K Number
K243277
Device Name
Freedom® Medial Congruent Liner
Date Cleared
2024-11-19

(34 days)

Product Code
Regulation Number
888.3560
AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP Authorized
Intended Use
The Freedom® Medial Congruent Liner consists of an ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) liner that is designed to be used with the Freedom® Total Knee Cruciate Retaining (CR) Femoral Components in the Freedom® Total Knee System. The Freedom® Total Knee System is indicated for the following: - · Severe knee joint pain, loss of mobility, and disability due to: rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, and polyarthritis. - · Correction of functional deformities. - · Post-traumatic loss of knee ioin contour, particularly when there is patellofemoral erosion. - dysfunction, and/or prior patellectomy. - · Moderate valqus, varus, or flexion trauma. - · Knee fractures untreatable by other methods. The Freedom® Medial Congruent Tibial Liner is intended for cemented use only. This device is for single use only.
Device Description
Freedom® Medial Congruent Liners have been developed with the desire to achieve a higher level of constraint than typically achieved in a traditional CR knee design while also providing the femoral component with a medial-pivoting motion throughout a range of motion. They possess an anterior and buildup and a higher sagittal conformity of the medial compartment that interact with the femoral component, to provide additional constraint. Designed to be used with the Freedom CR Femoral Component. Eliminates the need to remove bone for a PS box. Designed to allow high flexion. Includes a deep anterior patellar cut-out to allow for tendon clearance. Facilitates intraoperative flexibility, given compatibility with existing femoral and tibial baseplate options
More Information

No
The device description and performance studies focus on the mechanical properties and design of a knee implant component, with no mention of AI or ML.

Yes

The device is a "knee" liner designed to be used with "Freedom® Total Knee Cruciate Retaining (CR) Femoral Components". This system is "indicated for the following: Severe knee joint pain, loss of mobility, and disability due to: rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, and polyarthritis. Correction of functional deformities. Post-traumatic loss of knee ioin contour, particularly when there is patellofemoral erosion. dysfunction, and/or prior patellectomy. Moderate valqus, varus, or flexion trauma. Knee fractures untreatable by other methods." These are all conditions that require medical treatment through a therapeutic device.

No

Explanation: The device is a knee implant component (liner) designed for surgical replacement in patients with severe knee joint pain, loss of mobility, and functional deformities. It is a therapeutic device, not a diagnostic one.

No

The device description clearly states it is a physical component (UHMWPE liner) designed to be used with other physical components (femoral components) of a total knee system. The performance studies involve physical testing of this component.

Based on the provided information, this device is not an IVD (In Vitro Diagnostic).

Here's why:

  • Intended Use: The intended use clearly states that the device is a component of a total knee system used for surgical implantation to address various knee joint conditions. This is a therapeutic and reconstructive purpose, not a diagnostic one.
  • Device Description: The description details the physical characteristics and function of the liner as a component within a knee implant system. It does not describe any function related to analyzing biological samples or providing diagnostic information.
  • Performance Studies: The performance studies focus on mechanical properties and range of motion within the knee joint, which are relevant to the function of an implant, not a diagnostic test.
  • Lack of IVD Characteristics: There is no mention of analyzing biological samples (blood, urine, tissue, etc.), detecting biomarkers, or providing information for diagnosis, monitoring, or screening of diseases or conditions in vitro.

Therefore, the Freedom® Medial Congruent Liner is a surgical implant, not an In Vitro Diagnostic device.

N/A

Intended Use / Indications for Use

The Freedom® Medial Congruent Liner consists of an ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) liner that is designed to be used with the Freedom® Total Knee Cruciate Retaining (CR) Femoral Components in the Freedom® Total Knee System. The Freedom® Total Knee System is indicated for the following:

  • Severe knee joint pain, loss of mobility, and disability due to: rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, and polyarthritis.
  • Correction of functional deformities.
  • Post-traumatic loss of knee ioin contour, particularly when there is patellofemoral erosion.
  • dysfunction, and/or prior patellectomy.
  • Moderate valqus, varus, or flexion trauma.
  • Knee fractures untreatable by other methods.

The Freedom® Medial Congruent Tibial Liner is intended for cemented use only. This device is for single use only.

Product codes

JWH

Device Description

Freedom® Medial Congruent Liners have been developed with the desire to achieve a higher level of constraint than typically achieved in a traditional CR knee design while also providing the femoral component with a medial-pivoting motion throughout a range of motion. They possess an anterior and buildup and a higher sagittal conformity of the medial compartment that interact with the femoral component, to provide additional constraint. Designed to be used with the Freedom CR Femoral Component. Eliminates the need to remove bone for a PS box. Designed to allow high flexion. Includes a deep anterior patellar cut-out to allow for tendon clearance. Facilitates intraoperative flexibility, given compatibility with existing femoral and tibial baseplate options.

