(27 days)
The AVEA Disposable Expiratory Filter/ Water Trap is an expiratory filter and water trap for use with the AVEA Ventilator.
It would be used in an institutional healthcare environment (e.g., hospitals). It may be used on adult, pediatric, and neonatal patients.
It should be operated by properly trained clinical personnel, under the direction of a physician.
The AVEA disposable expiratory filter/water trap is designed to be used exclusively with the AVEA Ventilator.
This document is a 510(k) clearance letter for the AVEA Disposable Expiratory Filter/Water Trap. It declares the device substantially equivalent to a predicate device and provides the regulatory information. Crucially, it does not describe a clinical study of the device against acceptance criteria for performance; instead, it relies on demonstrating identicality to a previously cleared predicate device.
Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information regarding:
- A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance.
- Sample sizes, data provenance, and expert details for a test set.
- Ground truth establishment and adjudication methods.
- MRMC comparative effectiveness study results.
- Standalone AI algorithm performance (as this is a physical medical device, not an AI software).
- Training set sample size or ground truth establishment for a training set.
The document explicitly states:
- "The subject and predicate devices are identical in all ways."
- "The subject device and the predicate – AVEA disposable expiratory filter/water trap – K081837 is substantially equivalent based upon identicality."
This means that the study proving the device meets acceptance criteria for this specific 510(k) relies purely on the fact that it is a direct copy of a previously cleared device. The "acceptance criteria" here are essentially "be identical to the predicate device."
Here's what can be extracted from the document related to performance, based on the predicate device's listed performance:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria (as per predicate device's listed performance) and Reported Device Performance (by virtue of identicality)
| Performance Parameter | Acceptance Criteria (based on Predicate) | Reported Device Performance (Identical to Predicate) |
|---|---|---|
| Viral Filtration Efficiency (VFE) / Bacterial Filtration Efficiency (BFE) | 99.999% | 99.999% |
| DOP / POA Efficiency | 99.97% | 99.97% |
| Flow Resistance | < 1 cmH2O at 60 lpm | < 1 cmH2O at 60 lpm |
| Flow Leakage | < 0.01 lpm at 140 cmH2O internal pressure | < 0.01 lpm at 140 cmH2O internal pressure |
| Internal Volume | 500 ml (includes Water trap of 130 ml) | 500 ml (includes Water trap of 130 ml) |
| Dimensions | Diameter – 9.7 cm, Height – 33 cm | Diameter – 9.7 cm, Height – 33 cm |
| Biocompatibility | Tested per ISO 10993 | Tested per ISO 10993 |
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g., country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)
This information is not available in the provided document. As the clearance is based on identicality to a predicate, no new performance testing data (and thus no test set or its provenance) for the subject device is presented. The document mentions "Bench testing: Testing was not listed in K081837" and "Identical to K081837" for the subject device. This suggests that the original predicate device (K081837) also didn't explicitly list specific bench testing details in its 510(k) summary, or at least not in a way that is reproduced here.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)
This information is not applicable/not available. This is a physical device, not an AI or diagnostic imaging device that requires expert review for ground truth establishment.
4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set
This information is not applicable/not available for the same reasons as point 3.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
This information is not applicable/not available. This is a physical device (expiratory filter/water trap), not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
This information is not applicable/not available for the same reasons as point 5.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert concensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)
For the physical properties (VFE, BFE, flow resistance, leakage, dimensions, volume), the "ground truth" would be established through laboratory bench testing according to relevant standards. For biocompatibility, it's established through testing per ISO 10993. The document states identicality to the predicate for these, implying that the predicate's performance claims serve as the reference.
8. The sample size for the training set
This information is not applicable/not available. This is a manufactured physical device, not a machine learning model that requires a training set.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
This information is not applicable/not available for the same reasons as point 8.
In summary, the "study" proving this device meets acceptance criteria (for a 510(k)) is simply the demonstration that it is geometrically and functionally identical to a previously cleared predicate device that has established safety and effectiveness. No new clinical or extensive performance studies were required for this specific 510(k) because of this identicality.
FDA 510(k) Clearance Letter - AVEA Disposable Expiratory Filter/Water Trap
Page 1
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
Doc ID # 04017.07.05
May 8, 2025
Telesair Inc.
℅ Paul Dryden
President
ProMedic, LLC
131 Bay Point Dr. NE
Saint Petersburg, Florida 33704
Re: K251133
Trade/Device Name: AVEA disposable expiratory filter/water trap (11790)
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 868.5895
Regulation Name: Continuous Ventilator
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: CBK
Dated: April 11, 2025
Received: April 11, 2025
Dear Paul Dryden:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Page 2
K251133 - Paul Dryden Page 2
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-
Page 3
K251133 - Paul Dryden Page 3
assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Ethan L. Nyberg -S
Ethan Nyberg, Ph.D.
Assistant Director
DHT1C: Division of Anesthesia,
Respiratory, and Sleep Devices
OHT1: Office of Ophthalmic, Anesthesia,
Respiratory, ENT, and Dental Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
Page 4
FORM FDA 3881 (8/23) Page 1 of 1
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
Indications for Use
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120
Expiration Date: 07/31/2026
See PRA Statement below.
