstrated statistically and clinically equivalent results for HIV viral load determinations between the principal device and predicate devices (VACUTAINER® Brand PLUS Tube with EDTA). |
| Equivalent results for HCV viral load measurements (b-DNA and PCR) compared to predicate devices. | Study II (HCV b-DNA): Demonstrated equivalent results to VACUTAINER® Brand PLUS Tube with EDTA for both negative and positive HCV samples. Studies V & VI (HCV PCR): Demonstrated equivalent results to VACUTAINER® Brand PLUS Tube with EDTA for HCV viral load measurements. |
2. Sample Sizes Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
- Study I (HIV): 56 HIV-Positive patients.
- Studies III & IV (HIV): 40 HIV-positive subjects.
- Study II (HCV b-DNA): 49 paired samples from 24 HCV negative and 25 HCV positive subjects.
- Studies V & VI (HCV PCR): 65 HCV-positive patients.
Data Provenance: The document does not specify the country of origin of the data. It appears to be prospective as it mentions "paired samples were collected."
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts
The ground truth in this context refers to the viral load measurements themselves, as determined by established molecular diagnostic kits (e.g., Roche Amplicor® HIV RT PCR Monitor™ Kit, Chiron Quantiplex HCV RNA Assay). The document does not mention the use of experts to establish a "ground truth" other than the performance of these assays. There is no indication of expert consensus or adjudication in this regard; the assays themselves are the reference.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
No adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1) is mentioned. The studies involve direct comparison of viral load measurements obtained from different tubes using standard laboratory assays.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
This is a medical device for blood collection and preparation, not an AI-powered diagnostic tool. Therefore, an MRMC study and analysis of human reader improvement with AI assistance are not applicable to this device.
6. If a Standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done
This is a physical medical device (blood collection tube) and does not involve an algorithm. Therefore, a standalone algorithm performance study is not applicable.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
The "ground truth" for the performance evaluation was established by viral load measurements using commercially available and validated molecular diagnostic kits (e.g., Roche Amplicor® HIV RT PCR Monitor™ Kit, Amplicor® HCV RT PCR Monitor - Test Kit, Chiron Quantiplex HCV RNA Assay) on blood samples. These kits are considered the reference standard for viral load quantification.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
The document does not describe a "training set" as it would for a machine learning model. The studies described are clinical evaluations comparing the performance of the device to predicate devices. There is no mention of a separate training phase for the device itself.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
As there is no "training set" in the context of this physical device's evaluation, this question is not applicable.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows a graphic with the number 100 in a stylized font, partially obscured by a globe illustration. Above the number, the text "K972075" is visible, stamped across the top of the image. Additionally, the date "FEB 24 1998" is stamped above the text "K972075". The overall impression is that of an official document or record with a combination of numerical and textual elements.
CELEBRATING THE FIRST ONE HUNDRED: 1897-1997
Image /page/0/Picture/2 description: The image shows the logo for Becton Dickinson. The logo is in a bold, sans-serif font. The words "BECTON" and "DICKINSON" are stacked on top of each other. The logo is in black and white.
Becton Dickinson and Company 1 Becton Drive Franklin Lakes, New Jersey 07417
510(K) SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS. 800
General Information ﻨﺴ
l. General Information
This Summary of 510(k) Safety and Effectiveness information is being submitted This Summary of STO(K) Salety and Lifestivents of 1990 and 21 CFR 807.92
Establishment:
-
· Address:
Becton Dickinson VACUTAINER Systems 1 Becton Drive Franklin Lakes, NJ 07417-1885 -
· Registration Number:
-
2243072
-
· Contact Person:
John A. Schalago Regulatory Affairs Specialist Telephone no .: 201 - 847 - 6280 Facsimile no .: 201 - 847 - 4858
· Date of Summary:
December 4, 1997
Device Name:
- VACUTAINER® Brand PPT™-Plasma Preparation Tube · Trade Name:
- · Classification Name : Blood Specimen Collection Device
- Class II · Classification:
- None Established under 514 of · Performance Standards:
the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act
- Safety and Effectiveness Information Supporting the Substantial 0 Equivalence Determination
The term, "Substantial Equivalence" used in this 510(k) Premarket Notification, is limited to the definition of Substantial Equivalence as found in the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended and as applied under 21 CFR § 807. Subpart E under which a device can be marketed without pre-market approval or reclassification. A determination of substantial equivalency under this notification is not intended to have any bearing whatsoever on the resolution
{1}------------------------------------------------
of patent infringement suits or any other patent matters. No statements related of patent ininingement outle of any othere herein shall be construed as an to of in Support of Substantial OquivalUnce Horsin Swent Laws or their application by the courts.
