(23 days)
This in vitro diagnostic product is intended for the quantitative determination of HDL cholesterol in human serum.
Numerous studies have shown an inverse relationship between serum HDL cholesterol and the risk of coronary heart disease. HDL cholesterol also has an important role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis.
An aliquot of serum is added to the first reagent which contains a mixture of polymers and polyanions that bind to the surface of low-density lipoproteins (LDL), very low-density lipoproteins (VLDL) and chylomicrons. These complexed lipoproteins are stabilized, even in the presence of detergent, which is added as part of the second reagent, together with cholesterol enzymes. HDL particles are not stabilized by the polymers and polyanions and become solubilized by the detergent. As a result, only the HDL cholesterol is subject to measurement.
The ACE™ HDL-C Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of HDL cholesterol in human serum. The study provided focuses on establishing substantial equivalence to a predicate device (N-geneous™ HDL Cholesterol Reagent) and to a CDC reference method, rather than specifically defining explicit acceptance criteria in a regulatory sense for a single-arm study. The performance assessment compares key metrics to both the predicate device and the CDC reference method.
Here's the breakdown of the information requested based on the provided text:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The provided document doesn't explicitly state "acceptance criteria" in a pass/fail format with specific thresholds. Instead, it presents performance summaries for comparison against a predicate device and a reference method, with the implicit acceptance being that the proposed device performs comparably. The document states that "Based on these data, the Schiapparelli Biosystems ACE™ HDL-C reagent is substantially equivalent to the Centers for Disease Control Reference Method and the predicate device, the Genzyme N-geneous HDL Cholesterol Reagent."
| Parameter | Implied "Acceptance Criteria" (from Predicate/CDC) | Proposed Device Performance (ACE™ HDL-C Reagent) |
|---|---|---|
| Assay Range | Predicate: 2 mg/dL to 200 mg/dL | 2 mg/dL to 100 mg/dL |
| Precision | ||
| Within Run (% CV) | Predicate: < 1.5 %CV | < 2.7 % CV |
| Between Run (% CV) | Predicate: < 3.8 %CV | < 4.6 %CV |
| Correlation vs. CDC Ref | ||
| Slope | CDC Ref: 1.01 | 1.014 |
| Intercept | CDC Ref: -3.39 | 0.13 |
| r | CDC Ref: 0.96 | 0.986 |
| Correlation vs. Phosphotungstic Acid Ppt | ||
| Slope | Predicate: 0.81 | N/A (Proposed vs. Dextran Sulfate Ppt) |
| Intercept | Predicate: 7.82 | N/A (Proposed vs. Dextran Sulfate Ppt) |
| r | Predicate: 0.96 | N/A (Proposed vs. Dextran Sulfate Ppt) |
| Correlation vs. Dextran Sulfate Ppt (Proposed only) | N/A (This is a comparison method for the proposed device) | |
| Slope | N/A | 0.991 |
| Intercept | N/A | 0.55 |
| r | N/A | 0.976 |
Note: The document directly compares the proposed device to the CDC reference method for slope, intercept, and r. For other correlation, the proposed device is compared against Dextran Sulfate Ppt, while the predicate is compared against Phosphotungstic Acid Ppt. The implied acceptance is that these values should be "comparable" to demonstrate substantial equivalence.
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance
The document does not explicitly state the sample size used for the test set or the data provenance (e.g., country of origin, retrospective or prospective nature of the data). It only provides performance summary data (e.g., precision values, correlation statistics).
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts
This information is not applicable and not provided in the document. The study involves laboratory-based measurements of HDL cholesterol rather than expert interpretation of medical images or other subjective data. Ground truth is established by a reference laboratory method (CDC Reference Method) or comparative chemical precipitation methods.
4. Adjudication method for the test set
This information is not applicable and not provided in the document. Adjudication methods are typically relevant for studies involving human interpretation or subjective assessments, which is not the case for this chemical assay.
