(276 days)
The IPL Treatment Device (Model: MDSQMC-01) is intended for use in surgical and aesthetic applications in permanent hair removal, reduction of benign pigmented lesions and benign vascular lesions.
Mild to moderate inflammatory Acne (Acne vulgaris)
Permanent hair reduction is defined as the long-term, stable reduction in the number of hairs regrowing when measured at 6, 9,and 12 months after the completion of a treatment regimen.
The IPL Treatment Device is an intense pulsed light system which delivers intense pulsed light at a wavelength ranging from 400nm-1200nm, Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) systems work on the principles of selective thermolysis. That is, causing thermal damage to target chromophores by using light of appropriate wavelength in pulses that exceeds the chromophores' thermal relaxation time but sparing normal skin by limiting the pulse width below the thermal relaxation time for skin. IPL Systems are different from lasers in that they deliver many wavelengths in each pulse of light instead of just one wavelength. Generally, IPL enhances penetration without using excessive energy levels and enables targeting of specific chromophores. Based on this, the IPL Treatment Device (inclusive of the handpiece used to deliver pulsed-light energy) is indicated for use in surgical and aesthetic applications in permanent hair removal, and reduction of benign pigmented lesions and benign vascular lesions.
The provided FDA 510(k) clearance letter and summary for the IPL Treatment Device (Model: MDSQMC-01) primarily focus on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device through technical specifications, safety, and biocompatibility testing. It does not contain information about acceptance criteria and clinical study results that would typically prove a device meets those criteria for performance-based claims.
Specifically, the document states:
- "The following performance data were provided in support of the substantial equivalence determination."
- It then lists Biocompatibility Testing, Electrical Safety and EMC, Eye Safety, Software Verification and Validation, and Usability.
These are non-clinical performance data related to the device's safety and fundamental operation, not its clinical efficacy or diagnostic performance as would be demonstrated in studies with acceptance criteria for patient outcomes or diagnostic accuracy.
Therefore, many of the requested details about acceptance criteria and clinical study types (like MRMC studies, ground truth establishment, expert qualifications, sample sizes for test/training sets, effect sizes) are not present in the provided text.
Based on the information available:
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
The document does not explicitly state performance-based acceptance criteria for its indicated uses (permanent hair removal, reduction of benign pigmented/vascular lesions, mild to moderate inflammatory Acne) nor does it provide clinical study results against such criteria. The "Performance Data" section details safety and engineering tests, not clinical performance outcomes.
2. Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)
This information is not provided in the document. The document lists non-clinical testing (biocompatibility, electrical safety, etc.) but does not describe any clinical test sets, their sizes, or provenance.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)
This information is not provided. As no clinical test set is detailed, there's no mention of experts or ground truth establishment relevant to clinical performance.
4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set
This information is not provided.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
This information is not provided. The device is an IPL treatment device, not a diagnostic AI device that would typically participate in MRMC studies to evaluate human reader improvement with AI assistance.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
This information is not provided. The device is a physical IPL treatment device, not a standalone algorithm.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)
This information is not provided for clinical performance. The "ground truth" for the non-clinical tests would be the established standards (e.g., ISO, IEC norms) that the device successfully met.
8. The sample size for the training set
This information is not provided. As no clinical efficacy study is described, there is no mention of a training set.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
This information is not provided.
Summary of available "Performance Data" which are non-clinical:
| Acceptance Criteria (Standard Compliance) | Reported Device Performance (Passed/Compliant) |
|---|---|
| Biocompatibility Testing: | |
| ISO 10993-5 (Cytotoxicity) | No toxicity |
| ISO 10993-10 (Skin Sensitization) | No significant evidence of causing skin sensitization |
| ISO 10993-23 (Skin Irritation) | Applied sample did not induce irritation |
| Electrical Safety and EMC: | |
| IEC 60601-1-2 (EMC) | Compliant |
| IEC 60601-1 (Basic Safety & Essential Performance) | Compliant |
| IEC 60601-2-57 (Non-laser light source) | Compliant |
| Eye Safety: | |
| IEC 62471 (Photobiological safety) | Compliant |
| Software Verification and Validation: | |
| Basic Documentation risk level | All software requirement specifications met, hazards mitigated |
| Usability (FDA Guidance) | Evaluated and Verified |
The study that proves the device meets these acceptance criteria are the laboratory and engineering tests listed under "Performance Data," demonstrating compliance with the referenced international standards (ISO, IEC) for safety and software functionality, and adherence to FDA guidance for usability. These studies were performed by the manufacturer as part of their submission without specific mention of external labs or detailed methodologies beyond the standard references.