-
· Device Description
The VACUTAINER® Brand PPT™-Plasma Preparation Tube (blood collection The VACOTAINER® Brand Property is an evacuated plastic tube containing EDTA Antiocagana, processing and transporting blood in a blood obliobiler Rabe for Selleum NER® Brand PPT™ consists of a Closed plastic tube. The VAOS v. ... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (dipotassium or tripotassium) and a polymeric gel barrier material. -
· Intended Use
ar
The VACUTAINER® Brand PPT™ Plasma Preparation Tube with EDTA The VACUTAINER® Diana . . .
anticoagulant and a gel barrier material are evacuated blood collection tubest in a anticoagulant and a gol banner ting, processing and transporting blood in a which provide a mound of other is used together with VACUTAINER® Closed plastic tube. "There it is a closed system for the collection of venous blood with the same indications identified here.
Blood collected in a tube containing EDTA anticoagulant and gel barrier material is used primarily to provide undiluted plasma for use in molecular material is used primarily to proving but not limited to PCR (Polymerase Chain diagnostic tool morrous included DNA). The specimen may also be used for reaction) and bDNA (Dranches an undiluted plasma sample as determined by the laboratory.
• Synopsis of Test Methods and Results
Six studies were conducted to evaluate the use of the VACUTAINER® Brand On cludios for molecular diagnostic viral load determinations. Study I evaluated the clinical functional performance of the PPT™ tube as compared evaluatou the chillion franco Venoject KsEDTA). Studies II, III, IV, V, and VI were conducted to demonstrate substantial equivalence to the predicate device (PLUS K2 EDTA). Studies I, III, and IV compared HIV viral loads obtained with the principal device to viral loads obtained with either control or predicate (non-gel separator EDTA) devices. Studies II, V, and VI compared products (non-gol open in the principal device to those obtained in the predicate device.
{2}------------------------------------------------
The clinical functional performance of the VACUTAINER® PPT™ Tube was The cilineal functional portenments on INV RT PCR Monitor™ Kit. (Study I) evaluation compared the VACUTAINER® PPT™ Tube, principal The Clinical Gvaluation Compared the 1.00 to 56 HIV-Positive patients. Paired aliquots of undiluted plasma produced in the VACUTAINER® PPT™ tube and aliquots of unundiou processor for HIV viral load. The PPT™ tube Terumb vollojoo. IS LD Projected performance compared to the samples produced in the EDTA control tube.
Substantial equivalence between the principal device and the predicate Substantial equivalories Brand PLUS EDTA) was demonstrated for the device (9758 17 ... .. .. .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Monitor™ Test Kit, (Studies III and IV), the Amplicor® HCV RT PCR Monitor - Tost Kit (Studies V and VI), and for the Chiron Quantiplex HCV-RNA (branched DNA) assay (Study II).
Two HIV clinical evaluations (Study III and Study IV) compared viral load TWo first of paired PPT ™/EDTA samples from HIV positive subjects. measuremorne of pail the viral load of plasma produced from forty (40) HIV positive subjects. The samples were evaluated using the Roche Amplicor® HIV RT PCR Monitor™ Kit. The results of HIV viral load determinations demonstrated statistically and clinically equivalent results between the principal and predicate devices.
The VACUTAINER® Brand PPT™ Tube was also evaluated for HCV viral load determinations, by b-DNA and PCR. For Study II, a total of forty-nine (49) paired samples were collected from twenty-four (24) HCV negative and twenty-five (25) HCV positive subjects and evaluated using the Chiron Quantiplex HCV RNA Assay. The VACUTAINER® Brand PPT™ Tube, principal device, demonstrated equivalent results to the VACUTAINER® Brand PLUS Tube with EDTA for both negative and positive HCV samples.