5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
This information is not applicable and not provided in the document. This is a submission for a diagnostic reagent for an automated assay, not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool that involves human readers.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
Yes, a standalone performance assessment was done for the ACE™ HDL-C Reagent, as evidenced by the "Performance Assessment" section. This section details the reagent's assay range, precision (within-run and between-run), and correlation against reference methods. There is no human-in-the-loop component for the direct measurement by this reagent.
7. The type of ground truth used
The ground truth for the performance assessment was established using a CDC Reference Method for cholesterol determination and chemical precipitation methods (specifically Dextran Sulfate Ppt for the proposed device and Phosphotungstic Acid Ppt for the predicate device within the correlation studies).
8. The sample size for the training set
The document does not mention a "training set" in the context of machine learning or algorithm development. This is a diagnostic reagent, and its performance is evaluated through analytical validation, not a machine learning training process.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
Not applicable, as there is no "training set" in the context of this device's development as described in the provided summary.
{0}------------------------------------------------
510(k) PREMARKET NOTIFICATION Summary of Safety and Effectiveness ACE™ HDL-C Reagent
In lieu of a 510(k) statement under 513(i) of the Act, this Summary of Safety and Effectiveness is tur nou of a S10(k) summary for disclosure to any other persons / companies without specific written authorization from Schiapparelli Biosystems, Inc.
Submitter
Schiapparelli Biosystems, Inc. 368 Passaic Avenue Fairfield, NJ 07004 Phone: (201) 882-8630
Contact Person
Steve Dalessio Manager. Quality Assurance and Regulatory Affairs Phone: (201) 882-8630
Device Names
ACE™ HDL-C Reagent Proprietary Name: Homogeneous assay for high density lipoprotein cholesterol Common Name: Classification Name: High density lipoprotein cholesterol test
Predicate Device
Genzyme Corporation's - N-geneous™ HDL Cholesterol Reagent [510(k) Number K962186]
Device Description
An aliquot of serum is added to the first reagent which contains a mixture of polymers and polyanions that bind to the surface of low-density lipoproteins (LDL), very low-density lipoproteins (VLDL) and chylomicrons. These complexed lipoproteins are stabilized, even in the presence of detergent, which is added as part of the second reagent, together with cholesterol enzymes. HDL particles are not stabilized by the polymers and polyanions and become solubilized by the detergent. As a result, only the HDL cholesterol is subject to measurement.
Intended Use of the Device
ACE™ HDL-C Reagent is intended for use in the quantitative determination of HDL cholesterol in human serum.
HHDL510K.WPS
Image /page/0/Picture/17 description: The image shows the date May 21, 1997. The month is written in all caps, and the day and year are written in numerals. The text is written in a bold, sans-serif font. The image is a close-up of the date, and the background is white.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Summary of Safety and Effectiveness ACE™ HDL-C Reagent
COMPARATIVE FEATURES OF PREDICATE AND PROPOSED DEVICE
| PARAMETER | PREDICATE DEVICE | PROPOSED DEVICE |
|---|---|---|
| Trade Name | N-geneous TM HDLCholesterol | ACE TM HDL-C Reagent |
| Reference No. | K962186 | TBD |
| Analyte | HDL Cholesterol | HDL Cholesterol |
| Intended Use | Quantitative determinationof HDL Cholesterol | Quantitative determinationof HDL Cholesterol |
| Methodology | Homogeneous; Direct | Homogeneous; Direct |
| Reagents | ||
| Reagent 1 | Liquid; Polyanion, Polymer | Liquid; Polyanion, Polymer |
| Volume | 300 uL | 300 uL |
| Reagent 2 (Diluent) | Liquid; Detergent | Liquid; Detergent |
| Reagent 3 (Recon with Rgt 2) | Lyophilized; Enzymes | Lyophilized; Enzymes |
| Volume | 100 uL | 100 uL |
| Specimen | ||
| Type | Serum and Plasma | Serum |
| Volume | 3 uL | 3 uL |
| Assay System | ||
| Reagent 1 + sample | Incubate 300s | Incubate 300s |
| Reagent 3 | Incubate 24 - 300s | Incubate 300s |
| Temperature | 37C | 37C |
| Detection Method | ||
| Type | Spectrophotometric | Spectrophotometric |
| Wavelength, nm | Bichromatic: 546/660 | Bichromatic: 544/692 |
HHDL510K.WPS
-7-
{2}------------------------------------------------
Summary of Safety and Effectiveness ACETM HDL-C Reagent
Performance Assessment
Non-clinical test results submitted in the premarket notification include within-run and between run precision and method correlation. Following is a data summary.