FDA 510(k) Clearance Letter - IPL Treatment Device
Page 1
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue Doc ID# 04017.07.05
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
July 3, 2025
Medusa (Guangxi)Medical Devices Co., Ltd.
℅ Candice Qiu
Registration Specialist
Feiying Drug & Medical Consulting Technical Service Group
Rm 2401 Zhenye International Business Center, No. 3101-90,
Qianhai Road
Shenzhen, Guangdong 518052
China
Re: K243123
Trade/Device Name: IPL Treatment Device (MDSQMC-01)
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.4810
Regulation Name: Laser Surgical Instrument For Use In General And Plastic Surgery And In Dermatology
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: ONF
Dated: July 3, 2025
Received: July 3, 2025
Dear Candice Qiu:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Page 2
K243123 - Candice Qiu Page 2
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-
Page 3
K243123 - Candice Qiu Page 3
assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
MARK MACIOS -S Digitally signed by MARK MACIOS -S Date: 2025.07.03 11:56:25 -04'00'
for Tanisha Hithe
Assistant Director
DHT4A: Division of General Surgery Devices
OHT4: Office of Surgical and
Infection Control Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
Page 4
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120
Expiration Date: 07/31/2026
See PRA Statement below.
Indications for Use
Submission Number (if known)
K243123
Device Name
IPL Treatment Device (MDSQMC-01)
Indications for Use (Describe)
The IPL Treatment Device (Model: MDSQMC-01) is intended for use in surgical and aesthetic applications in permanent hair removal, reduction of benign pigmented lesions and benign vascular lesions.
Mild to moderate inflammatory Acne (Acne vulgaris)
Permanent hair reduction is defined as the long-term, stable reduction in the number of hairs regrowing when measured at 6, 9,and 12 months after the completion of a treatment regimen.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
☒ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services
Food and Drug Administration
Office of Chief Information Officer
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff
PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
Page 5
MEDUSA (Guangxi) Medical Devices Co., Ltd. 510(k)s -510(k) Summary
Page 1 of 9
510(k) Summary of K243123
"510(k) Summary" as required by 21 CFR Part 807.92.
I. Submitter
MEDUSA (Guangxi) Medical Devices Co., Ltd.
Address: Room 602, Building 1, Intersection of Renhou Road and Weier Road(Northwest side), Yulin Traditional Chinese Medicine Health Industrial Park, Renhou Town, YuLin City, Guangdong Province, China
Contact Person: Zhanai Chen
Title: General Manager
Tel: +86 13825005622
Email: mds13825005622@126.com
Preparation date: 07/03/2025
II. Device
Name of Device: IPL Treatment Device
Model(s): MDSQMC-01
Regulation Name: Powered Light Based Non-Laser Surgical Instrument With Thermal Effect
Regulatory Class: II
Product Code: ONF
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.4810
III. Predicate Device and Reference Device
Predicate device:
| Manufacturer | Predicate Device | 510(k) Number | Approval Date |
Page 6
MEDUSA (Guangxi) Medical Devices Co., Ltd. 510(k)s -510(k) Summary
Page 2 of 9
| Manufacturer | Predicate Device | 510(k) Number | Approval Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shangdong Huamei Technology Co., Ltd. | The Intense Pulsed Light Treatment System, (Model: HM-IPL-B8) | K230816 | April 21, 2023 |
Reference device:
| Manufacturer | Reference Device | 510(k) Number | Approval Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beijing Superlaser Technology Co., Ltd. | IPL Treatment Device, (Model: AAD Dual Light) | K192519 | November 6, 2019 |
| Lumenis Ltd. | Stellar M22 for Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) and Laser system | K193500 | January 16, 2020 |
IV. Device Description
The IPL Treatment Device is an intense pulsed light system which delivers intense pulsed light at a wavelength ranging from 400nm-1200nm, Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) systems work on the principles of selective thermolysis. That is, causing thermal damage to target chromophores by using light of appropriate wavelength in pulses that exceeds the chromophores' thermal relaxation time but sparing normal skin by limiting the pulse width below the thermal relaxation time for skin. IPL Systems are different from lasers in that they deliver many wavelengths in each pulse of light instead of just one wavelength. Generally, IPL enhances penetration without using excessive energy levels and enables targeting of specific chromophores. Based on this, the IPL Treatment Device (inclusive of the handpiece used to deliver pulsed-light energy) is indicated for use in surgical and aesthetic applications in permanent hair removal, and reduction of benign pigmented lesions and benign vascular lesions.