For Studies V and VI, paired PPT™/EDTA samples were collected from a total of sixty-five (65) HCV-positive patients and were evaluated for HCV viral load using the Roche Amplicor® HCV RT PCR Monitor™ Test Kit. Viral load measurements of paired HCV samples were compared and results indicated that viral load results obtained from plasma produced in the VACUTAINER® Brand PPT™ Tube are equivalent to those obtained with the VACUTAINER® Brand PLUS Tube with EDTA.
ر ۽
{3}------------------------------------------------
- · Substantial Equivalence
Becton Dickinson VACUTAINER Systems believes that the VACUTAINER® Becon Dicklifson VAOOTAINER ogenivalent to two commercially available
Brand PPT™ Tube is substantially equivalent to two couivalent Bland PP T --- Tube is Substantially oquitely demonstrated equivalent Diod Collection tubos: "Official tool comparisons of the Principal and penormance and ensctiveness and compulacturing process supports the Predicate device onlaracements una nee. The predicate devices, determination of oubotantial oclearance date are identified below:
| Manufacturer | Predicate Device | K-Number | ClearanceDate |
|---|---|---|---|
| VACUTAINER Systems | VACUTAINER® Brand PLUS Tube withEDTA Anticoagulant | K953463 | 9/20/95 |
| VACUTAINER Systems | VACUTAINER™ Brand PST™ Tube | K945952 | 1/18/95 |
Joska Abelaigor
ohn A. Schalago Regulatory Affairs Specialist Regulatory Affairs Department December 4, 1997 Date
{4}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/4/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features a stylized caduceus symbol, which is a staff with two snakes coiled around it. The words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES • USA" are arranged in a circular pattern around the caduceus symbol.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
Becton Dickinson Vacutainer Systems and Labware John A. Schalago Regulatory Affairs Specialist 1 Beckton Drive Franklin Lakes, NJ 07417
FEB 0 6 2015
Re: K972075
Trade/Device Name: VACUTAINER Brand PPT Plasma Preparation Tubes Regulation Number: 21 CFR 862.1675 Regulation Name: Blood specimen collection device Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: PJE Dated: December 4, 1997 Received: December 5, 1997
Dear Mr. Schalago:
This letter corrects our substantially equivalent letter of February 24, 1998.
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must
{5}------------------------------------------------
Page 2
comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Parts 801 and 809 ); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Parts 801 and 809), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
Also, please note http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.lda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportalProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Courtney H. Lias. Ph.D. Director Division of Chemistry and Toxicology Devices Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health Center for Devices and Radiological Health
{6}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Number (if known): 1972075
Device Name: VACUTAINBR® Brand PPT™ Plasma Preparation Tubes
Indications for Use:
The VACUTAINER® Brand PPT™ Plasma Preparation Tube with HDTA anticoagulant and a gel barrier material are evacuated blood collection which provide a means of collecting, processing and transporting blood in a closed plastic tube. When the Tube is .. used together with VACUPAINER® Brand needles and holders, it is a closed system for the collection of venous blood with the same indications identified here.
Blood collected in a tube containing HDTA anticoagulant and gel barrier material can be primarily used to provide undiluted plasma for use in molecular diagnostic test methods; including but not limited to Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and branched-DNA (bDNA). The specimen may also be used for other testing that requires an undiluted plasma sample as determined by the laboratory.
| (Division Sign-OffDivision of Clinical Laboratory Devices | |
|---|---|
| 510(k) Number | k9912675 |
(PLRASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NERDED) ::
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODB)
Prescription Use v OR Over-the-Counter Use (Per 21 CFR 801 : 109)
(Optional Format 1-2-96)
§ 862.1675 Blood specimen collection device.
(a)
Identification. A blood specimen collection device is a device intended for medical purposes to collect and to handle blood specimens and to separate serum from nonserum (cellular) components prior to further testing. This generic type device may include blood collection tubes, vials, systems, serum separators, blood collection trays, or vacuum sample tubes.(b)
Classification. Class II.