| PARAMETER | PREDICATE DEVICE | PROPOSED DEVICE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance Summary | ||
| Assay Range | 2 mg/dL to 200 mg/dL | 2 mg/dL to 100 mg/dL |
| Precision | ||
| Within Run | < 1.5 %CV | < 2.7 % CV |
| Between Run | < 3.8 %CV | < 4.6 %CV |
| Correlation vs CDC Ref | ||
| Slope | 1.01 | 1.014 |
| Intercept | -3.39 | 0.13 |
| r | 0.96 | 0.986 |
| Correlation vs | Phosphotungstic Acid Ppt | Dextran Sulfate Ppt |
| Slope | 0.81 | 0.991 |
| Intercept | 7.82 | 0.55 |
| r | 0.96 | 0.976 |
Based on these data , the Schiapparelli Biosystems ACE™ HDL-C reagent is substantially equivalent to the Centers for Disease Control Reference Method and the predicate device, the Genzyme N-geneous HDL Cholesterol Reagent. On this basis, the reagent is determined to be safe and effective for its intended use. Performance details are included in the reagent product labeling.
HHDL510K.WPS
(
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image is a circular seal for the Department of Health & Human Services - USA. The seal features the department's emblem, which is a stylized depiction of an eagle or bird-like figure. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" is arranged around the upper portion of the circle, following its curvature.
ublic Health Service
MAY 2 | 1997
Food and Drug Administration 2098 Gaither Road Rockville MD 20850
Steve Dalessio Manager, Quality Assurance & Regulatory Affairs Schiapparelli Biosystems, Inc. 368 Passaic Avenue Fairfield, New Jersey 0.7004 - - - - - - - -
K971526 Re : ACE HDL-C Reagent Regulatory Class: I & II Product Code: LBS, JIX, JJY Dated: April 23, 1997 Received: April 28, 1997
Dear Mr. Dalessio:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions The general controls provisions of the Act of the Act. include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Good Manufacturing Practice for Medical Devices: General (GMP) requlation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic GMP inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP requlation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Reqister. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
{4}------------------------------------------------
Page 2
Under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA-88), this device may require a CLIA complexity categorization. To determine if it does, you should contact the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) at (770) 488-7655.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling requlation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4588. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to
premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsmamain.html".
Sincerely yours,
Steven Litman
Steven I. Gutman, M.D., M.B.A. Director Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{5}------------------------------------------------
| 15/97 | 15:39 |
|---|---|
| 301 594 5941 |
Page 1 of 1
510(k) Number (if known):_
Device Name:_ACE HDL-C REAGENT
Indications For Use:
This in vitro diagnostic product is intended for the quantitative determination of HDL cholesterol in human serum.
Numerous studies have shown an inverse relationship between serum HDL cholesterol and the risk of coronary heart disease. HDL cholesterol also has an important role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis.
signature
(Division Sign-Off)
Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices
510(k) Number K971526
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Prescription Use) (Per 21 CFR 801.109)
: "
Article Carante
OR
Over-The-Counter Use_
(Optional Format 1-2-96)
§ 862.1475 Lipoprotein test system.
(a)
Identification. A lipoprotein test system is a device intended to measure lipoprotein in serum and plasma. Lipoprotein measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of lipid disorders (such as diabetes mellitus), atherosclerosis, and various liver and renal diseases.(b)
Classification. Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 862.9.