V. Indications for Use
The IPL Treatment Device (Model: MDSQMC-01) is intended for use in surgical and aesthetic applications in permanent hair removal, reduction of benign pigmented lesions and benign vascular lesions. Mild to moderate inflammatory Acne (Acne vulgaris).
Page 7
MEDUSA (Guangxi) Medical Devices Co., Ltd. 510(k)s -510(k) Summary
Page 3 of 9
Permanent hair reduction is defined as the long-term, stable reduction in the number of hairs regrowing when measured at 6, 9,and 12 months after the completion of a treatment regimen.
VI. Materials
| Component name | Body Contact Category | Contact Duration |
|---|---|---|
| IPL Treatment Device (Handle, Light guide, Expertfilter) | Surface-contacting device: Intact skin | Less than 24 hours |
VII. Comparison of Technological Characteristics With the Predicate Device
The IPL Treatment Device has the same intended use, mode of action and similar operational characteristics as the predicate device. Any minor differences between the subject device and the listed predicate device and reference devices do no raise any issues of safety or efficacy. Performance data supports that the device is safe and as effective as the predicate device and reference devices for its intended use. Therefore, the IPL Treatment Device may be found substantially equivalent to its predicate device and reference devices. IPL Treatment Device is compared with the following Predicate Device and Reference Devices in terms of intended use, design, material, specifications, and performance:
| Comparison Elements | Subject Device | Predicate Device | Reference devices 1 | Reference devices 2 | Remark |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 510(k) Number | Pending | K230816 | K192519 | K193500 | / |
| Trade name | IPL Treatment Device, (Model: MDSQMC-01) | The Intense Pulsed Light Treatment System, (Model: HM-IPL-B8) | Multi-modality workstation, (Model: AAD Dual Light) | Stellar M22 for Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) and Laser system | / |
Page 8
MEDUSA (Guangxi) Medical Devices Co., Ltd. 510(k)s -510(k) Summary
Page 4 of 9
| Comparison Elements | Subject Device | Predicate Device | Reference devices 1 | Reference devices 2 | Remark |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | MEDUSA (Guangxi) Medical Devices Co., Ltd. | Shangdong Huamei Technology Co., Ltd. | Beijing Superlaser Technology Co., Ltd. | Lumenis Ltd. | / |
| Regulation number | 21 CFR 878.4810 | 21 CFR 878.4810 | 21 CFR 878.4810 | 21 CFR 878.4810 | Same |
| Product code | ONF | ONF | ONF | GEX, ONF, ONG | Same |
| Device classification | Class II | Class II | Class II | Class II | Same |
| Indication for use/ Intended use | The IPL Treatment Device (Model: MDSQMC-01) is intended for use in surgical and aesthetic applications in permanent hair removal, reduction of benign pigmented lesions and benign vascular lesions. Mild to moderate inflammatory Acne (Acne vulgaris). Permanent hair reduction is defined as the long-term, stable reduction in the number of hairs regrowing when measured at 6, 9,and 12 | The Intense Pulsed Light Treatment System (Model:HM-IPL-B8) are indicated for use in surgical and aesthetic applications in permanent hair removal, reduction of benign pigmented lesions and benign vascular lesions. Permanent hair reduction is defined as the long-term, stable reduction in the number of hairs regrowing when measured at 6, 9,and 12 months after the completion of a treatment regimen. | The Multi-modality workstation (inclusive of the andpiece used to deliver ulsed-light energy) is indicated for se in surgical and aesthetic pplications in permanent hair emoval, reduction of benign igmented lesions and benign ascular lesions. Permanent hair reduction is defined s the long-term, stable reduction in he number of hairs regrowing when easured at 6, 9, and 12 months fter the completion of a | The Lumenis Stellar M22 has connection capability with the following available treatment handpieces, for multi-application treatment options. All handpieces are designed for aesthetic and dermatological skin procedure applications, as follows: The Stellar Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) handpiece with a spectrum of 400-1200 nm (with 9 different filters) is indicated for: | Same |
