(206 days)
Not Found
No.
The device is an automated in vitro diagnostic test that performs nucleic acid detection and identification using microarray-based hybridization. It does not mention any components or processes that involve AI, machine learning, or deep learning.
No
Explanation: This device is an in vitro diagnostic test designed to detect and identify pathogens and genetic resistance markers in blood cultures. It aids in diagnosis but does not directly treat or prevent a disease, which is the function of a therapeutic device.
Yes.
The device is explicitly described as an "in vitro diagnostic test" intended to "aid in the diagnosis of bacterial bloodstream infections (BSI)."
No
The device is described as an "automated, sample-to-result LIAISON PLEX® System" which is a "fully automated, bench-top 'sample-to-answer' device that performs sample preparation and microarray-based hybridization for the detection of target-specific nucleic acids." It also mentions "test reagents are supplied as a single, disposable test cartridge." These descriptions clearly indicate the presence of hardware components and chemical reagents beyond just software. It is an in vitro diagnostic (IVD) system that includes physical components.
Yes.
The "Intended Use / Indications for Use" section explicitly states "a qualitative multiplexed in vitro diagnostic test".
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
The LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay (BCP), performed using the automated, sample-to-result LIAISON PLEX® System, is a qualitative multiplexed in vitro diagnostic test for the simultaneous detection and identification of selected gram-positive pathogens and/or selected genetic determinants associated with antimicrobial resistance in positive blood culture bottles. BCP is performed directly on blood culture media using blood culture bottles identified as positive by a continuous monitoring blood culture system and which contain gram-positive bacteria as determined by Gram stain.
The BCP Assay detects and identifies the following:
Gram Positive Resistance Markers (a):
- mecA/mecC
- vanA
- vanB
Genera and Species:
- Bacillus spp.
- Enterococcus faecalis
- Enterococcus faecium
- Listeria spp.
- Staphylococcus spp.
- Staphylococcus aureus
- Staphylococcus epidermidis
- Staphylococcus lugdunensis
- Streptococcus spp.
- Streptococcus agalactiae
- Streptococcus anginosus group
- Streptococcus pneumoniae
- Streptococcus pyogenes
(a) Negative results for antimicrobial resistance genes do not indicate bacterial susceptibility as there are multiple mechanisms that can contribute to resistance.
The LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay contains targets for the detection of genetic determinants associated with resistance to methicillin (mecA/mecC) and vancomycin (vanA and vanB) to aid in the identification of potentially antimicrobial-resistant organisms in positive blood culture samples. In mixed growth, the LIAISON PLEX BCP Assay does not specifically attribute vanA/vanB-mediated vancomycin resistance to either E. faecalis or E. faecium, or mecA/mecC-mediated methicillin resistance to either Staphylococcus spp., S. aureus, S. epidermidis or S. lugdunensis.
The antimicrobial resistance gene or marker detected may or may not be associated with the agent responsible for disease. Negative results for these select antimicrobial resistance gene and marker assays do not indicate susceptibility, as multiple mechanisms of methicillin and vancomycin resistance exist.
The LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay is indicated for use in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory findings to aid in the diagnosis of bacterial bloodstream infections (BSI). The LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay is not intended to monitor these infections. Sub-culturing of positive blood cultures is necessary to recover organisms for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), for identification of organisms not detected by the LIAISON PLEX BCP Assay, to detect mixed infections that may not be detected by the LIAISON PLEX BCP Assay, for association of antimicrobial resistance genes to a specific organism, or for epidemiological typing.
Product codes
PAM
Device Description
The LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay (BCP Assay) is an automated test for the detection and identification of nucleic acid from gram-positive bacteria in a positive blood culture media sample. The BCP Assay is performed directly on blood culture media using blood culture bottles identified as positive by a continuous monitoring blood culture system, and which contain gram-positive bacteria, as determined by a Gram stain.
The LIAISON PLEX® System is a fully automated, bench-top "sample-to-answer" device that performs sample preparation and microarray-based hybridization for the detection of target-specific nucleic acids. The test reagents are supplied as a single, disposable test cartridge. Target amplification is not performed as part of the BCP Assay workflow, as it is a non-amplified, direct detection test performed on the LIAISON PLEX® System.
Mentions image processing
Not Found
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
Not Found
Anatomical Site
Blood culture bottles
Indicated Patient Age Range
0-1, >1-5, >5-21, >21-65, >65, Age Unknown
Intended User / Care Setting
Not Found
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
A multi-site clinical study established the diagnostic accuracy of the LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture (BCP) Assay for the detection and identification of pathogenic gram-positive organisms in positive blood culture. The clinical performance of the LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay was evaluated using clinical specimens prospectively collected between April 2024 and August 2024 from four geographically diverse clinical sites within the United States. The clinical study utilized remnant, de-identified blood culture specimens collected from patients exhibiting clinical signs and symptoms of bloodstream infection, evidenced by positive identification by a continuous monitoring blood culture system.
A total of 562 unique prospectively collected specimens that met the pre-determined inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study. Clinical runs and re-runs using the LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay were tested on the LIAISON PLEX® System by trained operators at four clinical sites. For targets that exhibited low prevalence rates in the prospective study, the prospective specimen set was supplemented with 163 pre-selected left-over, de-identified specimens sourced from ten vendors in the United States and one site in Italy. The pre-selected specimens were identified by Standard of Care (SoC) testing and confirmed as positive by VITEK 2 and/or PCR/BDS according to the reference method algorithm prior to enrollment in the study. To minimize bias, pre-selected specimens were tested across four external and one internal site in a randomized, blinded manner along with negative specimens.
Out of the 562 specimens enrolled in the prospective arm of the study, 53 prospective specimens were excluded from the analysis (one (1) duplicate patient enrollment, one (1) due to sample handling errors and 51 with incomplete reference testing results due to lack of clinical isolates, mixed growth, insufficient growth, or no growth). The remaining 509 specimens were included in the analysis.
For targets that exhibited low prevalence rates in the prospective study, the prospective specimen set was supplemented with 163 pre-selected (Arm 2) and 225 contrived specimens (Arm 3). Of these, one pre-selected specimen was excluded (sample handling error), leaving 162 pre-selected and 225 contrived specimens included in the analysis.
Summary of Performance Studies
Site-to-site Reproducibility: The reproducibility panel, blinded to operators, consisted of a total of 16 blood culture samples. 7 samples each contained representative on-panel organisms individually cultured at ring positivity, and eight hours after ring positivity, one sample was contrived with an off-panel organism (Escherichia coli), and the last sample was a negative blood culture matrix (NBM) specimen. The blinded reproducibility panel was tested in triplicate by each operator on each testing day for five non-consecutive testing days. Overall, results of site-to-site reproducibility evaluation demonstrated 99.7% reproducibility of the LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay with a 95% CI of 99.3% to 99.9%.
Precision/Repeatability: Within laboratory (operator-to-operator) precision/repeatability of the LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay was evaluated based on the results generated by two operators testing samples (two on-panel organisms (Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis) at ring positivity and at 8 hours after ring positivity, contrived negative and negative blood culture samples) at the internal site (Site 1). Within laboratory precision/repeatability of the LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay was 100%.
Lot-to-lot Reproducibility: Lot-to-lot reproducibility of the LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay was evaluated by one operator over a minimum of five non-consecutive days across three lots of LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay cartridges and four LIAISON PLEX® systems. The same reproducibility panel of six blood culture samples; two representative on-panel organisms (Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis) individually cultured at ring positivity, and eight hours after ring positivity, one negative sample contrived with an off-panel organism (Escherichia coli), and one negative blood culture matrix (NBM) sample, were prepared and tested for the evaluation of the lot-to-lot reproducibility. Each sample type was tested in triplicate per cartridge lot on a given testing day. Lot-to-lot reproducibility of the LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay cartridges was 100%.
Growth and Detection Study: This study was performed to evaluate detection of each organism at the time of culture positivity and 8 hours after culture positivity for the organisms listed in Table 5. Three bottles for each organism were grown to ring positive or 8 hours after ring positive and three replicates were tested for each bottle, for a total of 9 replicates tested per organism. The results demonstrated 100% positivity for target positive samples and 0% positivity when tested with negative blood.
Analytical Reactivity (Inclusivity): The analytical reactivity (inclusivity) of the LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay was evaluated by using a collection of 184 isolates, representing the genetic diversity of the analytes included as part of the LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay.
Cross-Reactivity: The analytical specificity study was performed to evaluate cross-reactivity of the LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay with "off-panel" organisms, including both phylogenetically related to the on-panel organisms and organisms likely to be present in typical blood culture samples. Out of the 103 off-panel species tested, 97 resulted in no cross-reactivity, 5 resulted in cross-reactivity with one reportable target, and 1 organism resulted in positivity for 1 out of 6 replicates tested.
Competitive Inhibition / Co-Infection and Microbial Interference: The competitive inhibition and microbial interference study was executed to evaluate the performance of the LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay in the presence of clinically significant levels of potential co-infections of on-panel organisms and potentially interfering (off-panel) microbes. On-panel targets were detected with 100% positivity for all combinations tested, both in the presence of competitive on-panel targets and in the presence of competitive off-panel pathogens.
Interfering Substances: The interfering substances study was performed to evaluate the performance of the LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay in the presence of non-microbial (endogenous and exogenous) interfering substances which may be present in blood culture specimens. Six representative "on-panel" organisms were individually tested to assess effectiveness of target detection in the presence of six typically occurring interfering substances. Each interfering substance was tested across five replicates for each organism. 100% target detection was observed for all six targets without interferent and in the presence of all six interfering substances. 0% target detection was observed with the negative sample with and without interfering substances.
Carry-Over/Cross Contamination: This study was performed to evaluate the risk of carry-over and cross contamination occurring during normal use of the device when highly concentrated positive specimens are processed alongside negative specimens. Two operators tested 30 high concentration positive samples and 30 negative samples. The results demonstrate 100% agreement between expected and observed results, indicating that no cross contamination occurred within runs and no carry-over was observed across runs.
Matrix Comparison / Testing of Blood Culture Bottle Types / Matrix Equivalency: The performance of LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture (BCP) Assay was evaluated across 12 additional types of commercially available blood culture media bottles using target organisms representative of all "on-panel" BCP targets with resistance markers, representative off-panel (gram-negative) targets, and negative blood matrix (NBM). The results demonstrate that all 12 bottle (media) types are compatible with the LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture (BCP) Assay.
Clinical Performance:
- Study Type: Multi-site clinical study (prospective, pre-selected, and contrived specimens).
- Sample Size: 509 prospective, 162 pre-selected, and 225 contrived specimens.
- Key Results (Sensitivity/Specificity - Combined prospective and pre-selected specimens):
- Bacillus spp.: Sensitivity 90%, Specificity 99.8%
- Enterococcus faecalis: Sensitivity 100%, Specificity 100%
- Enterococcus faecium: Sensitivity 100%, Specificity 99.7%
- Listeria spp.: Sensitivity 100%, Specificity 100%
- Staphylococcus spp.: Sensitivity 98.2%, Specificity 99.3%
- Staphylococcus aureus: Sensitivity 99.4%, Specificity 99.8%
- Staphylococcus epidermidis: Sensitivity 96.9%, Specificity 98.9%
- Staphylococcus lugdunensis: Sensitivity 100%, Specificity 100%
- Streptococcus spp.: Sensitivity 98.3%, Specificity 99.6%
- Streptococcus agalactiae: Sensitivity 100%, Specificity 100%
- Streptococcus anginosus group: Sensitivity 94.3%, Specificity 99.8%
- Streptococcus pneumoniae: Sensitivity 100%, Specificity 99.8%
- Streptococcus pyogenes: Sensitivity 100%, Specificity 100%
- mecA/mecC: Sensitivity 98.8%, Specificity 96.1%
- vanA: Sensitivity 100%, Specificity 100%
- vanB: Sensitivity 100%, Specificity 100%
Key Metrics
- Site-to-site Reproducibility: 99.7% reproducibility (95% CI: 99.3% to 99.9%)
- Within-laboratory Precision/Repeatability: 100%
- Lot-to-lot Reproducibility: 100%
- Clinical Performance (Sensitivity/PPA):
- Bacillus spp.: 90% (18/20) with 95% CI of 69.9% - 97.2% (Combined)
- Enterococcus faecalis: 100% (40/40) with 95% CI of 91.2% - 100% (Combined)
- Enterococcus faecium: 100% (36/36) with 95% CI of 90.4% - 100% (Combined)
- Listeria spp.: 100% (5/5) with 95% CI of 56.6% - 100% (Combined)
- Staphylococcus spp.: 98.2% (336/342) with 95% CI of 96.2% - 99.2% (Combined)
- Staphylococcus aureus: 99.4% (160/161) with 95% CI of 96.6% - 99.9% (Combined)
- Staphylococcus epidermidis: 96.9% (93/96) with 95% CI of 91.2% - 98.9% (Combined)
- Staphylococcus lugdunensis: 100% (26/26) with 95% CI of 87.1% - 100% (Combined)
- Streptococcus spp.: 98.3% (175/178) with 95% CI of 95.2% - 99.4% (Combined)
- Streptococcus agalactiae: 100% (38/38) with 95% CI of 90.8% - 100% (Combined)
- Streptococcus anginosus group: 94.3% (33/35) with 95% CI of 81.4% - 98.4% (Combined)
- Streptococcus pneumoniae: 100% (32/32) with 95% CI of 89.3% - 100% (Combined)
- Streptococcus pyogenes: 100% (37/37) with 95% CI of 90.6% - 100% (Combined)
- mecA/mecC: 98.8% (158/160) with 95% CI of 95.6% - 99.7% (Combined)
- vanA: 100% (30/30) with 95% CI of 88.6% - 100% (Combined)
- vanB: 100% (1/1) with 95% CI of 20.7% - 100% (Combined)
- Clinical Performance (Specificity/NPA):
- Bacillus spp.: 99.8% (633/634) with 95% CI of 99.1% - 100% (Combined)
- Enterococcus faecalis: 100% (593/593) with 95% CI of 99.4% - 100% (Combined)
- Enterococcus faecium: 99.7% (595/597) with 95% CI of 98.8% - 99.9% (Combined)
- Listeria spp.: 100% (628/628) with 95% CI of 99.4% - 100% (Combined)
- Staphylococcus spp.: 99.3% (289/291) with 95% CI of 97.5% - 99.8% (Combined)
- Staphylococcus aureus: 99.8% (471/472) with 95% CI of 98.8% - 100% (Combined)
- Staphylococcus epidermidis: 98.9% (531/537) with 95% CI of 97.6% - 99.5% (Combined)
- Staphylococcus lugdunensis: 100% (607/607) with 95% CI of 99.4% - 100% (Combined)
- Streptococcus spp.: 99.6% (453/455) with 95% CI of 98.4% - 99.9% (Combined)
- Streptococcus agalactiae: 100% (595/595) with 95% CI of 99.4% - 100% (Combined)
- Streptococcus anginosus group: 99.8% (597/598) with 95% CI of 99.1% - 100% (Combined)
- Streptococcus pneumoniae: 99.8% (600/601) with 95% CI of 99.1% - 100% (Combined)
- Streptococcus pyogenes: 100% (596/596) with 95% CI of 99.4% - 100% (Combined)
- mecA/mecC: 96.1% (172/179) with 95% CI of 92.1% - 98.1% (Combined)
- vanA: 100% (48/48) with 95% CI of 92.6% - 100% (Combined)
- vanB: 100% (77/77) with 95% CI of 95.3% - 100% (Combined)
Predicate Device(s)
Reference Device(s)
Not Found
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information
Not Found
§ 866.3365 Multiplex nucleic acid assay for identification of microorganisms and resistance markers from positive blood cultures.