The Freedom® Medial Congruent Liner is intended for use with the currently available, FDA Cleared, Freedom® Total Knee Cruciate Retaining (CR) Femoral Component (K082019) as part of total knee replacement (TKR) surgery. Total knee replacement surgery is a procedure where worn, diseased, or damaged surfaces of the knee joint are removed and replaced with artificial surfaces. The MC Tibial insert will be a prescription product consisting of single use only, implantable devices for implanting into patients in an operating theatre by a qualified surgeon.

The devices are to be packaged and terminally sterilized by ethylene oxide. The packaging is to keep devices sterilized for 5 years. The packaging will be able to be opened easily in an operating theatre without instruments and in a manner that allows the implant to remain sterile.

The MC tibial inserts have been developed with the desire to achieve a medial stability of the CR femoral component while also providing posterior femoral rollback of the lateral condyle throughout a range of motion to provide the knee with a medial-pivoting motion, which more closely replicates natural motion. They possess an anterior buildup and a high level of conformity to the femoral condyle in the sagittal plane of the medial compartment to enable a high level of constraint and stability. Additionally, the lateral compartment features a decreased anterior and posterior lip as well as a decreased sagittal conformity to the lateral condyle of the CR femoral component to allow for mobility in the A/P aspect. The MC tibial inserts are designed to eliminate the need to remove bone for a PS box and allow for high flexion with the anterior buildyp of the medial compartment to increase subluxation forces relative to more traditional CR tibial inserts.

The modular Freedom Knee tibial component is composed of a UHMWPE tibial insert inserted into a metal tibial tray. The MC tibial inserts will be used with the current tibial trays. The A/P and M/L aspect of the MC insert and UC insert are identical. The topographical footprints of the UC insert are also identical. The material and locking tab geometry of the MC tibial insert are identical to the current Freedom UC tibial insert. Therefore, the tibial insert inserts and disassembly forces with the tray can be considered the same for the MC tibial insert as for the UC tibial insertion and disassembly testing is needed. A dimensional diagram of the bearing surfaces of the MC tibial inserts is included in this submission. Those dimensions integral to the compatibility of insert size are shown to be the same for the MC tibial insert as the UC tibial insert. In addition, dimensions defining the insert thickness and the location of the most distal point of the tibial condyles are comparable between the MC and UC tibial inserts. The sizing and compatibility of the MC tibial inserts and the Freedom CR femoral components is therefore the same as for the existing UC tibial inserts and femoral components.

The Subject Device's articular surface is asymmetric in that its medial compartment and lateral compartment each feature different articular sagittal radii. The Subject Device differs from the Predicate Device in the design of the medial anterior lip of the insert, in that it is slightly elevated with the desire to achieve a medial stability of the CR femoral component. The subject device's medial compartment also features an increased sagittal conformity at full extension with respect to the mating CR femoral compared to that of the Predicate Device. The lateral compartment of the Subject Device features a decreased sagittal conformity compared to the Predicate Device while also featuring a decreased anterior and posterior buildup compared to the Predicate Device to enable greater A/P translation of the femoral component's lateral condyle throughout a range of motion.

Mentions image processing

Not Found

Mentions AI, DNN, or ML

Not Found

Input Imaging Modality

Not Found

Anatomical Site

knee joint

Indicated Patient Age Range

Not Found

Intended User / Care Setting

qualified surgeon / operating theatre

Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol

Not Found

Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol

Not Found

Summary of Performance Studies

The following tests were performed on the Subject Device and compared to the Predicate Device:

  • Tibiofemoral Range of Motion (ASTM F2083 6.2.3): Simulated Computer-Aided-Design software determined the range of motion (maximum flexion angle) of the Subject Device was equivalent to the Predicate Device.
  • Tibiofemoral Constraint Characterization (ASTM F1223 and F2083): The purpose of this study was to characterize the anterior (A/P), medial/lateral (M/L), and internal/external constraint of the articular surface through the required various degrees of flexion as compared to the Predicate Device. The results satisfied the preestablished benchmark performance in comparison to the Predicate Device.
  • Tibiofemoral Contact Area and Contact Pressure (ASTM 2083 6.2.2): Determined the contact area and contact pressure of the articular surface of the Subject Device and compared with the previously recorded results of the Predicate device at the required flexion angles and orientations. The contact area and contact pressure was found to be equivalent throughout a range of motion compared to the Predicate Device.

Key Metrics

Not Found

Predicate Device(s)

K182574

Reference Device(s)

K082019

Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information

Not Found

§ 888.3560 Knee joint patellofemorotibial polymer/metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis.