Page 9
MEDUSA (Guangxi) Medical Devices Co., Ltd. 510(k)s -510(k) Summary
Page 5 of 9
| Comparison Elements | Subject Device | Predicate Device | Reference devices 1 | Reference devices 2 | Remark |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| months after the completion of a treatment regimen. | treatment egimen. | o Benign epidermal lesions, including dyschromia, hyperpigmentation, melasma, and ephelides (freckles) o Cutaneous lesions, including warts, scars and striae o Benign cutaneous vascular lesions, including port wine stains, hemoangiomas, facial, truncal and leg telangiectasias, erythema of rosacea, angiomas and spider angiomas, poikiloderma of Civatte, leg veins and venous malformations o Removal of unwanted hair and to effect stable long term, or |
Page 10
MEDUSA (Guangxi) Medical Devices Co., Ltd. 510(k)s -510(k) Summary
Page 6 of 9
| Comparison Elements | Subject Device | Predicate Device | Reference devices 1 | Reference devices 2 | Remark |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| treatment egimen. | o Benign epidermal lesions, including dyschromia, hyperpigmentation, melasma, and ephelides (freckles) o Cutaneous lesions, including warts, scars and striae o Benign cutaneous vascular lesions, including port wine stains, hemoangiomas, facial, truncal and leg telangiectasias, erythema of rosacea, angiomas and spider angiomas, poikiloderma of Civatte, leg veins and venous malformations o Removal of unwanted hair and to effect stable long term, or |
Page 11
MEDUSA (Guangxi) Medical Devices Co., Ltd. 510(k)s -510(k) Summary
Page 7 of 9
| Comparison Elements | Subject Device | Predicate Device | Reference devices 1 | Reference devices 2 | Remark |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| permanent* hair reduction in skin types 1-V through selective targeting of melanin in hair follicles o Mild to moderate inflammatory Acne (Acne vulgaris) | |||||
| Prescription or OTC | Prescription Use | Prescription Use | Prescription Use | Prescription Use | Same |
| Light source | Intense Pulsed Light | Intense Pulsed Light | Intense Pulsed Light | Intense Pulsed Light | Same |
| Wavelength | Acne (400nm-600nm, 800-1200nm), 515nm-1200nm, 560nm-1200nm, 590nm,-1200nm, 615nm-1200nm, 640-1200nm, 695-1200nm | 430-1200nm, 530-1200nm, 640-1200nm Optional: 480nm-1200nm, 560-1200nm, 590-1200nm, 690-1200nm, 750nm-1200nm | 520-650nm, 800~1200nm, 540-800nm, 640-1200nm | 400-1200 nm | Different Note 1 |
| Energy density | 10-35J/cm2 | 10-50J/cm2±20%error | 1-50J/cm2 | Up to 35 or 56 J/cm2, upon tip size | Similar Note 2 |
| Pulse Width | 3-20ms | 1-20ms±10%error | 1-25ms | Unknown | Similar Note 3 |
| Max. Power | 2400VA | 2000W | 3500VA | Unknown | Similar Note 4 |
Page 12
MEDUSA (Guangxi) Medical Devices Co., Ltd. 510(k)s -510(k) Summary
Page 8 of 9
| Comparison Elements | Subject Device | Predicate Device | Reference devices 1 | Reference devices 2 | Remark |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spot size | 10mmx45mm | 15mmx50mm; 80mmx40mm±20%error | Small: 40 x 12 mm Large: 46 x 16mm Ex-Large: 60 x 20mm | 8x15 mm (1.20 cm2) | Similar Note 5 |
Safety Comparison
| Power supply | AC100~240V, 50/60Hz | 110V±10% 60Hz | 110V, 60Hz or 230V, 50Hz | Unknown | Different Note 6 |
| Electrical Safety | The proposed devices were tested to demonstrated to comply with IEC 60601-1 | The proposed devices were tested to demonstrated to comply with IEC 60601-1 | The proposed devices were tested to demonstrated to comply with IEC 60601-1 | IEC 60601-1 | Same |
| EMC | The proposed devices were tested to demonstrated to comply with IEC 60601-1-2 | The proposed devices were tested to demonstrated to comply with IEC 60601-1-2 | The proposed devices were tested to demonstrated to comply with IEC 60601-1-2 | IEC 60601-1-2 | Same |
| Patient Contact Material | Handpiece | Handpiece (Sapphire Crystal) | Handpiece | Handpiece has three (3) Sapphire Cool Light Guides | Same |