(a)
Identification. A multiplex nucleic acid assay for identification of microorganisms and resistance markers from positive blood cultures is a qualitative in vitro device intended to simultaneously detect and identify microorganism nucleic acids from blood cultures that test positive by Gram stain or other microbiological stains. The device detects specific nucleic acid sequences for microorganism identification as well as for antimicrobial resistance. This device aids in the diagnosis of bloodstream infections when used in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory findings. However, the device does not replace traditional methods for culture and susceptibility testing.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls). The special control for this device is FDA's guideline document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guideline: Multiplex Nucleic Acid Assay for Identification of Microorganisms and Resistance Markers from Positive Blood Cultures.” For availability of the guideline document, see § 866.1(e).
U.S. Food & Drug Administration 510(k) Clearance Letter
Page 1
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
Doc ID # 04017.07.05
June 6, 2025
Luminex Corporation
Rocio Rueda
Senior Regulatory Affairs Associate
4088 Commercial Avenue
Northbrook, Illinois 60062
Re: K243490
Trade/Device Name: LIAISON PLEX Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 866.3365
Regulation Name: Multiplex Nucleic Acid Assay For Identification Of Microorganisms And Resistance Markers From Positive Blood Cultures
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: PAM
Dated: November 7, 2024
Received: November 12, 2024
Dear Rocio Rueda:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Page 2
K243490 - Rocio Rueda Page 2
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801 and Part 809); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-
Page 3
K243490 - Rocio Rueda Page 3
assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Noel J. Gerald -S
Noel J. Gerald, Ph.D.
Deputy Division Director
Division of Microbiology Devices
OHT7: Office of In Vitro Diagnostics
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
Page 4
FORM FDA 3881 (8/23) Page 1 of 2
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
Indications for Use
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120
Expiration Date: 07/31/2026
See PRA Statement below.
510(k) Number (if known): K243490
Device Name: LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay
Indications for Use (Describe)
The LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay (BCP), performed using the automated, sample-to-result LIAISON PLEX® System, is a qualitative multiplexed in vitro diagnostic test for the simultaneous detection and identification of selected gram-positive pathogens and/or selected genetic determinants associated with antimicrobial resistance in positive blood culture bottles. BCP is performed directly on blood culture media using blood culture bottles identified as positive by a continuous monitoring blood culture system and which contain gram-positive bacteria as determined by Gram stain.
The BCP Assay detects and identifies the following:
Gram Positive Resistance Markers(a):
- mecA/mecC
- vanA
- vanB
Genera and Species:
- Bacillus spp.
- Enterococcus faecalis
- Enterococcus faecium
- Listeria spp.
- Staphylococcus spp.
- Staphylococcus aureus
- Staphylococcus epidermidis
- Staphylococcus lugdunensis
- Streptococcus spp.
- Streptococcus agalactiae
- Streptococcus anginosus group
- Streptococcus pneumoniae
- Streptococcus pyogenes
(a) Negative results for antimicrobial resistance genes do not indicate bacterial susceptibility as there are multiple mechanisms that can contribute to resistance.
The LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay contains targets for the detection of genetic determinants associated with resistance to methicillin (mecA/C) and vancomycin (vanA and vanB) to aid in the identification of potentially antimicrobial-resistant organisms in positive blood culture samples. In mixed growth, the LIAISON PLEX BCP Assay does not specifically attribute vanA/vanB-mediated vancomycin resistance to either E. faecalis or E. faecium, or mecA/mecC-mediated methicillin resistance to either Staphylococcus spp., S. aureus, S. epidermidis or S. lugdunensis.
The antimicrobial resistance gene or marker detected may or may not be associated with the agent responsible for disease. Negative results for these select antimicrobial resistance gene and marker assays do not indicate susceptibility, as multiple mechanisms of methicillin and vancomycin resistance exist.
The LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay is indicated for use in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory findings to aid in the diagnosis of bacterial bloodstream infections (BSI). The LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay is not intended to monitor
Page 5
FORM FDA 3881 (8/23) Page 2 of 2
these infections. Sub-culturing of positive blood cultures is necessary to recover organisms for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), for identification of organisms not detected by the LIAISON PLEX BCP Assay, to detect mixed infections that may not be detected by the LIAISON PLEX BCP Assay, for association of antimicrobial resistance genes to a specific organism, or for epidemiological typing.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
☒ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services
Food and Drug Administration
Office of Chief Information Officer
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff
PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
Page 6
LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 1 of 43
510(k) Summary
This Summary of 510(k) safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of 21 CFR 807.92.
Preparation date: 04 April 2025
A. 510(k) Number:
B. Purpose for Submission:
Traditional 510(k), New Device
C. Measurand:
Nucleic acid sequences for the following organisms: Bacillus spp., Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Listeria spp., Staphylococcus spp., Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus lugdunensis, Streptococcus spp., Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus anginosus group, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes
Nucleic acid sequences for the following resistance markers: mecA/mecC, vanA, vanB
D. Type of Test:
Qualitative Multiplexed Direct Detection Hybridization Assay
E. Applicant:
Rocio Rueda, Luminex Corporation
4088 Commercial Avenue
Northbrook, IL 60062
(847) 400-9000
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay
G. Regulatory Information:
Product Code | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
---|---|---|---|
PAM | II | 21 CFR 866.3365 – Multiplex Nucleic Acid Assay for Identification of Microorganisms and Resistance Markers from Positive Blood Cultures | 83 (Microbiology) |
Page 7
LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 2 of 43
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
The LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture (BCP) Assay, performed using the automated, sample-to-result LIAISON PLEX® System, is a qualitative multiplexed in vitro diagnostic test for the simultaneous detection and identification of selected gram-positive pathogens and/or selected genetic determinants associated with antimicrobial resistance in positive blood culture bottles. The LIAISON PLEX BCP Assay is performed directly on blood culture media using blood culture bottles identified as positive by a continuous monitoring blood culture system and which contain gram-positive bacteria as determined by Gram stain.
The LIAISON PLEX BCP Assay detects and identifies the following:
Gram-Positive Resistance Markers^a | Genera and Species |
---|---|
mecA/mecC | Bacillus spp. |
vanA | Enterococcus faecalis |
vanB | Enterococcus faecium |
Listeria spp. | |
Staphylococcus spp. | |
Staphylococcus aureus | |
Staphylococcus epidermidis | |
Staphylococcus lugdunensis | |
Streptococcus spp. | |
Streptococcus agalactiae | |
Streptococcus anginosus group | |
Streptococcus pneumoniae | |
Streptococcus pyogenes |
^a Negative results for antimicrobial resistance genes do not indicate bacterial susceptibility as there are multiple mechanisms that can contribute to resistance.
The LIAISON PLEX® BCP contains targets for the detection of genetic determinants associated with resistance to methicillin (mecA/mecC) and vancomycin (vanA and vanB) to aid in the identification of potentially antimicrobial-resistant organisms in positive blood culture samples. In mixed growth, the LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay does not specifically attribute vanA/vanB-mediated vancomycin resistance to either E. faecalis or E. faecium, or mecA/mecC-mediated methicillin resistance to either Staphylococcus spp., S. aureus, S. epidermidis or S. lugdunensis.
The antimicrobial resistance gene or marker detected may or may not be associated with the agent
Page 8
LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 3 of 43
responsible for disease. Negative results for these select antimicrobial resistance gene and marker assays do not indicate susceptibility, as multiple mechanisms of methicillin and vancomycin resistance exist.
The LIAISON PLEX BCP Assay is indicated for use in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory findings to aid in the diagnosis of bacterial bloodstream infections (BSI). The LIAISON PLEX BCP Assay is not intended to monitor treatment of these infections. Sub-culturing of positive blood cultures is necessary to recover organisms for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), for identification of organisms not detected by LIAISON PLEX BCP Assay, to detect mixed infections that may not be detected by the LIAISON PLEX BCP Assay, for association of antimicrobial resistance genes to a specific organism, or for epidemiological typing.
Page 9
LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 4 of 43
2. Indication(s) for use:
Same as intended use.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use only.
For in vitro diagnostic use only.
4. Special instrument requirements:
For use with LIAISON PLEX® Systems.
I. Device Description:
The LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay (BCP Assay) is an automated test for the detection and identification of nucleic acid from gram-positive bacteria in a positive blood culture media sample. The BCP Assay is performed directly on blood culture media using blood culture bottles identified as positive by a continuous monitoring blood culture system, and which contain gram-positive bacteria, as determined by a Gram stain.
The LIAISON PLEX® System is a fully automated, bench-top "sample-to-answer" device that performs sample preparation and microarray-based hybridization for the detection of target-specific nucleic acids. The test reagents are supplied as a single, disposable test cartridge. Target amplification is not performed as part of the BCP Assay workflow, as it is a non-amplified, direct detection test performed on the LIAISON PLEX® System.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
VERIGENE Blood Culture Gram-Positive (BC-GP) Nucleic Acid Test
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
3. Comparison with predicate:
The following tables compare the LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay to the VERIGENE Blood Culture Gram-Positive (BC-GP) Nucleic Acid Test.
Comparison to Predicate Device | Predicate Device: VERIGENE Blood Culture Gram-Positive (BC-GP) Nucleic Acid Test, K122514 | Candidate Device: LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay |
---|---|---|
Product Code | PAM | PAM |
Regulation Number | 21 CFR 866.3365 | 21 CFR 866.3365 |
Page 10
LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 5 of 43
Comparison to Predicate Device | Predicate Device: VERIGENE Blood Culture Gram-Positive (BC-GP) Nucleic Acid Test, K122514 | Candidate Device: LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay |
---|---|---|
Organism Detected | Organisms: Staphylococcus spp., Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus lugdunensis, Streptococcus spp., Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus anginosus group, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Listeria spp. |
Resistance Markers: mecA, vanA, vanB | Organisms: Bacillus spp., Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Listeria spp., Staphylococcus spp., Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus lugdunensis, Streptococcus spp., Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus anginosus group, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes
Resistant markers: mecA/mecC, vanA, vanB |
| Measurand | Nucleic acid from Organisms detected | Same |
| Intended Use | The Verigene® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Nucleic Acid Test (BC-GP), performed using the sample-to-result Verigene System, is a qualitative multiplexed in vitro diagnostic test for the simultaneous detection and identification of potentially pathogenic gram-positive bacteria which may cause bloodstream infection (BSI). BC-GP is performed directly on blood culture bottles identified as positive by a continuous monitoring blood culture system and which contain gram-positive bacteria.
BC-GP detects and identifies the following:
Bacterial Genera and Species
Staphylococcus spp.
Staphylococcus aureus
Staphylococcus epidermidis
Staphylococcus lugdunensis
Streptococcus spp.
Streptococcus pneumoniae
Streptococcus pyogenes
Streptococcus agalactiae
Streptococcus anginosus group
Enterococcus faecalis
Enterococcus faecium
Listeria spp.
Resistance Markers¹
mecA
vanA
vanB
¹In mixed growth, BC-GP | The LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay (BCP), performed using the automated, sample-to-result LIAISON PLEX® System, is a qualitative multiplexed in vitro diagnostic test for the simultaneous detection and identification of selected gram-positive pathogens and/or selected genetic determinants associated with antimicrobial resistance in positive blood culture bottles. BCP is performed directly on blood culture media using blood culture bottles identified as positive by a continuous monitoring blood culture system and which contain gram-positive bacteria as determined by Gram stain.
The BCP Assay detects and identifies the following:
Genera and Species
Bacillus spp.
Enterococcus faecalis
Enterococcus faecium
Listeria spp.
Staphylococcus spp.
Staphylococcus aureus
Staphylococcus epidermidis
Staphylococcus lugdunensis
Streptococcus spp.
Streptococcus agalactiae
Streptococcus anginosus group
Streptococcus pneumoniae
Streptococcus pyogenes |
Page 11
LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 6 of 43
Comparison to Predicate Device | Predicate Device: VERIGENE Blood Culture Gram-Positive (BC-GP) Nucleic Acid Test, K122514 | Candidate Device: LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay |
---|---|---|
does not specifically attribute van-mediated vancomycin resistance to either E. faecalis or E. faecium, or mecA-mediated methicillin resistance to either S. aureus or S. epidermidis. |
BC-GP is indicated for use in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory findings to aid in the diagnosis of bacterial bloodstream infections; however, it is not used to monitor these infections. Sub-culturing of positive blood cultures is necessary to recover organisms for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), for identification of organisms not detected by BC-GP, differentiation of mixed growth, for association of antimicrobial resistance marker genes to a specific organism, or for epidemiological typing. | Resistance Markers^a
mecA/mecC
vanA
vanB
^a Negative results for antimicrobial resistance genes do not indicate bacterial susceptibility as there are multiple mechanisms that can contribute to resistance.
The LIAISON PLEX BCP Assay contains targets for the detection of genetic determinants associated with resistance to methicillin (mecA/mecC) and vancomycin (vanA and vanB) to aid in the identification of potentially antimicrobial-resistant organisms in positive blood culture samples. In mixed growth, BCP does not specifically attribute vanA/vanB-mediated vancomycin resistance to either E. faecalis or E. faecium, or mecA/mecC-mediated methicillin resistance to either Staphylococcus spp., S. aureus, S. epidermidis or S. lugdunensis.
The antimicrobial resistance gene or marker detected may or may not be associated with the agent responsible for disease. Negative results for these select antimicrobial resistance gene and marker assays do not indicate susceptibility, as multiple mechanisms of methicillin and vancomycin resistance exist.
The LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay is indicated for use in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory findings to aid in the diagnosis of bacterial bloodstream infections (BSI). The LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay is not intended to monitor these infections. Sub-culturing of positive blood cultures is necessary to recover organisms for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), for identification of organisms not detected by LIAISON PLEX BCP Assay, to detect mixed infections that may not be detected by the LIAISON PLEX BCP Assay, for association of antimicrobial resistance genes to a specific organism, or for epidemiological typing. |
Page 12
LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 7 of 43
Comparison to Predicate Device | Predicate Device: VERIGENE Blood Culture Gram-Positive (BC-GP) Nucleic Acid Test, K122514 | Candidate Device: LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay |
---|---|---|
does not specifically attribute van-mediated vancomycin resistance to either E. faecalis or E. faecium, or mecA-mediated methicillin resistance to either S. aureus or S. epidermidis. |
BC-GP is indicated for use in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory findings to aid in the diagnosis of bacterial bloodstream infections; however, it is not used to monitor these infections. Sub-culturing of positive blood cultures is necessary to recover organisms for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), for identification of organisms not detected by BC-GP, differentiation of mixed growth, for association of antimicrobial resistance marker genes to a specific organism, or for epidemiological typing. | Resistance Markers^a
mecA/mecC
vanA
vanB
^a Negative results for antimicrobial resistance genes do not indicate bacterial susceptibility as there are multiple mechanisms that can contribute to resistance.