(a)
Identification. A knee joint patellofemorotibial polymer/metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a knee joint. The device limits translation and rotation in one or more planes via the geometry of its articulating surfaces. It has no linkage across-the-joint. This generic type of device includes prostheses that have a femoral component made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, and a tibial component or components and a retropatellar resurfacing component made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. This generic type of device is limited to those prostheses intended for use with bone cement (§ 888.3027).(b)
Classification. Class II.

0

Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logos of the Department of Health & Human Services and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The Department of Health & Human Services logo is on the left, and the FDA logo is on the right. The FDA logo is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.

November 19, 2024

Maxx Orthopedics, Inc. Donald Guthner Director, Regulatory Affairs 2460 General Armistead Avenue Suite 100 Norristown, Pennsylvania 19403

Re: K243277

Trade/Device Name: Freedom® Medial Congruent Liner Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3560 Regulation Name: Knee Joint Patellofemorotibial Polymer Semi-Constrained Cemented Prosthesis Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: JWH Dated: October 16, 2024 Received: October 16, 2024

Dear Donald Guthner:

We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug. and Cosmetic Act (that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.

If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of

1

Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.

Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).

Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).

Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.

All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advicecomprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.

Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.

For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the

2

Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).

Sincerely,

Lixin Liu-S

Lixin Liu, Ph.D Assistant Director DHT6A: Division of Joint Arthroplasty Devices OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health

Enclosure

3

Indications for Use

Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: 07/31/2026 See PRA Statement below.

Submission Number (if known)

K243277

Device Name

Freedom® Medial Congruent Liner

Indications for Use (Describe)

The Freedom® Medial Congruent Liner consists of an ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) liner that is designed to be used with the Freedom® Total Knee Cruciate Retaining (CR) Femoral Components in the Freedom® Total Knee System. The Freedom® Total Knee System is indicated for the following:

  • · Severe knee joint pain, loss of mobility, and disability due to: rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, and polyarthritis.
  • · Correction of functional deformities.
  • · Post-traumatic loss of knee ioin contour, particularly when there is patellofemoral erosion.
  • dysfunction, and/or prior patellectomy.
  • · Moderate valqus, varus, or flexion trauma.
  • · Knee fractures untreatable by other methods.

The Freedom® Medial Congruent Tibial Liner is intended for cemented use only. This device is for single use only.

Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)

Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)

Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)

CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.

This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.

The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:

Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov

"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."

4

510(k) Summary

2460 General Armistead Ave, Suite 100

Maxx Orthopedics, Inc.

Norristown, PA 19403 United States of America

646-460-2984

Mr. Donald Guthner

21CFR 807.92(a)(1)

CONTACT DETAILS: Applicant Name: Applicant Address:

Applicant Contact Telephone: Applicant Contact: Applicant Contact Email:

DEVICE NAME Device Trade Name: Common Name: Classification Name:

Regulation Number: Product Code(s)

LEGALLY MARKETED PREDICATE DEVICES

Predicate # K182574

Predicate Trade Name Freedom Ultracongruent CR Tibial Liner 21CFR 807.92(a)(3)

Product Code JWH

DEVICE DESCRIPTION SUMMARY

21CFR 807.92(a)(4)

Freedom® Medial Congruent Liners have been developed with the desire to achieve a higher level of constraint than typically achieved in a traditional CR knee design while also providing the femoral component with a medial-pivoting motion throughout a range of motion. They possess an anterior and buildup and a higher sagittal conformity of the medial compartment that interact with the femoral component, to provide additional constraint.

Designed to be used with the Freedom CR Femoral Component.

Eliminates the need to remove bone for a PS box.

Designed to allow high flexion.

Includes a deep anterior patellar cut-out to allow for tendon clearance.

Facilitates intraoperative flexibility, given compatibility with existing femoral and tibial baseplate options

INTENDED USE/INDICATIONS FOR USE

The Freedom® Medial Congruent Liner consists of an ultra-hight polyethylene (UHMWPE) liner that is designed to be used with the Freedom® Total Knee Cruciate Retaining (CR) Femoral Components in the Freedom® Total Knee System. The Freedom® Total Knee System is indicated for the following:

  • · Severe knee joint pain, loss of mobility, and disability due to: rheumatoid arthritis, traumatic arthritis, and polyarthritis.
  • · Correction of functional deformities.
  • · Post-traumatic loss of knee join contour, particularly when there is patellofemoral erosion, dysfunction, and/or prior patellectomy.
  • Moderate valgus, varus, or flexion trauma.

21CFR 807.92(a)(5)

Don.quthner(@maxxortho.com 21CFR 807.92(a)(2) Freedom® Medial Congruent Liner

Medial Congruent CR Tibial Liner Knee joint patellofemorotibial polymer/metal/polymer semi constrained cemented prosthesis 21 CFR 888.3560 JWH

5

· Knee fractures untreatable by other methods.

The Freedom® Medial Congruent Tibial Liner is intended for cemented use only. This device is for single use only.