510(k) Number (if known): K251133
Device Name: AVEA Disposable Expiratory Filter/Water trap
Indications for Use (Describe)
The AVEA Disposable Expiratory Filter/ Water Trap is an expiratory filter and water trap for use with the AVEA Ventilator.
It would be used in an institutional healthcare environment (e.g., hospitals). It may be used on adult, pediatric, and neonatal patients.
It should be operated by properly trained clinical personnel, under the direction of a physician.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
☒ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services
Food and Drug Administration
Office of Chief Information Officer
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff
PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
Page 5
Telesair 510(k) Summary
Page 1 of 4
Date Prepared: 23-Apr-25
Sponsor: Telesair Inc.
199 Technology Drive, Suite 110
Irvine, CA 92618
Tel - 949-570-3553
Sponsor Contact: Don Lin, Ph.D. - Founder and CEO
Submission Correspondent: Paul Dryden
ProMedic Consulting LLC
Proprietary or Trade Name: AVEA disposable expiratory filter/water trap
Common/Usual Name: Ventilator, continuous, facility use
Classification Name: Continuous Ventilator
21 CFR 868.5895
Product Code: CBK
Proprietary or Trade Name: AVEA disposable expiratory filter/water trap
Common/Usual Name: Ventilator, continuous, facility use
Classification Name: Continuous Ventilator
21 CFR 868.5895
Product Code: CBK
Device Description: The AVEA disposable expiratory filter/water trap is designed to be used exclusively with the AVEA Ventilator.
Indications for Use: The AVEA Disposable Expiratory Filter/ Water Trap is an expiratory filter and water trap for use with the AVEA Ventilator.
It would be used in an institutional healthcare environment (e.g., hospitals). It may be used on adult, pediatric, and neonatal patients.
It should be operated by properly trained clinical personnel, under the direction of a physician.
Page 6
Telesair 510(k) Summary
Page 2 of 4
Table of Comparison of Subject vs. Predicate
| Predicate Vyaire AVEA Disposable Expiratory Filter/ Water Trap | Subject device AVEA Disposable Expiratory Filter/ Water Trap | Comparison | |
|---|---|---|---|
| K# | K081837 | TBD | |
| Product Code | CBK | CB | Identical |
| CFR | 868.5895 | 868.5895 | Identical |
| Indications for Use | The AVEA Ventilator is intended to provide continuous respiratory support in an institutional healthcare environment (e.g. hospitals). It may be used on adult, pediatric, and neonatal patients. It should be operated by properly trained clinical personnel, under the direction of a physician. This is the same intended use as previously cleared for AVEA under K013642, K022674, and K062093. There is no change to the AVEA intended use. | The AVEA Disposable Expiratory Filter/ Water Trap is an expiratory filter and water trap for use with the AVEA Ventilator. It would be used in an institutional healthcare environment (e.g., hospitals). It may be used on adult, pediatric, and neonatal patients. It should be operated by properly trained clinical personnel, under the direction of a physician. | Clarified the indications to be specific for the filter as an accessory to the Avea ventilator. Otherwise similar. |
| Fundamental scientific technology | Filtration media with integral water trap | Filtration media with integral water trap | Identical to K081837 |
| Bench testing | Testing was not listed in K081837 | Identical to K081837 | Identical to K081837 |
| Performance as listed on labeling | VFE / BFE 99.999% DOP / POA efficiency 99.97% Flow resistance - < 1 cmH2O at 60 lpm Flow leakage - <0.01 lpm at 140 cmH2O internal pressure | VFE / BFE 99.999% DOP / POA efficiency 99.97% Flow resistance - < 1 cmH2O at 60 lpm Flow leakage - <0.01 lpm at 140 cmH2O internal pressure | Identical to K081837 |
Page 7
Telesair 510(k) Summary
Page 3 of 4
| Predicate Vyaire AVEA Disposable Expiratory Filter/ Water Trap | Subject device AVEA Disposable Expiratory Filter/ Water Trap | Comparison | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Internal volume | 500 ml includes Water trap of 130 ml | 500 ml includes Water trap of 130 ml | Identical for K081837 |
| Dimensions | Diameter – 9.7 cm Height – 33 cm | Diameter – 9.7 cm Height – 33 cm | Identical to K081837 |
| Biocompatibility | Tested per ISO 10993 | Tested per ISO 10993 | Identical to K081837 |
Substantial Equivalence Discussion
The subject and predicate devices are identical in all ways.
Intended Use/ Indications for Use
The indications for use for the subject device have been updated to reflect this as an accessory to the AVEA ventilator only. Otherwise, the intended use is the same as AVEA disposable expiratory filter/water trap cleared under K081837.
Page 8
Telesair 510(k) Summary
Page 4 of 4
Substantial Equivalence Conclusion
The subject device and the predicate – AVEA disposable expiratory filter/water trap – K081837 is substantially equivalent based upon identicality.
§ 868.5895 Continuous ventilator.
(a)
Identification. A continuous ventilator (respirator) is a device intended to mechanically control or assist patient breathing by delivering a predetermined percentage of oxygen in the breathing gas. Adult, pediatric, and neonatal ventilators are included in this generic type of device.(b)
Classification. Class II (performance standards).