The LIAISON PLEX BCP Assay contains targets for the detection of genetic determinants associated with resistance to methicillin (mecA/mecC) and vancomycin (vanA and vanB) to aid in the identification of potentially antimicrobial-resistant organisms in positive blood culture samples. In mixed growth, BCP does not specifically attribute vanA/vanB-mediated vancomycin resistance to either E. faecalis or E. faecium, or mecA/mecC-mediated methicillin resistance to either Staphylococcus spp., S. aureus, S. epidermidis or S. lugdunensis.
The antimicrobial resistance gene or marker detected may or may not be associated with the agent responsible for disease. Negative results for these select antimicrobial resistance gene and marker assays do not indicate susceptibility, as multiple mechanisms of methicillin and vancomycin resistance exist.
The LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay is indicated for use in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory findings to aid in the diagnosis of bacterial bloodstream infections (BSI). The LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay is not intended to monitor these infections. Sub-culturing of positive blood cultures is necessary to recover organisms for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), for identification of organisms not detected by LIAISON PLEX BCP Assay, to detect mixed infections that may not be detected by the LIAISON PLEX BCP Assay, for association of antimicrobial resistance genes to a specific organism, or for epidemiological typing. |
| Automated System (Sample to Answer) | Automated | Same |
| Instrumentation | VERIGENE | LIAISON PLEX® |
| Sample Types | Positive Blood Culture | Same |
Page 13
LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 8 of 43
K. Standards/Guidance Documents Referenced:
- Class II Special Controls Guideline: Multiplex Nucleic Acid Assay for Identification of Microorganisms and Resistance Markers from Positive Blood Cultures (May 2015)
- Electronic Submission Template for Medical Device 510(k) Submissions - Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff (October 2, 2023).
- Content of Premarket Submissions for Device Software Functions - Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff (June 14, 2023).
- Cybersecurity in Medical Devices: Quality System Considerations and Content of Premarket Submissions - Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff (September 23, 2023).
- Statistical Guidance on Reporting Results from Studies Evaluating Diagnostic Tests - Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff (March 13, 2007).
- CLSI. User Protocol for Evaluation of Qualitative Test Performance; Approved Guideline - Second Edition. CLSI document EP12-A2. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2008.
- CLSI. Evaluation of Stability of In Vitro Diagnostic Reagents; Approved Guideline. CLSI document EP25-A. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2009.
- ISO 14971:2019 Medical devices - Application of risk management to medical devices
- IEC 62366-1:2015 +A1:2020 Medical devices- Part 1: Application of usability engineering to medical devices
- ISO 62304:2006 Medical device software - Software life-cycle processes
- ISO 15223-1:2021: Medical Devices- Symbols to be used with medical device labels, labeling and information to be supplied - Part 1: General requirements
- IEC 61010-1 Ed. 3.1 2017-01: Safety requirements for electrical equipment for measurement, control, and laboratory use - Part 1: General requirements
- EN 61010-2-101:2002/IEC 61010-2-101:2015: Safety requirements for electrical equipment for measurement, control and laboratory use - Part 2-101: Particular requirements for in vitro diagnostic (IVD) medical equipment.
- IEC 60601-1-2:2014 (Edition 4.0): Medical electrical equipment- Part 1-2: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance - Collateral Standard: Electromagnetic disturbances - Requirements and tests
- ISO 13485:2016/EN ISO13485:2016; Medical devices-Quality Management System - Requirements for regulatory purposes
- ISO 20916:2019; In vitro diagnostic medical devices. Clinical performance studies using specimens from human subjects. Good study practice
- EN ISO18113-1:2011; In vitro diagnostic medical devices- Information supplied by the manufacturer (labeling). Terms, definition and general requirements
Page 14
LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 9 of 43
- EN ISO 18113-2:2011; In vitro diagnostic medical devices- Information supplied by the manufacturer (labeling) – Part 2: In vitro diagnostic reagents for professional use
- EN ISO 18113-3:2011; In vitro diagnostic medical devices- Information supplied by the manufacturer (labeling) – Part 3: In vitro diagnostic instruments for professional use
- EN ISO 23640:2015; In vitro diagnostic medical devices- Evaluation of stability of in vitro diagnostic reagents
- IEC 61326-1:2012; Electrical equipment for measurement control and laboratory use - EMC requirements - Part 1: General requirements
- EN 61326-2-6:2006/IEC 61326-2-6:2012; Electrical equipment for measurement control and laboratory use - EMC requirements - Part 2-6: Particular requirements - In vitro diagnostic (IVD) medical equipment
L. Test Principle:
The LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay (BCP Assay) is performed directly on blood culture media using blood culture bottles identified as positive by a continuous monitoring blood culture system, and which contain gram-positive bacteria, as determined by a Gram stain.
The system consists of an instrument and a single-use, disposable test cartridge. The user loads an aliquot of the sample into the sample port of the LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Cartridge. Next, the user sets up the sample order on the LIAISON PLEX® System by first entering the sample information or scanning the barcode ID located on the sample tube, then scanning the barcode ID located on the test cartridge. Last, the user inserts the test cartridge into the processing module to initiate the test. The LIAISON PLEX® System identifies the assay being run and automatically initiates the proper testing protocol to process the sample, analyze the data, and generate test results.
The LIAISON PLEX® System automates the BCP Assay sample analysis through the following steps:
a) Sample Preparation: Nucleic acid extraction via mechanical and chemical cell lysis and magnetic bead-based nucleic acid isolation; PCR amplification is not used in this assay. By performing direct detection, the assay specifically detects the viable bacteria and minimizes interference from trace nucleic acids or non-viable bacteria that may be present at much lower levels and potentially lead to false positive results.
b) Hybridization: Extracted nucleic acid hybridize to target-specific capture DNA on a microarray format, and target-specific mediator and gold nanoparticle probe hybridize to captured nucleic acids;
c) Signal Analysis: Gold nanoparticle probes bound specifically to target-containing spots in the microarray are silver-enhanced, and light scatter from the spots is measured and further analyzed to determine the presence (Detected) or absence (Not Detected) of a target.
Page 15
LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 10 of 43
M. Performance Characteristics:
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Site-to-site Reproducibility
Site-to-site reproducibility of the LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay was evaluated by testing LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay cartridges across five non-consecutive days with at least two operators each at multiple sites; three external sites and one internal site. The reproducibility panel, blinded to operators, consisted of a total of 16 blood culture samples. 7 samples each contained representative on-panel organisms individually cultured at ring positivity, and eight hours after ring positivity, one sample was contrived with an off-panel organism (Escherichia coli), and the last sample was a negative blood culture matrix (NBM) specimen. The blinded reproducibility panel was tested in triplicate by each operator on each testing day for five non-consecutive testing days. The call agreement and 95% confidence intervals are presented in Table 1. Overall, results of site-to-site reproducibility evaluation demonstrated 99.7% reproducibility of the LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay with a 95% CI of 99.3% to 99.9%.
Table 1. LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Site-to-Site Reproducibility Results Summary
Organism ID | Reportable Targets | Sample Type | Agreement (%) with Expected results | 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|---|
Site1 | Site 2 | |||
Staphylococcus aureus | Staphylococcus spp. S. aureus | Panel 1 – RP | 100% (30/30) | 100% (30/30) |
Panel 1 – RP+8 Hours | 100% (30/30) | 96.7% (29/30)^a | ||
Enterococcus faecalis | Enterococcus faecalis | Panel 2 – RP | 100% (30/30) | 100% (30/30) |
Panel 2 – RP+8 Hours | 100% (30/30) | 100% (30/30) | ||
Bacillus subtilis | Bacillus spp. | Panel 3 – RP | 100% (30/30) | 100% (30/30) |
Panel 3 – RP+8 Hours | 100% (30/30) | 100% (30/30) | ||
Listeria monocytogenes | Listeria spp. | Panel 4 – RP | 100% (30/30) | 100% (30/30) |
Panel 4 – RP+8 Hours | 100% (30/30) | 100% (30/30) | ||
Staphylococcus epidermidis | Staphylococcus spp. Staphylococcus epidermidis | Panel 5 – RP | 100% (30/30) | 100% (30/30) |
Panel 5 – RP+8 Hours | 100% (30/30) | 100% (30/30) | ||
Streptococcus pneumoniae | Streptococcus spp. Streptococcus pneumoniae | Panel 6 – RP | 100% (30/30) | 100% (30/30) |
Panel 6 – RP+8 Hours | 100% (30/30) | 100% (30/30) | ||
Streptococcus pyogenes | Streptococcus spp. Streptococcus pyogenes | Panel 7 – RP | 100% (30/30) | 100% (30/30) |
Page 16
LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 11 of 43
Organism ID | Reportable Targets | Sample Type | Agreement (%) with Expected results | 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|---|
Site1 | Site 2 | |||
Panel 7 – RP+8 Hours | 100% (30/30) | 100% (30/30) | ||
Escherichia coli | None | Contrived Negative | 100% (60/60) | 100% (60/60) |
No Target | None | Negative Blood Matrix | 100% (30/30) | 100% (30/30) |
Resistance markers | ||||
Staphylococcus aureus | mecA/C | Panel 1 – RP | 100% (30/30) | 100% (30/30) |
Panel 1 – RP+8 Hours | 100% (30/30) | 96.7% (29/30) | ||
Enterococcus faecalis | vanB | Panel 2 – RP | 100% (30/30) | 100% (30/30) |
Panel 2 – RP+8 Hours | 100% (30/30) | 100% (30/30) | ||
Staphylococcus epidermidis | mecA/mecC | Panel 5 – RP | 100% (30/30) | 100% (30/30) |
Panel 5 – RP+8 Hours | 100% (30/30) | 100% (30/30) |
^a False positive S. lugdunensis, S. anginosus group, and Streptococcus spp. result in 1/30 replicates. Reportable targets were fully detected.
^b False positive E. faecium and vanA result in 1/30 replicates.
^c False positive S. lugdunensis result in 1/30 replicates. Reportable targets were fully detected.
^d False positive Staphylococcus spp. result in 1/30 replicates. Reportable targets were fully detected.
Precision/Repeatability
Within laboratory (operator-to-operator) precision/repeatability of the LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay was evaluated based on the results generated by two operators testing samples (two on-panel organisms (Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis) at ring positivity and at 8 hours after ring positivity, contrived negative and negative blood culture samples) at the internal site (Site 1). Within laboratory precision/repeatability of the LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay was 100%, and results are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2. LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Within-Laboratory Precision/Repeatability Results Summary
Organism ID | Reportable Targets | Sample Type | Agreement (%) | Overall 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|---|
Staphylococcus aureus | Staphylococcus spp | S. aureus | Panel 1 – RP | 100% (30/30) | 88.6% - 100% |
Panel 1 – RP+8 Hours | 100% (30/30) | 88.6% - 100% | ||
Enterococcus faecalis | Enterococcus faecalis | Panel 2 – RP | 100% (30/30) | 88.6% - 100% |
Panel 2 – RP+8 Hours | 100% (30/30) | 88.6% - 100% | ||
Escherichia coli | None | Contrived Negative | 100% (30/30) | 88.6% - 100% |
No Target | None | Negative Blood Matrix | 100% (30/30) | 88.6% - 100% |
Resistance Markers | ||||
Staphylococcus aureus | mecA/C | Panel 1 – RP | 100% (30/30) | 88.6% - 100% |
Page 17
LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 12 of 43
Organism ID | Reportable Targets | Sample Type | Agreement (%) | Overall 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|---|
Panel 1 – RP+8 Hours | 100% (30/30) | 88.6% - 100% | ||
Enterococcus faecalis | vanB | Panel 2 – RP | 100% (30/30) | 88.6% - 100% |
Panel 2 – RP+8 Hours | 100% (30/30) | 88.6% - 100% | ||
Overall Agreement (All Targets/Sample Types) | 100% (180/180) | 97.9% - 100% |
Page 18
LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 13 of 43
Lot-to-lot Reproducibility
Lot-to-lot reproducibility of the LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay was evaluated by one operator over a minimum of five non-consecutive days across three lots of LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay cartridges and four LIAISON PLEX® systems. The same reproducibility panel of six blood culture samples; two representative on-panel organisms (Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis) individually cultured at ring positivity, and eight hours after ring positivity, one negative sample contrived with an off-panel organism (Escherichia coli), and one negative blood culture matrix (NBM) sample, were prepared and tested for the evaluation of the lot-to-lot reproducibility. Each sample type was tested in triplicate per cartridge lot on a given testing day. Lot-to-lot reproducibility of the LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay cartridges was 100%, and results are summarized in Table 3.
Table 3: LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture (BCP) Assay Lot-to-Lot Reproducibility Results
Organism ID | Reportable Targets | Sample Type | Reagent Lot | Results (%) agreement | Results (95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Staphylococcus aureus | Staphylococcus spp. S. aureus | Panel 1 – RP | Lot 1 | 100% (15/15) | |
Lot 2 | 100% (15/15) | 79.6% - 100% | |||
Lot 3 | 100% (15/15) | ||||
Overall | 100% (45/45) | 92.1% – 100% | |||
Panel 1 – RP+8 Hours | Lot 1 | 100% (15/15) | |||
Lot 2 | 100% (15/15) | 79.6% - 100% | |||
Lot 3 | 100% (15/15) | ||||
Overall | 100% (45/45) | 92.1% – 100% | |||
Enterococcus faecalis | Enterococcus faecalis | Panel 2 – RP | Lot 1 | 100% (15/15) | 79.6% - 100% |
Lot 2 | 100% (15/15) | ||||
Lot 3 | 100% (15/15) | ||||
Overall | 100% (45/45) | 92.1% – 100% | |||
Panel 2 – RP+8 Hours | Lot 1 | 100% (15/15) | 79.6% - 100% | ||
Lot 2 | 100% (15/15) | ||||
Lot 3 | 100% (15/15) | ||||
Overall | 100% (45/45) | 92.1% – 100% | |||
Escherichia coli | None | Contrived Negative | Lot 1 | 100% (15/15) | 79.6% - 100% |
Lot 2 | 100% (15/15) | ||||
Lot 3 | 100% (15/15) | ||||
Overall | 100% (45/45) | 92.1% – 100% | |||
No Target | None | Negative Blood Matrix | Lot 1 | 100% (15/15) | 79.6% - 100% |
Lot 2 | 100% (15/15) | ||||
Lot 3 | 100% (15/15) | ||||
Overall | 100% (45/45) | 92.1% – 100% | |||
Resistance Marker | |||||
Staphylococcus aureus | mecA/C | Panel 1 – RP | Lot 1 | 100% (15/15) | |
Lot 2 | 100% (15/15) | 79.6% - 100% | |||
Lot 3 | 100% (15/15) | ||||
Overall | 100% (45/45) | 92.1% – 100% | |||
Panel 1 – RP+8 Hours | Lot 1 | 100% (15/15) | |||
Lot 2 | 100% (15/15) | 79.6% - 100% | |||
Lot 3 | 100% (15/15) |
Page 19
LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 14 of 43
Organism ID | Reportable Targets | Sample Type | Reagent Lot | Results (%) agreement | Results (95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overall | 100% (45/45) | 92.1% – 100% | |||
Enterococcus faecalis | vanB | Panel 2 – RP | Lot 1 | 100% (15/15) | 79.6% - 100% |
Lot 2 | 100% (15/15) | ||||
Lot 3 | 100% (15/15) | ||||
Overall | 100% (45/45) | 92.1% – 100% | |||
Panel 2 – RP+8 Hours | Lot 1 | 100% (15/15) | 79.6% - 100% | ||
Lot 2 | 100% (15/15) | ||||
Lot 3 | 100% (15/15) | ||||
Overall | 100% (45/45) | 92.1% – 100% |
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Not applicable. The LIAISON® PLEX Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay is a qualitative assay.