INDICATIONS FOR USE COMPARISON

21CFR 807.92(a)(5)

21CFR 807.92(a)(6)

The Indications for Use Statements are identical between the Subject Device and the Predicate Device.

TECHNOLOGICAL COMPARISON

DEVICE DESCRIPTION AND COMPARISON TO CLEARED DEVICE

The Freedom® Medial Congruent Liner is intended for use with the currently available, FDA Cleared, Freedom® Total Knee Cruciate Retaining (CR) Femoral Component (K082019) as part of total knee replacement (TKR) surgery. Total knee replacement surgery is a procedure where worn, diseased, or damaged surfaces of the knee joint are removed and replaced with artificial surfaces. The MC Tibial insert will be a prescription product consisting of single use only, implantable devices for implanting into patients in an operating theatre by a qualified surgeon.

The devices are to be packaged and terminally sterilized by ethylene oxide. The packaging is to keep devices sterilized for 5 years. The packaging will be able to be opened easily in an operating theatre without instruments and in a manner that allows the implant to remain sterile.

The MC tibial inserts have been developed with the desire to achieve a medial stability of the CR femoral component while also providing posterior femoral rollback of the lateral condyle throughout a range of motion to provide the knee with a medial-pivoting motion, which more closely replicates natural motion. They possess an anterior buildup and a high level of conformity to the femoral condyle in the sagittal plane of the medial compartment to enable a high level of constraint and stability. Additionally, the lateral compartment features a decreased anterior and posterior lip as well as a decreased sagittal conformity to the lateral condyle of the CR femoral component to allow for mobility in the A/P aspect. The MC tibial inserts are designed to eliminate the need to remove bone for a PS box and allow for high flexion with the anterior buildyp of the medial compartment to increase subluxation forces relative to more traditional CR tibial inserts.

The modular Freedom Knee tibial component is composed of a UHMWPE tibial insert inserted into a metal tibial tray. The MC tibial inserts will be used with the current tibial trays. The A/P and M/L aspect of the MC insert and UC insert are identical. The topographical footprints of the UC insert are also identical. The material and locking tab geometry of the MC tibial insert are identical to the current Freedom UC tibial insert. Therefore, the tibial insert inserts and disassembly forces with the tray can be considered the same for the MC tibial insert as for the UC tibial insertion and disassembly testing is needed. A dimensional diagram of the bearing surfaces of the MC tibial inserts is included in this submission. Those dimensions integral to the compatibility of insert size are shown to be the same for the MC tibial insert as the UC tibial insert. In addition, dimensions defining the insert thickness and the location of the most distal point of the tibial condyles are comparable between the MC and UC tibial inserts. The sizing and compatibility of the MC tibial inserts and the Freedom CR femoral components is therefore the same as for the existing UC tibial inserts and femoral components.

The Subject Device's articular surface is asymmetric in that its medial compartment and lateral compartment each feature different articular sagittal radii. The Subject Device differs from the Predicate Device in the

6

design of the medial anterior lip of the insert, in that it is slightly elevated with the desire to achieve a medial stability of the CR femoral component. The subject device's medial compartment also features an increased sagittal conformity at full extension with respect to the mating CR femoral compared to that of the Predicate Device. The lateral compartment of the Subject Device features a decreased sagittal conformity compared to the Predicate Device while also featuring a decreased anterior and posterior buildup compared to the Predicate Device to enable greater A/P translation of the femoral component's lateral condyle throughout a range of motion.

NON-CLINICAL and/or CLINICAL TESTS SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 21 CFR 807.92 (b) The following tests were performed on the Subject Device and compared to the Predicate Device:

  • Tibiofemoral Range of Motion (ASTM F2083 6.2.3)
    • O Simulated Computer-Aided-Design software determined the range of motion (maximum flexion angle) of the Subject Device was equivalent to the Predicate Device.
  • Tibiofemoral Constraint Characterization (ASTM F1223 and F2083) ●
    • The purpose of this study was to characterize the anterior (A/P), medial/lateral O (M/L), and internal/external constraint of the articular surface through the required various degrees of flexion as compared to the Predicate Device. The results satisfied the preestablished benchmark performance in comparison to the Predicate Device.
  • Tibiofemoral Contact Area and Contact Pressure (ASTM 2083 6.2.2) ●
    • Determined the contact area and contact pressure of the articular surface of the Subject Device O and compared with the previously recorded results of the Predicate device at the required flexion angles and orientations. The contact area and contact pressure was found to be equivalent throughout a range of motion compared to the Predicate Device.

Conclusion: The Freedom® Medial Congruent Liner design does not raise any different questions of safety or effectiveness. The intended use, indications for use, and technological characteristics, of the Freedom® Medial Congruent Liner are substantially equivalent to the predicate Freedom Ultracongruent CR Tibial Liner.