Biocompatibility
| Cytotoxicity | No toxicity (ISO 10993-5) | No toxicity (ISO 10993-5) | No toxicity (ISO 10993-5) | | Same |
| Irritation | Applied sample did not induce irritation to skin. (ISO 10993-23) | Applied sample did not induce irritation to skin. (ISO 10993-10) | Applied sample did not induce irritation to skin. (ISO 10993-10) | Unknown | Same |
| Sensitization | The test article showed no signification evidence of causing skin | The test article showed no signification evidence of causing skin | The test article showed no signification evidence of causing | Unknown | Same |
Page 13
MEDUSA (Guangxi) Medical Devices Co., Ltd. 510(k)s -510(k) Summary
Page 9 of 9
| Comparison Elements | Subject Device | Predicate Device | Reference devices 1 | Reference devices 2 | Remark |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| sensitization in the guinea pig. (ISO 10993-10) | sensitization in the guinea pig. (ISO 10993-10) | skin sensitization in the guinea pig. (ISO 10993-10) |
VIII. Performance Data
The following performance data were provided in support of the substantial equivalence determination.
1) Biocompatibility Testing
The biocompatibility evaluation for the body-contacting components of the IPL Hair Removal Device was conducted in accordance with the "Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1, 'Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices -Part 1: Evaluation and Testing Within a Risk Management Process, Document Issued on September 4, 2020", as recognized by FDA. The following testing was performed to, and passed, including:
- ISO 10993-5:2009, Biological evaluation of medical devices -Part 5: Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity
- ISO 10993-10:2021, Biological evaluation of medical devices -Part 10: Tests for skin sensitization
- ISO 10993-23:2021, Biological evaluation of medical devices -Part 23: Tests for skin irritation.
2) Electrical Safety and EMC
Electrical safety and EMC testing was performed to, and passed, as per the following standards:
- IEC 60601-1-2: 2014+A1:2020, Medical electrical equipment - Part 1-2: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance - Collateral standard: electromagnetic compatibility.
- IEC 60601-1: 2005+A1:2012+A2:2020 Medical electrical equipment - Part 1: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance.
- IEC60601-2-57: 2011, Medical electrical equipment - Part 2-57: Particular requirements for thebasic safety and essential performance of non-laser light source equipment intended for therapeutic.diagnostic, monitoring and cosmetic/aesthetic use.
3) Eye Safety
- IEC 62471: 2006, Photobiological safety of lamps and lamp systems
4) Software Verification and Validation
Software documentation consistent with Basic Documentation risk level was submitted in this 510(k). System validation testing presented in this 510(k) demonstrated that all software requirement specifications are met and all software hazards have been mitigated to acceptable risk levels.
5) Usability
The product usability has been evaluated and verified according to the following FDA guidance
- Applying Human Factors and Usability Engineering to Medical Devices, issued on FEBRUARY 2016.
IX. Conclusions
Based on the above analysis and non-clinical tests performed, it can be concluded that the subject device IPL Treatment Device is as safe, as effective, and performs as well as the legally marketed predicate devices.
§ 878.4810 Laser surgical instrument for use in general and plastic surgery and in dermatology.
(a)
Identification. (1) A carbon dioxide laser for use in general surgery and in dermatology is a laser device intended to cut, destroy, or remove tissue by light energy emitted by carbon dioxide.(2) An argon laser for use in dermatology is a laser device intended to destroy or coagulate tissue by light energy emitted by argon.
(b)
Classification. (1) Class II.(2) Class I for special laser gas mixtures used as a lasing medium for this class of lasers. The devices subject to this paragraph (b)(2) are exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 878.9.