Page 20
LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 15 of 43
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
Controls
Several controls are built into the assay and system to ensure identification of processing errors and to establish validity of test results.
Internal Controls
Each LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay cartridge includes internal controls to ensure performance of sample preparation and detection. The internal extraction control is present in the lysis tube when the sample is added. Sample preparation is initiated and the extraction control assesses extraction, nucleic acid recovery, and detection. Finally, addition of a post-extraction hybridization control serves as an indicator of successful hybridization. Internal control results are reported as Pass or Fail on the printed reports (see Table 4 for detailed explanations of each control result). Internal controls must generate a signal above threshold in each internal reaction for the system to report a valid test result.
Table 4. Interpretation of Controls on the LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Report
Internal Control Result | Explanation | Suggested Action |
---|---|---|
Pass | Test was completed and internal controls were successful, indicating that valid results were generated. | Review and report results |
Fail | One or more internal control failed. | Repeat test with a new cartridge |
External Controls
Positive and negative external controls should be tested with each new lot or shipment of reagents, or monthly, (whichever occurs first), or in accordance with updated local, regional, state, and/or federal guidelines. Verified negative blood matrix can be used as the negative control. Previously characterized positive samples or verified negative blood matrix spiked with well characterized organisms may be used as the external positive control. External controls should be used in accordance with laboratory protocols and in accordance with local, state, and federal accrediting organizations, as applicable.
Stability
Specimen Stability
Performance of the LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture (BCP) Assay was assessed using specimens tested in a fresh state (at bottle/ring positive and at bottle/ring positive + 8 hours) and after exposure to various storage conditions. Conditions tested included refrigerated storage (2° to 8°C) and room temperature storage (15°C to 30°C) to span the typical "fresh specimen" storage conditions across multiple time points. Positive specimens containing five target organisms representing a total of 9 reportable gram-positive targets
Page 21
LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 16 of 43
and select resistance markers were tested as well as negative blood matrix control specimen containing no target organisms. 100% detection of all reportable targets was observed across all timepoints. The negative sample demonstrated 0% positivity across all time-points and storage conditions tested. The results demonstrated that specimens may be stored under the following temperature conditions without impacting the performance of the LIAISON PLEX® BCP cartridge:
- Up to 72 hours (3 days) at Refrigerated (2-8°C) or Room Temperature (15-30°C) storage conditions.
Device Stability
A shelf-life study was conducted to evaluate the real-time stability of the LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay at the recommended storage conditions of room temperature (15°C – 30°C). Real-time stability was assessed using three Positive Control panels which interrogate representative targets in the assay, and one Negative Control which consisted of negative blood matrix. Results of real-time stability for all tested lots demonstrated the LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay is stable for at least 1 month when stored at 15°C – 30°C, and up to 3 months when stored at 15°C – 30°C for two of the three cartridge lots evaluated. Testing for the third lot is ongoing. Shelf-life will be extended based upon results of on-going stability testing.
An open box stability study was performed to evaluate the stability of the LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay cartridges at room temperature once removed from their foil pouch. Testing was performed shortly after kits were manufactured and will be repeated at the end of the product shelf-life. Non-aged cartridges were tested at 0 hours (T0), 3 hours (T1), and 9 hours (T2) after removal from their pouch. Each time point included testing of three Positive Control panels which interrogate seven reportable targets in the assay, and one Negative Control which consisted of negative blood matrix. One unexpected result (false positive) for Staphylococcus lugdunensis and Streptococcus spp. occurred for a negative target. Expected results were observed at all other timepoints and conditions. Results of open-box stability indicate the cartridges are stable for up to nine hours after cartridges are removed from their foil pouches and stored at room temperature.
Fresh vs. Frozen Specimen Stability
A fresh vs. frozen specimen stability study was performed to evaluate the performance of the LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture (BCP) assay in specimens that have been prepared "fresh" (at two growth durations referred to as Bottle/Ring Positive and Bottle/Ring Positive + 8 hours) and subjected to a defined number of freeze/thaw (F/T) cycles as well as those experiencing a prolonged storage in frozen conditions. The study was performed using six representative organisms detected by the LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay cultured individually in blood culture bottles. Performance testing using negative blood matrix served as a control test during the study. Material was tested under 5 different conditions – Material was tested at multiple freeze thaw cycles: 1st Freeze-thaw, 2nd Freeze-thaw, and 3rd Freeze-thaw, and was frozen for a minimum of 8 hours in between each freeze-thaw cycle. In the prolonged testing, material was frozen at time points of 15 days and 30 days. A total of 701 replicates were included in this study. The results
Page 22
LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 17 of 43
demonstrated 100% positivity for target positive samples at both growth durations and all freeze-thaw conditions. The negative blood matrix demonstrated 0% positivity of all reportable targets for the assay at all freeze-thaw conditions.
d. Growth and Detection Study
The growth and detection study was performed to evaluate detection of each organism at the time of culture positivity and 8 hours after culture positivity for the organisms listed in Table 5. Three bottles for each organism were grown to ring positive or 8 hours after ring positive and three replicates were tested for each bottle, for a total of 9 replicates tested per organism. The results, presented in Table 5, demonstrated 100% positivity for target positive samples and 0% positivity when tested with negative blood.
Table 5. LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Growth & Detection Results Summary
Organism Tested | Expected Targets | Ring Positivity | 8 Hours After Ring Positivity |
---|---|---|---|
Per Bottle (CFU/mL) | Positive Agreement/ Total (% Detected) | ||
Bacillus subtilis ATCC 19659 | Bacillus spp. | 1.29E+08 | 9/9 (100%) |
6.10E+08 | |||
3.60E+08 | |||
Enterococcus faecium ATCC 700221 | Enterococcus faecium | vanA | 2.37E+08 | 9/9 (100%) |
3.01E+08 | |||
2.24E+08 | |||
Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 51575 | Enterococcus faecalis | vanB | 6.87E+08 | 9/9 (100%) |
9.27E+08 | |||
9.83E+08 | |||
Listeria monocytogenes ATCC 15313 | Listeria spp. | 7.57E+08 | 9/9 (100%) |
9.63E+08 | |||
7.73E+08 | |||
Staphylococcus aureus ATCC BAA-2312 | Staphylococcus spp.| Staphylococcus aureus | mecA/mecC | 1.52E+07 | 9/9 (100%) |
2.34E+07 | |||
1.88E+07 | |||
Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 35984 | Staphylococcus spp. |Staphylococcus epidermidis | mecA/mecC | 1.55E+08 | 9/9 (100%) |
4.40E+08 | |||
2.84E+08 | |||
Staphylococcus lugdunensis ATCC 49576 | Staphylococcus spp.| Staphylococcus lugdunensis | 5.67E+08 | 9/9 (100%) |
7.43E+08 | |||
8.90E+08 | |||
Streptococcus agalactiae ATCC 12386 | Streptococcus spp.| Streptococcus | 1.21E+09 | 9/9 (100%) |
1.32E+09 |
Page 23
LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 18 of 43
Organism Tested | Expected Targets | Ring Positivity | 8 Hours After Ring Positivity |
---|---|---|---|
Per Bottle (CFU/mL) | Positive Agreement/ Total (% Detected) | ||
agalactiae | 1.12E+09 | ||
Streptococcus anginosus ATCC 33397 | Streptococcus spp.| Streptococcus anginosus group | 7.57E+08 | 9/9 (100%) |
4.97E+08 | |||
3.63E+08 | |||
Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC 49619 | Streptococcus spp.| Streptococcus pneumoniae | 8.30E+08 | 9/9 (100%) |
8.40E+08 | |||
9.80E+08 | |||
Streptococcus pyogenes ATCC 700294 | Streptococcus spp.| Streptococcus pyogenes | 3.43E+08 | 9/9 (100%) |
3.40E+08 | |||
4.70E+08 | |||
Organism Tested | Expected Targets | Ring Negative | |
Negative Blood | None | 0/3 (0%) |
^a False Positive Bacillus spp. result in one replicate. Three additional replicates were tested and no additional FPs were observed.
e. Analytical Reactivity (Inclusivity)
The analytical reactivity (inclusivity) of the LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay was evaluated by using a collection of 184 isolates, representing the genetic diversity of the analytes included as part of the LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay. Table 6 contains the summary of the organisms tested and the genus and species detected by the LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay. Table 7 contains the summary for the antimicrobial resistance marker reportable targets also detected by the assay.
Table 6: LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture (BCP) Inclusivity Summary (Microorganism Markers)
Reportable Target (Genus) | Reportable Target (Species) | Organism | # of strains | % Detected |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bacillus spp. | N/A | Bacillus cereus | 4 | 100% |
Bacillus licheniformis | 2 | 100% | ||
Bacillus subtilis | 3 | 100% | ||
Bacillus thuringiensis | 2 | 100% | ||
N/A | Enterococcus faecalis | Enterococcus faecalis | 9 | 100% |
Enterococcus faecium | Enterococcus faecium | 9 | 100%^a | |
Listeria spp. | N/A | Listeria grayi | 2 | 100% |
Listeria innocua | 2 | 100% | ||
Listeria ivanovii | 2 | 100% | ||
Listeria monocytogenes | 6 | 100% | ||
Listeria seeligeri | 2 | 100% |
Page 24
LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 19 of 43
Reportable Target (Genus) | Reportable Target (Species) | Organism | # of strains | % Detected |
---|---|---|---|---|
Listeria welshimeri | 2 | 100% | ||
Staphylococcus spp. | S. aureus | Staphylococcus aureus | 43 | 100% |
S. epidermidis | Staphylococcus epidermidis | 8 | 100% | |
S. lugdunensis | Staphylococcus lugdunensis | 5 | 100% | |
N/A | Staphylococcus argenteus | 2 | 100%^b | |
Staphylococcus auricularis | 2 | 100% | ||
Staphylococcus capitis | 2 | 100% | ||
Staphylococcus caprae | 1 | 100% | ||
Staphylococcus cohnii | 2 | 100% | ||
Staphylococcus haemolyticus | 2 | 100% | ||
Staphylococcus hominis | 3 | 100% | ||
Staphylococcus intermedius | 2 | 100% | ||
Staphylococcus muscae | 1 | 100%^c | ||
Staphylococcus pasteuri | 1 | 100% | ||
Staphylococcus saccharolyticus | 3 | 100% | ||
Staphylococcus saprophyticus | 2 | 100% | ||
Staphylococcus schleiferi | 1 | 100% | ||
Mammaliicoccus (Staphylococcus) sciuri | 2 | 100% | ||
Staphylococcus simulans | 2 | 100% | ||
Staphylococcus warneri | 2 | 100% | ||
Staphylococcus xylosus | 1 | 100% | ||
Streptococcus spp. | S. agalactiae | Streptococcus agalactiae | 5 | 100% |
S. anginosus Group | Streptococcus anginosus | 2 | 100% | |
Streptococcus constellatus | 3 | 100% | ||
Streptococcus intermedius | 2 | 100% | ||
S. pneumoniae | Streptococcus pneumoniae | 5 | 100% | |
S. pyogenes | Streptococcus pyogenes | 5 | 100% | |
N/A | Streptococcus bovis | 3 | 100% | |
Streptococcus dysgalactiae | 2 | 100% | ||
Streptococcus equi | 2 | 100% | ||
Streptococcus equinus | 2 | 100% | ||
Streptococcus gallolyticus | 3 | 100% | ||
Streptococcus gordonii | 2 | 100% | ||
Streptococcus infantarius subsp. coli | 1 | 100% | ||
Streptococcus infantis | 2 | 100% | ||
Streptococcus mitis | 2 | 100% | ||
Streptococcus mutans | 2 | 88.9%^d | ||
Streptococcus oralis | 2 | 100% | ||
Streptococcus parasanguinis | 2 | 100% |
Page 25
LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 20 of 43
Reportable Target (Genus) | Reportable Target (Species) | Organism | # of strains | % Detected |
---|---|---|---|---|
Streptococcus peroris | 1 | 100% | ||
Streptococcus pseudopneumoniae | 1 | 100% | ||
Streptococcus salivarius | 1 | 100% | ||
Streptococcus sanguinis | 2 | 100% |
^a One replicate from one strain resulted in a false positive (FP) S. lugdunensis result, three additional replicates were run for that strain. No additional FPs were observed.
^b Staphylococcus argenteus cross reacts with S. aureus.
^c Staphylococcus muscae cross reacts with Listeria spp.
^d One strain of Streptococcus mutans, ATCC 25175, was not detected as Streptococcus spp. in one of three initial replicates tested. Three additional replicates were run, giving an overall detection rate for Streptococcus spp. of 5/6 for that strain. S. mutans strain 31383 was fully detected in all replicates.
Table 7: LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture (BCP) Inclusivity Summary – Antimicrobial Resistance Markers
Reportable Target (Resistance Marker) | Organism | # of strains | % Detected |
---|---|---|---|
mecA/C | Staphylococcus argenteus | 1 | 100% |
mecA/C | Staphylococcus aureus | 35 | 100% |
Staphylococcus epidermidis | 5 | 100% | |
Staphylococcus hominis | 1 | 100% | |
Mammaliicoccus (Staphylococcus) sciuri | 2 | 100% | |
vanA | Enterococcus faecalis | 3 | 100% |
Enterococcus faecium | 3 | 100%^a | |
vanB | Enterococcus faecalis | 3 | 100% |
Enterococcus faecium | 3 | 100% |
^a One replicate from one strain resulted in a false positive (FP) S. lugdunensis result, and three additional replicates were run for that strain. No additional FPs were observed.
Predicted (in silico) Reactivity (Inclusivity) Results
For all targets, in silico inclusivity analysis was performed using sequences available in the GenBank and WGS (whole genome shotgun) databases from March to April 2024. Alignments of the signal fragment for each target were generated using MAFFT (version 7.490). For all targets, the inclusivity analysis involved assessing the percent homology of each oligo sequence to its binding region on each target sequence retrieved from the public databases. The predicted inclusivity based on sequence homology is the percentage of sequences with at least 90% oligo identity. In determining oligo identity, the highest percent identity of each oligo in the same component was assessed and then the lowest percent identity of the two components (capture and mediator probes) is used to characterize the inclusivity of the sequence. In silico analysis results are summarized below in Table 8.
Page 26
LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 21 of 43
Table 8 – In silico Analysis Results
Reportable Target | Inclusive Organism/Target | Total # Sequences in Alignment | # Sequences with Percent Oligo Identity ≥ 90% | Predicted Inclusivity Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bacillus spp.^a | Bacillus cereus group | 6722 | 6718 | 100 |
Bacillus subtilis group | 4320 | 4318 | 100 | |
Enterococcus faecalis | Enterococcus faecalis | 746 | 745 | 100 |
Enterococcus faecium | Enterococcus faecium | 555 | 555 | 100 |
Listeria spp.^b | Listeria monocytogenes | 8812 | 8812 | 100 |
other Listeria species | 899 | 876 | 97 | |
Staphylococcus aureus | Staphylococcus aureus | 2307 | 2307 | 100 |
Staphylococcus epidermidis | Staphylococcus epidermidis | 250 | 250 | 100 |
Staphylococcus lugdunensis | Staphylococcus lugdunensis | 162 | 162 | 100 |
Staphylococcus spp.^c | Staphylococcus spp. | 13355 | 13354 | 100 |
Streptococcus agalactiae | Streptococcus agalactiae | 454 | 454 | 100 |
Streptococcus anginosus Group | Streptococcus anginosus | 356 | 356 | 100 |
Streptococcus constellatus | 70 | 70 | 100 | |
Streptococcus intermedius | 127 | 127 | 100 | |
unspecified species from Streptococcus anginosus group | 7 | 7 | 100 | |
Streptococcus pneumoniae | Streptococcus pneumoniae | 693 | 693 | 100 |
Streptococcus pyogenes | Streptococcus pyogenes | 732 | 732 | 100 |
Streptococcus spp.^d | Streptococcus spp. | 23589 | 23574 | 100 |
mecA/mecC^e | mecA | 2201 | 2158 | 98 |
mecC | 32 | 32 | 100 | |
vanA^f | vanA | 570 | 551 | 97 |
vanB^f | vanB | 215 | 215 | 100 |
^a Includes sequences for 26 species of B. cereus group and 15 species of B. subtilis group. Oligo designs may also detect Bacillus species that are not part of these two groups.
^b Includes sequences for 28 Listeria species.
^c Includes sequences for 44 Staphylococcus species.
^d Includes sequences for 108 Streptococcus species.
^e Includes sequences for Staphylococcus species only.
^f Includes sequences for E. faecalis and E. faecium only.
f. Analytical Specificity (Exclusivity)
Cross-Reactivity
The analytical specificity study was performed to evaluate cross-reactivity of the LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay with "off-panel" organisms, including both phylogenetically related to the on-panel organisms and organisms likely to be present in typical blood culture samples. Table 9 contains the summary for the genus and species reportable targets. Out
Page 27
LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 22 of 43
of the 103 off-panel species tested, 97 resulted in no cross-reactivity, 5 resulted in cross-reactivity with one reportable target, and 1 organism resulted in positivity for 1 out of 6 replicates tested. Organisms with cross-reactivity and the BCP target that was detected are listed in Table 10.
Table 9: LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay Analytical Specificity (Cross Reactivity) Summary
Organism | Positivity | Organism | Positivity |
---|---|---|---|
Gram Positive | |||
Abitrophia defectiva | 0% | Enterococcus flavescens | 0% |
Aerococcus viridans | 0% | Enterococcus gallinarum, vanC | 0% |
Arcanobacterium bernardiae | 0% | Enterococcus hirae | 0% |
Arcanobacterium haemolyticum | 0% | Enterococcus mundtii | 0% |
Corynebacterium amycolatum | 0% | Enterococcus raffinosus | 0% |
Corynebacterium diphtheriae | 0% | Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae | 0% |
Corynebacterium flavescens | 0% | Kocuria kristinae | 0% |
Corynebacterium genitalium | 0% | Kytococcus sedentarius, methicillin resistant | 0% |
Corynebacterium glutamicum | 0% | Lactobacillus acidophilus | 0% |
Corynebacterium jeikeium | 0% | Lactobacillus crispatus | 0% |
Corynebacterium pseudodiptherticum | 0% | Lactobacillus rhamnosus | 0% |
Corynebacterium renale | 0% | Leuconostoc carnosum | 100% |
Corynebacterium striatum | 0% | Leuconostoc mesenteroides | 0% |
Corynebacterium urealyticum | 0% | Pediococcus acidilactici | 0% |
Cutibacterium acnes | 0% | Pediococcus pentosaceus | 0% |
Cutibacterium avidum | 0% | Peptostreptococcus anaerobius | 0% |
Propionibacterium freudenreichii | 0% | Planococcus citreus | 0% |
Enterococcus avium | 100% | Planococcus kocurii | 0% |
Enterococcus casseliflavis, VRE, vanC | 0% | Rothia dentocariosa | 0% |
Enterocococcus dispar | 0% | Rothia (Stomatococcus) mucilaginosa | 0% |
Enterococcus durans | 0% | ||
Gram Negative | |||
Acinetobacter calcoaceticus | 0% | Haemophilus influenzae | 0% |
Acinetobacter pittii | 0% | Herbaspirillum huttiense | 0% |
Aggregatibacter aphrophilus | 100% | Kingella kingae | 0% |
Bacteroides fragilis | 0% | Klebsiella oxytoca | 0% |
Brevundimonas diminuta | 0% | Klebsiella pneumoniae | 0% |
Burkholderia cepacia | 0% | Klebsiella variicola | 0% |
Capnocytophaga ochracea | 0% | Leclercia adecarboxylata | 0% |
Cardiobacterium hominis | 0% | Moraxella catarrhalis | 0% |
Cedecea lapagei | 0% | Morganella morganii | 0% |
Citrobacter amalonaticus | 0% | Neisseria lactamica | 0% |
Page 28
LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 23 of 43
Organism | Positivity | Organism | Positivity |
---|---|---|---|
Citrobacter freundii | 0% | Neisseria meningitidis | 0% |
Comamonas testosteroni | 0% | Neisseria mucosa | 0% |
Delftia acidovorans | 0% | Neisseria sicca | 0% |
Eikenella corrodens | 0% | Parabacteroides distasonis | 0% |
Elizabethkingia meningoseptica | 0% | Pasteurella aerogenes | 0% |
Enteric Group 137 | 0% | Prevotella bivia | 0% |
Enterobacter aerogenes | 0% | Proteus mirabilis | 0% |
Enterobacter cloacae | 0% | Proteus penneri | 100% |
Enterobacter hormaechei | 0% | Proteus vulgaris | 100% |
Escherichia albertii | 0% | Pseudomonas aeruginosa | 0% |
Escherichia coli | 0% | Pseudomonas alcaligenes | 0% |
Escherichia fergusonii | 0% | Raoultella ornithinolytica | 0% |
Escherichia hermannii | 0% | Salmonella enterica | 0% |
Fusobacterium necrophorum | 0% | Serratia marcescens | 0% |
Fusobacterium nucleatum | 0% | Stenotrophomonas maltophilia | 0% |
Haemophilus haemolyticus | 0% | ||
Yeast/Fungi | |||
Aspergillus fumigatus | 0% | Cryptococcus neoformans | 0% |
Candida albicans | 0% | Debaryomyces hansenii (Candida famata) | 0% |
Nakaseomyces glabratus (Candida glabrata) | 0% | Kluyveromyces lactis | 0% |
Pichia kudriavzevii (Candida krusei) | 0% | Saccharomyces cerevisiae | 0% |
Candida parapsilosis | 16.7%^a | Schizosaccharomyces pombe | 0% |
Candida tropicalis | 0% |
^a Initial testing results showed 1 of 3 replicates detected as S. lugdunensis. An additional 3 replicates were tested (for a total of 6 replicates) and no additional false positives were seen.
Table 10: LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay Analytical Specificity (Cross Reactivity) Summary
Cross-Reactive Organism | BCP Target Detected |
---|---|
Enterococcus avium | Enterococcus faecium |
Leuconostoc carnosum | Streptococcus spp. |
Aggregatibacter aphrophilus | Streptococcus spp. |
Proteus penneri | Streptococcus spp. |
Proteus vulgaris | Streptococcus spp. |
Page 29
LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 24 of 43
In Silico Cross-Reactivity
For in silico exclusivity assessment of the oligo sequences incorporated in the assay designs against on-panel and off-panel organisms listed in Table 11, based on analysis of sequences available in the GenBank nt database as of July 27, 2024, the following potential cross-reactivity is predicted:
- Some strains of Enterococcus durans and 3 strains of Streptococcus species (AY123726.1, FJ577604.1, MK608388.1) are predicted to produce false positive Enterococcus faecalis results.
- One strain of Enterococcus durans (KT877992.1), 1 strain of Enterococcus faecalis (CP092577.1) and some strains Enterococcus avium are predicted to produce false positive Enterococcus faecium results.
- Staphylococcus aureus oligo designs are predicted to detect some strains of Staphylococcus argenteus and one strain of Staphylococcus schweitzeri (LR134304.1).
- Staphylococcus spp. oligo designs are predicted to detect some strains of Macrococcoides caseolyticum.
- Some strains of Streptococcus species (S. lactarius, S. milleri, S. oralis, S. periodonticum, S. pneumoniae, S. rubneri, S. vaginalis) are predicted to produce false positive Streptococcus anginosus Group results.
- Streptococcus pneumoniae oligo designs are predicted to detect a few strains of various Streptococcus species (S. downii, S. mitis, S. oralis).
- Some strains of Aggregatibacter aphrophilus, unspecified Bacillus species, Enterococcus species (E. durans, E. gallinarum), Glaesserella parasuis, Haemophilus species (H. ducreyi, H. influenzae, H. parahaemolyticus, H. parainfluenzae), Lactococcus species (L. garvieae, L. lactis), Leuconostoc carnosum, Moellerella wisconsensis, Morganella morganii, Pasteurella multocida, Proteus species (P. appendicitidis, P. columbae, P. faecis, P. penneri, P. terrae, P. vulgaris), Providencia species (P. alcalifaciens, P. hangzhouensis, P. heimbachae, P. huaxiensis, P. manganoxydans, P. rettgeri, P. rustigianii, P. stuartii, P. vermicola, P. zhijiangensis), Serratia species (S. marcescens, S. symbiotica) and Xenorhabdus species (X. bovienii, X. hominickii, X. nematophila) are predicted to produce false positive Streptococcus spp. results.
- Listeria spp. oligo designs are predicted to detect some strains of Staphylococcus muscae.
Table 11: Potential Cross-Reactive Organisms assessed in the In Silico Exclusivity Analysis
On-Panel Organisms | Off-Panel Organisms | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Gram-Positive Bacteria | Gram-Negative Bacteria | Resistance Markers | Yeasts / Viruses / Parasites | |
Bacillus spp. | Abiotrophia defectiva | Acinetobacter spp. | AmpC | Aspergillus flavus |
Enterococcus faecalis | Actinomyces israelii | Actinobacillus hominis | CMY | Aspergillus fumigatus |
Enterococcus faecium | Actinomyces naeslundii | Actinobacillus ureae | CTX-M | Aspergillus niger |
Listeria spp. | Actinomyces odontolyticus | Aeromonas caviae | IMP | Aspergillus terreus |
Staphylococcus aureus | Aerococcus sanguinicola | Aeromonas hydrophila | KPC | Blastomyces dermatitidis |
Staphylococcus epidermidis | Aerococcus urinae | Aeromonas sobria | MCR | Candida albicans |
Staphylococcus lugdunensis | Aerococcus viridans | Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans | NDM | Candida auris |
Staphylococcus spp. | Arcanobacterium bernardiae | Aggregatibacter aphrophilus | ompK36 | Candida dubliniensis |
Streptococcus agalactiae | Arcanobacterium haemolyticum | Bacteroides caccae | OXA | Candida famata |
Streptococcus anginosus group | Arthrobacter psychrolactophilus | Bacteroides fragilis | RAHN | Candida glabrata |
Page 30
LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 25 of 43
On-Panel Organisms | Off-Panel Organisms | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Gram-Positive Bacteria | Gram-Negative Bacteria | Resistance Markers | Yeasts / Viruses / Parasites | |
Streptococcus pneumoniae | Brochothrix thermosphacta | Bacteroides ovatus | SHV | Candida guilliermondii |
Streptococcus pyogenes | Carnobacterium divergens | Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron | SME | Candida haemulonii |
Streptococcus spp. | Carnobacterium maltaromaticum | Bacteroides uniformis | SPM | Candida inconspicua |
mecA | Cellulomonas turbata | Bacteroides vulgatus | TEM | Candida kefyr |
mecC | Cellulosimicrobium cellulans | Bacteroides xylanisolvens | vanC | Candida krusei |
vanA | Clostridioides difficile | Bordetella bronchiseptica | vanD | Candida lipolytica |
vanB | Clostridium bifermentans | Bordetella parapertussis | vanM | Candida lusitaniae |
Clostridium clostridioforme | Bordetella pertussis | VIM | Candida metapsilosis | |
Clostridium perfringens | Brevundimonas diminuta | Candida multis-gemmis | ||
Clostridium ramosum (Thomasclavelia ramosa) | Brevundimonas vesicularis | Candida nivariensis | ||
Clostridium septicum | Burkholderia cepacia | Candida norvegensis | ||
Clostridium tertium | Burkholderia mallei | Candida orthopsilosis | ||
Clostridium tetani | Burkholderia multivorans | Candida parapsilosis | ||
Corynebacterium spp. | Burkholderia pseudomallei | Candida sojae | ||
Cutibacterium acnes | Campylobacter hominis | Candida tropicalis | ||
Cutibacterium avidum | Capnocytophaga ochracea | Candida duobushaemulonii | ||
Cutibacterium granulosum | Cardiobacterium hominis | Candida viswanathii | ||
Enterococcus avium | Chlamydia trachomatis | Coccidioides immitis | ||
Enterococcus casseliflavus | Chlamydophila pneumoniae | Coccidioides posadasii | ||
Enterococcus cecorum | Chromobacterium violaceum | Cryptococcus amylolentus | ||
Enterococcus dispar | Citrobacter spp. | Cryptococcus gattii | ||
Enterococcus durans | Comamonas testosteroni | Cryptococcus neoformans | ||
Enterococcus flavescens | Delftia acidovorans | Cryptococcus uniguttulatus | ||
Enterococcus gallinarum | Eikenella corrodens | Cutaneotrichosporon curvatum | ||
Enterococcus hirae | Elizabethkingia meningoseptica | Cyberlindnera fabianii | ||
Enterococcus mundtii | Enterobacter spp. | Geotrichum capitatum (Magnusiomyces capitatus) | ||
Enterococcus raffinosus | Enterobacteriaceae | Histoplasma capsulatum | ||
Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae | Escherichia coli | Kluyveromyces lactis | ||
Finegoldia magna | Fusobacterium necrophorum | Kodamaea ohmeri | ||
Gemella haemolysans | Fusobacterium nucleatum | Lodderomyces elongisporus | ||
Gemella morbillorum | Haemophilus influenzae | Magnusiomyces capitatus | ||
Globicatella spp. | Haemophilus aegyptius | Millerozyma farinosa | ||
Granulicatella adiacens | Haemophilus ducreyi | Naganishia albida | ||
Granulicatella elegans | Haemophilus haemolyticus | Papiliotrema laurentii | ||
Kocuria kristinae | Haemophilus parahaemolyticus | Penicillium chrysogenum | ||
Kocuria rhizophila | Haemophilus parainfluenzae | Rhodotorula mucilaginosa | ||
Kytococcus sedentarius | Haemophilus parasuis | Saccharomyces cerevisiae | ||
Lactobacillus acidophilus | ||||
Lactobacillus crispatus |
Page 31
LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 26 of 43
On-Panel Organisms | Off-Panel Organisms | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Gram-Positive Bacteria | Gram-Negative Bacteria | Resistance Markers | Yeasts / Viruses / Parasites | |
Lactobacillus rhamnosus | Haemophilus quentini | Schizosaccharomyces pombe | ||
Lactococcus garvieae | Haemophilus sputorum | Talaromyces marneffei | ||
Lactococcus lactis | Herbaspirillum huttiense | Trichosporon asahii | ||
Leuconostoc carnosum | Kingella denitrificans | Wickerhamomyces anomalus | ||
Leuconostoc citreum | Kingella kingae | BK Virus | ||
Leuconostoc mesenteroides | Kingella negevensis | Chikungunya Virus | ||
Macrococcus caseolyticus | Kingella oralis | Cytomegalovirus | ||
Micrococcus luteus | Klebsiella oxytoca | Dengue Virus | ||
Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) | Klebsiella pneumoniae | Enterovirus | ||
Mycobacterium fortuitum | Klebsiella variicola | Epstein Barr Virus | ||
Mycobacterium mucogenicum | Legionella pneumophila | Hepatitis A virus | ||
Mycoplasma hominis | Leptospira interrogans | Hepatitis B virus | ||
Mycoplasma pneumoniae | Moraxella catarrhalis | Hepatitis C virus | ||
Nocardia farcinica | Moraxella osloensis | Human alphaherpesvirus 1 | ||
Parvimonas micra | Morganellaceae | Human alphaherpesvirus 2 | ||
Pediococcus acidilactici | Mycobacterium tuberculosis | Human betaherpesvirus 6 | ||
Pediococcus pentosaceus | Neisseria gonorrhoeae | Human betaherpesvirus 7 | ||
Peptostreptococcus anaerobius | Neisseria lactamica | Human Immunodeficiency Virus | ||
Planococcus citreus | Neisseria meningitidis | JC Virus | ||
Planococcus kocurii | Neisseria mucosa | Measles Virus | ||
Propionibacterium freudenreichii | Neisseria sicca | Mumps Virus | ||
Propionibacterium propionicum (Arachnia propionica) | Parabacteroides distasonis | Parvovirus B19 | ||
Rhodococcus equi | Parabacteroides merdae | Rubella Virus | ||
Rothia dentocariosa | Pasteurella aerogenes | Varicella Zoster Virus | ||
Rothia mucilaginosa | Pasteurella canis | West Nile Virus | ||
Sarcina ventriculi | Pasteurella multocida | Zika Virus | ||
Solibacillus silvestris | Pasteurella stomatis | Plasmodium falciparum | ||
Ureaplasma parvum | Prevotella bivia | Trypanosoma cruzi | ||
Ureaplasma urealyticum | Prevotella buccae | |||
Vagococcus fluvialis | Prevotella denticola | |||
Weissella paramesenteroides | Prevotella melaninogenica | |||
Prevotella oralis | ||||
Proteus spp. | ||||
Pseudomonas spp. | ||||
Psychrobacter cryohalolentis | ||||
Psychrobacter immobilis | ||||
Ralstonia mannitolilytica | ||||
Ralstonia pickettii |
Page 32
LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 27 of 43
On-Panel Organisms | Off-Panel Organisms | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Gram-Positive Bacteria | Gram-Negative Bacteria | Resistance Markers | Yeasts / Viruses / Parasites | |
Salmonella spp. | ||||
Serratia spp. | ||||
Shigella spp. | ||||
Stenotrophomonas acidaminiphila | ||||
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia | ||||
Stenotrophomonas nitritireducens | ||||
Stenotrophomonas rhizophila | ||||
Treponema pallidum | ||||
Veillonella parvula | ||||
Vibrio alginolyticus | ||||
Vibrio parahaemolyticus | ||||
Vibrio vulnificus |
g. Interference
Competitive Inhibition / Co-Infection and Microbial Interference
The competitive inhibition and microbial interference study was executed to evaluate the performance of the LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay in the presence of clinically significant levels of potential co-infections of on-panel organisms and potentially interfering (off-panel) microbes. To evaluate potential co-infections, varying ratios of two on-panel target organisms including a low titer (concentration at bottle/ring positive) and a high titer specimen (concentration at bottle/ring positive +8 hours) were tested in combination, as listed in Table 12. The on-panel target organisms were chosen to be representative of clinically relevant poly-microbial infections in blood culture specimens. To assess microbial interference, three off-panel microbes were combined in pairs with each of three representative on-panel target organisms, as listed in Table 13. These specific organism sets were chosen to mimic potentially interfering micro-organisms that are commonly found in positive blood culture samples but are not designed to be detected by the LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay.
Results are shown in Tables 12 and Table 13. On-panel targets were detected with 100% positivity for all combinations tested, both in the presence of competitive on-panel targets and in the presence of competitive off-panel pathogens.
Page 33
LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 28 of 43
Table 12: LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay Competitive Inhibition Summary
On-Panel High Titer Target | Positivity | On-Panel Low Titer Target | Positivity |
---|---|---|---|
Enterococcus faecalis | 100% | Staphylococcus epidermidis | 100% |
100% | Enterococcus faecium | 100% | |
Enterococcus faecium | 100% | Staphylococcus epidermidis | 100% |
100% | Enterococcus faecalis | 100% | |
Staphylococcus aureus | 100% | Staphylococcus epidermidis | 100% |
100% | Streptococcus agalactiae | 100% | |
Staphylococcus epidermidis | 100% | Enterococcus faecalis | 100% |
100% | Enterococcus faecium | 100% | |
100% | Staphylococcus aureus | 100% | |
100% | Staphylococcus lugdunensis | 100% | |
100% | Streptococcus pneumoniae | 100% | |
Staphylococcus lugdunensis | 100% | Staphylococcus epidermidis | 100% |
Streptococcus agalactiae | 100% | Staphylococcus aureus | 100% |
Streptococcus pneumoniae | 100% | Staphylococcus epidermidis | 100% |
Table 13: LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay Microbial Interference Summary
On-Panel Low Titer Target | Positivity | Off-Panel High Titer Target | Positivity |
---|---|---|---|
Staphylococcus epidermidis | 100% | Escherichia coli | 0% |
100% | Klebsiella pneumoniae | 0% | |
100% | Proteus mirabilis | 0% | |
Enterococcus faecium | 100% | Escherichia coli | 0% |
100% | Klebsiella pneumoniae | 0% | |
100% | Proteus mirabilis | 0% | |
N/A | N/A | Escherichia coli | 0% |
N/A | N/A | Klebsiella pneumoniae | 0% |
N/A | N/A | Proteus mirabilis | 0% |
Interfering Substances
The interfering substances study was performed to evaluate the performance of the LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay in the presence of non-microbial (endogenous and exogenous) interfering substances which may be present in blood culture specimens. Six representative "on-panel" organisms were individually tested to assess effectiveness of target detection in the presence of six typically occurring interfering substances. Each interfering substance was tested across five replicates for each organism. In addition, five replicates of a negative control was tested alongside the positive specimens to assess impact of the same interfering agents in specimens containing no target. A positive control (specimen without interfering substances) for all four targets was also tested to assess for detection capabilities.
Page 34
LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 29 of 43
As seen in Table 14, 100% target detection was observed for all six targets without interferent and in the presence of all six interfering substances. 0% target detection was observed with the negative sample with and without interfering substances.
Table 14: LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay Interfering Substances Summary
Organism | Interfering Substance & Tested Concentration | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unconjugated Bilirubin | Conjugated Bilirubin | Hemoglobin | Intralipid | γ-globulin | Sodium polyanetholsulfonate | No interferent | |
20 mg/dL | 20 mg/dL | 14 g/L | 3000 mg/dL | 6 g/dL | 0.25% w/v | ||
% Positivity | |||||||
Staphylococcus aureus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Staphylococcus epidermidis | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Streptococcus pneumoniae | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Streptococcus agalactiae | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Enterococcus faecalis | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Enterococcus faecium | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Negative Blood Matrix | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Carry-Over/Cross Contamination
This study was performed to evaluate the risk of carry-over and cross contamination occurring during normal use of the device when highly concentrated positive specimens are processed alongside negative specimens. Two operators tested 30 high concentration positive samples consisting of Staphylococcus aureus at a final concentration of 1.90E+08 CFU/mL, and 30 negative samples consisting of Negative Blood Matrix. Staphylococcus aureus was selected as it is a representative organism with three expected positive target detections on the LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay.
Testing was performed on two LIAISON PLEX® instruments containing 6 modules over the course of four days. The samples were loaded into cartridges alternating between positive and negative samples (checkerboard fashion), six specimens at a time using sample prep trays. The results, presented in Table 15, demonstrate 100% agreement between expected and observed results, indicating that no cross contamination occurred within runs and no carry-over was observed across runs.
Page 35
LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 30 of 43
Table 15. Overall Results
Overall Percent Agreement between Expected and Observed Results | 100% |
Staphylococcus aureus Positivity in High Positive Control Replicates | 100% |
Staphylococcus aureus Positivity in Negative Control Replicates | 0% |
h. Assay Cut-off
The specific assay parameters for the LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay are considered confidential and proprietary.
2. Comparison Studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
Refer to Section 3 Clinical Performance.
b. Matrix Comparison: Testing of Blood Culture Bottle Types / Matrix Equivalency
The performance of LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture (BCP) Assay was evaluated across 12 additional types of commercially available blood culture media bottles using target organisms representative of all "on-panel" BCP targets with resistance markers, representative off-panel (gram-negative) targets, and negative blood matrix (NBM). The results, presented in Table 16, demonstrate that all 12 bottle (media) types are compatible with the LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture (BCP) Assay. BACT/ALERT® FA Plus blood culture bottle type is established in the clinical evaluation and for all other analytical studies, such as, growth and detection and analytical reactivity/ inclusivity verification testing and was not included in testing performed for the media equivalency study. Table 17 presents the range of CFU/mL by organism across all bottle types tested in the study.
Table 16: LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture (BCP) Assay Media Equivalency/ Universal Blood Culture Bottle Result Summary
Manufacturer System | Blood Culture Bottle Manufacturer | Blood Culture Bottle Type^c | Unique Bottles | Seeded Organisms | Negative Blood Matrix^d | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gram-positive Bacteria | Gram-negative Bacteria | |||||
Expected Results | ||||||
bioMérieux BACT/ALERT® 3D System | bioMérieux BACT/ALERT® | Aerobic BACT/ALERT® SA | 20/20 | 10/10 | 1/1 | |
Anaerobic BACT/ALERT® | 20/20 | 10/10 | 1/1 |
Page 36
LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 31 of 43
Manufacturer System | Blood Culture Bottle Manufacturer | Blood Culture Bottle Type^c | Unique Bottles | Seeded Organisms | Negative Blood Matrix^d | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gram-positive Bacteria | Gram-negative Bacteria | |||||
SN | ||||||
BACT/ALERT® FN Plus | 20/20 | 10/10 | 1/1 | |||
Pediatric BACT/ALERT® PF Plus | 58/58 | 10/10 | 1/1 | |||
Becton Dickinson 9050 / FX40 | Becton Dickinson^a | BACTEC™ Aerobic | ||||
BACTEC™ Standard | 20/20^b | 10/10 | 1/1 | |||
BACTEC™ Plus | 20/20 | 10/10 | 1/1 | |||
Anaerobic | ||||||
BACTEC™ Standard | 58/58^b | 10/10 | 1/1 | |||
BACTEC™ Plus | 58/58 | 10/10 | 1/1 | |||
Pediatric BACTEC™ Peds Plus | 58/58 | 10/10 | 1/1 | |||
Lytic Anaerobic BACTEC™ Lytic | 20/20 | 10/10 | 1/1 | |||
N/A | Thermo Scientific^a | VersaTREK™ Aerobic REDOX™ 1 EZ Draw™ | 56/56 | 10/10 | 1/1 | |
Anaerobic REDOX™ 2 EZ Draw™ | 56/56 | 10/10 | 1/1 | |||
Bottles with Expected Results /Total Number Blood Bottles | 464/464^b (100%) | 120/120 (100%) | 12/12 (100%) |
^a For gram-negative blood culture preparation, BACTEC™ and VersaTREK™ systems were not available and corresponding media bottles were placed in a standard laboratory incubator with a shaker for growth. For gram-positive blood culture growth, only VersaTREK™ bottles needed to be placed in a standard laboratory incubator with a shaker in lieu of VersaTREK™ system; BACT/ALERT® and BACTEC™ blood bottles were grown using corresponding automated blood culture systems up to bottle ring positivity.
^b One organism, (E. faecalis strain 51575) required use of a ring positivity + 8 bottle to confirm the bottle matrix was not inhibitory.
^c bioMérieux BACT/ALERT® FA Plus blood culture bottle type (PN: 410851) was not tested in this study protocol as the effectiveness of this is bottle type was established through blood culture growth required for other analytical studies including growth and detection and analytical reactivity/inclusivity verification.
^d Each unique bottle of Negative Blood Matrix was tested in replicates of three.
Table 17: Range of CFU/mL by Organism Across All Bottle Types Tested
Gram-Positive Organisms | Strain ID | Expected Result | Bottle Titer Range (CFU/mL) |
---|---|---|---|
Bacillus cereus | ATCC 10702 | Bacillus spp. | 6.10E+07^b - 4.40E+08 |
Bacillus subtilis | ATCC 19659 | Bacillus spp. | 4.90E+05 - 3.73E+08 |
Enterococcus faecalis | ATCC 51575 | Enterococcus faecalis | vanB | 8.63E+07 - 3.50E+09^a |
Enterococcus faecalis | Clinical Isolate CLCS VRE-1 | Enterococcus faecalis | vanA | 9.20E+06 - 6.50E+08 |
Enterococcus faecium | ATCC 700221 | Enterococcus faecium | vanA | 3.17E+07 - 9.77E+08 |
Enterococcus faecium | ATCC 51858 | Enterococcus faecium | vanB | 3.83E+06 - 5.50E+08 |
Page 37
LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 32 of 43
Gram-Positive Organisms | Strain ID | Expected Result | Bottle Titer Range (CFU/mL) |
---|---|---|---|
Listeria ivanovii | ATCC 700402 | Listeria spp. | 1.50E+08 - 1.40E+09 |
Listeria monocytogenes | ATCC 15313 | Listeria spp. | 6.60E+07 - 1.88E+09 |
Staphylococcus aureus | ATCC BAA-2312 | Staphylococcus spp. | S. aureus | mecA/C | 8.00E+06 - 1.29E+09 |
Staphylococcus aureus | CDC AR-0227 | Staphylococcus spp. |S. aureus | mecA/C | 1.43E+07 - 3.50E+09 |
Staphylococcus epidermidis | ATCC 35984 | Staphylococcus spp. | S. epidermidis |mecA/C | 6.93E+06 - 1.43E+09 |
Staphylococcus lugdunensis | ATCC 49576 | Staphylococcus spp. | S. lugdunensis | 2.20E+07 - 3.46E+09 |
Streptococcus agalactiae | ATCC 12386 | Streptococcus spp. | S. agalactiae | 2.70E+07 - 1.71E+09 |
Streptococcus anginosus | ATCC 33397 | Streptococcus spp. | S. anginosus Group | 1.82E+07 - 4.37E+09 |
Streptococcus constellatus | ATCC 27823 | Streptococcus spp. | S. anginosus Group | 4.00E+07 - 2.53E+09 |
Streptococcus pneumoniae | ATCC 49619 | Streptococcus spp. | S. pneumoniae | 2.70E+06 - 2.88E+09 |
Streptococcus pyogenes | ATCC 700294 | Streptococcus spp. | S. pyogenes | 2.80E+06 - 2.07E+09 |
Corynebacterium diphtheriae | ATCC 27010 | No target detected | 2.80E+06 - 1.31E+09 |
Corynebacterium striatum | ATCC 43735 | No target detected | 4.30E+07 - 1.17E+09 |
Cutibacterium acnes | ATCC 6919 | No target detected | 2.83E+07 - 5.90E+09 |
Gram-negative | Strain ID | Expected Result | Bottle Titer Range (CFU/mL) |
---|---|---|---|
Acinetobacter baumannii | IHMA 128307 | No target detected | 3.90E+07 - 9.10E+08 |
Escherichia coli | NCTC 13846 | No target detected | 6.70E+08 - 2.11E+09 |
Haemophilus influenzae | ATCC 9007 | No target detected | 2.30E+08 - 2.93E+09 |
Klebsiella oxytoca | IHMA 683079 | No target detected | 6.23E+07 - 1.56E+09 |
Klebsiella pneumoniae | IHMA 629630 | No target detected | 2.17E+08 - 1.19E+09 |
Klebsiella variicola | Clinical Isolate V0512 | No target detected | 2.60E+08 - 1.68E+09 |
Pseudomonas aeruginosa | IHMA 576602 | No target detected | 2.10E+07 - 9.70E+08 |
Proteus mirabilis | ATCC 12453 | No target detected | 1.10E+08 - 9.03E+08 |
Page 38
LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 33 of 43
Gram-Positive Organisms | Strain ID | Expected Result | Bottle Titer Range (CFU/mL) |
---|---|---|---|
Serratia marcescens | IHMA 1642209 | No target detected | 7.57E+08 - 2.87E+09 |
Citrobacter freundii | IHMA 549813 | No target detected | 3.93E+08 - 2.06E+09 |
^a Two bottles tested at ring positive with titers of 8.63E+07 and 1.46E+08 were not fully detected. Bottles grown to ring positivity + 8 hours were used to confirm that the results were not due to bottle matrix.
^b No viable counts were achieved for B. cereus in two of the BD BACTEC™ Standard Anaerobic media bottles.
3. Clinical Performance:
A multi-site clinical study established the diagnostic accuracy of the LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture (BCP) Assay for the detection and identification of pathogenic gram-positive organisms in positive blood culture. The clinical performance of the LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay was evaluated using clinical specimens prospectively collected between April 2024 and August 2024 from four geographically diverse clinical sites within the United States. The clinical study utilized remnant, de-identified blood culture specimens collected from patients exhibiting clinical signs and symptoms of bloodstream infection, evidenced by positive identification by a continuous monitoring blood culture system.
A total of 562 unique prospectively collected specimens that met the pre-determined inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study. Clinical runs and re-runs using the LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay were tested on the LIAISON PLEX® System by trained operators at four clinical sites. For targets that exhibited low prevalence rates in the prospective study, the prospective specimen set was supplemented with 163 pre-selected left-over, de-identified specimens sourced from ten vendors in the United States and one site in Italy. The pre-selected specimens were identified by Standard of Care (SoC) testing and confirmed as positive by VITEK 2 and/or PCR/BDS according to the reference method algorithm prior to enrollment in the study. To minimize bias, pre-selected specimens were tested across four external and one internal site in a randomized, blinded manner along with negative specimens.
Out of the 562 specimens enrolled in the prospective arm of the study, 53 prospective specimens were excluded from the analysis (one (1) duplicate patient enrollment, one (1) due to sample handling errors and 51 with incomplete reference testing results due to lack of clinical isolates, mixed growth, insufficient growth, or no growth). The remaining 509 specimens were included in the analysis.
For targets that exhibited low prevalence rates in the prospective study, the prospective specimen set was supplemented with 163 pre-selected (Arm 2) and 225 contrived specimens (Arm 3). Of these, one pre-selected specimen was excluded (sample handling error), leaving 162 pre-selected and 225 contrived specimens included in the analysis.
Table 18 provides a summary of the general demographic information for the 509 prospectively collected and 162 pre-selected specimens that were included in the study analysis.
Page 39
LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 34 of 43
Table 18: LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay Summary of the General Demographic Information
Prospective (N=509) | Preselected (N=162) | |
---|---|---|
#Specimens(%) | #Specimens(%) | |
Gender All Sites | ||
Male | 295 (58.0%) | 87 (53.7%) |
Female | 214 (42.0%) | 71 (43.8%) |
Gender Unknown | 0 (0.0%) | 4 (2.5%) |
Total | 509 (100.0%) | 162 (100.0%) |
Age (years) | ||
0-1 | 15 (2.9%) | 4 (2.5%) |
>1-5 | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (0.6%) |
>5-21 | 11 (2.2%) | 5 (3.1%) |
>21-65 | 266 (52.3%) | 83 (51.2%) |
>65 | 213 (41.8%) | 57 (35.2%) |
Age Unknown | 4 (0.8%) | 12 (7.4%) |
Total | 509 (100.0%) | 162 (100.0%) |
Subject Status | ||
Emergency Room | 88 (17.3%) | 0 (0.0%) |
Hospitalized | 391 (76.8%) | 4 (2.5%) |
Outpatient | 2 (0.4%) | 0 (0.0%) |
Status Unknown | 28 (5.5%) | 158 (97.5%) |
Total | 509 (100.0%) | 162 (100.0%) |
Blood Culture Bottle Type | ||
BacT/ALERT FA Plus | 148 (29.1%) | 48 (29.6%) |
BacT/ALERT FN Plus | 93 (18.3%) | 31 (19.1%) |
BacT/ALERT PF Plus | 4 (0.8%) | 2 (1.2%) |
BacT/ALERT SA Standard Aerobic | 27 (5.3%) | 0 (0.0%) |
BacT/ALERT SN Standard Anaerobic | 21 (4.1%) | 0 (0.0%) |
BD BACTEC Lytic Anaerobic | 55 (10.8%) | 2 (1.2%) |
BD BACTEC Peds Plus | 8 (1.6%) | 0 (0.0%) |
BD BACTEC Plus Aerobic | 135 (26.5%) | 2 (1.2%) |
BD BACTEC Standard Aerobic | 18 (3.5%) | 42 (25.9%) |
BD BACTEC Standard Anaerobic | 0 (0.0%) | 7 (4.3%) |
Bottle Type Unknown | 0 (0.0%) | 28 (17.3%) |
Bottle Type Total | 509 (100.0%) | 162 (100.0%) |
The clinical performance of the LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay was compared to culture followed by automated microbiological/biochemical identification using VITEK 2, PCR followed by BDS, or a combination according to the algorithm described in Table 19 below.
Page 40
LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 35 of 43
Table 19: LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay Summary of Comparator Method
LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay Target | Comparator Method |
---|---|
Enterococcus faecalis | Culture followed by Automated microbiological/biochemical identification using VITEK 2 |
Enterococcus faecium | |
Listeria spp. | |
Staphylococcus spp. | |
Staphylococcus aureus | |
Staphylococcus epidermidis | |
Staphylococcus lugdunensis | |
Streptococcus spp. | |
Streptococcus agalactiae | |
Streptococcus anginosus group | |
Streptococcus pneumoniae | |
Streptococcus pyogenes | |
Bacillus spp. | PCR followed by bi-directional sequencing |
mecA/mecC | |
vanA | |
vanB |
Of the 671 clinical specimens collectively included in the prospective and pre-selected study analysis (Arms 1 and 2 combined), 646 samples (96.3%) generated valid LIAISON PLEX BCP Assay results (i.e., Detected or Not Detected) on the first attempt. There were 25 specimens (3.7%) with an invalid result on the initial run. Of the 25 specimens retested, 24 specimens generated valid BCP results after a single retest for a final testing success rate of 99.9% (670/671).
Prospective and Pre-selected Clinical Evaluation
Clinical Performance (Sensitivity, Specificity, and 95% confidence interval) of the LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay compared to the reference method is summarized in Table 20 for combined prospective and pre-selected specimens.
Table 20. LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Performance with Prospective and Pre-selected Specimens - Arm 1 and Arm 2
Pathogen Target | Sensitivity/PPA | Specificity/NPA | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TP / (TP+FN) | Sensitivity /PPA (%) | 95% CI | TN / (TN+FP) | Specificity/NPA (%) | 95% CI | |
Bacteria | ||||||
Bacillus spp. | ||||||
Prospective | 1/1 | 100% | 20.7% - 100% | 506/507 | 99.8% | 98.9% - 100% |
Pre-selected | 17/19 | 89.5% | 68.6% - 97.1% | 127/127 | 100% | 97.1% - 100% |
Combined | 18/20 | 90% | 69.9% - 97.2% | 633/634¹ | 99.8% | 99.1% - 100% |
Page 41
LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 36 of 43
Pathogen Target | Sensitivity/PPA | Specificity/NPA | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TP / (TP+FN) | Sensitivity /PPA (%) | 95% CI | TN / (TN+FP) | Specificity/NPA (%) | 95% CI | |
Enterococcus faecalis | ||||||
Prospective | 38/38 | 100% | 90.8% - 100% | 468/468 | 100% | 99.2% - 100% |
Pre-selected | 2/2 | 100% | 34.2% - 100% | 125/125 | 100% | 97% - 100% |
Combined | 40/40 | 100% | 91.2% - 100% | 593/593 | 100% | 99.4% - 100% |
Enterococcus faecium | ||||||
Prospective | 16/16 | 100% | 80.6% - 100% | 489/490 | 99.8% | 98.9% - 100% |
Pre-selected | 20/20 | 100% | 83.9% - 100% | 106/107 | 99.1% | 94.9% - 99.8% |
Combined | 36/36 | 100% | 90.4% - 100% | 595/597² | 99.7% | 98.8% - 99.9% |
Listeria spp. | ||||||
Prospective | 0/0 | NA% | NA | 506/506 | 100% | 99.2% - 100% |
Pre-selected | 5/5 | 100% | 56.6% - 100% | 122/122 | 100% | 96.9% - 100% |
Combined | 5/5 | 100% | 56.6% - 100% | 628/628 | 100% | 99.4% - 100% |
Staphylococcus spp. | ||||||
Prospective | 316/322 | 98.1% | 96% - 99.1% | 182/184 | 98.9% | 96.1% - 99.7% |
Pre-selected | 20/20 | 100% | 83.9% - 100% | 107/107 | 100% | 96.5% - 100% |
Combined | 336/342³ | 98.2% | 96.2% - 99.2% | 289/291⁴ | 99.3% | 97.5% - 99.8% |
Staphylococcus aureus | ||||||
Prospective | 160/161 | 99.4% | 96.6% - 99.9% | 344/345 | 99.7% | 98.4% - 99.9% |
Pre-selected | 0/0 | NA % | NA | 127/127 | 100% | 97.1% - 100% |
Combined | 160/161 | 99.4% | 96.6% - 99.9% | 471/472⁵ | 99.8% | 98.8% - 100% |
Staphylococcus epidermidis | ||||||
Prospective | 93/96 | 96.9% | 91.2% - 98.9% | 405/410 | 98.8% | 97.2% - 99.5% |
Pre-selected | 0/0 | NA | NA | 126/127 | 99.2% | 95.7% - 99.9% |
Combined | 93/96⁶ | 96.9% | 91.2% - 98.9% | 531/537⁷ | 98.9% | 97.6% - 99.5% |
Staphylococcus lugdunensis | ||||||
Prospective | 6/6 | 100% | 61% - 100% | 500/500 | 100% | 99.2% - 100% |
Pre-selected | 20/20 | 100% | 83.9% - 100% | 107/107 | 100% | 96.5% - 100% |
Combined | 26/26 | 100% | 87.1% - 100% | 607/607 | 100% | 99.4% - 100% |
Streptococcus spp. | ||||||
Prospective | 97/98 | 99% | 94.4% - 99.8% | 406/408 | 99.5% | 98.2% - 99.9% |
Pre-selected | 78/80 | 97.5% | 91.3% - 99.3% | 47/47 | 100% | 92.4% - 100% |
Combined | 175/178 | 98.3% | 95.2% - 99.4% | 453/455⁸ | 99.6% | 98.4% - 99.9% |
Streptococcus agalactiae | ||||||
Prospective | 21/21 | 100% | 84.5% - 100% | 485/485 | 100% | 99.2% - 100% |
Pre-selected | 17/17 | 100% | 81.6% - 100% | 110/110 | 100% | 96.6% - 100% |
Combined | 38/38 | 100% | 90.8% - 100% | 595/595 | 100% | 99.4% - 100% |
Page 42
LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 37 of 43
Pathogen Target | Sensitivity/PPA | Specificity/NPA | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TP / (TP+FN) | Sensitivity /PPA (%) | 95% CI | TN / (TN+FP) | Specificity/NPA (%) | 95% CI | |
Streptococcus anginosus group | ||||||
Prospective | 8/9 | 88.9% | 56.5% - 98% | 496/497 | 99.8% | 98.9% - 100% |
Pre-selected | 25/26 | 96.2% | 81.1% - 99.3% | 101/101 | 100% | 96.3% - 100% |
Combined | 33/35 | 94.3% | 81.4% - 98.4% | 597/598⁹ | 99.8% | 99.1% - 100% |
Streptococcus pneumoniae | ||||||
Prospective | 11/11 | 100% | 74.1% - 100% | 494/495 | 99.8% | 98.9% - 100% |
Pre-selected | 21/21 | 100% | 84.5% - 100% | 106/106 | 100% | 96.5% - 100% |
Combined | 32/32 | 100% | 89.3% - 100% | 600/601 | 99.8% | 99.1% - 100% |
Streptococcus pyogenes | ||||||
Prospective | 21/21 | 100% | 84.5% - 100% | 485/485 | 100% | 99.2% - 100% |
Pre-selected | 16/16 | 100% | 80.6% - 100% | 111/111 | 100% | 96.7% - 100% |
Combined | 37/37 | 100% | 90.6% - 100% | 596/596 | 100% | 99.4% - 100% |
Resistance Marker Genes¹⁰ | ||||||
mecA/mecC | ||||||
Prospective | 155/157 | 98.7% | 95.5% - 99.6% | 154/161 | 95.7% | 91.3% - 97.9% |
Pre-selected | 3/3 | 100% | 43.9% - 100% | 18/18 | 100% | 82.4% - 100% |
Combined | 158/160 | 98.8% | 95.6% - 99.7% | 172/179 | 96.1% | 92.1% - 98.1% |
vanA | ||||||
Prospective | 8/8 | 100% | 67.6% - 100% | 47/47 | 100% | 92.4% - 100% |
Pre-selected | 22/22 | 100% | 85.1% - 100% | 1/1 | 100% | 20.7% - 100% |
Combined | 30/30 | 100% | 88.6% - 100% | 48/48 | 100% | 92.6% - 100% |
vanB | ||||||
Prospective | 1/1 | 100% | 20.7% - 100% | 54/54 | 100% | 93.4% - 100% |
Pre-selected | 0/0 | NA | NA | 23/23 | 100% | 85.7% - 100% |
¹The one Bacillus spp. FP was positive by Standard of Care MALDI-ToF assay.
²Out of two Enterococcus faecium FPs, one was positive by Standard of Care molecular and biochemical assays.
³Out of six Staphylococcus spp. FNs, one was negative by BDS and one was negative by Standard of Care MALDI-ToF assay.
⁴Out of two Staphylococcus spp. FPs, one was positive by BDS and one was positive by Standard of Care MALDI-ToF and molecular assays
⁵The one Staphylococcus aureus FP was positive by BDS and Standard of Care molecular assay.
⁶Out of three Staphylococcus epidermidis FNs, one was negative by BDS.
⁷Out of six Staphylococcus epidermidis FPs, three were positive by both BDS and Standard of Care MALDI-ToF assay, one was positive by both BDS and Standard of Care molecular assay and one was positive by Standard of Care MALDI-ToF assay and not tested by BDS.
⁸Out of two Streptococcus spp. FPs, one was positive by BDS and one was positive by Standard of Care molecular assay.
⁹The one Streptococcus anginosus group FP was positive by both BDS and Standard of Care molecular assay.
¹⁰The LIAISON PLEX BCP assay will report the presence or absence of resistance markers only if an applicable organism is also detected, therefore the total number of evaluable samples for each resistance marker is dependent on the number of applicable organisms enrolled.
Page 43
LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 38 of 43
Pathogen Target | Sensitivity/PPA | Specificity/NPA | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TP / (TP+FN) | Sensitivity /PPA (%) | 95% CI | TN / (TN+FP) | Specificity/NPA (%) | 95% CI | |
Combined | 1/1 | 100% | 20.7% - 100% | 77/77 | 100% | 95.3% - 100% |
Contrived Specimen Testing
For low-prevalence targets that did not reach the minimum number of positives from the combined prospective and pre-selected populations, a total of 225 specimens were contrived and tested as part of Arm 3. To minimize bias, contrived specimens were blinded, randomized, and tested along with negative clinical specimens at three external testing sites and one internal testing site between June 2024 to September 2024. Results from contrived specimens were analyzed separately from the prospective and pre-selected data sets.
Out of the 225 specimens included in the contrived study analysis, 211 specimens (93.8%) generated valid LIAISON PLEX BCP Assay results (i.e., Detected or Not Detected) on the first attempt. There were 14 specimens with an invalid result on the initial run. Of the 14 specimens retested, all 14 specimens generated a valid result after a single retest for a final testing success rate of 100% (225/225).
A summary of the contrived specimen set is provided in Table 21.
Table 21: Summary of Contrived Specimens
Organism | Resistance Marker(s) | Strain | # of Independent Specimens Tested |
---|---|---|---|
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens | NA | ATCC 23350 | 10 |
Bacillus atrophaeus | NA | ATCC 6455 | 10 |
Bacillus cereus | NA | ATCC 11778 | 10 |
Bacillus licheniformis | NA | ATCC 14580 | 10 |
Bacillus thuringiensis | NA | ATCC 10792 | 10 |
Bacillus spp. Total | 50 | ||
Enterococcus faecalis | vanB | ATCC 700802 | 10 |
ATCC 51299 | 10 | ||
64188262 | 10 | ||
Enterococcus faecalis Total | 30 | ||
Enterococcus faecium | vanB | ATCC 51858 | 10 |
JMI CS-712 | 10 | ||
Enterococcus faecium Total | 20 | ||
Listeria grayi | NA | ATCC 25401 | 10 |
Listeria innocua | NA | ATCC 33090 | 10 |
Listeria ivanovii | NA | ATCC 19119 | 10 |
Listeria monocytogenes | NA | ATCC 19114 | 8 |
Listeria welshimeri | NA | ATCC 35897 | 11 |
Listeria spp. Total | 49 | ||
Staphylococcus lugdunensis | NA | ATCC 84497462 | 50 |
Staphylococcus lugdunensis Total | 50 |
Page 44
LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 39 of 43
Clinical Performance (Sensitivity, Specificity, and 95% confidence interval) of the LIAISON PLEX® BCP Assay compared to the reference method is summarized in Table 22 for contrived specimens.
Table 22: Sensitivity/PPA and Specificity/NPA of Contrived Data Set – Arm 3
Pathogen Target | Sensitivity/PPA | Specificity/NPA | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Analyte | TP / (TP+FN) | Sensitivity/PPA (%) | 95% CI | TN /(TN+FP) | Specificity/NPA (%) | 95% CI |
Bacteria | ||||||
Bacillus spp. | 50/50 | 100% | 92.9% - 100% | 175/175 | 100% | 97.9% - 100% |
Enterococcus faecalis | 30/30 | 100% | 88.6% - 100% | 195/195 | 100% | 98.1% - 100% |
Enterococcus faecium | 20/20 | 100% | 83.9% - 100% | 205/205 | 100% | 98.2% - 100% |
Listeria spp. | 49/49 | 100% | 92.7% - 100% | 176/176 | 100% | 97.9% - 100% |
Staphylococcus spp. | 50/50 | 100% | 92.9% - 100% | 175/175 | 100% | 97.9% - 100% |
Staphylococcus aureus | 0/0 | NA | NA | 225/225 | 100% | 98.3% - 100% |
Staphylococcus epidermidis | 0/0 | NA | NA | 225/225 | 100% | 98.3% - 100% |
Staphylococcus lugdunensis | 50/50 | 100% | 92.9% - 100% | 175/175 | 100% | 97.9% - 100% |
Streptococcus spp. | 0/0 | NA | NA | 225/225 | 100% | 98.3% - 100% |
Streptococcus agalactiae | 0/0 | NA | NA | 225/225 | 100% | 98.3% - 100% |
Streptococcus anginosus group | 0/0 | NA | NA | 225/225 | 100% | 98.3% - 100% |
Streptococcus pneumoniae | 0/0 | NA | NA | 225/225 | 100% | 98.3% - 100% |
Streptococcus pyogenes | 0/0 | NA | NA | 225/225 | 100% | 98.3% - 100% |
Resistance Marker Genes¹ | ||||||
mecA/mecC | 0/0 | NA | NA | 50/50 | 100% | 92.9% - 100% |
vanA | 0/0 | NA | NA | 50/50 | 100% | 92.9% - 100% |
vanB | 50/50 | 100% | 92.9% - 100% | 0/0 | NA | NA |
¹The LIAISON PLEX BCP Assay will report the presence or absence of resistance markers only if an applicable organism is also detected. Therefore the total number of evaluable samples for each resistance marker is dependent on the number of applicable organisms enrolled.
LIAISON PLEX BCP Assay Performance for Genus-Level Targets by Species
The LIAISON PLEX BCP Assay reports genus-level results for Bacillus spp., Staphylococcus spp. and Streptococcus spp. Sensitivity/PPA for each of these target organisms stratified at the species level is presented in Table 23 below. Specimens with reference results of low discrimination between two species of the same genus that were not further resolved are listed as "spp. (unknown)".
Page 45
LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 40 of 43
Table 23: Sensitivity/PPA of Genus-level Targets, Stratified by Species
Organism | Prospective (Arm 1) | Pre-selected (Arm 2) | Contrived (Arm 3) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sensitivity/PPA | 95% CI | Sensitivity/PPA | 95% CI | Sensitivity/PPA | 95% CI | |
Bacillus spp. | 100% (1/1) | 20.7% - 100% | 89.5% (17/19) | 68.6% - 97.1% | 100% (50/50) | 92.9% - 100% |
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens | NA | NA | NA | NA | 100% (10/10) | 72.2% - 100% |
Bacillus atrophaeus | NA | NA | NA | NA | 100% (10/10) | 72.2% - 100% |
Bacillus cereus | NA | NA | NA | NA | 100% (10/10) | 72.2% - 100% |
Bacillus licheniformis | NA | NA | NA | NA | 100% (10/10) | 72.2% - 100% |
Bacillus thuringiensis | NA | NA | NA | NA | 100% (10/10) | 72.2% - 100% |
Listeria spp. | NA | NA | 100% (5/5) | 56.6% - 100% | 100% (49/49) | 92.7% - 100% |
Listeria grayi | NA | NA | NA | NA | 100% (10/10) | 72.2% - 100% |
Listeria innocua | NA | NA | NA | NA | 100% (10/10) | 72.2% - 100% |
Listeria ivanovii | NA | NA | NA | NA | 100% (10/10) | 72.2% - 100% |
Listeria monocytogenes | NA | NA | 100% (5/5) | 56.6% - 100% | 100% (8/8) | 67.6% - 100% |
Listeria welshimeri | NA | NA | NA | NA | 100% (11/11) | 74.1% - 100% |
Staphylococcus spp. | 98.1% (316/322) | 96% - 99.1% | 100% (20/20) | 83.9% - 100% | 100% (50/50) | 92.9% - 100% |
Staphylococcus aureus | 99.4% (160/161) | 96.6% - 99.9% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Staphylococcus epidermidis | 96.9% (93/96) | 91.2% - 98.9% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Staphylococcus lugdunensis | 100% (6/6) | 61% - 100% | 100% (20/20) | 83.9% - 100% | 100% (50/50) | 92.9% - 100% |
Staphylococcus arlettae | 100% (1/1) | 20.7% - 100% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Staphylococcus auricularis | 66.7% (2/3) | 20.8% - 93.9% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Staphylococcus capitis | 100% (9/9) | 70.1% - 100% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Staphylococcus caprae | 100% (1/1) | 20.7% - 100% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Staphylococcus haemolyticus | 100% (6/6) | 61% - 100% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Staphylococcus hominis | 96.3% (31/32) | 84.3% - 99.4% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Page 46
LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 41 of 43
Organism | Prospective (Arm 1) | Pre-selected (Arm 2) | Contrived (Arm 3) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sensitivity/PPA | 95% CI | Sensitivity/PPA | 95% CI | Sensitivity/PPA | 95% CI | |
Staphylococcus pseudintermedius | 100% (1/1) | 20.7% - 100% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Staphylococcus saccharolyticus | 0% (0/1) | 0% - 79.3% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Staphylococcus saprophyticus | 100% (1/1) | 20.7% - 100% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Staphylococcus simulans | 100% (1/1) | 20.7% - 100% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Staphylococcus vitulinus | 0% (0/1) | 0% - 79.3% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Staphylococcus warneri | 100% (3/3) | 43.9% - 100% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Staphylococcus spp. Unknown | 87.5% (7/8) | 52.9% - 97.8% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Streptococcus spp. | 99% (97/98) | 94.4% - 99.8% | 97.5% (78/80)¹ | 91.3% - 99.3% | NA | NA |
Streptococcus agalactiae | 100% (21/21) | 84.5% - 100% | 100% (17/17) | 81.6% - 100% | NA | NA |
Streptococcus anginosus | 88.9% (8/9) | 56.5% - 98% | 96.2% (25/26) | 81.1% - 99.3% | NA | NA |
Streptococcus pneumoniae | 100% (11/11) | 74.1% - 100% | 100% (21/21) | 84.5% - 100% | NA | NA |
Streptococcus pyogenes | 100% (21/21) | 84.5% - 100% | 100% (16/16) | 80.6% - 100% | NA | NA |
Streptococcus dysgalactiae | 100% (15/15) | 79.6% - 100% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Streptococcus gallolyticus | 100% (1/1) | 20.7% - 100% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Streptococcus gordonii | 100% (4/4) | 51% - 100% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Streptococcus parasanguinis | 100% (1/1) | 20.7% - 100% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Streptococcus salivarius | 100% (2/2) | 34.2% - 100% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Streptococcus sanguinis | 100% (2/2) | 34.2% - 100% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Streptococcus spp. Unknown | 100% (11/11) | 74.1% - 100% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
¹For one specimen the assay returned a true positive call for Streptococcus anginosus without detecting Streptococcus spp. As a result, there are two total FNs for the Streptococcus spp. target, but only one listed when stratified by species.
The clinical performance for each resistance marker stratified by eligible organism (identified by the reference method for clinical specimens or the inoculated organism for contrived specimens) is listed in Tables 24-26.
Page 47
LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 42 of 43
Table 24: Performance of mecA/mecC, Stratified by Organism
Organism | Prospective (Arm 1) | Pre-selected (Arm 2) | Contrived (Arm 3) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sensitivity/PPA | 95% CI | Sensitivity/PPA | 95% CI | Sensitivity/PPA | 95% CI | |
Staphylococcus aureus | 100% (64/64) | 94.3% - 100% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Staphylococcus epidermidis | 97% (65/67) | 89.8% - 99.2% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Staphylococcus lugdunensis | 100% (4/4) | 51% - 100% | 100% (3/3) | 43.8% - 100% | NA | NA |
Staphylococcus capitis | 100% (2/2) | 34.2% - 100% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Staphylococcus haemolyticus | 100% (6/6) | 61.0% - 100% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Staphylococcus hominis | 100% (12/12) | 75.7% – 100% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Spp. unknown | 100% (2/2) | 34.2% - 100% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Overall | 98.70% (155/157) | 95.4% - 99.6% | 100% (3/3) | 43.8% - 100% | NA | NA |
Table 25: Performance of vanA, Stratified by Organism
Organism | Prospective (Arm 1) | Pre-selected (Arm 2) | Contrived (Arm 3) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sensitivity/PPA | 95% CI | Sensitivity/PPA | 95% CI | Sensitivity/PPA | 95% CI | |
Enterococcus faecalis | NA | NA | 100% (2/2) | 34.2% - 100% | NA | NA |
Enterococcus faecium | 100% (8/8) | 67.6% - 100% | 100% (20/20) | 83.9% - 100% | NA | NA |
Overall | 100% (8/8) | 67.6% - 100% | 100% (22/22) | 85.1% - 100% | NA | NA |
Table 26: Performance of vanB, Stratified by Organism
Organism | Prospective (Arm 1) | Pre-selected (Arm 2) | Contrived (Arm 3) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sensitivity/PPA | 95% CI | Sensitivity/PPA | 95% CI | Sensitivity/PPA | 95% CI | |
Enterococcus faecalis | NA | NA | NA | NA | 100% (30/30) | 88.6% - 100% |
Enterococcus faecium | 100% (1/1) | 20.7% - 100% | NA | NA | 100% (20/20) | 83.9% - 100% |
Overall | 100% (1/1) | 20.7% - 100% | NA | NA | 100% (50/50) | 92.9% - 100% |
Page 48
LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 43 of 43
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling provided in the submission satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.